econintersect.com
  • 토토사이트
    • 카지노사이트
    • 도박사이트
    • 룰렛 사이트
    • 라이브카지노
    • 바카라사이트
    • 안전카지노
  • 경제
  • 파이낸스
  • 정치
  • 투자
No Result
View All Result
  • 토토사이트
    • 카지노사이트
    • 도박사이트
    • 룰렛 사이트
    • 라이브카지노
    • 바카라사이트
    • 안전카지노
  • 경제
  • 파이낸스
  • 정치
  • 투자
No Result
View All Result
econintersect.com
No Result
View All Result
Home Uncategorized

Documentary Of The Week: The Trouble With Human Capital Theory

admin by admin
9월 6, 2021
in Uncategorized
0
0
SHARES
0
VIEWS

Written by John Lounsbury

There is a widely accepted concept in economics that employee compensation is related to productivity. The idea started with a 1899 book by neoclassical economist John Bates Clark, “The Distribuion of Wealth” which formulated the theory of marginal productivity founded on the hypothesis that every agent of production would receive the amount of wealth that agent produces (absent any “friction”). This can be restated as The Marginal Theory of Productivity: In a competitive market everyone earns what they produce.

productivity.income.distributions


Please share this article – Go to very top of page, right hand side, for social media buttons.


Blair Fix asserts that there is a serious shortcoming with the Clark theory. Clark justified the theory based on political arguments that the theoretical distribution as necessary for social stability. But the theory was never tested with data. So the theory is politically rationalized but not scientifically supported.

This week we have a lecture by Blair Fix delivered 28 January 2021 to the SEEFAR research center at Kedge Business School. In this lecture the history of the theory of human capital is developed starting with Clark in 1899 with emphasis on work since the 1950s. He finds that efforts to measure productivity differences have suffered from fundamental problems.

In this presentation Dr. Fix steps you through logical processes of evaluation of human capital theory as an explanation of income. He follows with his own research to explain the distribution of income. How he arrives at his conclusions is methodical and easily followed. The result is that all the customary proposals for the basis of income distribution within a firm (i.e. IQ, location, race, religion, parental income, sex, age, occupation, education, and others) show limited correlation to income compared to the hierarchial position within the firm. An extension across many firms and sectors finds the same predominance of hierarchial position (independent of all other characteristics) with the highest correlation with income.

These results fundamentally challenge the theory of marginal productivity and the very idea of human capital.

He concludes that the distribution of income is substantially determined by social structure rather than economic variables. He posits that future research should concentrate on social traits to understand distribution of income. It seems that there may be coming fundamental changes to Theory of the Firm as well as macroeconomical work on income distribution.

All of this presentation comes within this 50 minute video, which has some excellent graphics included.

Source: YouTube

See also:

The Rise Of Human Capital Theory (Blair Fix, 05 February 2021)

Documentary Of The Week: Power Theory Of Personal Income (07 January 2021)

.

include(“/home/aleta/public_html/files/ad_openx.htm”); ?>

Previous Post

The Impact Of Business Closures On Covid-19 Infection Rates

Next Post

LIVE: Current Weather And Forecasts Up To 7 Days – Thursday February 11, 2021 – Updated

Related Posts

Scammers Steal $300K Using Fake Blur Airdrop Websites
Uncategorized

FBI Warns Investors Of Crypto-Stealing Play-to-Earn Games

by admin
Maersk Almost Completing Russia Exit After The Sale Of Logistics Sites
Uncategorized

Maersk Almost Completing Russia Exit After The Sale Of Logistics Sites

by admin
Why Is ‘Staking’ At The Center Of Crypto’s Latest Regulation Scuffle
Uncategorized

Why Is ‘Staking’ At The Center Of Crypto’s Latest Regulation Scuffle

by admin
Mexico's Pemex Dismantled Resources Worth $342M From Two Top Fields
Uncategorized

Mexico’s Pemex Dismantled Resources Worth $342M From Two Top Fields

by admin
Oil Giant Schlumberger Rebrands Itself As SLB For Low-Carbon Future
Uncategorized

Oil Giant Schlumberger Rebrands Itself As SLB For Low-Carbon Future

by admin
Next Post
Final August 2021 Michigan Consumer Sentiment Shows A Stunning Loss Of Confidence

Final August 2021 Michigan Consumer Sentiment Shows A Stunning Loss Of Confidence

답글 남기기 응답 취소

이메일 주소는 공개되지 않습니다. 필수 필드는 *로 표시됩니다

Browse by Category

  • Business
  • Econ Intersect News
  • Economics
  • Finance
  • Politics
  • Uncategorized

Browse by Tags

adoption altcoins bank banking banks Binance Bitcoin Bitcoin market blockchain BTC BTC price business China crypto crypto adoption cryptocurrency crypto exchange crypto market crypto regulation decentralized finance DeFi Elon Musk ETH Ethereum Europe Federal Reserve finance FTX inflation investment market analysis Metaverse NFT nonfungible tokens oil market price analysis recession regulation Russia stock market technology Tesla the UK the US Twitter

Categories

  • Business
  • Econ Intersect News
  • Economics
  • Finance
  • Politics
  • Uncategorized

© Copyright 2024 EconIntersect

No Result
View All Result
  • 토토사이트
    • 카지노사이트
    • 도박사이트
    • 룰렛 사이트
    • 라이브카지노
    • 바카라사이트
    • 안전카지노
  • 경제
  • 파이낸스
  • 정치
  • 투자

© Copyright 2024 EconIntersect