Global Economic Intersection
Advertisement
  • Home
  • Economics
  • Finance
  • Politics
  • Investments
    • Invest in Amazon $250
  • Cryptocurrency
    • Best Bitcoin Accounts
    • Bitcoin Robot
      • Quantum AI
      • Bitcoin Era
      • Bitcoin Aussie System
      • Bitcoin Profit
      • Bitcoin Code
      • eKrona Cryptocurrency
      • Bitcoin Up
      • Bitcoin Prime
      • Yuan Pay Group
      • Immediate Profit
      • BitIQ
      • BitQH
      • Bitcoin Loophole
      • Crypto Boom
      • Bitcoin Treasure
      • Bitcoin Lucro
      • Bitcoin System
      • Oil Profit
      • The News Spy
      • Bitcoin Buyer
      • Bitcoin Inform
      • Immediate Edge
      • Bitcoin Evolution
      • Cryptohopper
      • Ethereum Trader
      • BitQL
      • Quantum Code
      • Bitcoin Revolution
      • British Trade Platform
      • British Bitcoin Profit
    • Bitcoin Reddit
    • Celebrities
      • Dr. Chris Brown Bitcoin
      • Teeka Tiwari Bitcoin
      • Russell Brand Bitcoin
      • Holly Willoughby Bitcoin
No Result
View All Result
  • Home
  • Economics
  • Finance
  • Politics
  • Investments
    • Invest in Amazon $250
  • Cryptocurrency
    • Best Bitcoin Accounts
    • Bitcoin Robot
      • Quantum AI
      • Bitcoin Era
      • Bitcoin Aussie System
      • Bitcoin Profit
      • Bitcoin Code
      • eKrona Cryptocurrency
      • Bitcoin Up
      • Bitcoin Prime
      • Yuan Pay Group
      • Immediate Profit
      • BitIQ
      • BitQH
      • Bitcoin Loophole
      • Crypto Boom
      • Bitcoin Treasure
      • Bitcoin Lucro
      • Bitcoin System
      • Oil Profit
      • The News Spy
      • Bitcoin Buyer
      • Bitcoin Inform
      • Immediate Edge
      • Bitcoin Evolution
      • Cryptohopper
      • Ethereum Trader
      • BitQL
      • Quantum Code
      • Bitcoin Revolution
      • British Trade Platform
      • British Bitcoin Profit
    • Bitcoin Reddit
    • Celebrities
      • Dr. Chris Brown Bitcoin
      • Teeka Tiwari Bitcoin
      • Russell Brand Bitcoin
      • Holly Willoughby Bitcoin
No Result
View All Result
Global Economic Intersection
No Result
View All Result

More Than 6.6 Million US Homes At Risk Of Hurricane Storm Surge Damage In 2015. Total Reconstruction Cost Value For All Homes Is Nearly $1.5 Trillion.

admin by admin
June 4, 2015
in Uncategorized
0
0
SHARES
3
VIEWS
Share on FacebookShare on Twitter

from CoreLogic

More than 6.6 million homes on the Atlantic and Gulf coasts are at risk of hurricane storm surge inundation with a total reconstruction cost value (RCV) of nearly $1.5 trillion (see Table 1 below).


The CoreLogic analysis examines risk from hurricane-driven storm surge for homes along the Atlantic and Gulf coastlines of 19 states and the District of Columbia, as well as for 84 metro areas. Homes are categorized among five risk levels, including Low, Moderate, High, Very High and Extreme. In addition to the number of homes at risk, the analysis provides RCVs, which indicate how much is required to rebuild the property, including labor and materials, and assuming worst-case scenario at 100-percent destruction.

At the regional level, the Atlantic Coast has more than 3.8 million homes at risk of storm surge in 2015 with an RCV of $939 billion, and the Gulf Coast has just under 2.8 million homes at risk and nearly $549 billion in potential exposure to total destruction damage (Table 2). Said Dr. Tom Jeffery, senior hazard risk scientist for CoreLogic:

The number of hurricanes each year is less important than the location of where the next hurricane will come ashore. It only takes one hurricane that pushes storm surge into a major metropolitan area for the damage to tally in the billions of dollars. With new home construction, and any amount of sea-level rise, the number of homes at risk of storm surge damage will continue to increase.

Table 3 shows that six states account for more than three-quarters of all at-risk homes nationally. Florida has the highest total number of properties at various risk levels (2,509,812), followed by Louisiana (760,272), New York (464,534), New Jersey (446,148), Texas (441,304) and Virginia (420,052). Even though Louisiana has the second most homes at risk of storm surge, only one-quarter of these homes are in the extreme or very high storm surge category due, in large part, to the upgrade and expansion of levees in Louisiana. Said Jeffery:

The levee system in and around New Orleans is one of the most extensive in the world. After Hurricane Katrina in 2005, upgrades were planned for the network of levees and pumping stations to reduce the potential devastation from future storms. Upgrades were completed in 2013, and CoreLogic analysis shows a significant number of homes are now protected from all but the higher category hurricanes as a result.

At the local level, five Core Based Statistical Areas (CBSAs) rank the highest in both number of homes at risk and total RCV. They include New York-Newark, NY-NJ-PA; Miami-Fort Lauderdale-West Palm Beach, FL; Tampa-St. Petersburg-Clearwater, FL; Virginia Beach-Norfolk-Newport News, VA-NC; and New Orleans-Metairie, LA (Table 5).

Additional findings in the CoreLogic storm surge analysis:

  • The five states with the highest RCV for homes at risk include: Florida ($491,119,183,016), New York ($177,398,620,779), Louisiana ($162,096,659,527) New Jersey ($126,829,146,685) and Virginia ($91,049,049,641).
  • The five states (including the District of Columbia) with the lowest RCV for homes at risk include: District of Columbia ($351,443,177), New Hampshire ($3,215,714,570) Maine ($5,807,400,656), Rhode Island ($7,476,741,658) and Alabama ($9,954,390,796).
  • The five states (including the District of Columbia) with the lowest total number of properties at risk include: the District of Columbia (3,668), New Hampshire (12,409), Maine (22,491), Rhode Island (26,490) and Delaware (49,716).
  • Virginia Beach-Norfolk-Newport News, VA-NC has the highest percentage of homes (87 percent) at risk of storm surge, but not designated in a FEMA flood zone. Philadelphia-Camden-Wilmington, PA-NJ-DE-MD and Jacksonville, Fla. also top the list at 85 percent and 77 percent, respectively.

The CoreLogic storm surge analysis also complements Federal Emergency Management Agency (FEMA) flood zone information to provide a snapshot of potential damage exposure at the property level, as many properties located outside designated FEMA flood zones are still at risk for storm surge damage. Standard FEMA flood zones are designed to identify areas at risk for both freshwater flooding, as well as storm surge, based on the likelihood of either a 100-year or 500-year flood event. They do not differentiate risk based on storm severity, and as a result, do not accurately define the total extent of potential risk along coastal areas. Homeowners who live outside the FEMA flood zones frequently do not carry flood insurance, given that there is no mandate to do so, and therefore may not be aware of the potential risk storm surge poses to their properties.

To illustrate varying degrees of flood risk exposure, the analysis compares homes that are not located within FEMA 100-year floodplains against the number of homes located in surge inundation zones, as well as those located in both surge and FEMA Special Flood Hazard Areas (SFHA). This data can be found in the full report at: http://www.corelogic.com/about-us/researchtrends/storm-surge-report

Table 1 – Residential Exposure by Storm Category for the Entire U.S.

Storm Surge Risk Level

 

(Storm Category)

Total Homes Potentially AffectedTotal Estimated

 

RCV

(U.S. dollars)

Extreme (Affected by a Category 1-5 storm)1,651,978$393,494,752,074
Very High (Category 2-5)1,438,526$324,225,419,007
High (Category 3-5)1,654,925$371,135,087,394
Moderate (Category 4-5)1,178,196$267,395,972,220
Low (Category 5)685,391$132,090,242,053
Total6,609,016$1,488,341,472,748

Table 2 – Residential Exposure by Coastal Region

RegionAtlantic Coast HomesAtlantic Coast RCV (U.S. Dollars)Gulf Coast HomesGulf Coast RCV (U.S. Dollars)
Extreme (Affected by a Category 1-5 storm)1,018,371$264,963,399,509633,607$128,531,352,565
Very High (Category 2-5)911,091$223,821,396,433527,435$100,404,022,574
High (Category 3-5)860,657$212,741,476,684794,268$158,393,610,710
Moderate (Category 4-5)686,061$172,277,118,076492,135$95,118,854,144
Low (Category 5)332,984$65,334,507,800352,407$66,755,734,253
Total3,809,164$939,137,898,5022,799,852$549,203,574,246

Table 3 – State Table (Ranked by Number of Homes at Risk)

RankStateExtremeVery HighHighModerateLow*Total
1Florida793,204461,632524,923352,102377,9512,509,812
2Louisiana97,760104,059337,495138,76282,196760,272
3New York127,325114,876131,03991,294N/A464,534
4New Jersey116,581178,66873,30377,596N/A446,148
5Texas45,80070,894112,189116,16896,253441,304
6Virginia94,260115,77098,46384,01527,544420,052
7South Carolina107,44357,32765,88546,79930,961308,415
8North Carolina73,46351,92748,59540,15537,347251,487
9Massachusetts31,42065,27974,41349,325N/A220,437
10Maryland47,99039,96627,59128,975N/A144,522
11Georgia41,97052,28128,85219,1908,465150,758
12Pennsylvania1,46745,77637,98332,426N/A117,652
13Mississippi14,80920,64329,38727,50710,588102,934
14Connecticut25,29223,65622,23026,529N/A97,707
15Alabama7,40312,70710,18213,74914,08658,127
16Delaware11,52310,85413,52813,811N/A49,716
17Rhode Island6,5955,9886,7207,187N/A26,490
18Maine5,1592,7537,3687,211N/A22,491
19New Hampshire2,5143,4704,2342,272N/A12,490
20District of ColumbiaN/A**N/A**5453,123N/A3,668
Total1,651,9781,438,5261,654,9251,178,196685,3916,609,016

* The “Low” risk category is based on Category 5 hurricanes, which are not likely along the northeastern Atlantic coast. States in that area have N/A designated for the Low category due to the extremely low probability of a Category 5 storm affecting that area.

** Washington, D.C. has no Atlantic coastal properties, but can be affected by larger hurricanes that push storm surge into the Potomac River. Category 1 and 2 storms will likely not generate sufficient storm surge to affect properties in Washington, D.C.

Table 4 – Reconstruction Value of Properties at Risk by State (U.S. Dollars)

RankStateExtremeVery HighHighModerateLowTotal
1Florida$166,127,920,621$87,593,956,407$100,948,271,678$66,046,901,592$70,402,132,718$491,119,183,016
2New York$50,677,202,371$43,738,512,048$47,941,521,073$35,041,385,287N/A$177,398,620,779
3Louisiana$19,219,426,239$20,723,521,330$73,585,253,144$30,455,626,839$18,112,831,975$162,096,659,527
4New Jersey$32,539,401,471$49,279,239,412$21,290,996,129$23,719,509,673N/A$126,829,146,685
5Virginia$21,749,493,964$24,472,282,097$20,790,731,449$17,769,718,808$6,266,823,323$91,049,049,641
6Texas$7,378,747,508$10,949,102,801$19,458,405,318$21,932,930,066$18,483,135,047$78,202,320,740
7South Carolina$27,968,086,462$12,767,874,946$13,882,875,874$9,539,308,384$6,213,580,227$70,371,725,893
8Massachusetts$10,293,155,124$17,512,619,612$21,563,396,990$15,311,723,734N/A$64,680,895,460
9North Carolina$13,933,404,480$10,330,860,954$9,906,870,506$7,751,458,704$7,201,904,492$49,124,499,136
10Maryland$11,764,631,642$9,641,288,327$6,381,209,263$6,920,924,916N/A$34,708,054,148
11Connecticut$9,162,361,469$8,157,864,151$7,292,127,632$8,774,300,132N/A$33,386,653,384
12Georgia$11,052,557,614$10,521,985,895$5,291,887,200$3,457,728,530$1,389,552,868$31,713,712,107
13Mississippi$2,828,758,155$3,858,574,230$5,351,501,617$4,850,283,320$1,766,898,284$18,656,015,606
14Pennsylvania$314,850,616$5,812,076,371$6,283,697,262$4,819,045,458N/A$17,229,669,707
15Delaware$3,604,927,907$3,338,893,060$4,202,564,034$3,823,191,061N/A$14,969,576,062
16Alabama$1,266,591,391$2,252,764,464$1,761,389,904$2,420,261,918$2,253,383,119$9,954,390,796
17Rhode Island$1,819,637,687$1,759,354,804$1,917,701,002$1,980,048,165N/A$7,476,741,658
18Maine$1,247,207,669$728,679,536$1,966,851,214$1,864,662,237N/A$5,807,400,656
19New Hampshire$546,389,684$785,968,562$1,255,120,636$628,235,688N/A$3,215,714,570
20District of ColumbiaN/AN/A$62,715,469$288,727,708N/A$351,443,177
Total393,494,752,074324,225,419,007371,135,087,394267,395,972,220132,090,242,0531,488,341,472,748

Table 5 – Storm Surge Risk for Top 5 Metro Areas

RankMetropolitan AreaTotal Properties Potentially Affected by All Categories of HurricaneTotal RCV (U.S. Dollars)
1New York, NY685,152$244,312,501,442
2Miami, FL564,913$105,134,042,455
3Tampa, FL447,990$78,191,384,320
4Virginia Beach, VA-NC395,341$86,393,517,790
5New Orleans, LA380,120$84,242,355,537

Additional CBSA data, market rankings, regional, state and local-level maps are available upon request.

Methodology

The 2015 CoreLogic storm surge analysis encompasses single-family residential structures including mobile homes, duplexes, manufactured homes and cabins, among other non-traditional home types. Year-over-year changes in the number of homes at risk and RCV can be the result of several variables, including new home construction, improved public records, enhanced modeling techniques, fluctuation in labor, equipment and material costs, and even potential rise in sea level. As a result, direct year-over-year comparisons should be avoided. To estimate the value property exposure of the single-family residences CoreLogic utilized it’s proprietary Marshall & Swift/Boeckh reconstruction cost valuation methodology. This methodology estimates the cost to rebuild the property in the event of a total loss and is not to be confused with property market values or new construction cost estimation. Reconstruction cost estimates more accurately reflect the actual cost of damage or destruction of residential buildings that would occur from hurricane-driven storm surge since they include the cost of materials, equipment and labor needed to rebuild, and also factor in geographical pricing differences. Actual land values are not included in the estimates. The values are based on 100-percent or total destruction of the residential structure. Depending upon the amount of surge water from a given storm, there may be less than 100 percent damage to the residence, which would result in a lower realized reconstruction cost value.

Storm surge is triggered primarily by the high winds and low pressure associated with hurricanes, which cause water to amass inside a storm as it moves across the ocean before releasing as a powerful rush overland when the hurricane moves onshore. In addition to the property damage and potential lives lost to flooding, the speed and force associated with storm surge waves can significantly increase geographic and economic impact in hurricane disaster areas.

Previous Post

Stratfor: How Islamic State Victories Shape the Syrian Civil War

Next Post

Documentary of the Week: Why Did Timothy Geithner Fire Robert Shiller?

Related Posts

Bitcoin Network Strengthens As Mining Difficulty Reaches ATH Of 31.251T
Econ Intersect News

Bitcoin Network Strengthens As Mining Difficulty Reaches ATH Of 31.251T

by John Wanguba
May 15, 2022
Financial Giants Turn Attention To TikTok
Business

Financial Giants Turn Attention To TikTok

by John Wanguba
May 15, 2022
Santander Sends 80% Of IT Network To The Cloud
Business

Santander Sends 80% Of IT Network To The Cloud

by John Wanguba
May 15, 2022
How Blockchain Technology Boosts Research And Business
Business

How Blockchain Technology Boosts Research And Business

by John Wanguba
May 12, 2022
Nubank To Allocate 1% To Bitcoin And Offer Crypto Investment Services
Business

Nubank To Allocate 1% To Bitcoin And Offer Crypto Investment Services

by John Wanguba
May 11, 2022
Next Post

Documentary of the Week: Why Did Timothy Geithner Fire Robert Shiller?

Leave a Reply Cancel reply

Your email address will not be published. Required fields are marked *

Browse by Category

  • Business
  • Econ Intersect News
  • Economics
  • Finance
  • Politics
  • Uncategorized

Browse by Tags

adoption altcoins banking Binance Bitcoin Bitcoin adoption Bitcoin market Bitcoin mining blockchain BTC business CBDC Coinbase crypto crypto adoption cryptocurrency crypto exchange crypto market crypto regulation decentralized finance DeFi digital assets Elon Musk ETH Ethereum finance funding government investment market analysis Metaverse mining NFT NFT marketplace NFTs nonfungible tokens nonfungible tokens (NFTs) price analysis regulation Russia social media technology Tesla the US Twitter

Archives

  • May 2022
  • April 2022
  • March 2022
  • February 2022
  • January 2022
  • December 2021
  • November 2021
  • October 2021
  • September 2021
  • August 2021
  • July 2021
  • June 2021
  • May 2021
  • April 2021
  • March 2021
  • February 2021
  • January 2021
  • December 2020
  • November 2020
  • October 2020
  • September 2020
  • August 2020
  • July 2020
  • June 2020
  • May 2020
  • April 2020
  • March 2020
  • February 2020
  • January 2020
  • December 2019
  • November 2019
  • October 2019
  • September 2019
  • August 2019
  • July 2019
  • June 2019
  • May 2019
  • April 2019
  • March 2019
  • February 2019
  • January 2019
  • December 2018
  • November 2018
  • October 2018
  • September 2018
  • August 2018
  • July 2018
  • June 2018
  • May 2018
  • April 2018
  • March 2018
  • February 2018
  • January 2018
  • December 2017
  • November 2017
  • October 2017
  • September 2017
  • August 2017
  • July 2017
  • June 2017
  • May 2017
  • April 2017
  • March 2017
  • February 2017
  • January 2017
  • December 2016
  • November 2016
  • October 2016
  • September 2016
  • August 2016
  • July 2016
  • June 2016
  • May 2016
  • April 2016
  • March 2016
  • February 2016
  • January 2016
  • December 2015
  • November 2015
  • October 2015
  • September 2015
  • August 2015
  • July 2015
  • June 2015
  • May 2015
  • April 2015
  • March 2015
  • February 2015
  • January 2015
  • December 2014
  • November 2014
  • October 2014
  • September 2014
  • August 2014
  • July 2014
  • June 2014
  • May 2014
  • April 2014
  • March 2014
  • February 2014
  • January 2014
  • December 2013
  • November 2013
  • October 2013
  • September 2013
  • August 2013
  • July 2013
  • June 2013
  • May 2013
  • April 2013
  • March 2013
  • February 2013
  • January 2013
  • December 2012
  • November 2012
  • October 2012
  • September 2012
  • August 2012
  • July 2012
  • June 2012
  • May 2012
  • April 2012
  • March 2012
  • February 2012
  • January 2012
  • December 2011
  • November 2011
  • October 2011
  • September 2011
  • August 2011
  • July 2011
  • June 2011
  • May 2011
  • April 2011
  • March 2011
  • February 2011
  • January 2011
  • December 2010
  • August 2010
  • August 2009

Categories

  • Business
  • Econ Intersect News
  • Economics
  • Finance
  • Politics
  • Uncategorized
Global Economic Intersection

After nearly 11 years of 24/7/365 operation, Global Economic Intersection co-founders Steven Hansen and John Lounsbury are retiring. The new owner, a global media company in London, is in the process of completing the set-up of Global Economic Intersection files in their system and publishing platform. The official website ownership transfer took place on 24 August.

Categories

  • Business
  • Econ Intersect News
  • Economics
  • Finance
  • Politics
  • Uncategorized

Recent Posts

  • Bitcoin Network Strengthens As Mining Difficulty Reaches ATH Of 31.251T
  • Financial Giants Turn Attention To TikTok
  • Santander Sends 80% Of IT Network To The Cloud

© Copyright 2021 EconIntersect - Economic news, analysis and opinion.

No Result
View All Result
  • Home
  • Contact Us
  • Bitcoin Robot
    • Bitcoin Profit
    • Bitcoin Code
    • Quantum AI
    • eKrona Cryptocurrency
    • Bitcoin Up
    • Bitcoin Prime
    • Yuan Pay Group
    • Immediate Profit
    • BitIQ
    • Bitcoin Loophole
    • Crypto Boom
    • Bitcoin Era
    • Bitcoin Treasure
    • Bitcoin Lucro
    • Bitcoin System
    • Oil Profit
    • The News Spy
    • British Bitcoin Profit
    • Bitcoin Trader
  • Bitcoin Reddit

© Copyright 2021 EconIntersect - Economic news, analysis and opinion.

en English
ar Arabicbg Bulgarianda Danishnl Dutchen Englishfi Finnishfr Frenchde Germanel Greekit Italianja Japaneselv Latvianno Norwegianpl Polishpt Portuguesero Romanianes Spanishsv Swedish