Global Economic Intersection
Advertisement
  • Home
  • Economics
  • Finance
  • Politics
  • Investments
    • Invest in Amazon $250
  • Cryptocurrency
    • Best Bitcoin Accounts
    • Bitcoin Robot
      • Quantum AI
      • Bitcoin Era
      • Bitcoin Aussie System
      • Bitcoin Profit
      • Bitcoin Code
      • eKrona Cryptocurrency
      • Bitcoin Up
      • Bitcoin Prime
      • Yuan Pay Group
      • Immediate Profit
      • BitQH
      • Bitcoin Loophole
      • Crypto Boom
      • Bitcoin Treasure
      • Bitcoin Lucro
      • Bitcoin System
      • Oil Profit
      • The News Spy
      • Bitcoin Buyer
      • Bitcoin Inform
      • Immediate Edge
      • Bitcoin Evolution
      • Cryptohopper
      • Ethereum Trader
      • BitQL
      • Quantum Code
      • Bitcoin Revolution
      • British Trade Platform
      • British Bitcoin Profit
    • Bitcoin Reddit
    • Celebrities
      • Dr. Chris Brown Bitcoin
      • Teeka Tiwari Bitcoin
      • Russell Brand Bitcoin
      • Holly Willoughby Bitcoin
No Result
View All Result
  • Home
  • Economics
  • Finance
  • Politics
  • Investments
    • Invest in Amazon $250
  • Cryptocurrency
    • Best Bitcoin Accounts
    • Bitcoin Robot
      • Quantum AI
      • Bitcoin Era
      • Bitcoin Aussie System
      • Bitcoin Profit
      • Bitcoin Code
      • eKrona Cryptocurrency
      • Bitcoin Up
      • Bitcoin Prime
      • Yuan Pay Group
      • Immediate Profit
      • BitQH
      • Bitcoin Loophole
      • Crypto Boom
      • Bitcoin Treasure
      • Bitcoin Lucro
      • Bitcoin System
      • Oil Profit
      • The News Spy
      • Bitcoin Buyer
      • Bitcoin Inform
      • Immediate Edge
      • Bitcoin Evolution
      • Cryptohopper
      • Ethereum Trader
      • BitQL
      • Quantum Code
      • Bitcoin Revolution
      • British Trade Platform
      • British Bitcoin Profit
    • Bitcoin Reddit
    • Celebrities
      • Dr. Chris Brown Bitcoin
      • Teeka Tiwari Bitcoin
      • Russell Brand Bitcoin
      • Holly Willoughby Bitcoin
No Result
View All Result
Global Economic Intersection
No Result
View All Result

Small Business Chief Economist Thinks Jobs Report Is Screwed Up

admin by admin
October 6, 2012
in Uncategorized
0
0
SHARES
3
VIEWS
Share on FacebookShare on Twitter

Econintersect: A blast from Chief economist for the National Federation of Independent Business (NFIB) William C. Dunkelberg towards the BLS’ Jobs report released today.

All in all, we received what can only be characterized as a strange report from the volatile Household survey. Giving me advice about our doctoral research at the Survey Research Center at Michigan, one of my professors posited a theorem:  ‘Nature never jumps.’ The corollary is this: ‘If it’s interesting, it’s wrong.’ The Household survey is volatile, and averaging its job number over the year produces a more reasonable figure.

Econintersect analysis of the data was presented in post entitled BLS Jobs Situation Disturbing in September 2012 which to a large extent is based on analysis of the unadjusted data.  In addition Econintersect Managing Editor John Lounsbury has weighed into the analysis with the following observations that add some more detail to Dunkelberg’s observations:

  • The 90% confidence level for non farms payroll (NFP) data is around +/- 100,000 (according to the BLS).  This means that the changes in NFP for September of 114,000 has a 90% confidence interval going from 14,000 to 214,000 payroll jobs gained.  The difference between 114,000 and the 115,000 consensus estimate (1,000) is such a small fraction of the confidence interval that the consensus prediction was actually essentially perfect.

  • The number reported (114,000) could have been close to zero (or over 200,000) in the statistical reality of the survey sampling process.
  • To reduce the uncertainty of the reported numbers it is useful to use a moving average.  Using a 3 month moving average reduces the uncertainty by the Square-root of 3 (equals 1.7).  Thus for three months the 90% confidence interval is reduced to +/- 60,000.  The average for NFP for the last three months is  146,000 +/-60,000.  That’s between 86,000 and 206,000 jobs gained on average each month with 90% confidence.
  • The uncertainty in the Household Survey is much larger than in the Establishment Survey.  The BLS keeps continually assessing the uncertainty and I have seen it reported as low as +/-260,000 and as high as +/-400,000 over the past 5-6 years.  The average over time is close to +/-300,000 and I will use that number in this discussion:
    1. The decline in the number employed in August (119,000) cannot be distinguished statistically from no change.
    2. The decline in the labor force in August (366,000) is significant, but not by a large margin.
    3. The increase in the number employed in September (873,000) is clearly a statistically significant change.
    4. The increase in the labor force in September (418,000) is also statistically significant, but not by the impressive margin for the number employed.
  • To get the uncertainty in the Household Survey data down close to +/-100,000 requires a 9-month moving average.  I have published in the past that a 6-month moving average (+/-122,000) is a reasonable procedure to implement.
  • Bottom line is that people try to use the BLS data in ways that are not justified by the clearly defined statistical limitations of the data.  The reported increase from 8.0% to 8.1% for August had no significance, yet many people discussed it as if it did.  The decrease from 8.1% to 7.8% in September is a statistically significant change.  It is all the more important because it came when the labor force was increasing by a statistically significant amount.  All too much of the decline in the unemployment rate in the last few years has come because of a declining labor force more than from an increase in the number employed.

It is likely that pundits and politicos will have their fun with the jobs data this month.  Econintersect continues to point out that one cannot rely on the BLS jobs report in real time – but eventually it over time through backward revision and averaging – the data will be correct.  To take one month of data in isolation will often turn out to be a statistical mistake.

Going back to the NFIB statement which was the lead for this post – here is their news release in its entirety.

WASHINGTON, D.C., October 5, 2012 — Chief economist for the National Federation of Independent Business (NFIB) William C. Dunkelberg, issued the following statement in response to the jobs report issued today by the Department of Labor.

“Today’s employment report was pretty much what we expected—114,000 new jobs in the Payroll survey. That is consistent with the NFIB survey findings of tepid job growth and most, if not all, reports on the health of the economy. Small businesses were largely sidelined in this jobs report as those businesses in retail, services and construction continue to add only few jobs, certainly not typical of a strong recovery.

“The Household Survey, however, was a shocker, finding over 870,000 new jobs—the biggest gain recorded since June 1983. But in 1983, real GDP was growing at an eight percent pace, not the 1.3 percent it is growing now. GDP growth was consistent with the Household job numbers posted at that time. The less than two percent pace of growth in the current economy does not generate 800,000 new jobs.

“Payroll revisions did add 86,000 jobs for July and August, but virtually all were government jobs, not jobs produced by a healthy private sector; in the private sector numbers were actually revised down a bit. And 580,000 of the new jobs in the Household survey were part-time workers, a rather hollow way to reduce the unemployment rate. However, a more comprehensive measure of unemployment (U6) remained at 14.7 percent. Again, this is not at all consistent with substantial improvement in labor markets.

“All in all, we received what can only be characterized as a strange report from the volatile Household survey. Giving me advice about our doctoral research at the Survey Research Center at Michigan, one of my professors posited a theorem:  ‘Nature never jumps.’ The corollary is this: ‘If it’s interesting, it’s wrong.’ The Household survey is volatile, and averaging its job number over the year produces a more reasonable figure.

“As the data come in, we’ll continue to assess the credibility of these latest numbers.”

 

source: NFIB and Econintersect

Written by Steven Hansen

Previous Post

Monster: U.S. Online Recruiting Growth Slowed in September 2012

Next Post

How to Buy Apple at $30 a Share

Related Posts

What Are BRC-30 Tokens?
Econ Intersect News

What Are BRC-30 Tokens?

by John Wanguba
June 2, 2023
XRP Explosive Boom Results In Record-Breaking Address Activity
Economics

XRP’s Explosive Boom Results In Record-Breaking Address Activity

by John Wanguba
June 1, 2023
What To Consider When Evaluating Low-Code And No-Code Platforms
Business

What To Consider When Evaluating Low-Code And No-Code Platforms

by John Wanguba
June 1, 2023
Crypto Bear Phase Gone, ‘Explosive’ Bull Market Imminent – Veteran Investor
Economics

Crypto Bear Phase Gone, ‘Explosive’ Bull Market Imminent – Veteran Investor

by John Wanguba
June 1, 2023
Only 2 Exchanges Registered In Hong Kong As Crypto Ban Is Removed
Economics

Only 2 Exchanges Registered In Hong Kong As Crypto Ban Is Removed

by John Wanguba
May 31, 2023
Next Post

How to Buy Apple at $30 a Share

Leave a Reply Cancel reply

Your email address will not be published. Required fields are marked *

Browse by Category

  • Business
  • Econ Intersect News
  • Economics
  • Finance
  • Politics
  • Uncategorized

Browse by Tags

adoption altcoins bank banking banks Binance Bitcoin Bitcoin adoption Bitcoin market blockchain BTC business China crypto crypto adoption cryptocurrency crypto exchange crypto market crypto regulation decentralized finance DeFi Elon Musk ETH Ethereum Europe Federal Reserve finance FTX inflation investment market analysis Metaverse NFT nonfungible tokens oil market price analysis recession regulation Russia stock market technology Tesla the UK the US Twitter

Archives

  • June 2023
  • May 2023
  • April 2023
  • March 2023
  • February 2023
  • January 2023
  • December 2022
  • November 2022
  • October 2022
  • September 2022
  • August 2022
  • July 2022
  • June 2022
  • May 2022
  • April 2022
  • March 2022
  • February 2022
  • January 2022
  • December 2021
  • November 2021
  • October 2021
  • September 2021
  • August 2021
  • July 2021
  • June 2021
  • May 2021
  • April 2021
  • March 2021
  • February 2021
  • January 2021
  • December 2020
  • November 2020
  • October 2020
  • September 2020
  • August 2020
  • July 2020
  • June 2020
  • May 2020
  • April 2020
  • March 2020
  • February 2020
  • January 2020
  • December 2019
  • November 2019
  • October 2019
  • September 2019
  • August 2019
  • July 2019
  • June 2019
  • May 2019
  • April 2019
  • March 2019
  • February 2019
  • January 2019
  • December 2018
  • November 2018
  • October 2018
  • September 2018
  • August 2018
  • July 2018
  • June 2018
  • May 2018
  • April 2018
  • March 2018
  • February 2018
  • January 2018
  • December 2017
  • November 2017
  • October 2017
  • September 2017
  • August 2017
  • July 2017
  • June 2017
  • May 2017
  • April 2017
  • March 2017
  • February 2017
  • January 2017
  • December 2016
  • November 2016
  • October 2016
  • September 2016
  • August 2016
  • July 2016
  • June 2016
  • May 2016
  • April 2016
  • March 2016
  • February 2016
  • January 2016
  • December 2015
  • November 2015
  • October 2015
  • September 2015
  • August 2015
  • July 2015
  • June 2015
  • May 2015
  • April 2015
  • March 2015
  • February 2015
  • January 2015
  • December 2014
  • November 2014
  • October 2014
  • September 2014
  • August 2014
  • July 2014
  • June 2014
  • May 2014
  • April 2014
  • March 2014
  • February 2014
  • January 2014
  • December 2013
  • November 2013
  • October 2013
  • September 2013
  • August 2013
  • July 2013
  • June 2013
  • May 2013
  • April 2013
  • March 2013
  • February 2013
  • January 2013
  • December 2012
  • November 2012
  • October 2012
  • September 2012
  • August 2012
  • July 2012
  • June 2012
  • May 2012
  • April 2012
  • March 2012
  • February 2012
  • January 2012
  • December 2011
  • November 2011
  • October 2011
  • September 2011
  • August 2011
  • July 2011
  • June 2011
  • May 2011
  • April 2011
  • March 2011
  • February 2011
  • January 2011
  • December 2010
  • August 2010
  • August 2009

Categories

  • Business
  • Econ Intersect News
  • Economics
  • Finance
  • Politics
  • Uncategorized
Global Economic Intersection

After nearly 11 years of 24/7/365 operation, Global Economic Intersection co-founders Steven Hansen and John Lounsbury are retiring. The new owner, a global media company in London, is in the process of completing the set-up of Global Economic Intersection files in their system and publishing platform. The official website ownership transfer took place on 24 August.

Categories

  • Business
  • Econ Intersect News
  • Economics
  • Finance
  • Politics
  • Uncategorized

Recent Posts

  • What Are BRC-30 Tokens?
  • XRP’s Explosive Boom Results In Record-Breaking Address Activity
  • What To Consider When Evaluating Low-Code And No-Code Platforms

© Copyright 2021 EconIntersect - Economic news, analysis and opinion.

No Result
View All Result
  • Home
  • Contact Us
  • Bitcoin Robot
    • Bitcoin Profit
    • Bitcoin Code
    • Quantum AI
    • eKrona Cryptocurrency
    • Bitcoin Up
    • Bitcoin Prime
    • Yuan Pay Group
    • Immediate Profit
    • BitIQ
    • Bitcoin Loophole
    • Crypto Boom
    • Bitcoin Era
    • Bitcoin Treasure
    • Bitcoin Lucro
    • Bitcoin System
    • Oil Profit
    • The News Spy
    • British Bitcoin Profit
    • Bitcoin Trader
  • Bitcoin Reddit

© Copyright 2021 EconIntersect - Economic news, analysis and opinion.

en English
ar Arabicbg Bulgarianda Danishnl Dutchen Englishfi Finnishfr Frenchde Germanel Greekit Italianja Japaneselv Latvianno Norwegianpl Polishpt Portuguesero Romanianes Spanishsv Swedish