econintersect.com
  • 토토사이트
    • 카지노사이트
    • 도박사이트
    • 룰렛 사이트
    • 라이브카지노
    • 바카라사이트
    • 안전카지노
  • 경제
  • 파이낸스
  • 정치
  • 투자
No Result
View All Result
  • 토토사이트
    • 카지노사이트
    • 도박사이트
    • 룰렛 사이트
    • 라이브카지노
    • 바카라사이트
    • 안전카지노
  • 경제
  • 파이낸스
  • 정치
  • 투자
No Result
View All Result
econintersect.com
No Result
View All Result
Home Uncategorized

January 24, 2020 Weather Impacts On Economic Activity – Impact On Recreation

admin by admin
9월 6, 2021
in Uncategorized
0
0
SHARES
0
VIEWS

Written by Sig Silber

Drought expanded a bit this week. It is still very low. Our feature this week is the impact of weather on the recreation industry. We are trying to broaden our approach to understanding the economic impacts of weather. We include a lot of NASS reports this week but not as features but in their normal place in the article. We mostly covered animal husbandry rather than crops and the reported results are much better than for crops. We include all our usual features and this post already includes the Week 3 – 4 forecast update so we have the 28-day forecast herein. We plan to go into more detail on the bush fire situation in Australia and that might be included in next week’s article or it might be a separate article.

Impact on Recreation


Please share this article – Go to the very top of the page, right-hand side, for social media buttons. Please feel free to send this article to anyone who you think might benefit from reading it.


Directory

Readers can scan through this article or jump to where they want to go via the links to the right.

Directory links are under construction. Check back for completion.

  • Special Topics for this Week
  • Intermediate-Term Weather Forecast.
  • Current Drought Conditions
  • Drought Forecasts
  • Floods
  • Wildfires
  • Crop Progress
  • International
  • Major Sources of Information
  • Background Information

2019 Climate Report

We reported on that to some extent last week. We could write a book on it. Here is the link for those who want to go into that topic in more depth.

NIDIS has been very active. They are sending me more material than I can publish. Good for them. But I think these two reports on the impact of weather on recreation were worth presenting. The second report can be followed fairly well by looking at the slides. The first one loses a lot by just looking at the slides. I provide the link for those who want to listen and watch the full Webinar. I did not have time to annotate the graphics with the accompanying audio.

Slide 1

Two categories of recreation are discussed. The full webinar can be watched here.

Slide 40

The first study was focused on the Intermountain West with a large part of the interviews done in Colorado. It is possible that I mess up and have a slide or two out of sequence.

Slide 41

This shows the number of interviews and the range of topics. Basically this is a project conducted by graduate students.

Slide 42

This rings true to me as I grew up in Atlantic City NJ and we had from 4th of July to Labor Day to make 80% or more of our annual income.

Slide 2

Anything NOAA does starts with a presumption that drought will be more frequent, harsher, and last longer. That may or may not be correct or correct everywhere. But if you want their funding, you will toe the party line.

Slide 3

Recreation takes many forms.

Slide 4

You can’t have a scientific study without a Methods and Materials Section.

Slide 43

Aside from the tears, the key issue here is that many commitments need to be made in advance of knowing what the demand will be.

Slide 5

The positive impact was that some people do not like to freeze while they fish but the fish may not like the warm days. Mostly drought is a negative for the recreational industry.
Also of interest is the public perception of the situation. The constant warnings about climate change may be harming the recreating industry. If the media focus on the negative, it could negatively impact the recreation industry.

Slide 7

The audio is very good here but I will summarize and say that diversification is a common strategy and that can be diversification at one location or owning multiple locations in different climate zones.

Slide 44

The most interesting point here was the lack of confidence in NOAA forecasts. But NOAA is not really equipped to make hour by hour forecasts for specific locations. That is the job of companies that specialize in that.

Slider 9

Lower elevation was better than higher elevation. And being below a dam that had periodic releases was better than being in a free-flowing stream.

Slide 10

Interesting that the NOAA products were found to be unreliable.

Slide 11

This creates opportunities for specialized forecasts. The graphic on the right is too small to read but it did not impress me. But it might have if I could have read it.

Slide 12

They made that point that their study in the Intermountain West might not apply elsewhere but I was not convinced of that and they also made the point that they focused on the operators not their suppliers and that was a valid point. But overall I thought they did a good job.

Slide 51

This is the Second Report. It is an earlier study of the snow sports industry nationwide. They had more resources to do this study.

Sllide 15

So this is 2017 data and I agree with their statement that it might be an underestimate.

slide 16,

I think I recall this was using IMPLAN to make these forecasts. 23.5 million times $150 is approximately $3.5 billion so that is a lot of Multiplier effect and I am not buying it. IMPLAN is based on Direct, Indirect and Induced impacts and I think it way overstates these impacts. So I would take the above estimates with a grain of salt. On the other hand, if skiing is related to out-of-town visitors and skiing was the reason for the trip, then there are potentially even higher economic impacts from the trip which may include many days not spent skiing but resulting from a desire to go on a skiing trip. So one has to not be obsessive about being able to determine the exact impact of the snow recreation industry but it is a significant impact and impacted by the weather.

Slide 17

Colorado seems to be the big winner.

Slide 52

There is a lot of variability

Slide 19

This shows the variability in skier visits.

Slide 19

Probably not a big surprise. I think I would have accepted this conclusion without a study.

Slide 20

Sllide 25

This translates the variability into dollars.

Slid3e 28

Some surprises here.

Sllide 52

In the audio they discuss not having snow on the mountains soon.I think they are using the RCP 8.5 scenario and that is not very realistic.
Not sure it was in this presentation or the prior presentation but there was a discussion of the backyard effect. I may be missing a slide as there was a lot of discussion of the “Backyard Effect”. Now whether this is psychological or faulty decision making it is not clear but if snow is not visible at low elevations i.e. in people’s back yards, they are less inclined to go to the mountains.

Slide 29

A mix of surviving as a provider of snow-related recreation and mitigating climate change. But apparently the industry is doing these things.

Slide 30

Apparently the recreationists are getting with the program.

Sllide 31

Here is an additional resource from Protect our Winters.

posted on 22 January 2020

How The Heat Affects Economic Data

by UPFINA

I wish I had had the time to really review this article. Perhaps I will in the future. But basically their main point is that housing starts increase when the weather is mild. But the question then becomes is this a true increase or just moving forward of the construction schedule?

Announcement of Increased Flooding Risk. (I receive this today January 24, 2020)

Announcement January 24, 2020 from Doug Kluck

Click Links below to get the details.

Upper Mississippi and Red River of the North

Missouri Basin

And shifting to the Alaska and CONUS Intermediate-Term Weather Forecast

First Temperature
https://www.wpc.ncep.noaa.gov/medr/DAY3_MAX_filled.gif

6 - 10 Day Forecast Temperature

8 - 14 Day Temperature

3 - 4 Week Temperature

Re Temperature, it starts warm everywhere and then we get a north/south divide with a cool anomaly in the Northern Tier.
One might expect this to improve natural gas prices. But geopolitics may be dominating natural resource economics right now.

And then Precipitation

Five day QPF

6 - 10 Day Forecast Precipitation

8 - 14 Day Precipitation

3 - 4 Week Precipitation

The near-term precipitation pattern is wet to the north and dry to the south.
Because we are publishing this week on Friday there will be no need to do an update for the Week 3 – 4 forecast.
Although the weather graphics in this article auto-update, we recommend that those interested in tracking the weather refer to our LIVE ALL WEEK article where we update the text forecasts twice a day usually fairly close to when the NWS has done their update. One can find the latest version of this by consulting the Directory of Sig Silber weather articles and then clicking on the version of LIVE ALL WEEK which is closest to the top of the stack. The LIVE ALL WEEK article provides access to NWS warnings via the maps in the second half of the article. So it provides the best access to severe weather information that is available.

Here is the discussion that was released with the Week 3 – 4 forecast today.

Week 3-4 Forecast Discussion Valid Sat Feb 08 2020-Fri Feb 21 2020

The Week 3-4 temperature and precipitation outlooks are based on the evolving circulation pattern from Week-2, dynamical model forecasts from the NCEP CFS, ECMWF, and JMA, and SubX multi-model ensemble (MME) of experimental and operational ensemble prediction systems. The Madden-Julian Oscillation (MJO) propagated eastward from the Maritime Continent to the central Pacific during early to mid-January. However, in the past week, the coherent Wave-1 spatial pattern in the 200-hPa Velocity Potential anomaly field became Wave-2 as constructive interference between a Kelvin and Rossby wave enhanced convection across the western Indian Ocean. Dynamical models continue to indicate a more low frequency signal in the global tropics with enhanced (suppressed) convection across the Pacific (Maritime Continent). Although the MJO evolution during the past few weeks would favor a colder outcome for much of the CONUS, the ongoing pattern and forecasts through the next two weeks are out of phase with a typical MJO response.

During January, a positive Arctic Oscillation (AO) phase prevailed over the Northern Hemisphere. A highly amplified upper-level trough resulted in below normal temperatures throughout Alaska since late December. The 0Z ECMWF ensemble mean maintains this amplified trough with large negative 500-hPa height anomalies across Alaska through Week-2. Enhanced flow from the North Pacific into western Canada is likely to keep the anomalously cold temperatures over Alaska into the beginning of February with above normal temperatures favored for much of the CONUS. Poor model consistency beyond Week-2 continues to decrease forecast confidence on if and when these anomalously cold temperatures shift south from Alaska into the lower 48.

The CFS, ECMWF, and JMA models maintain negative (positive) 500-hPa height anomalies at the higher (middle) latitudes of the Northern Hemisphere during the Week 3-4 period. The JMA model is preferred today given its more reasonable transition in the circulation pattern from the next couple of weeks. The JMA model at Week-3 features a zonally oriented 500-hPa height anomaly pattern over western North America with positive anomalies persisting across California and the Southwest. The upper-level trough axis varies largely among the dynamical models with the CFS and JMA having it over eastern North America while the ECMWF has the trough axis extending back into the interior West. The highest confidence in the temperature outlook across the CONUS exists across the Southwest where the evolving circulation pattern from Week-2 and Week 3-4 tools support above normal temperatures. Although many of the tools including the Sub-X MME continue to indicate a colder outcome across the central and eastern CONUS, forecast confidence is reduced by recent poor model consistency and the likelihood for above-normal temperatures persisting through Week-2.

Based on the preferred JMA model which has an upper-level ridge along the West Coast, below normal precipitation is favored from California eastward to the Great Basin, Southwest, and southern Great Plains. This favored dry area also has support from the Sub-X MME. The calibrated probabilities from the CFS, ECWMF, and JMA models indicate an extension of the favored area for below normal precipitation northeast to the lower Missouri Valley. Good model agreement and expectation for upslope flow to develop during the Week 3-4 period favor above normal precipitation across the northern Rockies and northern high Plains. Equal chances for below or above normal precipitation are forecast throughout the eastern CONUS due to weak or conflicting signals among precipitation tools.

Dynamical model solutions are in good agreement with an upper-level ridge over the Aleutians and Bering Sea with an upper-level trough either over or near eastern mainland Alaska. This longwave pattern favors below normal temperatures throughout much of Alaska and below normal precipitation across southern mainland Alaska, coastal southern Alaska, and the Alaska Panhandle.

Weekly sea surface temperature (SST) anomalies, centered on January 15, are running 0.5 to 1 degree C above normal surrounding Hawaii. Based on these SST anomalies along with dynamical model guidance, above normal temperatures are likely for Hawaii. Due to conflicting signals among the precipitation tools, equal chances of below or above normal precipitation are forecast across Hawaii.

January 24, 2020

January 24, 2020

You can see the north/south divide for the West.

Current Drought Conditions

Now we take a look at Thursday’s U.S. Drought Monitor Report.

The U.S. Drought Monitor is a comprehensive way of understanding the drought situation for the U.S. It is issued every Thursday and reflects the conditions as of the prior Tuesday. Drought is defined as a moisture deficit bad enough to have social, environmental or economic effects. Thus, more factors than recent precipitation are considered and more information on how it is done is found at the end of this report.

U.S. Affiliated Pacific Islands and the U.S. Virgin Islands.

https://droughtmonitor.unl.edu/data/png/20200121/20200121_usdm_pg2.png

The Western Pacific is an area that has been in drought probably due to the El Nino. This part of the world generally requires two inches of rain per week to avoid drought. Until recently you could see that at about 8N there was a dividing line between Moderate to no Drought and Severe to Exceptional Drought. The situation seems to be dramatically improving. There are only a few Pacific Islands still in drought.

Below is the map for just CONUS.

https://droughtmonitor.unl.edu/data/png/20200121/20200121_conus_trd.png
https://droughtmonitor.unl.edu/data/png/20191203/20191203_conus_trd.png
On an overall basis, the area impacted by drought and abnormally dry conditions increased from 23.30% to 24.87% which is an insignificant change. The number of people impacted by drought increased from 11,894,463 to 17,047,458 which is a pretty large change. There continues to be no more D4 and D3 decreased from 0.11% to 0.07% which is insignificant. D2 has increased from 3.01% to 3.31% which is an insignificant change. D1 has increased from 7.61% to 8.09% which is an insignificant change. And D0, which is not drought but abnormally dry increased from 12.57% to 13.40% which is an insignificant change. D0 is not included when estimating the number of people impacted. For now, we are in very good shape. Compared to a year ago, this is a very good situation with respect to drought. But apparently the increase in D1 although small in terms of percentage was important in terms of where it occurred and the number of people impacted.
And we expect some additional positive changes but the duration of those positive changes is not known with a high degree of confidence. We show the areas at risk later with the drought forecast through April. The cold weather has contributed to the improvement in the drought measures as the rate of evaporation has declined.
Last Week This Week

https://droughtmonitor.unl.edu/data/png/20200114/20200114_conus_trd.png

https://droughtmonitor.unl.edu/data/png/20200121/20200121_conus_trd.png

Some might find this animation of twelve weeks of change useful;

Animation of six weeks of change

The graphic below shows the one-week change in drought intensity. Yellow is bad. Green is good.

U.S. Drought Monitor Change Map

You see more degradation than improvement. But it all seems to be taking place west of a line drawn from westerm Montana to Louisiana
It will be easier to see individual states in the regional maps which follow and for those interested in a particular state, those maps can be accessed here.

Now we show the week to week change information by region. The yellow is where the level of drought has been raised. The green is where the level of drought has been lowered.

https://droughtmonitor.unl.edu/data/chng/png/20200114/20200114_high_plains_chng_PW.png

No Change

No Change
Some degradation in Delaware and Eastern Maryland.
Improvement to the north and mostly degradation to the south with no change to the east.
Some degradation in Eastern North Carolina and also in Alabama and the far west Florida Panhandle.
South Central New Mexico, Northeast Colorado parts of inland Washington and Oregon and southern Idaho and a small part of Wyoming had degradation while there was improvement in northern Idaho and Western Montana.

Here is the Discussion that was issued with the Drought Report. The Regional Headings can be clicked on to obtain maps and statistics.

This Week’s Drought Summary

Pacific weather systems migrated across the contiguous U.S. (CONUS) in a fairly westerly jet stream flow during this U.S. Drought Monitor (USDM) week. East of the Rockies, they tapped Gulf of Mexico moisture and dropped above-normal precipitation in a storm track that stretched from Texas to the Great Lakes. The jet stream flow amplified as the week progressed, producing a strong trough over the eastern CONUS with a ridge migrating across the West into the central CONUS. Cold arctic air was directed by the trough into the East behind surface frontal low pressure systems. The Pacific fronts dropped precipitation along the coastal ranges, but the air masses quickly dried out as they crossed the interior West, resulting in below-normal precipitation from the High Plains west to the coastal ranges. The Gulf of Mexico and Atlantic coasts were mostly drier than normal. Weekly temperatures were warmer than normal from Texas to the Mid-Atlantic, and colder than normal along the West Coast and northern to central Plains. Drought and abnormal dryness expanded across parts of the West, southern Plains and Gulf Coast, and Mid-Atlantic coast, but contracted in parts of the northern Rockies and southern to central Plains, as well as Hawaii and the Alaska panhandle.

Northeast

Half an inch to an inch of precipitation occurred across western and northern portions of the Northeast this week, with half an inch or less from southern New England to West Virginia. The Mid-Atlantic areas have been persistently dry with several drought indicators showing abnormal dryness for the last 1 to 6 months. These include the Standardized Precipitation Index (SPI), Standardized Precipitation Evapotranspiration Index (SPEI), soil moisture models, and some streamflow stations. As a result, the Delaware-Maryland D0 was expanded to encompass more of those two states.

Southeast

Parts of Alabama received over 2 inches of rain, with half an inch or more falling across most of Alabama, the Florida panhandle, the northern two-thirds of Georgia, and into the western Carolinas. Less than half an inch fell east and south of these areas and over southwest Alabama, with little to no rainfall over the southern half of Florida and parts of southern Georgia. D0 was expanded in southern Georgia, where SPI, SPEI, and soil moisture indicated dryness for the last 1 to 3 months, and across eastern North Carolina based on 1-6 month SPI, SPEI, and soil moisture deficits, and two spots of D0 were added in southwest Alabama. While dryness was also indicated for the last 3 months in northern Florida and central Virginia, no change was made to these areas this week, but they will be watched in the weeks ahead.

South

Bands of 2+ inch precipitation occurred across parts of Texas into central Oklahoma, and from eastern Texas into Mississippi, with some reports exceeding 5 inches. Half an inch or more of precipitation surrounded these areas across the region. But some areas had less than half an inch, including parts of western, southern, and east-central Texas, western Oklahoma, southeast Louisiana, and parts of Arkansas. For the dry areas, this week’s subnormal precipitation added to deficits stretching back 6 months or more. For the areas that were wet this week, the precipitation helped with short-term deficits, but longer-term deficits remained and were especially still severe at the 6-month time frame. The D2 in southwest Oklahoma was eliminated and its surrounding D0-D1 contracted. D0-D3 was contracted in the wet areas of Texas, but D0-D2 expanded in the dry areas. D0-D1 contracted in northwest Louisiana into adjacent Texas. Three-month precipitation deficits prompted expansion of D0 along the Louisiana coast into southern Mississippi.

Midwest

Half an inch to an inch of precipitation fell almost region-wide this week. Only Kentucky and a few areas of Iowa, Minnesota, and Wisconsin had less than half an inch. A strip of 1 to over 2 inches of precipitation was measured across Missouri and Illinois. Soils were wet across most of the Midwest, except parts of Ohio, and precipitation was above normal in most areas at most time scales from the last week to 12 months. There was no drought or abnormal dryness in the Midwest this week.

High Plains

Half an inch or more of precipitation fell across parts of the eastern Dakotas and eastern Kansas, with less than half an inch westward. Very little to no precipitation occurred across large parts of the western High Plains from Colorado to the Dakotas. D0 was trimmed in parts of southern Nebraska and adjacent Kansas. But D0 expanded in northeast Colorado into adjacent Nebraska, and a spot of D0 was added in north central Wyoming. Dry conditions were evident in northeast Colorado in many indices, especially SPI, SPEI, soil moisture, and groundwater indicators, and most notably at the 4-month time scale. Temperatures have been warmer than normal in this area, December was drier than normal, and very little precipitation has fallen in January. An area to watch is southeast Colorado, where reports note that winter wheat is suffering and soils are very dry, and evaporative demand (as measured by the EDDI [Evaporative Drought Demand Index]) is high, indicating the occurrence of warm temperatures, low humidity, and higher winds.

West

The Pacific weather systems have brought precipitation to coastal Oregon, Washington, and northern California this week, with 2 to locally over 5 inches measured in favored upslope areas. But this is the wet season and precipitation normals are high, so only a few parts of southwest Oregon, northwest California, and northwest Washington were wetter than normal for the week. The rain soaks the coastal soils and makes it wet in the short term, but the bigger hydrological picture is dry. Precipitation in the Pacific Northwest is below to much below normal for the water year to date (beginning October 1, 2019), and mountain snowpack is below normal in many areas. The Pacific fronts move quickly across the region, drying out as they cross the coastal ranges and leaving below-normal precipitation in interior Washington and Oregon. Streams are near to above normal along the coast, but below normal east of the coastal ranges. Other indicators reveal dryness east of the coastal ranges, including soil moisture, SPI, and SPEI, especially for the 1 to 9 month time scales. As a result, the 3 D1 areas in interior Washington and Oregon were joined, and D0 expanded in northeast Washington. D0-D1 expanded in southeast Idaho and D0 expanded in southwest Montana, where 3-month precipitation deficits were notable. But above-normal precipitation over the last 30 days prompted contraction of D0 in the Idaho panhandle and adjacent Montana, and in parts of eastern Idaho. The impacts indicator in the Pacific Northwest was changed from S to SL to indicate both short-term and long-term precipitation deficits.

Precipitation in California ranged from over 2 inches in the northwest to an inch or more in favored upslope areas of the coastal and Sierra Nevada ranges. Half an inch or less fell in the central valleys. Parts of northeast Nevada and the Rockies had half an inch or more of precipitation, but much of the rest of the West was dry with a tenth of an inch or less precipitation falling. In New Mexico, impacts from ranchers in the southeast related poor grass growth due to hot, dry, windy conditions, with no grass for grazing in some areas. The poor grasslands can be traced to lack of rain from spring 2019 and the failure of the summer and fall monsoon rains. D0 was expanded into southeast New Mexico and adjacent Texas based on a combination of 1-6 month precipitation deficits, 1-month SPI, 1-9 month SPEI, soil moisture, and groundwater indicators. These indicators also justified the introduction of a spot of D1 in Guadalupe, DeBaca, and Torrance Counties.

Alaska, Hawaii, and Puerto Rico

In Alaska, the last 2 weeks have been dry across most of the state, especially in the southern coastal areas and panhandle where it’s also been colder than normal. SNOTEL snow water content (SWE) is much below normal in the south central coastal area and below normal in the panhandle, and 1-month SPI is dry in the south central coastal area. But 30-90 day precipitation is near to wetter than normal. Warmer temperatures, lower loads, and above-normal precipitation in the Alaska panhandle have improved water levels and allowed Alaska Electric Light and Power (AEL&P) to reconnect all interruptible customers, so the D1 in the panhandle was removed. AEL&P noted that, throughout the winter, they will continue to monitor reservoir levels to ensure that hydropower remains available to their customers.

Hawaii has been drying out this week, but streamflow was still near to above normal across the state. Satellite-based observations of vegetation (NDVI) and ground observations indicate continued easing of drought in some areas. D0-D2 were contracted on Lanai and west Maui, and D0-D1 were contracted on The Big Island. No change was made to the D0 on Puerto Rico.

Pacific Islands

During the Northern Hemisphere winter, the North Pacific subtropical high, and the low latitude Inter-Tropical Convergence Zone (ITCZ), migrate south toward the equator. The seasonal migration brings drier subtropical trade winds to the northern portions of Micronesia and ITCZ rainfall to the southern regions. The weather conditions across the U.S.-Affiliated Pacific Islands (USAPI) during this USDM week (1/15/20-1/21/20) reflected this seasonal pattern. A dry season trade-wind regime was firmly entrenched over all the main islands of Micronesia. A near-equatorial trough was to the south, affecting mainly Kapingamarangi and Nukuoro, plus Indonesia and Kiribati. A couple cold front/shear lines penetrated into Marianas and western Federated States of Micronesia (FSM) waters and the northern Marshall Islands (RMI). Weak surface troughs briefly made an appearance in the central FSM but lingered over the RMI, while trade-wind disturbances brought a few showers to the Marianas and the RMI. South of the equator, Tropical Cyclone Tino (04F) moved west then south of the Samoan Islands. The track kept Tino away from American Samoa, but it was close enough that its wind and rainbands affected the islands. Concurrently, the monsoon trough (South Pacific Convergence Zone, SPCZ) lined up over the islands, enhancing rain over American Samoa.

Satellite-based estimates of 7-day precipitation (QPE) showed very little rain across Micronesia. Scattered areas of 1-4 inches were seen in parts of the southern FSM, and a larger area was south and east of the RMI. This larger area was part of an extensive area of rainfall which was along and just south of the equator and which extended southeast toward and past the Samoan Islands. This 4+ inch heavy rain area was associated with the ITCZ and SPCZ. It should be noted that the satellite QPE is able to detect broadscale synoptic rain patterns but does not capture smaller convective showers well.

Dry conditions persisted this week across Palau, receiving only 0.08 inch of rain. This week marked the fourth consecutive week with precipitation totals less than 1 inch. The month of January (as of January 21) had only 0.92 inch of rain. Due to the persistent dryness affecting Palau, abnormal dryness continued this week.

Dry conditions continued to affect the Marianas Islands this week, with all three stations having less than 1 inch of rain. Rota had the most precipitation at 0.70 inch of rain, while Guam had 0.63 inch, and Saipan’s manual gauge had 0.19 inch (ASOS: 0.10 inch; NPS 0.10 inch). During the last two months, Guam’s monthly precipitation totals have been less than 2 inches of rain, which is much less than the monthly threshold of 4 inches to meet most water needs. Guam’s International Airport had only 2.73 inches of rain from December 2019 through January 21, 2020, which is 28.5% of normal precipitation. For this reason, drought classification was deteriorated to moderate drought (D1-S) for Guam. Rota and Saipan continued to be in abnormally dry conditions this week.

All stations across the FSM had a dry week as they all received less than their 2-inches weekly threshold to meet most water needs. The stations with the least precipitation were Yap (0.04 inch; 2 days of missing data), Kosrae (0.09 inch), Pingelap (no rain was observed during this week), and Woleai (0.03 inch), which had less than a tenth of an inch of rain or no rain at all.

Yap, Lukunor, and Woleai had at least three to four weeks of precipitation totals less than 1 inch of rain. For this reason, their drought classification was changed to abnormally dry. Kapingamarangi, Pohnpei, Chuuk Lagoon, Kosrae, and Pingelap had drought free conditions this week as this was only the first or second week with precipitation totals below the weekly 2-inches threshold.

Nukuoro had 1.25 inches of rain this week and a total of 9.63 inches of rain for the month so far. Since the January precipitation total was more than the monthly threshold of 8 inches, drought free conditions remained in Nukuoro this week. Ulithi only had 0.17 inch this week, however, last week 7.92 inches of rain fell, securing Ulithi’s drought free status this week. Fananu had no data and was set to missing.

Dry conditions were present across the Marshalls Islands, with all stations analyzed receiving less than half of an inch of rain or no rain at all. The stations located in Majuro and Jaluit had no rain during the week, with Mili and Ailinglapalap reporting only 0.01 and 0.05 inch of rain, respectively. Ailinglapalap, Kwajalein, and Jaluit’s drought classification was changed from D-Nothing to abnormally dry conditions as this was at least the third consecutive week with little to no rain.

Three of the last four weeks have been dry for Majuro, receiving less than the weekly minimum of 2 inches of rain to meet most water needs. According to Majuro’s Water and Sewer Co, Majuro’s reservoir levels were at 66.8% of the maximum capacity of 36 million gallons (as of January 21, 2020), which is well below the critical 80% threshold. For this reason, Majuro’s drought classification was also changed to abnormally dry conditions.

Wotje and Mili were the only two stations that had drought free classifications for this week as this was only the second consecutive week with precipitation totals less than the weekly threshold of 2 inches. Utirik was set to missing this week due to insufficient data at the time of analysis.

Very wet conditions were observed in Tutuila during this drought week as 9.21 inches of rain fell in Pago Pago. This is over twice the monthly precipitation total of 4 inches to meet most water needs. The other stations located in Siufaga Ridge and Toa Ridge also saw wet conditions with precipitation totals at 5.18 inches and 5.80 inches, respectively. Dryness or drought development was not a concern for Tutuila and drought free conditions persisted this week.

Virgin Islands

St. Thomas precipitation total for the week was 0.67 inch at the Cyril E. King Airport and 0.72 inch at the CoCoRaHS station at Anna’s Retreat. For the month-to-date, the airport had 2.10 inches of rain, which is 126.5% of normal January precipitation. The CoCoRaHS station was slightly higher at 3.47 inches of rain. SPI values at all levels indicated drought free conditions for St. Thomas.

St. Croix’s airport precipitation for the week was only 0.29 inch of rain; however, the CoCoRaHS station at Christiansted was higher at 1.02 inches. The month-to-date rainfall of 2.23 inches at the airport was 147.7% of normal January precipitation. The CoCoRAHS station had 2.5 inches of rain for the month-to-date. However, SPI values at the 3, 9, and 12 months indicated moderate drought conditions, while the 6 month SPI value (-1.44) indicated severe drought. For this week, moderate drought continued in St. Croix.

This week’s precipitation total was 1.47 inches at Windswept Beach. The month-to-date precipitation of 3.81 inches was 130.0% of normal precipitation and the wettest January since 2008 and, as of January 21, the sixth wettest January since 1993. January 1996 is the wettest January with 5.98 inches of rain for the month. SPI values at all levels indicate drought free conditions for this location. For this reason drought free conditions were unchanged for St. John this week.

Looking Ahead

Pacific weather systems will continue to cross the CONUS in a westerly jet stream flow. For January 23-28, 3 or more inches of precipitation is forecast for the northern California to Washington coast and coastal ranges, with an inch or more across parts of the Rockies, especially the northern Rockies. An inch or more of precipitation will be widespread from central Texas to the Tennessee Valley, across parts of the central Plains to Midwest, and from northeast Georgia to New England. Half an inch or less of precipitation is predicted for the rest of the West to central and northern Plains, and parts of Florida and the Great Lakes. Temperatures are forecast to be warmer than normal for much of the CONUS. For January 29-February 1, odds favor above-normal precipitation across eastern Alaska and the panhandle as well as most of the CONUS. Below-normal precipitation is expected for western Alaska, parts of the southwestern CONUS, and northern portions of the Great Lakes and New England. Odds favor a continuation of warmer-than-normal temperatures across most of the CONUS and the Alaska panhandle, with below-normal temperatures in the Four Corners area and across most of Alaska.


Some may find the below way of looking at things useful and I hope these graphics are not too small to read. I did not make them so you could click on them individually but you can click on the whole graphic and it may enlarge. But I think you get the picture. It has been a rapid onset and demise. When you read these graphics, remember that the older graphics are not the drought conditions that existed then but the change from then until now.

changes in drought categories January 24, 2020

Remember when reading this graphic, the 1-year graphic shows the change from then until today. So for some, that may be a bit of an unusual way of looking at things.

Let’s focus on the change between December 24, 2019, and January 21, 2020 i.e. one month.

Here looking at a month of change, the situation is mixed but more improvement than degradation.

Focusing on the Intermountain West

Intermountain West Fourplex

We are now showing the new Water Year which started on October 1, 2019. The current week shown in the upper left was mixed almost identical to the month to date.

Drought Forecasts

These two forecasts (Monthly and Season) are issued by the same agency but to obtain them you need to access two different links here and here.

Here is the Monthly Drought Outlook which was updated on December 31, 2019.

New August 2018 Drought Outlook

It is pretty much a no-change forecast.

Here is the Three-Month Forecast which was issued on January 16, 2020

http://www.cpc.ncep.noaa.gov/products/expert_assessment/sdohomeweb.png

A new area of drought is forecast to develop covering Northern California and Oregon and Southeast Idaho. Other than that it looks pretty good with improvement shown for Texas.

Floods

Floods remain a concern.

Flood and High Water January 24, 2020

Last Week Current Week

Flood and High Water January 17, 2020

Flood and High Water January 24, 2020
The statistics shown on the maps indicate that the pattern has certainly changed a bit and appears to be improved compared to last week.

animation

Wildfires

Large Fires

So they appear to be back on line and showing no major fires.

Current Wildfire Risk. This is a new model that updates daily by NOAA (but not automatically in this article) to show the short-term risk.

January 24, 2020

Click here to update. Red is high risk, blue is low risk. This graphic updates daily but you have to click on the link provided to get the updates More information can be found here.

Overall the risk is now low to moderate with the major risk perhaps in Texas and along the lee side of the Rockies. .

This explains the model a bit.

Flow chart related to the current risk model

Not sure if this is conceptual or how they do it. Again here is the link for the explanation. It looks like it could be a major improvement.

New Month Fire risk.

There is an area of reduced risk.

Looking out another month.

New Month Fire risk.

The area of below-normal risk shifts a bit to the east.

New Month Fire risk.

For March, the area of below-normal risk extends back to the west a bit.

Crop and Animal Husbandry Progress – Selected NASS Reports (you can find them all here)

cattle on Feed January 24, 2020

Poultry Slaughter January 24, 2020

Chickens and Eggs January 23, 2020

Boiler Type Eggs Set January 22, 2020

Livestock Slaughter January 23, 2020

Milk Production January 23, 2020

Cold Stocks January 22, 2020

Pecan Production January 23, 2020

International

International Crop Report January 24, 2020

A map helps and is not always available and fortunately, it was available this week.

International Weather and Crop Map january 24, 2020

Overall it was a pretty good week for agriculture except for Morocco and Java and parts of Eastern Brazil.

Major Sources of Information

In the box are shown the major resources we use. We will not be using them all each week but the reader is welcome to refer to these resources.

Major Sources of Information Used in this Weekly Report

  • The U.S. Drought Monitor (the full report can be accessed here)
  • Selected graphics from our other Weather and Climate Reports are repeated in this report. These reports can be accessed by referencing the Directory here
  • Selections from the Tuesday USD Weather and Crop Bulletin (the full report can be accessed here). Selections from the USDA Office of the Chief Economist can be found here. NASS Executive Briefings can be found here. USDA Foreign Agriculture Service Briefs can be found here. Other useful sources of information that I regularly utilize are the National Integrated Drought Information System (NIDIS) which can be accessed here and the USDA NRCS Weekly and Weather Climate Update which can be accessed here.

Background Information

Drought severity classification

The sequence of drought occurrence and impacts for commonly accepted drought types. All droughts originate from a deficiency of precipitation or meteorological drought but other types of drought and impacts cascade from this deficiency. (Source: NDMC)

Source: National Drought Mitigation Center, University of Nebraska-Lincoln

Previous Post

Investing.com Weekly Wrap-Up: 24 Jan 2019

Next Post

The World’s Largest Human Migration Is About To Begin

Related Posts

Scammers Steal $300K Using Fake Blur Airdrop Websites
Uncategorized

FBI Warns Investors Of Crypto-Stealing Play-to-Earn Games

by admin
Maersk Almost Completing Russia Exit After The Sale Of Logistics Sites
Uncategorized

Maersk Almost Completing Russia Exit After The Sale Of Logistics Sites

by admin
Why Is ‘Staking’ At The Center Of Crypto’s Latest Regulation Scuffle
Uncategorized

Why Is ‘Staking’ At The Center Of Crypto’s Latest Regulation Scuffle

by admin
Mexico's Pemex Dismantled Resources Worth $342M From Two Top Fields
Uncategorized

Mexico’s Pemex Dismantled Resources Worth $342M From Two Top Fields

by admin
Oil Giant Schlumberger Rebrands Itself As SLB For Low-Carbon Future
Uncategorized

Oil Giant Schlumberger Rebrands Itself As SLB For Low-Carbon Future

by admin
Next Post

Democratic Governors Are Quicker In Responding To The Coronavirus Than Republicans

답글 남기기 응답 취소

이메일 주소는 공개되지 않습니다. 필수 필드는 *로 표시됩니다

Browse by Category

  • Business
  • Econ Intersect News
  • Economics
  • Finance
  • Politics
  • Uncategorized

Browse by Tags

adoption altcoins bank banking banks Binance Bitcoin Bitcoin market blockchain BTC BTC price business China crypto crypto adoption cryptocurrency crypto exchange crypto market crypto regulation decentralized finance DeFi Elon Musk ETH Ethereum Europe Federal Reserve finance FTX inflation investment market analysis Metaverse NFT nonfungible tokens oil market price analysis recession regulation Russia stock market technology Tesla the UK the US Twitter

Categories

  • Business
  • Econ Intersect News
  • Economics
  • Finance
  • Politics
  • Uncategorized

© Copyright 2024 EconIntersect

No Result
View All Result
  • 토토사이트
    • 카지노사이트
    • 도박사이트
    • 룰렛 사이트
    • 라이브카지노
    • 바카라사이트
    • 안전카지노
  • 경제
  • 파이낸스
  • 정치
  • 투자

© Copyright 2024 EconIntersect