econintersect.com
  • 토토사이트
    • 카지노사이트
    • 도박사이트
    • 룰렛 사이트
    • 라이브카지노
    • 바카라사이트
    • 안전카지노
  • 경제
  • 파이낸스
  • 정치
  • 투자
No Result
View All Result
  • 토토사이트
    • 카지노사이트
    • 도박사이트
    • 룰렛 사이트
    • 라이브카지노
    • 바카라사이트
    • 안전카지노
  • 경제
  • 파이낸스
  • 정치
  • 투자
No Result
View All Result
econintersect.com
No Result
View All Result
Home Uncategorized

Updated Outlook For March, 2019 – Cold And Wet Early In Month

admin by admin
9월 6, 2021
in Uncategorized
0
0
SHARES
0
VIEWS

Written by Sig Silber

Updated at 4:30 p.m. March 1, 2019 to incorporate the new Week 3 – 4 forecast which makes the Visual Consistency Testing more robust.

At the end of every month, NOAA issues an update to their Early Outlook for the following month which was issued on the Third Thursday of the Month. Usually the changes are minor but not so much this month even though it is only a week later. The changes are not unexpected but significant. We wil publish our usual “Weather Impacts on Economic Activity” Report tomorrow.

A coin toss?


Please share this article – Go to very top of page, right hand side for social media buttons.


Although the general theme is a cooler and wetter, it is important for readers to look at the maps for the month and the maps that we have in the article for first five days, Days 6 – 10, Days 8 – 14 and Week 3 – 4 as the pattern is expect to change during the month. Other than the full -month map, the other maps will auto-update so this article will remain useful throughout the month.

Some housekeeping: On February 23, 2019 we published our analysis of the NOAA and JAMSTEC Three- to Four- Season Outlook and that can be accessed here. In that report, the March Early Outlook was issued. This article presents the NOAA update of their Early Outlook for March. Remember, if you leave this page to go to links or if you have clicked to enlarge a graphic, in order to get back you need to hit the return arrow usually located on the left of your URL box on the upper left of the screen. Also most of the small graphics are designed to become full size when you click on them. If that does not work, an alternative way to view the larger graphics is to right click and then hit “view image”. That should usually work.

Now let us address the NOAA Update of the March, 2019 Forecast.

A note about terminology; the deviations from climatology/normal are color coded but also labeled “A” for more than (above) normal and “B” for less than (below) normal. The area designated EC means Equal Chances of being more or less than normal. In the Short Term forecasts, NOAA has switched from using EC to N for Normal. I believe this was a recommendation of a Focus Group. I find those new graphics harder to read especially if printed in black and white. For most purposes, EC and N can be considered to mean about the same thing. “N” implies a bit more certainty that the variation from Normal/Climatology will be small compared to “EC”.

First we will compare the NOAA Early Outlook for March, 2019 with the newly issued update.

Early Outlook Temperature

March 2019 Temperature Report Update Issued on February 28, 2019

Updated Temperature Outlook

March, 2019 Temperature Report Updated on February 28, 2019

This is a pretty big change for 7 days.

Early Outlook Precipitation

https://econintersect.com/images/2019/02/95721480March2019EarlyOutlookPrecipitationForecast.gif

Updated Precipitation

Updated March Pecipitation Issued on February 28, 2019

This is a substantial change. Of most interest is the newly added West Coast wet anomaly.
Here we compare the prior forecast to the new forecast as above but in a more compact format. Later, we show almost the entire month broken into four parts. The Week 3 – 4 maps which were are available at the time we published were available on March 1 and we updated the article at that time. I would suggest that people focus on those four pieces rather than the full-month forecast which is useful for some planning purposes but the four pieces are more useful for most practical purposes such as planning trips and agricultural activities.
 February 21, 2019 Forecast for MarchFebruary 28, 2019 Forecast for March
Temperature

March 2019 Temperature Report Update Issued on February 28, 2019

March, 2019 Temperature Report Updated on February 28, 2019

Precipitation

https://econintersect.com/images/2019/02/95721480March2019EarlyOutlookPrecipitationForecast.gif

Updated March Pecipitation Issued on February 28, 2019

Here is the discussion released today:

30-DAY OUTLOOK DISCUSSION FOR MARCH 2019

THE CLIMATIC BACKGROUND STATE STILL FEATURES AN ON GOING EL NINO. THE MADDEN-JULIAN OSCILLATION IS LIKELY TO BE ACTIVE OVER THE INDIAN OCEAN DURING THE FIRST WEEK TO 10 DAYS, WHICH WOULD FAVOR A SWITCH TOWARD WARMER IN THE NORTHEAST LATER IN THE MONTH. THE POTENTIAL FOR A MID-MONTH PATTERN CHANGE IS INDICATED IN SOME MODELS, SO UNCERTAINTY IS HIGHER IN AREAS WHERE THE PATTERN CHANGE WOULD HAVE THE GREATEST IMPACTS.

FOR THE TEMPERATURE OUTLOOK, THE AXIS OF THE COLDEST AIR FORECAST EARLY MONTH IS PREDICTED TO BE SLIGHTLY FURTHER WEST THAN IN THE MID-MONTH OUTLOOK. THE HIGHEST PROBABILITIES FOR BELOW NORMAL TEMPERATURES NOW STRETCH FROM THE NORTHERN ROCKIES TO THE NORTHERN PLAINS AND SOUTHWARD TO THE CENTRAL PLAINS WHERE EARLY MONTH AND WEEK3/4 OUTLOOKS ALL TILT COLD. MODEL GUIDANCE HAS CHANGED TO A COLDER PATTERN OVER THE NORTHEAST DURING THE FIRST 10 DAYS OF THE MONTH, SO THE UPDATED OUTLOOK REFLECTS THAT CHANGE. LATER MONTH GUIDANCE HAS SOME MODERATION INDICATED FOR TEMPERATURES IN THOSE REGIONS, SO PROBABILITIES REMAIN LOW TO REFLECT THE UNCERTAINTY. ABOVE NORMAL TEMPERATURES ARE FAVORED FOR MOST OF ALASKA, ESPECIALLY THE WEST COAST WHERE ICE COVERAGE OVER THE NEAR-SHORE WATERS IS LOWER THAN NORMAL.

EARLY IN THE MONTH, AN ACTIVE PATTERN IS FORECAST FROM CENTRAL CALIFORNIA EAST TO THE THE GREAT BASIN AND CENTRAL ROCKIES. IF THE CURRENT 7-DAY QPF OUTLOOKS VERIFY, MANY AREAS ACROSS THE WEST WILL RECEIVE ENOUGH PRECIPITATION IN THE FIRST 7 DAYS OF THE MONTH TO COMPLETELY ELIMINATE POSSIBILITIES FOR BELOW NORMAL PRECIPITATION. THE CFS DEPICTS A PATTERN FLIP TO A DRYER PATTERN ACROSS THE WEST DURING THE LATTER HALF OF MARCH. A STRONG SIGNAL FOR ABOVE NORMAL PRECIPITATION REMAINS FROM THE SOUTHEAST TO THE MID-ALTANTIC AND SOUTHERN PORTIONS OF THE NORTHEAST, IMPLYING THE MEAN BAROCLINIC ZONE AND ACTIVE STORM TRACK IS SOUTH OF THE COLD AIR FOR AT LEAST THE FIRST 10 DAYS OF THE MONTH. WESTERN ALASKA SHOULD START OFF THE MONTH WET, WHILE THE ALASKA PANHANDLE IS LIKELY TO BE RELATIVELY DRY, WITH A MID-MONTH FLIP TOWARD A WETTER THAN NORMAL PATTERN INDICATED IN THE CFS AND JMA FOR WEEK3/4. THE FORECAST MORE HEAVILY REFLECTS THE EARLY MONTH GUIDANCE, BUT PROBABILITIES FOR BELOW NORMAL PRECIPITATION OVER THE ALASKA PANHANDLE REMAIN MODEST.

I have added the Week 3.4 Discussion released on March 1, 2019

Week 3-4 Forecast Discussion Valid Sat Mar 16 2019-Fri Mar 29 2019

EL Nino conditions currently are present across the equatorial Pacific Ocean. Equatorial sea surface temperatures (SSTs) are above average across most of the Pacific Ocean. The RMM MJO index indicates that the MJO propagated eastward across the Western Hemisphere and Africa into the Western Indian Ocean during the last two to three weeks. The GEFS forecast of the RMM index depicts the MJO signal to continue a fast eastward propagation during Week-1, but weakens over the Indian Ocean during Week-2 due to continued interactions with equatorial Rossby waves and interactions with the El Nino state. The Week 3-4 temperature and precipitation outlooks rely primarily on dynamical model forecasts from the NCEP CFS, the ECMWF, and the JMA operational ensemble prediction systems, as well as forecasts from the Subseasonal Experiment (SubX), a multi-model ensemble (MME) of experimental ensemble prediction systems. Consideration is also given to the possible evolution of the predicted circulation pattern for Week-2.

Dynamical model guidance from the various models is broadly consistent, depicting a trough over the Bering Sea into the North Pacific, and a ridge over mainland Alaska. Dynamical model ensembles from the CFS and ECMWF depict near or below normal 500-hPa height anomalies over western Alaska, the Aleutians, parts of the Southeast, the Lower Mississippi Valley, and the Southern Plains, while above normal 500-hPa height anomalies are forecast over eastern Alaska. the Alaska Panhandle, the northwestern CONUS, and the Northeast. The CFS, ECMWF, and JMA indicate near to above normal 500-hPa heights over Hawaii.

Positive 500-hPa height anomalies increase chances of above normal temperatures over western Washington, western Oregon, and the Northeast. Below normal temperatures are favored for the central CONUS, while above normal temperatures are forecast for the Florida Panhandle, consistent with the CFS, ECMWF and SubX forecasts. The dynamical models forecast above normal temperatures across the Alaska Peninsula, mainland Alaska, and the Alaska Panhandle.

The Week 3-4 precipitation outlook indicates increased probabilities of above median precipitation for parts of the Southern Plains and the Southeast, while below median precipitation is forecast over southern California, and parts of the Southwest and the Southern Rockies, consistent with the CFS, ECMWF and SubX forecasts. Below median precipitation is more likely for parts of the Northern Plains, the Upper and Middle Mississippi Valley, the Ohio Valley, and the Great Lakes area, supported by most of the dynamical model forecasts. Anomalous ridging leads to enhanced probabilities of below normal precipitation for western portions of mainland Alaska. Conversely, above normal precipitation is favored for the Alaska Panhandle and the Aleutians underneath moist southerly flow ahead of the trough forecast over the Bering Sea.

Sea surface temperature anomalies are currently weakly negative around Hawaii, and the bulk of dynamical model guidance, including the experimental SubX models, depict enhanced chances for above normal temperatures over the southeastern islands and below normal temperature over the northwestern islands. Dynamical model precipitation forecasts strongly favor below normal precipitation which is consistent with weak El Nino conditions.

Visual Consistency Testing.

It is useful to see how the month forecast fits with the set of shorter forecasts that we have. These will continue to update in this article.

First Temperature

Day 3 Max Temperature6 - 10 Day Forecast Temperature8 - 14 Day Temperature3 - 4 Week Temperature
The new monthly forecast is to the right. Does it appear to be reflective of the four parts of the month for which we have forecasts? →

March, 2019 Temperature Report Updated on February 28, 2019

↑

← The Week 3 – 4 forecast was  updated on March 1.

The March forecast looks good re the four parts we have which covers almost all of March.

And Precipitation

Five day QPF6 - 10 Day Forecast Precipitation8 - 14 Day Precipitation3 - 4 Week Precipitation

The new monthly forecast is to the right. Does it appear to be reflective of the four parts of the month for which we have forecasts? →

fUpdated March Pecipitation Issued on February 28, 2019

↑

←The Week 3 – 4 forecast was updated on March 1.

It now appears that the full month forecast perhaps should show Texas a bit wetter.

 

 

Sometimes it is useful to compare the three-month outlook to the forecast for the first of the three months. It shows how much the pattern changes over the three-month period.

 

March Plus March, April and May ssued on February 21, 2019

One can mentally subtract the First-Month Outlook from the Three-month Outlook and create the Outlook for the last two months in the three-month period.

For both temperature and precipitation if you assume the colors in the maps are assigned correctly, it is a simple algebra equation to solve the month two/three forecast probability for a given location = (3XThree-Month Probability – Month One Probability)/2*. So you can derive the month two/three forecast this way. You can do that calculation easily for where you live or for the entire map.
It would appear that April and May 2019 will need to be a lot different than the three-month temperature maps to make the three-month forecast work. It is important to remember that here we are comparing a one month forecast issued today with a three month forecast issued on February 21, a week ago. The March forecasts have changed dramatically since their “Early Outlook” so we have to ask the question whether or not the three-month forecast shown would be as shown if issued today. I think not. Thus it is hard to draw conclusions relative to how to think about April and May by comparing the updated March with the prior three-month forecast. But the discussion released today indicates the revised March forecast is mostly about the early part of the month so this reduces to some extent the concern.
*The concept is that the probabilities of a deviation from climatology in the First Month and the combined Month Two and Three forecast that one derives must average out to the probabilities shown in the three-month maps.

And with respect to drought, this was issued on February 28, 2019.

New March 2019 Drought Outlook Issued on Februaryi 28, 2019

This map shows the updated March part of what has been forecast for the three-month period. Texas is in trouble.

Looking back on February to relate the forecast for March to the actuals in February..

First Temperature

The cold snap in the Northern Tier is evident and is forecast to carry over and expand into at least the first half of March.

And then Precipitation

It was wetter in the Northern Tier. The forecast is to move that pattern a bit to the south due to the cold intrusion.

Summary

The purpose of this article was to present the updated Outlook for March, 2019 and compare it with the Early Outlook. It is not to critique the updated Outlook for March based on our opinions. We have assessed the extent to which the monthly outlook seems to fit with the other forecasts provided by NOAA. We do not have a March forecast by JAMSTEC as they only provide three-month forecasts. We do have forecasts for March from other meteorological agencies but the objective in this article was simply to present the new forecast. In reality these forecasts are obsolete when issued as the situation changes day by day or six hours by six hours i.e. each new model run. In our other articles including the Weather Economic Impact article which will be published tomorrow March 1, 2019), we continually examine the current forecasts from NOAA including the Day 1 – 5, 6 – 10, 8 – 14 and Week 3 and 4. So we are continually looking at approximately 25 days into the future.

On March 14, 2019, IRI/CBC will issue their ENSO forecast and on March 15 or 16 we will present that and critique it. It is an ongoing process and we attempt to provide our readers with the best current assessment of the next approximately 25 days (except when we cover the Four-Season Analysis or medium-frequency cycles such as ENSO), so our analysis is pretty much ongoing. We also publish a Live Severe Weather Article which updates in real time to reflect NOAA Weather Headlines. All of our reports including past versions of these reports can be located via the Directory/Archive which can be accessed here.

Previous Post

Technical Thoughts: Finding Trading Ideas

Next Post

Early Headlines: Asia Stocks Mixed, Dollar, Oil, And Gold All Up, Cohen, Trump At Odds, Climate Denier Panel, US Loses Solar Jobs, EU Winners And Losers, India Pakistan Dispute, N. Korea Stays Nuclear, China Mfg Contracts, And More

Related Posts

Scammers Steal $300K Using Fake Blur Airdrop Websites
Uncategorized

FBI Warns Investors Of Crypto-Stealing Play-to-Earn Games

by admin
Maersk Almost Completing Russia Exit After The Sale Of Logistics Sites
Uncategorized

Maersk Almost Completing Russia Exit After The Sale Of Logistics Sites

by admin
Why Is ‘Staking’ At The Center Of Crypto’s Latest Regulation Scuffle
Uncategorized

Why Is ‘Staking’ At The Center Of Crypto’s Latest Regulation Scuffle

by admin
Mexico's Pemex Dismantled Resources Worth $342M From Two Top Fields
Uncategorized

Mexico’s Pemex Dismantled Resources Worth $342M From Two Top Fields

by admin
Oil Giant Schlumberger Rebrands Itself As SLB For Low-Carbon Future
Uncategorized

Oil Giant Schlumberger Rebrands Itself As SLB For Low-Carbon Future

by admin
Next Post

Democratic Governors Are Quicker In Responding To The Coronavirus Than Republicans

답글 남기기 응답 취소

이메일 주소는 공개되지 않습니다. 필수 필드는 *로 표시됩니다

Browse by Category

  • Business
  • Econ Intersect News
  • Economics
  • Finance
  • Politics
  • Uncategorized

Browse by Tags

adoption altcoins bank banking banks Binance Bitcoin Bitcoin market blockchain BTC BTC price business China crypto crypto adoption cryptocurrency crypto exchange crypto market crypto regulation decentralized finance DeFi Elon Musk ETH Ethereum Europe Federal Reserve finance FTX inflation investment market analysis Metaverse NFT nonfungible tokens oil market price analysis recession regulation Russia stock market technology Tesla the UK the US Twitter

Categories

  • Business
  • Econ Intersect News
  • Economics
  • Finance
  • Politics
  • Uncategorized

© Copyright 2024 EconIntersect

No Result
View All Result
  • 토토사이트
    • 카지노사이트
    • 도박사이트
    • 룰렛 사이트
    • 라이브카지노
    • 바카라사이트
    • 안전카지노
  • 경제
  • 파이낸스
  • 정치
  • 투자

© Copyright 2024 EconIntersect