econintersect.com
  • 토토사이트
    • 카지노사이트
    • 도박사이트
    • 룰렛 사이트
    • 라이브카지노
    • 바카라사이트
    • 안전카지노
  • 경제
  • 파이낸스
  • 정치
  • 투자
No Result
View All Result
  • 토토사이트
    • 카지노사이트
    • 도박사이트
    • 룰렛 사이트
    • 라이브카지노
    • 바카라사이트
    • 안전카지노
  • 경제
  • 파이낸스
  • 정치
  • 투자
No Result
View All Result
econintersect.com
No Result
View All Result
Home Uncategorized

July 12, 2019 Weather Impacts On Economic Activity – Let’s Review June

admin by admin
9월 6, 2021
in Uncategorized
0
0
SHARES
0
VIEWS

Written by Sig Silber

Tonight we continue to try to improve our new approach for shedding light on the crop situation. We begin the discussion of the impact of temperature on the U.S. economy. We also revisit the CONUS June, 2019 weather to see what we might learn. Of course, we provide full coverage of the U.S. Drought Monitor and also provide a short summary of International weather and crop conditions.

July 12, 2019

 


Please share this article – Go to the very top of the page, right-hand side, for social media buttons. Please feel free to send this article to anyone who you think might benefit from reading it.


New Format: Each week our Thursday night article will cover the Drought Monitor Report issued by NOAA in conjunction with the University of Nebraska – Lincoln and a summary of U.S. crop conditions.

It provides a link to the Severe Weather Report (this will take two clicks since that report gets republished each day and so you click here to get to the Directory and then click again on the version of the Severe Weather Report closest to the top of the list.

Soon we will have a link to a full weather report, not just severe weather. Each week, but not today, this article will have a different special feature. We have not worked that out yet but most likely those features might be:

A. a more detailed look at the prior month’s crop progress

B. a review of the prior month’s weather (A feature this week)

C. a review of the prior month’s International Weather

D. Current conditions of rivers and reservoirs.

E. Economic Impacts other than crop-related

F. Other. (Impact of Temperature on the Economy is a feature this week)

The goal is to reduce the time needed to read the article and provide information each week that changes each week and provide information that changes more slowly on a monthly basis.

Please provide feedback by completing the survey below on how you feel about the new format and what would make this article more useful to you.

First a News Note. It is the Second Thursday of the Month and the NOAA Court rules on ENSO.

EL NINO/SOUTHERN OSCILLATION (ENSO) DIAGNOSTIC DISCUSSION issued by CLIMATE PREDICTION CENTER/NCEP/NWS and the International Research Institute for Climate and Society 11 July 2019

ENSO Alert System Status: El Nino Advisory

Synopsis: A transition from El Nino to ENSO-neutral is expected in the next month or two, with ENSO-neutral most likely to continue through Northern Hemisphere fall and winter.

During June, El Nino was reflected in the continued presence of above average sea surface temperatures (SSTs) across the central equatorial Pacific Ocean. However, SST anomalies across most of the eastern Pacific decreased during the month. The latest weekly ENSO indices were +0.9 degC in Nino-4 and +0.6 degC in Nino-3.4, with smaller departures in the Nino-3 and Nino-1+2 regions. Upper-ocean subsurface temperatures (averaged across 180 deg-100 degW) were above average at the beginning of June, but returned to near average by end of the month, as anomalously cool waters expanded at depth. Weakly suppressed tropical convection continued over Indonesia, while weakly enhanced convection persisted near the Date Line. Low-level wind anomalies were near average over the tropical Pacific Ocean, and upper-level wind anomalies were westerly over the far eastern Pacific. The traditional and equatorial Southern Oscillation Indices were slightly negative. Overall, oceanic and atmospheric conditions were consistent with a weakening El Nino.

The latest plume of North American Multi-model Ensemble forecasts of the Nino-3.4 index shows a rapid transition toward ENSO-neutral by the late Northern Hemisphere summer, remaining neutral through fall and winter. Due to this model guidance and recent observations, the forecast consensus also favors a transition to ENSO-neutral during the next few months. In summary, a transition from El Nino to ENSO-neutral is expected in the next month or two, with ENSO-neutral most likely to continue through Northern Hemisphere fall and winter (click CPC/IRI consensus forecast for the chance of each outcome for each 3-month period).

This discussion is a consolidated effort of the National Oceanic and Atmospheric Administration (NOAA), NOAA’s National Weather Service, and their funded institutions. Oceanic and atmospheric conditions are updated weekly on the Climate Prediction Center web site (El Nino/La Nina Current Conditions and Expert Discussions). Forecasts are also updated monthly in the Forecast Forum of CPCs Climate Diagnostics Bulletin. Additional perspectives and analysis are also available in an ENSO blog. The next ENSO Diagnostics Discussion is scheduled for 8 August 2019.

I do not think it is worth any further discussion. It is better to be late than never. Obviously, it means that one should take their long-term forecast and toss it in the circular file but there will be a new one next week so all is not lost.

Let’s Review June

1-Month Statewide Average Temperature Ranks

Average temperatures were fairly normal. Florida had their second warmest June relative to average temperatures.There were seven states with below normal temperatures

1-Month Statewide Maximum Temperature Ranks

Fourteen states were below average. And many of these states were in the primary corn and soybean growing areas

1-Month Statewide Minimum Temperature Ranks

Florida set a record. Delaware was much above average.

1-Month Statewide Precipitation Ranks

No records were set but three states were much above average. Seven states were below average.

This provides a higher resolution way of looking at the data. It shows the data by Climate Division within each state.

1-Month Divisional Precipitation Ranks

IMPACTS

Temperature is harder so let’s work on that. The following article is interesting.

The Impact of Higher Temperatures on Economic Growth By Riccardo Colacito, Bridget Hoffmann, Toan Phan, and Tim Sablik

I am not endorsing this report issued by these Authors who did research on this topic for the Federal Reserve of Richmond. I am just providing it. And as they say: “Views expressed in this article are those of the authors and not necessarily those of the Federal Reserve Bank of Richmond or the Federal Reserve System.”

Here is one of the key graphics.

Impact of Temperature

One should read the full article but not everyone has the time to do so. Therefore I have extracted what I consider to be the most important statements in the article and they follow.

Highlighting the importance of these seasonal and regional variations, Colacito, Hoffmann, and Phan find no statistically significant relationship between temperature and economic growth when look-ing across the whole United States. But measuring the impact of temperature in different seasons and across individual states yields different results.

This makes one wonder. Is it cherrypicked?

Colacito, Hoffmann, and Phan find that temperature increases in the summer are associated with a decline in gross state product (GSP), which is the value added in production by the labor and capital of all industries in a given state. On average, each 1 ÌŠF increase in the mean summer temperature reduces the annual GSP growth rate by 0.154 percentage points.

OK

As theory would suggest, Colacito, Hoffmann, and Phan also find that higher temperatures during the colder fall months have a positive effect on growth. On average, each 1 ÌŠF increase in the mean fall tem-perature increases the annual GSP growth rate by 0.102 percentage points. This finding is smaller and less statistically robust than their finding for the summer effect, but it may help explain why temperature changes do not appear to have a significant effect on growth when averaged across the whole year and across the whole country: the effects in the summer and fall partly offset. The authors do not find any significant effects for temperature increases in the spring or winter.

It sure does explain why there was no overall impact observed.

Measuring the impact of temperature changes on states as opposed to the country as a whole also reveals significant variations. Colacito, Hoffmann, and Phan divide the country into four regions – North, South, Midwest, and West – using classifications from the U.S. Census Bureau. Average temperatures are highest in the South, and the authors find that the economies of southern states are the most sensitive to changes in summer and fall temperatures. Further investigation shows that this effect is not driven by a larger role of agriculture in southern states. In fact, the authors find that the economic effects of temperature are widespread across a variety of industries.

Probably the most believable and useful information in the article.

This raises a number of questions including:

  • When GDP is reduced is it lost or deferred?
  • Can the analysis be interpreted in the reverse i.e. are the impacts of cooler temperatures the opposite of the impact of the warmer temperatures.

The authors go on to attempt to estimate the long-term impacts. You can read that in the paper. I do not follow the logic that losses are necessarily cumulative. The authors also urge caution in interpreting their estimates for the long-term impacts.

I am presenting it but that does not mean I believe it. I think there are a lot of variables to consider and the methodology might be viable but the period of time 1998 – 2012 probably is too short to draw high confidence conclusions and indeed the confidence intervals shown are quite large. It is a good starting point however so I was happy to come across it. Services cover a lot of ground so I am not sure how to relate to that category. One can imagine easily that very hot summer temperatures are not good for real estate and property and casualty insurance. I am somewhat biased having grown up in Atlantic City N.J. and we prayed for it to be stinking hot in Philly. But times have changed. We know that heat can be a godsend for crops or their worse enemy. The impact of heat on crops and wildfires It is very anti-correlated correlated with precipitation. In June we were too wet and too cool. But that is one month in one year. So it may be that when you look over the period in question you get the above results. I have not had a chance to review the methodology (I assume it is some form of regression analysis) and there may or may not be sufficient information in the article to do that. So again I present it as it is a reputable source and thus it needs to be considered.

Present Drought Conditions

The U.S. Drought Monitor is a comprehensive way of understanding the drought situation for the U.S. It is issued every Thursday and reflects the conditions as of the prior Tuesday. Drought is defined as a moisture deficit bad enough to have social, environmental or economic effects. Thus, more factors than recent precipitation are considered and more information on how it is done is found at the end of this report.

https://droughtmonitor.unl.edu/data/png/20190709/20190709_usdm.png

U.S. Affiliated Pacific Islands and the U.S. Virgin Islands.

https://droughtmonitor.unl.edu/data/png/20190709/20190709_usdm_pg2.png

The Western Pacific is an area that is in drought probably due to the El Nino. This part of the world generally requires two inches of rain per week to avoid drought. You can see that about 8N is the dividing line between Moderate to no Drought and Severe to Exceptional Drought.

Below is the map for just CONUS.

https://droughtmonitor.unl.edu/data/png/20190709/20190709_conus_trd.png
On an overall basis, the area impacted by drought and abnormally dry conditions increased from 9.96% to 10.83% which is insignificant. The number of people impacted by drought increased from 10,636,217 to 10,773,797 which is insignificant. There continues to be no more D4 or D3 but D2 has increased slightly from 0.59% to 0.63% which is insignificant. D1 decreased from 2.63% to 2.60% which is an insignificant change and very low. And D0, which is not drought but abnormally dry, increased from 6.74% to 7.60% which is insignificant and remember that D0 is not included when estimating the number of people impacted. For now, we remain in very good shape.
But we expect some changes. You can see some areas in the South which are likely to be getting more precipitation than they want and will show reduced drought. The Northwest is still at risk and the timing of the Monsoon may impact the week to week appearance of these maps until and if the Monsoon really gets underway. It has not been discussed by NOAA as far as I know but we may have an Eastward Displaced Monsoon if the Bermuda High is not as far West as we would expect. This may be a transient situation for July.
Last Week This Week

https://droughtmonitor.unl.edu/data/png/20190702/20190702_conus_trd.png

https://droughtmonitor.unl.edu/data/png/20190709/20190709_conus_trd.png

Some might find this animation of twelve weeks of change useful;

Animation of six weeks of change

The graphic below shows the one-week change in drought intensity. Yellow is bad. Green is good.

https://droughtmonitor.unl.edu/data/chng/png/20190709/20190709_conus_chng_PW.png

There was not a lot of change. It will be easier to see individual states in the regional maps which follow and for those interested in a particular state, those maps can be accessed here.

Here is the Discussion that was issued with the Drought Report.

A broken, highly-variable rainfall pattern predominated across the Country. Most areas where conditions are often dry during the summer followed this pattern, with little or no precipitation falling across the Far West and the northern Intermountain West. Other areas receiving subnormal precipitation – generally only a few tenths of an inch – included north-central North Dakota, most of northeastern Minnesota, part of the Upper Peninsula of Michigan and adjacent Wisconsin, central and southern Texas, and many areas across Louisiana and Mississippi. Farther east, rainfall was highly variable across the Southeast from Alabama through the Carolinas. Most of this area recorded at least a few tenths of an inch of rain, and roughly half received at least an inch. The heaviest amounts (2 to locally 6 inches) were concentrated along the Georgia/Florida border and the coastal Carolinas while totals on the low side were somewhat more common in south-central and northeastern Alabama, northwestern and east-central Georgia, upstate South Carolina, and a stripe across interior western North Carolina.

Northeast

Somewhat below-normal precipitation was observed across interior southern New England and a few other nearby areas for roughly the past 2 months, but an extended period of surplus precipitation preceded this, and no dryness or drought was discerned in the region.

Southeast

Not surprisingly, the highly variable rainfall pattern led to deterioration in some areas and improvement in others, amounting to regional adjustments (as opposed to broad-scale changes) in the areas identified in dryness and drought. Moderate to severe drought expanded westward in southern Alabama, and moderate drought coverage also increased in central Alabama. Meanwhile, abnormal dryness was expanded in northeast Alabama and adjacent sections of Georgia and Tennessee, and through much of the central Carolinas. D0 and D1 coverage was reduced in parts of the eastern Carolinas, southern and eastern Georgia, and northern Florida. The analysis was primarily based on rainfall deficits in the 60- to 120-day time frame.

South

Similar to the Southeast Region, a variable rainfall pattern led essentially to regional adjustments. Dryness and drought in upper South Texas improved, but conditions persisted or worsened slightly off to the south and west. Patchy abnormal dryness was again assessed farther north in Texas, with some adjustments from the previous week resulting in approximately the same amount of coverage. Abnormal dryness was contracted from part of interior western Tennessee, but expanded farther east in southeastern Tennessee and adjacent parts of Georgia and Alabama.

Midwest

Up to 2 inches of rain in much of northwestern Minnesota ended abnormal dryness there, but D0 persisted along the rest of the state’s northern tier. To the east, abnormal dryness was introduced in much of the central and western Michigan Upper Peninsula and north-central Wisconsin, where most areas received 40 to 70 percent of normal rainfall during the past month and mild deficits date back 60 and 75 days. Some short-term rainfall deficits have begun to show up farther south, particularly in several areas from Iowa through northern Indiana, but given long-term precipitation surpluses, no D0 introduction seemed warranted at this time.

High Plains

Little or no rain fell on north-central North Dakota, and moderate to heavy amounts (isolated totals of 1.5 to 2.0 inches) were generally restricted to the fringes of the abnormally dry region. Conditions remained essentially unchanged, though there was some limited southwestern expansion of moderate drought. Subnormal short-term rainfall has been observed in a few areas across central and western Kansas and eastern portions of Nebraska, but D0 introduction was not yet warranted.

West

Light precipitation dampened western Montana, and little or none was observed farther west. As a result, conditions remained unchanged or deteriorated. Abnormal dryness expanded into parts of west-central and southwestern Montana, and adjacent portions of eastern Idaho. Abnormal dryness was also extended southward in eastern Washington, and brought into more of central and southern Oregon, particularly near the southwest coast. The continued slow drying trend also prompted some southeastward D1 expansion in central and northern Oregon, plus a small northward push of extreme drought in northwestern Washington.

Alaska, Hawaii, and Puerto Rico

Exceptionally hot and dry weather across interior Alaska for roughly the past month has dried out surface moisture and created ideal conditions for the rapid development and spread of wildfires. D0 was broadly expanded to cover most of the state outside the western and northern tiers, and some moderate drought was introduced in part of the Yukon Flats, with the most extreme fire danger noted in this general area. Outside the climatologically-wetter areas of southern and southeastern Alaska, 3-month precipitation totals generally range from 2 to 4 inches, though only 0.5 to 2.0 inches fell on Yukon Flats. Over 300,000 acres were scorched across Alaska during Sunday & Monday, bringing the year-to-date total to about 1.1 million acres, a total area 40 percent larger than the state of Rhode Island. Anchorage, AK reached 90 degF for the first time in recorded history in early July, and highs climbed into the upper 90’s in part of the interior. Many locations had to cancel Fourth-of-July fireworks, including many sites in and around Anchorage. Farther southeast, fire danger is low in the temperature rainforests of the southeast Alaska Panhandle, but a protracted stretch of subnormal precipitation – dating back multiple years at many locations– has led to problems generating hydroelectric power plus growing water supply concerns in some areas, including some in and near the cities of Juneau, Wrangell, and Haines. Ketchikan, in the southern Panhandle, has accumulated a precipitation deficit of over 50 inches through the past three years.

In Puerto Rico, 0.5 to 2.0 inches fell on central parts of the Commonwealth while only a few tenths of an inch were measured near the southwestern coastline and in north-central areas. This led to an increase in severe drought coverage from central to southwestern Puerto Rico, where 60-day rainfall totaled about half of normal at best. Farther north, some northward expansion of D1 occurred in central Puerto Rico, and abnormal dryness was introduced in north-central parts of the Island.

A few inches of rain improved dry conditions on parts of the central and eastern Big Island, but increasing reports of poor pastureland and dried-out vegetation and crops led to the introduction of moderate drought across northern sections of the Big Island, with drought severities remaining intact elsewhere.

Pacific Islands

A dry trade-wind regime dominated the weather pattern during this USDM week (7/03/19-7/09/19) across northern portions of Micronesia while areas of convection associated with various features of the Inter-Tropical Convergence Zone (ITCZ) brought rain to southern parts. The ITCZ features included surface troughs, weak circulations, and converging winds. Upper-level troughs and lows were also present, with TUTT (Tropical Upper-Tropospheric Trough) cells in the north, and their associated upper-level divergence enhanced showers in some areas. Precipitation from the TUTTs in the north, especially over the Marianas, was limited due to the lack of deep layer moisture. South of the equator, a high pressure ridge generated strong trade winds across American Samoa and kept a surface trough, with its heavier convection, to the north and west of the islands during most of the week.

Satellite-based estimates of 7-day precipitation (QPE) showed a large area of 2+ inches of rain across southeastern portions of the Federated States of Micronesia (FSM), and some 2+ inch areas just west of Palau and Yap State, just east of the Republic of the Marshall Islands (RMI), and north of 10 degrees North latitude, with less than an inch of precipitation indicated between these areas. The northern rain areas were associated with upper-level troughs and lows, while the southern areas were caused by ITCZ convection. The southeastern FSM rain area extended south of the equator, southeastward toward the Samoan Islands. The QPE maps showed a sharp gradient of precipitation in the Samoan area, with 4+ inches over the western Samoan Islands to less than half an inch east and south of American Samoa.

After a wet week, dry conditions returned to Palau, receiving only 0.97 inch of rain this week. Since this is less than the weekly minimum of 2 inches, abnormally dry (D0-S) conditions continued to affect Palau this week.

Dry conditions were present this week in the Marianas, with two of the three stations analyzed receiving less than half their weekly minimum of 1 inch. The station with the least rain was Saipan, receiving only 0.23 inch of rain. Guam followed with a rainfall total of 0.28 inch. Rota had the most rainfall at 0.95 inch of rain for the week. All three stations continued to be in extreme drought (D3-S).

Six (Chuuk, Pohnpei, Kosrae, Nukuoro, Lukunoch, and Pingelap) of 11 stations analyzed had precipitation totals that equaled or surpassed the 2 inch minimum threshold to meet most water needs. The station with the most precipitation was Nukuoro at 4.46 inches of rain for the week. Chuuk, Pohnpei, Kosrae, Nukuoro, Lukunoch, and Pingelap continued to be drought free (D-Nothing) this week.

However, Yap, Fananu, Kapingamarangi, and Woleai had a dry week. The station with the least precipitation was Fananu (0.15 inch; with 1 day of missing data). Although Fananu had 8 inches of rain for the month of June, the last two weeks have been extremely dry, with less than half of an inch of rain for the two weeks combined. For this reason moderate drought (D1-S) persists once again this week. This week Yap’s precipitation total of 1.88 inches was only 0.12 inch shy of reaching its 2 inches weekly minimum, helping maintain its drought classification of abnormally dry (D0-S). Kapingamarangi and Woleai remained drought free (D-Nothing) since this week marks the first or second consecutive week of dry conditions for these locations.

No data was available for Ulithi and thus was set to missing.

All of the stations analyzed in the Marshall Islands had little rain during the week, with Wotje reporting no rain. Jaluit and Ailinglapalap were the other two stations with the least precipitation totals at 0.20 inch and 0.30 inch, respectively. Jaluit’s drought classification of moderate drought (D1-S) continued this week as dry conditions affected the area since April 2019. Since this was Ailinglapalap and Mili’s first or second consecutive dry week and the month of June surpassed the 8-inches threshold to meet most water needs, drought free (D-Nothing) conditions persisted for both locations.

Kwajalein had a total of 0.85 inch of rain for the week, which is 1.15 inches of rain less than the weekly minimum of 2 inches. As dry conditions continued, Kwajalein remained in moderate drought (D1-S). The last two weeks have been very dry in Majuro, with precipitation totals less than 1 inch of rain and reservoir levels dropping. As of July 3, reservoir levels were at 77% of the maximum capacity of 36 million gallons and below the critical 80% threshold. Abnormally dry (D0-S) drought classification was unchanged this week.

Exceptional drought (D4-SL) continued to affect Wotje and Utirik since dry conditions have persisted since the end of 2018.

Pago Pago had its third consecutive dry week, with precipitation totals less than 1 inch and the month of June had less than 8 inches required to meet most water needs. For this reason, abnormal dryness (D0-S) was introduced to Pago Pago.

Virgin Islands

During this drought week, only 0.06 inch and 0.08 inch of rain fell at Cyril E. King Airport and Henry Rohlsen Airport, respectively. These values are also the month-to-date (July 1-9) values, which is 9.4 of normal for St. Thomas and 14.3% of normal for St. Croix. Meanwhile, the year-to-date precipitation totals were 63.4% of normal for St. Thomas and 56.3% for St. Croix. The SPI values for the 6-month period ranges between -1.0 to -1.5 for both stations, which is consistent with severe drought conditions (D2-S). The 9 and 12-month SPI were also -1.0 to -1.5 for St. Thomas, while it was -1.5 to -2.0 for St. Croix, which is consistent with severe to extreme drought. Given the low precipitation totals and the SPI values drought classification for both stations were downgraded to severe drought (D2-S). After a wet June (159.1% of normal), the month of July had a dry start at St. John. For this drought week ending on July 9, 2019, St. John received only 0.24 inch of rain and only 0.25 inch for the month-to-date, according to data provided by a volunteer observer. St. John remained in abnormally dry (D0-S) conditions.

Looking Ahead

During the next 5 days (July 11 – 15, 2019) a developing tropical system in the Gulf of Mexico is forecast to spread heavy rain from the lower Mississippi Valley eastward through northern and western Georgia, where totals exceeding 1.5 inch should be widespread. Between 7 and 15 inches of rain are forecast for the southeastern half of Louisiana, and 3 to 7 inches are anticipated through most of the rest of Louisiana, the southern half of Mississippi, and the southwestern quarter of Alabama. In other areas of drought, the precipitation pattern isn’t expected to bring any dramatic relief. Moderate rains of 0.5 to 1.0 inch are expected in central and eastern Tennessee, central and eastern Georgia, parts of the Carolinas, the most orographically-favored areas in northwestern Washington, and northwestern Minnesota. Only a few tenths of an inch at best are forecast in other areas of dryness and drought across the contiguous states. Meanwhile, abnormally high temperatures [daytime highs averaging 3 degF to 7 degF above normal] are expected in the central High Plains and the Intermountain West, and cooler than normal conditions – at least partially in association with heavy rains from the developing tropical system – should occur from the southeastern Great Plains eastward through the lower half of the Mississippi Valley into much of Alabama and Tennessee.

The CPC 6-10 day outlook (July 16-20, 2019) favors wetter-than-normal weather in the Mississippi Valley, upper Southeast, the northern Plains, the Northwest, and the eastern two-thirds of Alaska. Odds favor less rain than normal in central and western Texas, the immediate Southeast coastline, and northern Florida. Enhanced chances for above-normal temperatures cover Alaska and most of the Nation from the Rockies eastward. Only in the Northwest do odds slightly favor below-normal temperatures.

Now we show the week to week change information by region. The yellow is where the drought has been upgraded. The green is where the level of drought has been downgraded.

Not much change.

Impovement in Minnesota, Deterioration in Wisconsin
No Change
Mixed but no major changes
Mixed. In general, it was wetter along the coast and drier inland.

This was the only region where the pattern was clear: namely deterioration in the Northwest.

Some may find this way of looking at things useful and I hope these graphics are not too small to read. I did not make them so you could click on them individually but you can click on the whole graphic and it may enlarge. But I think you get the picture. It has been a rapid onset and demise. When you read these graphics, remember that the older graphics are not the drought conditions that existed then but the change from then until now.

changes in drought categories

The biggest changes are the improvement from 6 months ago and 12 months ago. Now you can see slight changes week to week and compared to a month ago. Remember when reading this graphic, the 1-year graphic shows the change from then until today. So for some, that may be a bit of an unusual way of looking at things.

Floods remain a concern.

Flood and high water July 12, 2019

Last Week Current Week

Flooding and High Water July 4, 2019

Flood and high water July 12, 2019

The purple triangles are the worst situations. The daily updated map can be obtained here. The situation is slowly improving. But after Barry, it may get much worse but the area impacted may not be that large. We will see.

Let’s see if this animation works.

Flood Animation

DC Flooding.

Active Major Fires

Large Fires July 12, 2019

It is mostly about Alaska.

Soil Conditions and Crop Reports

Last week

Departure from Normal Degree Days July 4, 2019

This Week

Side by Side

Departure from Normal Degree Days July 4, 2019
I see some but not a lot of improvement.

July 11, 2019

Summarizing the above in the below table.
CropCrop ProgressCrop Condition
CornSlow (Silking)Bad
SoybeansSlow (Emerged and Blooming)Bad
Winter WheatVery Slow (Harvested)Great
Spring WheatVery Slow (Headed)OK
CottonSlow (Squaring and Setting Bolls)Good
SorghumSlightly Slow (Headed and Coloring)Very Good)
RiceSlow (Headed)Slightly Bad
OatsVery Slow (Headed)Bad
BarleyVery Slow (Headed)OK
PeanutsSlightly Good (Pegging)OK
What we have tried to do is consider that last year many crops were negatively impacted by drought and this year crops were negatively impacted by cold and flooding. So we saw the possibility that some crops might be getting a slow start but be positively impacted by having more water. So we have rated the rate of development separately from the crop condition. This is not a week to week comparison but a comparison to last year but the five-year average and just last year with respect to condition. The actual numbers in most cases appear in the National Agriculture Summery above or in the more detailed tables from the USDA Weekly Crop Bulletin which can be accessed here.
One thing to keep in mind is that some research suggests that in the corn belt, hot and dry and cool and moist are more common than hot and moist and cool and dry. But hot and dry and cool and moist tend to be patterns with substantial persistence meaning that if they occur in one month their chances of repeating in the following month are fairly good. Cool and moist might not be helpful right now and hot and dry would be ok if it did not last too long. I am sure the computers are running the models to calculate what the various players in the agriculture sector should do.

International

International Crop Report July 12, 2019

A map helps and is not always available and fortunately, it was available this week.

July 12, 2019

 

Major Sources of Information

In the box are shown the major resources we use. We will not be using them all each week but the reader is welcome to refer to these resources. .

Major Sources of Information Used in this Weekly Report

  • The U.S. Drought Monitor (the full report can be accessed here)
  • Selected graphics from our Weekly Weather and Climate Report are repeated in this report. These provide forecasts for the next 25 days and they auto-update. The full Monday Report, which provides a lot more detail, can be accessed by referencing the Directory here
  • Selections from the Tuesday USD Weather and Crop Bulletin (the full report can be accessed here). Selections from the USDA Office of the Chief Economist can be found here. Other useful sources of information that I regularly utilize are the National Integrated Drought Information System (NIDIS) which can be accessed here and the USDA NRCS Weekly and Weather Climate Update which can be accessed here.

Background Information

Drought severity classification

The sequence of drought occurrence and impacts for commonly accepted drought types. All droughts originate from a deficiency of precipitation or meteorological drought but other types of drought and impacts cascade from this deficiency. (Source: NDMC)

Source: National Drought Mitigation Center, University of Nebraska-Lincoln

Previous Post

Quick Take On Employment

Next Post

Infographic Of The Day: American Giants – Here’s How These 8 Companies Stack Up Against The World

Related Posts

Scammers Steal $300K Using Fake Blur Airdrop Websites
Uncategorized

FBI Warns Investors Of Crypto-Stealing Play-to-Earn Games

by admin
Maersk Almost Completing Russia Exit After The Sale Of Logistics Sites
Uncategorized

Maersk Almost Completing Russia Exit After The Sale Of Logistics Sites

by admin
Why Is ‘Staking’ At The Center Of Crypto’s Latest Regulation Scuffle
Uncategorized

Why Is ‘Staking’ At The Center Of Crypto’s Latest Regulation Scuffle

by admin
Mexico's Pemex Dismantled Resources Worth $342M From Two Top Fields
Uncategorized

Mexico’s Pemex Dismantled Resources Worth $342M From Two Top Fields

by admin
Oil Giant Schlumberger Rebrands Itself As SLB For Low-Carbon Future
Uncategorized

Oil Giant Schlumberger Rebrands Itself As SLB For Low-Carbon Future

by admin
Next Post

Democratic Governors Are Quicker In Responding To The Coronavirus Than Republicans

답글 남기기 응답 취소

이메일 주소는 공개되지 않습니다. 필수 필드는 *로 표시됩니다

Browse by Category

  • Business
  • Econ Intersect News
  • Economics
  • Finance
  • Politics
  • Uncategorized

Browse by Tags

adoption altcoins bank banking banks Binance Bitcoin Bitcoin market blockchain BTC BTC price business China crypto crypto adoption cryptocurrency crypto exchange crypto market crypto regulation decentralized finance DeFi Elon Musk ETH Ethereum Europe Federal Reserve finance FTX inflation investment market analysis Metaverse NFT nonfungible tokens oil market price analysis recession regulation Russia stock market technology Tesla the UK the US Twitter

Categories

  • Business
  • Econ Intersect News
  • Economics
  • Finance
  • Politics
  • Uncategorized

© Copyright 2024 EconIntersect

No Result
View All Result
  • 토토사이트
    • 카지노사이트
    • 도박사이트
    • 룰렛 사이트
    • 라이브카지노
    • 바카라사이트
    • 안전카지노
  • 경제
  • 파이낸스
  • 정치
  • 투자

© Copyright 2024 EconIntersect