Global Economic Intersection
Advertisement
  • Home
    • 카지노사이트
  • Economics
  • Finance
  • Politics
  • Investments
    • Invest in Amazon $250
  • Cryptocurrency
    • Best Bitcoin Accounts
    • Bitcoin Robot
      • Quantum AI
      • Bitcoin Era
      • Bitcoin Aussie System
      • Bitcoin Profit
      • Bitcoin Code
      • eKrona Cryptocurrency
      • Bitcoin Up
      • Bitcoin Prime
      • Yuan Pay Group
      • Immediate Profit
      • BitQH
      • Bitcoin Loophole
      • Crypto Boom
      • Bitcoin Treasure
      • Bitcoin Lucro
      • Bitcoin System
      • Oil Profit
      • The News Spy
      • Bitcoin Buyer
      • Bitcoin Inform
      • Immediate Edge
      • Bitcoin Evolution
      • Cryptohopper
      • Ethereum Trader
      • BitQL
      • Quantum Code
      • Bitcoin Revolution
      • British Trade Platform
      • British Bitcoin Profit
    • Bitcoin Reddit
    • Celebrities
      • Dr. Chris Brown Bitcoin
      • Teeka Tiwari Bitcoin
      • Russell Brand Bitcoin
      • Holly Willoughby Bitcoin
No Result
View All Result
  • Home
    • 카지노사이트
  • Economics
  • Finance
  • Politics
  • Investments
    • Invest in Amazon $250
  • Cryptocurrency
    • Best Bitcoin Accounts
    • Bitcoin Robot
      • Quantum AI
      • Bitcoin Era
      • Bitcoin Aussie System
      • Bitcoin Profit
      • Bitcoin Code
      • eKrona Cryptocurrency
      • Bitcoin Up
      • Bitcoin Prime
      • Yuan Pay Group
      • Immediate Profit
      • BitQH
      • Bitcoin Loophole
      • Crypto Boom
      • Bitcoin Treasure
      • Bitcoin Lucro
      • Bitcoin System
      • Oil Profit
      • The News Spy
      • Bitcoin Buyer
      • Bitcoin Inform
      • Immediate Edge
      • Bitcoin Evolution
      • Cryptohopper
      • Ethereum Trader
      • BitQL
      • Quantum Code
      • Bitcoin Revolution
      • British Trade Platform
      • British Bitcoin Profit
    • Bitcoin Reddit
    • Celebrities
      • Dr. Chris Brown Bitcoin
      • Teeka Tiwari Bitcoin
      • Russell Brand Bitcoin
      • Holly Willoughby Bitcoin
No Result
View All Result
Global Economic Intersection
No Result
View All Result

Options Trading in a 401(k) or Other Accounts with Restrictions

admin by admin
September 18, 2015
in Uncategorized
0
0
SHARES
9
VIEWS
Share on FacebookShare on Twitter

Online Trading Academy Article of the Week

by Russ Allen, Online Trading Academy Instructor

Many people have some or all of their investing and trading funds in a tax-advantaged account, like an Individual Retirement Account or 401(k) in the United States; or in Canada, a Registered Retirement Savings Plan of a Tax-Free Savings Account.

How an investor should decide on allocation of funds between these accounts and fully taxable accounts is beyond our scope here. The point of this article is to discuss opportunities for option trading in such accounts, assuming an investor has some money in one of them and is interested in option trading to begin with.

The reason the issue exists is because all accounts of this type have restrictions on the type of investments that are allowed within them. For some, but not all, option strategies may be allowed in the tax-advantaged account that you have.

A typical set of restrictions for a tax-advantaged account might be as follows

Allowed:

  • Covered Calls
  • Protective Puts
  • Long Calls
  • Long Puts
  • Cash-secured short puts (Some U.S. accounts)
  • Debit spreads (Some U.S. accounts)
  • Credit spreads (Some U.S. accounts)

Not Allowed:

  • Short stock
  • Naked short puts
  • Naked short calls
  • Cash-secured short puts (Canada)
  • Debit spreads (Canada)
  • Credit spreads (Canada)

There are ways to structure trades in these accounts however, that allow us to, in effect, make some of the kinds of trades that are not specifically provided for. The investor can then make his or her choice from a wider selection of strategies.

The key to doing this is awareness of the equivalence between different option positions. If we are not allowed to make a short put trade, for example, then we can construct an equivalent to that short put using elements that are allowed. If we are not allowed to do a long call and a short call simultaneously (debit or credit spread), then we can create equivalents for those too.

Here is an example.

On September 3, 2015, the daily chart of GLD, the exchange-traded fund that tracks the price of gold, looked like this:

learn to trade options in a 401k

GLD was at a demand zone around $107. With interest rate rises probable in the near future and other factors, there was a pretty good bullish case for gold. Option premiums were not high. This was an opportunity for a limited-risk bullish trade called a Bull Call Spread. This would consist of a long call at the $107 strike as the moneymaker; and a short call at the $112 strike to reduce cost and volatility exposure.

At that time, the $107 September calls could be bought for $1.89, and the $112 calls could be sold for $.33. Net debit on the trade would be $1.89 – .33 = $1.56. This would be our maximum loss, which would occur if GLD were to be below $107 at expiration. Maximum profit would be the $5.00 difference between the strikes ($112 – 107), less the $1.56 cost, or $3.44.

Here is the P/L graph of that trade with maximum profit and maximum loss shown in the table at the bottom of the chart:

Assuming that one was interested in this trade, there is a problem if we want to do it in a tax-advantaged account. The Bull Call Spread is a debit spread which might not be one of the permitted position types.

However, using the equivalency principle we can construct it in a different way that is allowable. Here’s how.

If we want to sell the $112 call in our tax-advantaged account we must also own the stock. The short call is then a covered call which is allowed.

And here is where the equivalency comes in: a long stock position with a protective put at strike price x is equivalent to a simple long call position with strike price x. “Equivalent to” means that no matter what the stock price might be at expiration, both positions (the protected stock and the long call) would make or lose the same amount of money. And usually in tax-advantaged accounts, buying protective put options to accompany a long stock position is an allowed combination.

In this case, we could buy GLD at its current price of $107.73 and simultaneously buy the September $107 put, which was then available for $1.16. If in the worst case GLD then finished below $107 at expiration, we would lose $.73 per share on the stock, but no more than that since the put gives us the option to sell it at $107 no matter what.

We also have to add in the $1.16 cost of the put itself. This, together with the $.73 maximum loss on the stock, gives us a worst-case loss for the protected stock position of $1.16 + .73 = $1.89. This amount may be familiar – it was the same amount as the cost of the $107 call mentioned above.

So we could use the stock + $107 put in place of the long $107 call that we used in the Bull Call Spread. Then, we can sell the $112 call for the same $.33 as before. This is allowed, since we also own the stock – the short $112 call is covered. The combined position is a $112 covered call with a $107 protective put also known as a collar. The $.33 that the short call brings in reduces our maximum loss to $1.89 – .33 = $1.56. This amount is exactly the same as the maximum loss on the Bull Call Spread. The position also has the same maximum profit of $3.44 with GLD at or above $112. In fact, our profit or loss at any stock price is exactly the same – the collar (which is allowed) and the bull call spread (which is not allowed) are in fact the same trade.

Using option equivalency we can construct in our tax-advantaged accounts most kinds of debit and credit spreads, opening up unlimited possibilities.

That’s all we have space for today. Let us help you to become an educated option trader, explore the possibilities.

Option Equivalents – Six of One, Half a Dozen of the Other

In the section above, we pointed out how equivalent positions can be used to construct an options spread trade in an account where spreads were not allowed. We used long stock, a long put and a covered call (all of which were available in that account) to create the equivalent of a bull call spread, which is not allowed. The point was to get access to something not formally offered in that type of account, in a way that is completely aboveboard and doesn’t violate any rules.

We saw there that owning a stock and buying a put option was equivalent to just buying a call option (with no stock). In fact, the stock-plus-put position could be called a synthetic long call.

Our approach there was a special case of a general rule about options, which is that equivalent positions, also called synthetic positions, can be created for any component of a stock or option position.

This is the basic equation: Cx = S + Px

Where Cx = the profit or loss on a call with strike price X

S = profit or loss on a Stock position

Px = profit or loss on a Put at strike price X

From last week’s example, the Cx we needed to create was the GLD call at the 107 strike price.

We synthesized it with 100 shares of stock, plus one put at the 107 strike. We showed that no matter where the price of GLD went, the stock-plus-put position would make or lose the same amount of money as the long call position.

We then added a short call at the 112 strike to give us an equivalent of a 107/112 Bull Call Spread.

Long calls are not the only things that can be synthesized. Rearranging the basic equation gives us these results:

This position:is equivalent to this:Equation
Long CallLong stock plus long putC = S + P
Short CallShort stock plus short put-C = -S -P
Long PutShort stock plus long callP = -S + C
Short PutLong stock plus short call-P = S -C
Long stockLong call plus short putS = C – P
Short stockShort call plus long put-S = -C+ P

Using these equivalents, we can create many kinds of option positions using combinations of the few basic ones we may be allowed. Here are some examples:

Position Description:Formula:Synthetic:
Bull call spread
with a short call at strike X and a long call at strike Y
Cx – CyS + Px -Cy
Bear call spread
with a short call at strike X and a long call at strike Y
Cx – CyS + Px -Cy

Note that both variations of the call spread above use the same components to make up the synthetic. What makes the position bullish or bearish is the selection of strikes X and Y. For a bull call spread we would usually select strikes X and Y so that X < stock price < Y. For a bear call spread it would be stock price < Y < X.

Position Description:Formula:Synthetic:
Bull put spread
with a short put at strike X and a long put at strike Y
Py – PxPy + S -Cx
Bear put spread
with a short put at strike X and a long put at strike Y
Py – PxPy + S -Cx

Again, both variations of the put spread use the same components and are differentiated by the strike prices. In both of the put spreads, we synthesize a short put at strike X using a lot (100 shares) of stock together with a short call at strike X. The short call is covered, since we own the stock, so it is allowed. The “extra” long put, at strike Y, is also allowed.

Options are like Lego blocks that we can assemble into different subassemblies for different purposes. Whenever there is a difficulty in buying or selling an option for some reason, we should always check for a synthetic solution. In many cases they are available and can allow us to do the trade that we want.

All of this assumes that we know what kinds of option positions we want in the first place. That takes training and education, like that provided in our Professional Option Trader course. Start building your foundation today.

Previous Post

France Wants a Former Banker as President of the Central Bank . . .

Next Post

The Countries With The Biggest Annual Gambling Losses

Related Posts

Unlocking the Future: Google's Game-Changing Move to Advertise NFT Games Starting September 15th
Business

Unlocking the Future: Google’s Game-Changing Move to Advertise NFT Games Starting September 15th

by John Wanguba
September 8, 2023
Bitcoin Is Finally Trading Perfectly Like 'Digital Gold'
Economics

Bitcoin Is Finally Trading Perfectly Like ‘Digital Gold’

by John Wanguba
August 5, 2023
Can Worldcoin Overtake Bitcoin?
Economics

Can Worldcoin Overtake Bitcoin?

by John Wanguba
August 4, 2023
Bitcoin Is Steady Above $29,000 Awaiting US NFP Figures
Economics

Bitcoin Is Steady Above $29,000 Awaiting US NFP Figures

by John Wanguba
August 4, 2023
Namibia Will Regulate And Not Ban Crypto With New Law
Finance

Namibia Will Regulate And Not Ban Crypto With New Law

by John Wanguba
July 25, 2023
Next Post

The Countries With The Biggest Annual Gambling Losses

Leave a Reply Cancel reply

Your email address will not be published. Required fields are marked *

Browse by Category

  • Business
  • Econ Intersect News
  • Economics
  • Finance
  • Politics
  • Uncategorized

Browse by Tags

adoption altcoins bank banking banks Binance Bitcoin Bitcoin market blockchain BTC BTC price business China crypto crypto adoption cryptocurrency crypto exchange crypto market crypto regulation decentralized finance DeFi Elon Musk ETH Ethereum Europe Federal Reserve finance FTX inflation investment market analysis Metaverse NFT nonfungible tokens oil market price analysis recession regulation Russia stock market technology Tesla the UK the US Twitter

Archives

  • September 2023
  • August 2023
  • July 2023
  • June 2023
  • May 2023
  • April 2023
  • March 2023
  • February 2023
  • January 2023
  • December 2022
  • November 2022
  • October 2022
  • September 2022
  • August 2022
  • July 2022
  • June 2022
  • May 2022
  • April 2022
  • March 2022
  • February 2022
  • January 2022
  • December 2021
  • November 2021
  • October 2021
  • September 2021
  • August 2021
  • July 2021
  • June 2021
  • May 2021
  • April 2021
  • March 2021
  • February 2021
  • January 2021
  • December 2020
  • November 2020
  • October 2020
  • September 2020
  • August 2020
  • July 2020
  • June 2020
  • May 2020
  • April 2020
  • March 2020
  • February 2020
  • January 2020
  • December 2019
  • November 2019
  • October 2019
  • September 2019
  • August 2019
  • July 2019
  • June 2019
  • May 2019
  • April 2019
  • March 2019
  • February 2019
  • January 2019
  • December 2018
  • November 2018
  • October 2018
  • September 2018
  • August 2018
  • July 2018
  • June 2018
  • May 2018
  • April 2018
  • March 2018
  • February 2018
  • January 2018
  • December 2017
  • November 2017
  • October 2017
  • September 2017
  • August 2017
  • July 2017
  • June 2017
  • May 2017
  • April 2017
  • March 2017
  • February 2017
  • January 2017
  • December 2016
  • November 2016
  • October 2016
  • September 2016
  • August 2016
  • July 2016
  • June 2016
  • May 2016
  • April 2016
  • March 2016
  • February 2016
  • January 2016
  • December 2015
  • November 2015
  • October 2015
  • September 2015
  • August 2015
  • July 2015
  • June 2015
  • May 2015
  • April 2015
  • March 2015
  • February 2015
  • January 2015
  • December 2014
  • November 2014
  • October 2014
  • September 2014
  • August 2014
  • July 2014
  • June 2014
  • May 2014
  • April 2014
  • March 2014
  • February 2014
  • January 2014
  • December 2013
  • November 2013
  • October 2013
  • September 2013
  • August 2013
  • July 2013
  • June 2013
  • May 2013
  • April 2013
  • March 2013
  • February 2013
  • January 2013
  • December 2012
  • November 2012
  • October 2012
  • September 2012
  • August 2012
  • July 2012
  • June 2012
  • May 2012
  • April 2012
  • March 2012
  • February 2012
  • January 2012
  • December 2011
  • November 2011
  • October 2011
  • September 2011
  • August 2011
  • July 2011
  • June 2011
  • May 2011
  • April 2011
  • March 2011
  • February 2011
  • January 2011
  • December 2010
  • August 2010
  • August 2009

Categories

  • Business
  • Econ Intersect News
  • Economics
  • Finance
  • Politics
  • Uncategorized
Global Economic Intersection

After nearly 11 years of 24/7/365 operation, Global Economic Intersection co-founders Steven Hansen and John Lounsbury are retiring. The new owner, a global media company in London, is in the process of completing the set-up of Global Economic Intersection files in their system and publishing platform. The official website ownership transfer took place on 24 August.

Categories

  • Business
  • Econ Intersect News
  • Economics
  • Finance
  • Politics
  • Uncategorized

Recent Posts

  • Unlocking the Future: Google’s Game-Changing Move to Advertise NFT Games Starting September 15th
  • Bitcoin Is Finally Trading Perfectly Like ‘Digital Gold’
  • Can Worldcoin Overtake Bitcoin?

© Copyright 2021 EconIntersect - Economic news, analysis and opinion.

No Result
View All Result
  • Home
  • Contact Us
  • Bitcoin Robot
    • Bitcoin Profit
    • Bitcoin Code
    • Quantum AI
    • eKrona Cryptocurrency
    • Bitcoin Up
    • Bitcoin Prime
    • Yuan Pay Group
    • Immediate Profit
    • BitIQ
    • Bitcoin Loophole
    • Crypto Boom
    • Bitcoin Era
    • Bitcoin Treasure
    • Bitcoin Lucro
    • Bitcoin System
    • Oil Profit
    • The News Spy
    • British Bitcoin Profit
    • Bitcoin Trader
  • Bitcoin Reddit

© Copyright 2021 EconIntersect - Economic news, analysis and opinion.