Global Economic Intersection
Advertisement
  • Home
  • Economics
  • Finance
  • Politics
  • Investments
    • Invest in Amazon $250
  • Cryptocurrency
    • Best Bitcoin Accounts
    • Bitcoin Robot
      • Quantum AI
      • Bitcoin Era
      • Bitcoin Aussie System
      • Bitcoin Profit
      • Bitcoin Code
      • eKrona Cryptocurrency
      • Bitcoin Up
      • Bitcoin Prime
      • Yuan Pay Group
      • Immediate Profit
      • BitQH
      • Bitcoin Loophole
      • Crypto Boom
      • Bitcoin Treasure
      • Bitcoin Lucro
      • Bitcoin System
      • Oil Profit
      • The News Spy
      • Bitcoin Buyer
      • Bitcoin Inform
      • Immediate Edge
      • Bitcoin Evolution
      • Cryptohopper
      • Ethereum Trader
      • BitQL
      • Quantum Code
      • Bitcoin Revolution
      • British Trade Platform
      • British Bitcoin Profit
    • Bitcoin Reddit
    • Celebrities
      • Dr. Chris Brown Bitcoin
      • Teeka Tiwari Bitcoin
      • Russell Brand Bitcoin
      • Holly Willoughby Bitcoin
No Result
View All Result
  • Home
  • Economics
  • Finance
  • Politics
  • Investments
    • Invest in Amazon $250
  • Cryptocurrency
    • Best Bitcoin Accounts
    • Bitcoin Robot
      • Quantum AI
      • Bitcoin Era
      • Bitcoin Aussie System
      • Bitcoin Profit
      • Bitcoin Code
      • eKrona Cryptocurrency
      • Bitcoin Up
      • Bitcoin Prime
      • Yuan Pay Group
      • Immediate Profit
      • BitQH
      • Bitcoin Loophole
      • Crypto Boom
      • Bitcoin Treasure
      • Bitcoin Lucro
      • Bitcoin System
      • Oil Profit
      • The News Spy
      • Bitcoin Buyer
      • Bitcoin Inform
      • Immediate Edge
      • Bitcoin Evolution
      • Cryptohopper
      • Ethereum Trader
      • BitQL
      • Quantum Code
      • Bitcoin Revolution
      • British Trade Platform
      • British Bitcoin Profit
    • Bitcoin Reddit
    • Celebrities
      • Dr. Chris Brown Bitcoin
      • Teeka Tiwari Bitcoin
      • Russell Brand Bitcoin
      • Holly Willoughby Bitcoin
No Result
View All Result
Global Economic Intersection
No Result
View All Result

How to Buy Apple at $30 a Share

admin by admin
October 6, 2012
in Uncategorized
0
0
SHARES
19
VIEWS
Share on FacebookShare on Twitter

For some traders Apple is underpriced yet too expensive to buy

By Chris Ebert, Zentrader.ca

Apple (AAPL) has certainly been a great stock to own in 2012. Having begun the year trading near $400 a share, the price has risen some 65%, briefly topping $700 in September. At current prices, there are traders who simply cannot afford to buy the stock even if they want to do so.

Click on chart for larger image.

Even a trader with a sizable account of $100,000 might be reluctant to buy just 100 shares of Apple. At the current price per share near $670 such a purchase would require putting $67,000 of the account at risk. Taking such a risk on any one stock is certainly not advisable for most traders. Not only does it have the potential to cause huge losses, but it also greatly limits the amount of capital available for other trades.

Options are not just for professionals

Many individual stock traders may not realize that their broker will allow them to trade options. Sometimes it’s as simple as asking. Some brokers offer instant option trading approval upon the completion of a quick online form. While the requirements vary from broker to broker, a trader with as little as $2,000 may qualify, although there may be restrictions on the type of option trades that are permitted.

There are ways to use options that are both complicated and very risky, but there are also simple option trades that are no more risky than trading stocks. Using options as a replacement for buying stocks is not only a straightforward process, but it can sometimes be less risky than buying the stock itself.

I want to buy 100 shares of Apple, but I am looking to purchase a call option instead of buying the shares. There are call options in October, November, December and beyond, and each of those months has dozens of different call options, all at different prices. How do I choose which one is best?

Options have many different uses; speculation, generating income, or protecting gains to name just a few. Not all traders are using them as a replacement for buying stocks. The best option for those other purposes is not necessarily the best one to use as a replacement for buying stock. For a trader looking to buy a call option as a replacement for 100 shares of Apple stock, the “best” option is the one that will perform as closely as possible to a trade in which 100 shares of Apple stock was purchased outright.

A needle in a haystack

There are literally hundreds of call options to choose from on Apple, as is the case with many stocks. But there are only a few of them that are appropriate for use as a replacement for stock ownership. Finding the ones that are appropriate, not only for the intended purpose, but also for the preferences of the individual trader is a fairly straightforward process.

It’s good to be in-the-money

Call options that change in value most closely to the change in the price of a stock are those that are in-the-money. That is, they have a strike price that is lower than the current price of the stock. For example, when Apple shares are trading at $670, call options at the $650 strike price are in-the-money. Right off the bat, half of the haystack is eliminated. Only in-the-money call options will be useful.

The lower the strike price of the call option, the more closely its performance resembles that of the stock. A call option at the $600 strike price will track the profit and loss of the stock more closely than a call option at the $650 strike price.

Owning a call option at the lowest possible strike price will most resemble ownership of the stock itself. However, that call option will also be the most expensive. There is also a very good chance that such a call option would be difficult or impossible to purchase at a fair price. Just like stocks, some options are popular among traders, and others are not. Generally, the further away the strike price of the option is from the current price of the stock, the fewer traders there will be.

Choosing the rate of time decay

Because the “best” call option to replace stock ownership is both expensive and difficult to trade, it becomes necessary to make a concession. The strike price of the option will need to be raised somewhat. Just how far to raise the strike price depends on the specific stock and also the preferences of the trader. Raise it too little and the option might still be too expensive or too difficult to trade. Raise it too much and the option will become subjected to excessive time decay.

All options are subjected to some degree of time decay. That is, they tend to lose a portion of their value each day. On some options the rate can be very slow, on others it can occur quite fast. In choosing the best call option on Apple, a trader must decide on an acceptable rate of time decay. Is it worth losing $500 per week to time decay in order to control $67,000 worth of Apple stock? The decision is up to each individual trader. After all, it would take a $5 per share gain in the share price of Apple over the course of one week to offset the $500 lost to time decay on one call option.

There is no right answer. $500 may be acceptable for one trader while it is possible that another trader might decide that $200 per week was the maximum amount of acceptable time decay.

Converting time decay to time value

If $200 per week is an acceptable rate of time decay, an option purchased one week before its expiration date can have a maximum of $200 in time value at the time of the purchase, or $2 per share. If it is purchased six weeks before the expiration date, it can have a maximum of $1,200 of time value, or $12 per share, because the average amount of time decay over those six weeks cannot exceed $200 per week. The same process applies to every expiration date. At six months from expiration the maximum amount of time value would be $52 per share while at one year it would be $104, and so on.

Finding the needle

For any expiration date, there is a very simple way to find the call option with the appropriate amount of time value: Find the put option that is trading at a price (or premium) equal to the time value being sought. The call option at that strike price will have a time value approximately equal to the premium of the put option.

For example, if a put option at the $640 strike price has a premium of $2 per share, the call option at the $640 strike price will have a time value of $2 per share. This is not exactly true on some options, especially if the underlying stock pays a dividend, but it is not necessary to be exact. For the purposes of finding the needle in the haystack, approximation is sufficient.

Making a list

Starting with the nearest expiration date, and proceeding to later expiration dates, find the strike price of the call option that has the correct amount of time value that was calculated for that date.

For example, with Apple shares trading at $670, the list might look like this:

  • October 12, 1 week away, $2 time decay per week , $2 time value, $640 strike price, $32 premium
  • October 20, 2 weeks away, $2 (avg.) time decay per week, $4 time value, $630 strike price, $41 premium
  • November 17, 6 weeks away, $2 (avg.) time decay per week, $12 time value, $615 strike price, $63 premium

How to buy Apple stock for $30 a share

Any of the options on the list will fit the original criteria that the trader decided was appropriate. The call option will perform in a way that causes it to have a profit or loss that is approximately the same as owning 100 shares of Apple stock, and the average weekly loss due to time decay will be $200. That is not to say every option on the list will produce identical returns. Slightly different rates of time decay may cause slightly different returns. In general though, under normal market conditions the returns will be relatively similar.

Now the haystack has been totally eliminated, and what is left is a handful of needles from which to choose. So which of them is the best? Again it depends on the trader.

If the November 17th options are chosen, the $63 per share premium is about twice as much as the $32 premium on the October 12th weekly options. There is a much higher risk of loss if something suddenly goes horribly wrong with Apple.

If the weekly options are chosen, the position could require twelve trades over the course of six weeks. The call option would need to be sold the day before expiration and then the next week’s call option would need to be purchased. It would also be necessary to adjust the strike price of the following week’s option so that it conformed to the $2 time value that was previously deemed appropriate. That could potentially require a different strike price each week.

Options are not magic

While it is possible to use options to open a trade that is essentially equivalent to buying Apple stock, for $32 per share, it does not mean it is advisable. A trader with a $100,000 account would be taking on the risk of Apple shares plummeting, and the call option expiring worthless. That’s a $3,200 loss in one week, or more than 3% of the total account, and while that is a higher percentage than many experienced traders will tolerate, it is not unheard-of. A trader with a $10,000 account would be risking nearly a third of the account on a single trade, on a single stock; that is well beyond the tolerance of most experienced traders.

In-the-money call options should be purchased on Apple only by traders who were going to purchase Apple shares anyway. And the option trade should be handled the same as the stock trade.

For example, if a trader would normally use a $10 trailing stop on Apple stock, then the call option should be sold when Apple shares reach the level of that trailing stop. If Apple shares were to climb from $670 to $700 with a $10 trailing stop, they would be sold if the price then declined to $690. If the price does decline to $690, that is the time to sell whatever call option is owned, no matter what strike price and expiration was chosen for the option, and no matter what profit or loss exists on that option.


About the Author

Christopher Ebert uses his engineering background to mix and match options as a means of preserving portfolio wealth while outpacing inflation. He studies options daily, trades options almost exclusively, and enjoys sharing his experiences. He recently co-published the book “Show Me Your Options!”


Previous Post

Small Business Chief Economist Thinks Jobs Report Is Screwed Up

Next Post

Debate Exposes Obama Biggest Failure

Related Posts

How First Republic's Befriending Of The Wealthy Led To A Crisis
Business

How First Republic’s Befriending Of The Wealthy Led To A Crisis

by John Wanguba
March 31, 2023
How Is Donald Trump's Indictment Affecting The Crypto Space?
Econ Intersect News

How Is Donald Trump’s Indictment Affecting The Crypto Space?

by John Wanguba
March 31, 2023
What Does CFTC's Lawsuit Against Binance Mean For Coinbase?
Business

What Does CFTC’s Lawsuit Against Binance Mean For Coinbase?

by John Wanguba
March 31, 2023
Will The Fed Rate Hikes Crash The Stock Market?
Economics

Will The Fed Rate Hikes Crash The Stock Market?

by John Wanguba
March 31, 2023
How To Protect Your Portfolio Against Inflation And Interest Rate Hikes
Econ Intersect News

How To Protect Your Portfolio Against Inflation And Interest Rate Hikes

by John Wanguba
March 31, 2023
Next Post

Debate Exposes Obama Biggest Failure

Leave a Reply Cancel reply

Your email address will not be published. Required fields are marked *

Browse by Category

  • Business
  • Econ Intersect News
  • Economics
  • Finance
  • Politics
  • Uncategorized

Browse by Tags

adoption altcoins bank banking banks Binance Bitcoin Bitcoin adoption Bitcoin market Bitcoin mining blockchain BTC business China crypto crypto adoption cryptocurrency crypto exchange crypto market crypto regulation decentralized finance DeFi Elon Musk ETH Ethereum Europe finance FTX inflation investment market analysis Metaverse NFT nonfungible tokens oil market price analysis recession regulation Russia stock market technology Tesla the UK the US Twitter

Archives

  • March 2023
  • February 2023
  • January 2023
  • December 2022
  • November 2022
  • October 2022
  • September 2022
  • August 2022
  • July 2022
  • June 2022
  • May 2022
  • April 2022
  • March 2022
  • February 2022
  • January 2022
  • December 2021
  • November 2021
  • October 2021
  • September 2021
  • August 2021
  • July 2021
  • June 2021
  • May 2021
  • April 2021
  • March 2021
  • February 2021
  • January 2021
  • December 2020
  • November 2020
  • October 2020
  • September 2020
  • August 2020
  • July 2020
  • June 2020
  • May 2020
  • April 2020
  • March 2020
  • February 2020
  • January 2020
  • December 2019
  • November 2019
  • October 2019
  • September 2019
  • August 2019
  • July 2019
  • June 2019
  • May 2019
  • April 2019
  • March 2019
  • February 2019
  • January 2019
  • December 2018
  • November 2018
  • October 2018
  • September 2018
  • August 2018
  • July 2018
  • June 2018
  • May 2018
  • April 2018
  • March 2018
  • February 2018
  • January 2018
  • December 2017
  • November 2017
  • October 2017
  • September 2017
  • August 2017
  • July 2017
  • June 2017
  • May 2017
  • April 2017
  • March 2017
  • February 2017
  • January 2017
  • December 2016
  • November 2016
  • October 2016
  • September 2016
  • August 2016
  • July 2016
  • June 2016
  • May 2016
  • April 2016
  • March 2016
  • February 2016
  • January 2016
  • December 2015
  • November 2015
  • October 2015
  • September 2015
  • August 2015
  • July 2015
  • June 2015
  • May 2015
  • April 2015
  • March 2015
  • February 2015
  • January 2015
  • December 2014
  • November 2014
  • October 2014
  • September 2014
  • August 2014
  • July 2014
  • June 2014
  • May 2014
  • April 2014
  • March 2014
  • February 2014
  • January 2014
  • December 2013
  • November 2013
  • October 2013
  • September 2013
  • August 2013
  • July 2013
  • June 2013
  • May 2013
  • April 2013
  • March 2013
  • February 2013
  • January 2013
  • December 2012
  • November 2012
  • October 2012
  • September 2012
  • August 2012
  • July 2012
  • June 2012
  • May 2012
  • April 2012
  • March 2012
  • February 2012
  • January 2012
  • December 2011
  • November 2011
  • October 2011
  • September 2011
  • August 2011
  • July 2011
  • June 2011
  • May 2011
  • April 2011
  • March 2011
  • February 2011
  • January 2011
  • December 2010
  • August 2010
  • August 2009

Categories

  • Business
  • Econ Intersect News
  • Economics
  • Finance
  • Politics
  • Uncategorized
Global Economic Intersection

After nearly 11 years of 24/7/365 operation, Global Economic Intersection co-founders Steven Hansen and John Lounsbury are retiring. The new owner, a global media company in London, is in the process of completing the set-up of Global Economic Intersection files in their system and publishing platform. The official website ownership transfer took place on 24 August.

Categories

  • Business
  • Econ Intersect News
  • Economics
  • Finance
  • Politics
  • Uncategorized

Recent Posts

  • How First Republic’s Befriending Of The Wealthy Led To A Crisis
  • How Is Donald Trump’s Indictment Affecting The Crypto Space?
  • What Does CFTC’s Lawsuit Against Binance Mean For Coinbase?

© Copyright 2021 EconIntersect - Economic news, analysis and opinion.

No Result
View All Result
  • Home
  • Contact Us
  • Bitcoin Robot
    • Bitcoin Profit
    • Bitcoin Code
    • Quantum AI
    • eKrona Cryptocurrency
    • Bitcoin Up
    • Bitcoin Prime
    • Yuan Pay Group
    • Immediate Profit
    • BitIQ
    • Bitcoin Loophole
    • Crypto Boom
    • Bitcoin Era
    • Bitcoin Treasure
    • Bitcoin Lucro
    • Bitcoin System
    • Oil Profit
    • The News Spy
    • British Bitcoin Profit
    • Bitcoin Trader
  • Bitcoin Reddit

© Copyright 2021 EconIntersect - Economic news, analysis and opinion.

en English
ar Arabicbg Bulgarianda Danishnl Dutchen Englishfi Finnishfr Frenchde Germanel Greekit Italianja Japaneselv Latvianno Norwegianpl Polishpt Portuguesero Romanianes Spanishsv Swedish