econintersect.com
  • 토토사이트
    • 카지노사이트
    • 도박사이트
    • 룰렛 사이트
    • 라이브카지노
    • 바카라사이트
    • 안전카지노
  • 경제
  • 파이낸스
  • 정치
  • 투자
No Result
View All Result
  • 토토사이트
    • 카지노사이트
    • 도박사이트
    • 룰렛 사이트
    • 라이브카지노
    • 바카라사이트
    • 안전카지노
  • 경제
  • 파이낸스
  • 정치
  • 투자
No Result
View All Result
econintersect.com
No Result
View All Result
Home Uncategorized

Telecom Courtship Could Be A Win-Win For Investors

admin by admin
9월 6, 2021
in Uncategorized
0
0
SHARES
0
VIEWS

by Investing Daily, Investing Daily

— this post authored by Scott Chan

Investing Daily Article of the Week

Merger talks between T-Mobile (Nasdaq: TMUS) and Sprint (NYSE: S) are again heating up, with a deal reportedly possible by the end of October. In recent years, T-Mobile was close to a deal with AT&T (NYSE: T) in 2011 and Sprint in 2014, but both prospective deals broke apart due to expected stiff opposition based on anti-trust grounds from the Obama administration. The difference now is that the Trump administration, regarded as more pro-business, is in power and chances of regulatory approval is higher.

Given the significance of the possible merger, which would reduce the number of U.S. national wireless carriers to three, there should still be some regulatory scrutiny. For example, consumers have enjoyed lower pricing and benefited from more unlimited call and data plan offerings thanks to the intense competition among wireless carriers to snatch market share from competitors in a saturated U.S. market, so a merger of the two companies most aggressively competing on price could be perceived as anti-consumer. Last week’s confirmation of Makan Delrahim as the chief of the Department of Justice’s antitrust unit, however, seems to bode well for the probability of approval. Delrahim has a background as a pro-merger lobbyist.

The combined entity would have about 130 million subscribers, still behind Verizon’s 147 million (NYSE: VZ) and AT&T’s 136 million, but the merger clearly would close the gap significantly. The biggest benefit is the potential cost savings. Wireless is a very high fixed-cost business. Combining the two companies should enable the combined entity to save at least $1 billion a year, and perhaps as much as $3 billion to $5 once the integration is complete. However, since T-Mobile and Sprint use mutually incompatible mobile technologies (GSM versus CDMA), integration could be time consuming and bumpy.

The rumored deal is reported to be all stock, and the exchange ratio will be “at market.” T-Mobile’s majority owner, Deutsche Telekom (ETR: DTE) would probably remain the majority shareholder.

If the potential merger does come to fruition, it would occur as the wireless industry is on the cusp of rolling out next-generation technology – 5G. Sprint, thanks to a previous acquisition, owns a large amount of unused spectrum, that could be used for the upcoming 5G deployment.

The FCC controls what frequencies of the spectrum can be used for what purpose. It has designated a finite spectrum, between 700 MHz and 2.6 GHz, to be used for cellular phones and divided up this spectrum into blocks and auctioned them to various carriers. As mobile data usage has exploded, the need for addition spectrum to accommodate the huge demand has also grown. But, the amount of spectrum available is finite. Hence, Sprint’s ownership of a deep unused spectrum portfolio could be a very significant edge.

In the case of T-Mobile, in recent years it has leap-frogged Sprint to become the third-largest U.S. carrier by subscriber count. Its aggressive marketing strategy has also resulted in the fastest-growing subscriber base in the nation. According to a survey, the subscriber base is also the most loyal, with a quarter of its subscriber base reporting that it won’t switch carriers for anything. No other carrier scored higher than 16 percent.

Assuming a merger indeed occurs, the resulting company should be better able to compete with the Big Two of Verizon and AT&T. Since Verizon and AT&T’s plans tend to be more expensive, the combined company will be able to charge higher rates but still undercut the Big Two in pricing while offering comparable network quality. The two companies’ networks would combine – with Sprint’s CDMA technology likely to be phased out. Expected higher pricing and synergetic savings would then result in better margins than either company could muster on its own.

The potential merger is seen as a likely “win-win” scenario for the two companies, which explains why investors reacted positively to the report that a deal was close.

Of course, excited as a potential deal may be, talks could still break down if Sprint holds out for a better deal – it’s known to have talked with Charter Communications (Nasdaq: CHTR) – or if Washington gives a thumbs down. Additionally, Wall Street’s history is littered with failed mergers and acquisitions so even a merger is no guarantee of improvements in profitability. However, there’s no doubt that a merger would be a ground-shaking event for the U.S. wireless industry and this is a situation that bears watching.

Previous Post

The Real Problem Of Buy And Hold

Next Post

North Korea: The Devastating Artillery Factor

Related Posts

Scammers Steal $300K Using Fake Blur Airdrop Websites
Uncategorized

FBI Warns Investors Of Crypto-Stealing Play-to-Earn Games

by admin
Maersk Almost Completing Russia Exit After The Sale Of Logistics Sites
Uncategorized

Maersk Almost Completing Russia Exit After The Sale Of Logistics Sites

by admin
Why Is ‘Staking’ At The Center Of Crypto’s Latest Regulation Scuffle
Uncategorized

Why Is ‘Staking’ At The Center Of Crypto’s Latest Regulation Scuffle

by admin
Mexico's Pemex Dismantled Resources Worth $342M From Two Top Fields
Uncategorized

Mexico’s Pemex Dismantled Resources Worth $342M From Two Top Fields

by admin
Oil Giant Schlumberger Rebrands Itself As SLB For Low-Carbon Future
Uncategorized

Oil Giant Schlumberger Rebrands Itself As SLB For Low-Carbon Future

by admin
Next Post

Uncle Sam’s Unfunded Promises

답글 남기기 응답 취소

이메일 주소는 공개되지 않습니다. 필수 필드는 *로 표시됩니다

Browse by Category

  • Business
  • Econ Intersect News
  • Economics
  • Finance
  • Politics
  • Uncategorized

Browse by Tags

adoption altcoins bank banking banks Binance Bitcoin Bitcoin market blockchain BTC BTC price business China crypto crypto adoption cryptocurrency crypto exchange crypto market crypto regulation decentralized finance DeFi Elon Musk ETH Ethereum Europe Federal Reserve finance FTX inflation investment market analysis Metaverse NFT nonfungible tokens oil market price analysis recession regulation Russia stock market technology Tesla the UK the US Twitter

Categories

  • Business
  • Econ Intersect News
  • Economics
  • Finance
  • Politics
  • Uncategorized

© Copyright 2024 EconIntersect

No Result
View All Result
  • 토토사이트
    • 카지노사이트
    • 도박사이트
    • 룰렛 사이트
    • 라이브카지노
    • 바카라사이트
    • 안전카지노
  • 경제
  • 파이낸스
  • 정치
  • 투자

© Copyright 2024 EconIntersect