econintersect.com
  • 토토사이트
    • 카지노사이트
    • 도박사이트
    • 룰렛 사이트
    • 라이브카지노
    • 바카라사이트
    • 안전카지노
  • 경제
  • 파이낸스
  • 정치
  • 투자
No Result
View All Result
  • 토토사이트
    • 카지노사이트
    • 도박사이트
    • 룰렛 사이트
    • 라이브카지노
    • 바카라사이트
    • 안전카지노
  • 경제
  • 파이낸스
  • 정치
  • 투자
No Result
View All Result
econintersect.com
No Result
View All Result
Home Uncategorized

Effects Of Physical Infrastructure Spending On The Economy And The Budget Under Two Illustrative Scenarios

admin by admin
9월 6, 2021
in Uncategorized
0
0
SHARES
0
VIEWS

from the Congressional Budget Office

CBO examined two illustrative scenarios that would boost federal funding for a mix of types of physical infrastructure by $500 billion over 10 years. The two scenarios differ in how the additional spending would be financed.

Increases in physical infrastructure spending would boost private-sector productivity in the coming decades, contributing to economic growth that could lower the budgetary cost of that spending. To study such increases, the Congressional Budget Office examined two illustrative scenarios that would boost federal funding for a mix of types of physical infrastructure by $500 billion over 10 years. (Those funds would not all be spent within 10 years.) The same broad mix of physical capital is funded in both scenarios, neither of which corresponds to a specific legislative proposal. CBO compared outcomes under each scenario with those from its projections for the economy and the budget if current laws governing taxes and spending generally remained unchanged.

Budgetary Effects of Macroeconomic Changes

In this dynamic analysis, CBO finds that the effects of macroeconomic changes on the federal budget would depend on how additional infrastructure spending was financed and the time period considered.

Under Scenario 1, which is deficit-neutral before accounting for macroeconomic changes, infrastructure is financed by reducing the government’s noninvestment purchases.

  • In present value, which expresses the flows of current and future income or payments in terms of their value at a single point in time, the budgetary effects over 30 years stemming from macroeconomic changes would reduce the net cost of funding $500 billion of additional infrastructure by approximately one-third.
  • From fiscal years 2022 to 2031, the deficit would decrease by $11 billion because of the macroeconomic changes.

Under Scenario 2, infrastructure is financed by increasing federal borrowing.

  • In present value, the budgetary effects over 30 years stemming from macroeconomic changes would increase the net cost of funding $500 billion of additional infrastructure by approximately one-fourth.
  • From fiscal years 2022 to 2031, the effects of macroeconomic changes would decrease the deficit by $2 billion (not including the additional outlays for infrastructure).

Data and Supplemental Information

  • Data Underlying Figure and Tables

Related Publications

  • Budgeting for Federal Investment

    April 15, 2021

  • The Economic Effects of Financing a Large and Permanent Increase in Government Spending: Working Paper 2021-03

    March 22, 2021

  • Options for Reducing the Deficit: 2021 to 2030

    December 9, 2020

  • A Simplified Model of How Macroeconomic Changes Affect the Federal Budget: Working Paper 2020-01

    January 16, 2020

  • Federal Investment, 1962 to 2018

    June 27, 2019

  • Public Spending on Transportation and Water Infrastructure, 1956 to 2017

    October 15, 2018

  • The Macroeconomic and Budgetary Effects of Federal Investment

    June 16, 2016

  • Approaches to Making Federal Highway Spending More Productive

    February 11, 2016

  • Alternative Approaches to Funding Highways

    March 23, 2011

Source

https://www.cbo.gov/publication/57327

Previous Post

Infographic Of The Day: How Factor Investing Works

Next Post

07 August 2021 Initial Unemployment Claims Rolling Average Marginally Worsens

Related Posts

Scammers Steal $300K Using Fake Blur Airdrop Websites
Uncategorized

FBI Warns Investors Of Crypto-Stealing Play-to-Earn Games

by admin
Maersk Almost Completing Russia Exit After The Sale Of Logistics Sites
Uncategorized

Maersk Almost Completing Russia Exit After The Sale Of Logistics Sites

by admin
Why Is ‘Staking’ At The Center Of Crypto’s Latest Regulation Scuffle
Uncategorized

Why Is ‘Staking’ At The Center Of Crypto’s Latest Regulation Scuffle

by admin
Mexico's Pemex Dismantled Resources Worth $342M From Two Top Fields
Uncategorized

Mexico’s Pemex Dismantled Resources Worth $342M From Two Top Fields

by admin
Oil Giant Schlumberger Rebrands Itself As SLB For Low-Carbon Future
Uncategorized

Oil Giant Schlumberger Rebrands Itself As SLB For Low-Carbon Future

by admin
Next Post
Final August 2021 Michigan Consumer Sentiment Shows A Stunning Loss Of Confidence

Final August 2021 Michigan Consumer Sentiment Shows A Stunning Loss Of Confidence

답글 남기기 응답 취소

이메일 주소는 공개되지 않습니다. 필수 필드는 *로 표시됩니다

Browse by Category

  • Business
  • Econ Intersect News
  • Economics
  • Finance
  • Politics
  • Uncategorized

Browse by Tags

adoption altcoins bank banking banks Binance Bitcoin Bitcoin market blockchain BTC BTC price business China crypto crypto adoption cryptocurrency crypto exchange crypto market crypto regulation decentralized finance DeFi Elon Musk ETH Ethereum Europe Federal Reserve finance FTX inflation investment market analysis Metaverse NFT nonfungible tokens oil market price analysis recession regulation Russia stock market technology Tesla the UK the US Twitter

Categories

  • Business
  • Econ Intersect News
  • Economics
  • Finance
  • Politics
  • Uncategorized

© Copyright 2024 EconIntersect

No Result
View All Result
  • 토토사이트
    • 카지노사이트
    • 도박사이트
    • 룰렛 사이트
    • 라이브카지노
    • 바카라사이트
    • 안전카지노
  • 경제
  • 파이낸스
  • 정치
  • 투자

© Copyright 2024 EconIntersect