econintersect.com
  • 토토사이트
    • 카지노사이트
    • 도박사이트
    • 룰렛 사이트
    • 라이브카지노
    • 바카라사이트
    • 안전카지노
  • 경제
  • 파이낸스
  • 정치
  • 투자
No Result
View All Result
  • 토토사이트
    • 카지노사이트
    • 도박사이트
    • 룰렛 사이트
    • 라이브카지노
    • 바카라사이트
    • 안전카지노
  • 경제
  • 파이낸스
  • 정치
  • 투자
No Result
View All Result
econintersect.com
No Result
View All Result
Home Uncategorized

Updated Outlook For May, 2019 – Mostly Wet, Center Of CONUS Cool

admin by admin
9월 6, 2021
in Uncategorized
0
0
SHARES
0
VIEWS

Written by Sig Silber

At the end of every month, NOAA issues an update to their Early Outlook for the following month which was issued on the Third Thursday of the Month. Usually, the changes are minor and that is the case this month which is a bit surprising given the End-of-Month Forecast Update is twelve days from the Early Outlook and the MJO forecast is now more intense. Nevertheless, the forecast has not changed very much. The forecast may not be the best news for the agriculture sector and we will discuss that on Thursday. There are also flooding concerns particularly for the Lower Mississippi River Valley.

April 30, 2019

 


Please share this article – Go to the very top of the page, right-hand side for social media buttons.


Although the general theme is mostly wet with warm coasts and a cool center of CONUS, it is important for readers to look at the maps for the month and the maps that we have in the article for the first five days, Days 6 – 10, Days 8 – 14 and Week 3 – 4 as the pattern is expected to change somewhat during the month. Other than the full-month map, the other maps will auto-update so this article will remain useful throughout the month.

Some housekeeping: On April 19, 2019 we published Part I of our analysis of the NOAA and JAMSTEC Three- to Four- Season Outlook and that can be accessed here. In that report, the May Early Outlook was issued. This article presents the NOAA update of their Early Outlook for May. Remember, if you leave this page to go to links or if you have clicked to enlarge a graphic, in order to get back you need to hit the return arrow usually located on the left of your URL box on the upper left of the screen. Also, most of the small graphics are designed to become full size when you click on them. If that does not work, an alternative way to view the larger graphics is to right click and then hit “view image”. That should usually work.

Now let us address the NOAA Update of the May, 2019 Forecast.

A note about terminology; the deviations from climatology/normal are color coded but also labeled “A” for more than (above) normal and “B” for less than (below) normal. The area designated EC means Equal Chances of being more or less than normal. In the Short Term forecasts, NOAA has switched from using EC to N for Normal. For most purposes, EC and N can be considered to mean about the same thing. “N” implies a bit more certainty that the variation from Normal/Climatology will be small compared to “EC”.

First, we will compare the NOAA Early Outlook for May, 2019 with the newly issued update.

Early Outlook Temperature

May 2019 Early Temperature Report Issued on April 18, 2019

Updated Temperature Outlook

May, 2019 Temperature Report Updated on April; 30, 2019

Same theme but a shift north of the cool anomaly. The West Coast warm anomaly is extended further south.

Early Outlook Precipitation

May 2019 Early Precipitation Outlook Issued on April 18, 2019

Updated Precipitation

Updated May Pecipitation Issued on April 30, 2019

Same theme with a slight western shift and significant expansion of the coverage of the wet anomaly.
Here we compare the prior forecast to the new forecast as above but in a more compact format. Later, we show almost the entire month broken into four parts.
 April 18, 2019 Forecast for MayApril 30, 2019 Forecast for May
Temperature

May 2019 Early Temperature Report Issued on April 18, 2019

May, 2019 Temperature Report Updated on April; 30, 2019

Precipitation

May 2019 Early Precipitation Outlook Issued on April 18, 2019

Updated May Pecipitation Issued on April 30, 2019

Here is the discussion released today:

30-DAY OUTLOOK DISCUSSION FOR MAY 2019

The May 2019 outlook is updated at the end of the month considering the latest forecast guidance for the month of May, including dynamical model forecasts for May average temperature and accumulated precipitation from the NCEP Climate Forecast System (CFS) and Global Ensemble Forecast System (GEFS), as well as shorter range forecasts for week 1 and 2 from the NCEP GEFS, ECMWF, and Canadian (ECCC) models, and guidance for weeks 3 and 4 from the CFS, ECMWF and JMA models as well as the Subseasonal Experiment (SubX), a suite of experimental and operational models, including the GEFS and ECCC models. The background climate state is similar to that during the release of the prior May outlook issued mid-April. El Nino conditions continue across the equatorial Pacific, and are forecast to persist, likely into boreal summer. Equatorial convection is enhanced near and just west of the International Date Line, and upper-level anticyclonic circulations are observed to the north and south of the equator. An MJO event developed recently, with enhanced convection progressing eastward from the Indian Ocean to the Maritime Continent in the last week. Dynamical models predict the progression of enhanced convection across the Western Pacific in the next couple of weeks, where it may alter the current El Nino influenced background state.

The temperature outlook indicates a larger area of enhanced probabilities of below normal than the previous May outlook for much of the central CONUS east of the Rockies. The area of likely below normal extends eastward to the western Great Lakes, across the northern tier, and from the southern Rockies to western Texas in the south. Enhanced probabilities of above normal temperatures continue in the outlook for much of the eastern CONUS, while likely below normal temperatures for the Northeast early in the month lead to reduced probabilities for May above average temperatures for the region. Dynamical model forecasts for increased probabilities of below normal temperatures over the central CONUS and above normal temperatures over the Southeast in week 2 appear to be influenced by an active MJO over the Western Pacific. Above normal temperatures continue to be most likely for Alaska and the northwest CONUS, under predicted ridging, with the highest probabilities over western and southern coastal areas of Alaska, where above average sea surface temperatures persist. Decadal trends and dynamical model forecasts indicate a slightly enhanced probability of above normal temperatures extending into parts of the Southwest, west of the Four Corners region.

The precipitation outlook indicates substantially enhanced probabilities of above normal from northeastern Texas into eastern Oklahoma and Kansas, as well as the states of Arkansas and Missouri, where heavy precipitation is predicted in dynamical model forecasts for the first week of May, and above normal precipitation is likely throughout the month. The precipitation outlook for above normal precipitation over much of the central CONUS and along the Gulf Coast for May appears consistent with the current El Nino base state as modified by MJO activity over the western Pacific. Dynamical model forecasts predict enhanced probabilities of above normal precipitation for May from parts of Central and Southern California eastward into the Central Rockies, and across the Central and Southern Plains to the Mississippi Valley ahead of troughing near the southwestern CONUS. The outlook indicates slightly enhanced probabilities of above normal precipitation extending eastward to the Appalachians and Florida, where dynamical model forecasts indicate below normal precipitation in the first couple days of May and during the second half of the month, but precipitation in model forecasts for week 2 increase the chances of above normal for total monthly accumulated precipitation. The outlook indicates equal chances of above and below normal precipitation for the Atlantic Coast from Georgia to Maine. Dynamical model forecasts for May from the CFS and GEFS continue to indicate enhanced probabilities of below normal precipitation for the southern Alaska Panhandle and for much of the Pacific Northwest, under a predicted mid-level ridge, while above normal precipitation is likely for much of western Alaska, ahead of a predicted trough over the Aleutians.

Visual Consistency Testing.

It is useful to see how the month forecast fits with the set of shorter forecasts that we have. These will continue to update in this article.

First Temperature

Day 3 Max Temperature6 - 10 Day Forecast Temperature8 - 14 Day Temperature3 - 4 Week Temperature
The new monthly forecast is to the right. Does it appear to be reflective of the four parts of the month for which we have forecasts? →

May, 2019 Temperature Report Updated on April; 30, 2019

↑

← The Week 3 – 4 forecast will be updated on May 3 so we may need to update the commentary when the update is issued but the new Week 3 – 4 forecast was probably considered by NOAA in preparing the forecast even though it has not yet been released to the public.

And Precipitation

Five day QPF6 - 10 Day Forecast Precipitation8 - 14 Day Precipitation3 - 4 Week Precipitation

The new monthly forecast is to the right. Does it appear to be reflective of the four parts of the month for which we have forecasts? →

fUpdated May Pecipitation Issued on April 30, 2019

↑

←The Week 3 – 4 forecast will be updated on May 3 so we may need to update the commentary when the update is issued but the new Week 3 – 4 forecast was probably considered by NOAA in preparing the forecast even though it has not yet been released to the public.

Both the Temperature and Precipitation Monthly forecasts are consistent with the concatonation of the shorter-term forecasts but we do not have such a forecast for the last week of May at the time this article was published.

Sometimes it is useful to compare the three-month outlook to the forecast for the first of the three months. It shows how much the pattern changes over the three-month period.

May plus May June July ssued on April 30, 2019

One can mentally subtract the First-Month Outlook from the Three-month Outlook and create the Outlook for the last two months in the three-month period.

For both temperature and precipitation if you assume the colors in the maps are assigned correctly, it is a simple algebra equation to solve the month two/three forecast probability for a given location = (3XThree-Month Probability – Month One Probability)/2*. So you can derive the month two/three forecast this way. You can do that calculation easily for where you live or for the entire map.
It would appear that June and July 2019 will not need to be a lot different than the three-month temperature maps to make the three-month forecast work. It is important to remember that here we are comparing a one month forecast issued today with a three-month forecast issued on April 18 twelve days ago.
*The concept is that the probabilities of a deviation from climatology in the First Month and the combined Month Two and Three forecast that one derives must average out to the probabilities shown in the three-month maps.

And with respect to drought, this was also issued on April 30, 2019.

New May 2019 Drought Outlook Issued on April 30, 2019

This map shows the updated May part of what has been previously forecast for the three-month period. The only two areas of concern for May are Washington State and the area on both sides of the Georgia/South Carolina border.

Looking back on April to relate the forecast for May to the actuals in April.

First Temperature

https://hprcc.unl.edu/products/maps/acis/MonthPDataUS.png

The cold snap in the Northern Tier is evident and is forecast to carry over into May.

And then Precipitation

https://hprcc.unl.edu/products/maps/acis/MonthTNormUS.png

The precipitation pattern was slightly different in April (29 of 30 days shown) but pretty similar.

Summary

The purpose of this article was to present the updated Outlook for May, 2019 and compare it with the Early Outlook. It is not to critique the updated Outlook for May based on our opinions. We have assessed the extent to which the monthly outlook seems to fit with the other forecasts provided by NOAA. We do not have a May forecast by JAMSTEC as they only provide three-month forecasts. In reality, all forecasts are obsolete when issued as the situation changes day by day or six hours by six hours i.e. each new model run. In our other articles including the Weather Economic Impact article which will be published Thursday May 2, 2019), we continually examine the current forecasts from NOAA including the Day 1- 5, 6-10, 8-14 and Week 3 and 4. So we are continually looking at approximately 25 days into the future.

On May 9, 2019, IRI/CBC will issue their ENSO forecast and we will present that and critique it. It is an ongoing process and we attempt to provide our readers with the best current assessment of the next approximately 25 days (except when we cover the Four-Season Analysis or medium-frequency cycles such as ENSO), so our analysis is pretty much ongoing. We also publish a Live Severe Weather Article which updates in real time to reflect NOAA Weather Headlines. All of our reports includng past versions of these reports can be located via the Directory/Archive which can be accessed here.

.

Previous Post

The Next Financial Crisis Won’t Be Caused By Fraud: This Time Will Be Different

Next Post

Inflation And Income Growth Implications On Fed Rate Cut

Related Posts

Scammers Steal $300K Using Fake Blur Airdrop Websites
Uncategorized

FBI Warns Investors Of Crypto-Stealing Play-to-Earn Games

by admin
Maersk Almost Completing Russia Exit After The Sale Of Logistics Sites
Uncategorized

Maersk Almost Completing Russia Exit After The Sale Of Logistics Sites

by admin
Why Is ‘Staking’ At The Center Of Crypto’s Latest Regulation Scuffle
Uncategorized

Why Is ‘Staking’ At The Center Of Crypto’s Latest Regulation Scuffle

by admin
Mexico's Pemex Dismantled Resources Worth $342M From Two Top Fields
Uncategorized

Mexico’s Pemex Dismantled Resources Worth $342M From Two Top Fields

by admin
Oil Giant Schlumberger Rebrands Itself As SLB For Low-Carbon Future
Uncategorized

Oil Giant Schlumberger Rebrands Itself As SLB For Low-Carbon Future

by admin
Next Post

Democratic Governors Are Quicker In Responding To The Coronavirus Than Republicans

답글 남기기 응답 취소

이메일 주소는 공개되지 않습니다. 필수 필드는 *로 표시됩니다

Browse by Category

  • Business
  • Econ Intersect News
  • Economics
  • Finance
  • Politics
  • Uncategorized

Browse by Tags

adoption altcoins bank banking banks Binance Bitcoin Bitcoin market blockchain BTC BTC price business China crypto crypto adoption cryptocurrency crypto exchange crypto market crypto regulation decentralized finance DeFi Elon Musk ETH Ethereum Europe Federal Reserve finance FTX inflation investment market analysis Metaverse NFT nonfungible tokens oil market price analysis recession regulation Russia stock market technology Tesla the UK the US Twitter

Categories

  • Business
  • Econ Intersect News
  • Economics
  • Finance
  • Politics
  • Uncategorized

© Copyright 2024 EconIntersect

No Result
View All Result
  • 토토사이트
    • 카지노사이트
    • 도박사이트
    • 룰렛 사이트
    • 라이브카지노
    • 바카라사이트
    • 안전카지노
  • 경제
  • 파이낸스
  • 정치
  • 투자

© Copyright 2024 EconIntersect