Written by Sig Silber
The takeaway for me from the forecast of a moderately positive PNA is that the Pacific Troughs originating in the Gulf of Alaska are more likely to go inland and impact the Northwest than drop down off the coast of the U.S., become wetter and enter Southern California. One complication to the forecast is the possibility of a Negative AO also which would tend to reduce the warm anomaly in the Northwest. All in all, the next couple of weeks are likely to feel like Late Fall rather than Winter (even though December 1 begins meteorological winter) except for Alaska which will gets its first taste of true Winter. Week- 2 (defined as Days 8 -14) is likely to be a bit wetter than Week – 1 (defined as Days 6 – 10).

Please share this article – Go to very top of page, right hand side for social media buttons.
In our Monday night Weekly Weather and Climate Report, we mostly cover Days 6 – 14 and Weeks 3 – 4 which depending on when you read this article covers to about Day 25. We cover Days 1- 5 also but in most cases readers will want to consult their local NWS Office for more detailed information that impacts them in the short term. However, we now publishing a Report that continually updates and provides easy access to products from the NOAA Storm Prediction Center and other parts of NOAA. This will make it easy to see if there are special situations that need to be considered by those living in the areas covered or planning to travel there. It is not intended to replace reliance on the local NWS Offices but is an easy way to find out if and where that is needed.
Here is the recent history of the overall pattern for North America and the North Pacific.



Looking at the current activity of the Jet Stream. The below graphics and the above graphics are very related.
This and this provides more information on the PNA but I have to warn you that there is not total agreement on this subject. What might be reasonable to conclude is that when the Jet Stream is strong the PNA+ pattern is frequent and this often means less of a tendency to have a split Jet stream with North and South sub-streams over CONUS. So that looks like what we might have in the forecast for the next couple of weeks. We are currently seeing stormy weather in the Southeast and PNA Positive may be contributing to that
Summary of the Forecast
We now provide our usual summary first for temperature and then for precipitation of small images of the four short-term maps. You can click on these maps to see larger versions. The easiest way to return to this report is by using the “Back Arrow” usually found top left corner of your screen to the left of the URL Box. Larger maps are available later in the article with the discussion and analysis.
Sometimes it is useful to see the evolution of the forecasts from the 1 – 5 Day, 6 – 10 Day (which NOAA considers to be Week-1 of their intermediate forecast) , 8 – 14 Day (which NOAA considers to be Week-2) and Week 3 and 4 (which after being issued overlap with Week-2). I do not have comparable maps for the Day 1 – 5 forecast in the same format as the three maps we generally work with. What I am showing for temperature is the Day 3 Maximum Temperature and for precipitation the five-day precipitation: the latter being fairly similar in format to the subsequent set of the maps I present each week but showing absolute QPF (inches of precipitation) not QPF deviation from Normal.
First Temperature
And then Precipitation
A. Now we will begin with our regular approach and focus on Alaska and CONUS (all U.S.. except Hawaii).
Water Vapor.
This view of the past 24 hours provides a lot of insight as to what is happening.

You can see from this animation that there has been moisture entering the Northwest and Canada from the Pacific and also impacting CONUS further south as the Jet Stream has been split. .

Tonight, Monday December 10, 2018, as I am looking at the above graphic, you see the same pattern.
This graphic is about Atmospheric Rivers i.e. thick concentrated movements of water moisture. More explanation on Atmospheric Rivers can be found by clicking here or if you want more theoretical information by clicking here. The idea is that we have now concluded that moisture often moves via narrow but deep channels in the atmosphere (especially when the source of the moisture is over water) rather than being very spread out. This raises the potential for extreme precipitation events. You can convert this graphic into a flexible forecasting tool by clicking here. One can obtain views of different geographical areas by clicking here.

And Now the Day One and Two CONUS Forecasts
Day One CONUS Forecast | Day Two CONUS Forecast |
These graphics update and can be clicked on to enlarge but my brief comments are only applicable to what I see on Monday night prior to publishing. | |
| You see very definitive snow areas around mostly in the Northwest. But it is not very much really. | |
Additional useful forecasts from the Storm Prediction Center and be found here. Storm events are covered by Met Watch which can be accessed here. Explanation of symbols can be found here.
60 Hour Forecast Animation
Here is a national animation of weather fronts and precipitation forecasts with four 6-hour projections of the conditions that will apply covering the next 24 hours and a second day of two 12-hour projections the second of which is the forecast for 48 hours out and to the extent it applies for 12 hours, this animation is intended to provide coverage out to 60 hours. Beyond 60 hours, additional maps are available at links provided below. The explanation for the coding used in these maps, i.e. the full legend, can be found here although it includes some symbols that are no longer shown in the graphic because they are implemented by color coding.

The below makes it easier to focus on a particular day. The best way to read them is from left to right on the first row and then from left to right in the row below it.
include(“/home4/aleta/public_html/pages/weather/modules/Weather_Map_by_Day_Matrix.htm”); ?>
What is Behind the Forecasts? Let us try to understand what NOAA is looking at when they issue these forecasts.
Below is a graphic which highlights the forecast surface Highs and the Lows re air pressure on Day 7. The Day 3 forecast can be found here. the Day 6 Forecast can be found here.

The Aleutian Low is quite strong with surface central pressure of 976 hPa and is centered in the Gulf of Alaska. The Hawaiian High is shown tonight weak with surface central pressure of 1020 hPa. We see a High over the Central Rockies with surface central pressure of 1024 hPa. Further east there is a Mid-Atlantic Low (now offshore and shifted for Day 7 to the North) with central surface pressure of 1008 hPa. In the Arctic there is a rather easterly displaced High with surface central pressure of 1020 hPa. It is not a very complex situation but there are always complications.
include(“/home4/aleta/public_html/pages/weather/modules/Air_Pressure_Map_by_Day_Matrix.htm”); ?>
Looking at the current activity of the Jet Stream. The below graphics and the above graphics are very related.
Not all weather is controlled by the Jet Stream (which is a high altitude phenomenon) but it does play a major role in steering storm systems especially in the winter The sub-Jet Stream level intensity winds shown by the vectors in this graphic are also very important in understanding the impacts north and south of the Jet Stream which is the higher-speed part of the wind circulation and is shown in gray on this map. In some cases however a Low-Pressure System becomes separated or “cut off” from the Jet Stream. In that case it’s movements may be more difficult to predict until that disturbance is again recaptured by the Jet Stream. This usually is more significant for the lower half of CONUS with the cutoff lows being further south than the Jet Stream. Some basic information on how to interpret the impact of jet streams on weather can be found here and here. I have not provided the ability to click to get larger images as I believe the smaller images shown are easy to read.
| Current | Day 5 |
![]() | ![]() |
| You can see the current pattern here. | It does not look that much different on Day 5. But it is clearly zonal i.e. west to east movement with very little meridional movement. |
Putting the Jet Stream into Motion and Looking Forward a Few Days Also
To see how the pattern is projected to evolve, please click here. In addition to the shaded areas which show an interpretation of the Jet Stream, one can also see the wind vectors (arrows) at the 300 Mb level.
This longer animation shows how the jet stream is crossing the Pacific and when it reaches the U.S. West Coast is going every which way.
Click here to gain access to a very flexible computer graphic. You can adjust what is being displayed by clicking on “earth” adjusting the parameters and then clicking again on “earth” to remove the menu. Right now it is set up to show the 500 hPa wind patterns which is the main way of looking at synoptic weather patterns. This amazing graphic covers North and South America. It could be included in the Worldwide weather forecast section of this report but it is useful here re understanding the wind circulation patterns.
500 MB Mid-Atmosphere View
The map below is the mid-atmosphere 7-Day chart rather than the surface highs and lows and weather features. In some cases it provides a clearer less confusing picture as it shows only the major pressure gradients. This graphic auto-updates so when you look at it you will see NOAA’s latest thinking. The speed at which these troughs and ridges travel across the nation will determine the timing of weather impacts. This graphic auto-updates I think every six hours and it changes a lot. Thinking about clockwise movements around High Pressure Systems and counter- clockwise movements around Low Pressure Systems provides a lot of information.

Here is the whole suite of similar maps for Days 3, 4, 5, 6 and repeated for Day 7. It is quite complicated. Read from left to right first row and then left to right on the second row.
include(“/home4/aleta/public_html/pages/weather/modules/500_Millibar_by_Day_Matrix.htm”); ?>
We are showing both the situation on the surface and at mid-atmosphere 500 mb and the view is different so sometimes it is useful to simply be able to compare them.
| Surface 850MB | Mid Atmosphere 500 MB |
|
|
Here is the seven-day cumulative precipitation forecast. More information in how to interpret this graphic is available here.

Four – Week Outlook: Looking Beyond Days 1 to 5, What is the Forecast for the Following Three + Weeks?
I use “EC” in my discussions although NOAA sometimes uses “EC” (Equal Chances) and sometimes uses “N” (Normal) to pretty much indicate the same thing although “N” may be more definitive.
First – Temperature
6 – 10 Day Temperature Outlook issued today (Note the NOAA Level of Confidence in the Forecast Released on December 10, 2018 was 4 out of 5

8 – 14 Day Temperature Outlook issued today (Note the NOAA Level of Confidence in the Forecast Released on December 10, 2018 was 3 out of 5).
–
Looking further out.

Now – Precipitation
6 – 10 Day Precipitation Outlook Issued Today (Note the NOAA Level of Confidence in the Forecast Released on December 10, 2018 was 4 out of 5)

8 – 14 Day Precipitation Outlook Issued Today (Note the NOAA Level of Confidence in the Forecast Released on December 10, 2018 was 3 out of 5)

Looking further out.

Here is the 6 – 14 Day NOAA discussion released today December 10, 2018
6-10 DAY OUTLOOK FOR DEC 16 – 20 2018
TODAY’S ENSEMBLE MODELS ARE IN GOOD AGREEMENT ON THE PREDICTED 500-HPA CIRCULATION PATTERN OVER NORTH AMERICA FOR THE 6-10 DAY PERIOD. AN AMPLIFIED TROUGH IS ANTICIPATED OVER WESTERN MAINLAND ALASKA EXTENDING SOUTHEASTWARD OFF THE COAST OF NORTHWESTERN NORTH AMERICA. RIDGING IS FORECAST DOWNSTREAM OF THIS TROUGH OVER MUCH OF THE INTERIOR WESTERN CONUS EXTENDING TO THE NORTHERN PLAINS. TODAY’S MANUAL 500-HPA HEIGHT BLEND IS BASED PRIMARILY ON THE ENSEMBLE MEAN SOLUTIONS WITH THE GREATEST WEIGHT GIVEN TO TODAY’S GEFS AND ECMWF ENSEMBLE MEAN SOLUTIONS. BELOW NORMAL HEIGHTS ARE EXPECTED ACROSS ALASKA AND THE PACIFIC NORTHWEST COAST. ABOVE NORMAL HEIGHTS ARE GENERALLY FORECAST ACROSS MUCH OF THE CONUS. NEAR NORMAL HEIGHTS ARE FORECAST ACROSS THE SOUTHEASTERN CONUS.
BELOW NORMAL TEMPERATURES ARE FAVORED FOR MAINLAND ALASKA AND THE ALEUTIANS IN ASSOCIATION WITH THE TROUGH PREDICTED IN THE VICINITY. THERE ARE ENHANCED PROBABILITIES OF ABOVE NORMAL TEMPERATURES AHEAD OF THIS TROUGH FOR THE ALASKA PANHANDLE EXTENDING SOUTH TO PARTS OF THE PACIFIC NORTHWEST. ABOVE NORMAL TEMPERATURES ARE FAVORED FARTHER TO THE EAST ACROSS MUCH OF THE CONUS UNDERNEATH ABOVE NORMAL HEIGHTS AND PACIFIC FLOW. NEAR NORMAL TEMPERATURES ARE FAVORED FOR MUCH OF THE FLORIDA PENINSULA, CONSISTENT WITH DYNAMICAL FORECAST TOOLS.
ABOVE NORMAL PRECIPITATION IS LIKELY FOR THE PACIFIC NORTHWEST AHEAD OF A MEAN TROUGH PREDICTED OFFSHORE OF NORTHWESTERN NORTH AMERICA. NEAR TO BELOW NORMAL PRECIPITATION IS FAVORED FOR PARTS OF THE SOUTHWEST AND MUCH OF THE GREAT PLAINS DUE TO RIDGING AND ABOVE NORMAL HEIGHTS. THE POTENTIAL FOR SOUTHERN STREAM ENERGY LEADS TO SLIGHTLY ENHANCED PROBABILITIES OF ABOVE NORMAL PRECIPITATION FOR PARTS OF THE SOUTHERN PLAINS, NORTHEASTWARD ACROSS PARTS OF THE OHIO VALLEY AND THE MID-ATLANTIC IN ASSOCIATION WITH MEAN CYCLONIC FLOW.
BELOW NORMAL PRECIPITATION IS LIKELY FOR PARTS OF SOUTHEAST, CONSISTENT WITH CONSOLIDATION FORECAST TOOLS. ABOVE NORMAL PRECIPITATION IS ALSO FAVORED ACROSS EASTERN ALASKA AND THE ALEUTIANS, ASSOCIATED WITH A TROUGH PREDICTED OVER WESTERN PARTS OF THE STATE. BELOW NORMAL PRECIPITATION IS FAVORED FOR PARTS OF WESTERN CENTRAL MAINLAND ALASKA DUE TO PREDICTED MEAN LOW-LEVEL OFFSHORE FLOW.
FORECAST CONFIDENCE FOR THE 6-10 DAY PERIOD: ABOVE AVERAGE, 4 OUT OF 5, DUE TO GOOD AGREEMENT AMONG MODEL SOLUTIONS AND ASSOCIATED SURFACE TOOLS
8-14 DAY OUTLOOK FOR DEC 18 – 24 2018
TODAY’S MODEL ENSEMBLE MEANS ARE IN GOOD AGREEMENT ON THE PREDICTED 500-HPA CIRCULATION PATTERN DURING THE 8-14 DAY PERIOD. AN TROUGH IS FORECAST TO DEAMPLIFY ACROSS THE WESTERN BERING SEA. DOWNSTREAM RIDGING IS FORECAST TO DEVELOP OVER CALIFORNIA. A LOW AMPLITUDE TROUGH IS GENERALLY FORECAST FARTHER TO THE EAST OVER THE EASTERN AND CENTRAL CONUS. THE MANUAL 500-HPA HEIGHT BLEND, BASED PRIMARILY ON THE ENSEMBLE MEANS FROM THE GEFS AND ECMWF, FEATURES BELOW NORMAL HEIGHTS FOR ALASKA AND THE PACIFIC NORTHWEST COAST, AND NEAR TO ABOVE NORMAL HEIGHTS FOR A MAJORITY OF THE CONUS.
ABOVE NORMAL TEMPERATURES ARE FAVORED ACROSS MUCH OF THE CONUS UNDERNEATH PREDICTED NEAR TO ABOVE NORMAL HEIGHTS. FORECAST TROUGHING LEADS TO ENHANCED PROBABILITIES OF BELOW NORMAL TEMPERATURES FOR MUCH OF MAINLAND ALASKA AND THE ALEUTIANS. ABOVE NORMAL TEMPERATURES ARE FAVORED AHEAD OF THE TROUGH AXIS FOR THE ALASKA PANHANDLE AND PARTS OF SOUTHEASTERN MAINLAND ALASKA.
ABOVE NORMAL PRECIPITATION IS FAVORED FOR MUCH OF THE NORTHWESTERN CONUS DUE TO PERSISTENT UPSTREAM TROUGHING. DOWNSTREAM RIDGING ACROSS THE WESTERN CONUS LEADS TO ENHANCED PROBABILITIES OF BELOW NORMAL PRECIPITATION FOR MUCH OF CALIFORNIA AND PARTS OF THE CENTRAL GREAT BASIN AND THE SOUTHWEST. ABOVE NORMAL PRECIPITATION IS FAVORED FOR THE REMINDER OF THE CONUS UNDERNEATH PREDICTED CYCLONIC FLOW. ABOVE NORMAL PRECIPITATION IS FAVORED FOR MUCH OF ALASKA AHEAD OF FORECAST TROUGHING OVER THE WESTERN BERING SEA.
FORECAST CONFIDENCE FOR THE 8-14 DAY PERIOD: AVERAGE, 3 OUT OF 5, DUE TO FAIR AGREEMENT ON THE PREDICTED 500-HPA HEIGHT PATTERN, OFFSET BY DIFFERENCES AMONG THE SURFACE TOOLS ACROSS MUCH OF THE FORECAST DOMAIN.
Some Indices of Possible Interest: We should always remember that the forecast is driven by many factors some of which are conflicting in terms of their impacts. Please pay more attention to the graphics than my commentary which does not update on a regular basis once the article is published. The indices will continue to update. I provide these indices as they are important guidelines to the weather. It is in a way looking at the factors that are impacting the weather. There were developed because weather forecasters found them to be useful.


include (“/home4/aleta/public_html/pages/weather/modules/AO_NAO_PNA_MJO_Background_Information.htm”); ?>


We provided additional information in the introduction to this Article.
Madden Julian Oscillation (MJO)
The MJO is an area of convective activity along the Equator which circles the globe generally in 30 to 60 days. The location of the convective activity not only impacts the Equator but also the middle latitudes. Most people are not familiar with the MJO but at certain times it plays an important role Worldwide re weather and for CONUS.
There are a lot of models and I try to read the results from all of them. For access to a variety of models, I refer readers here. This weekly report summarizes things. Here is another useful source of information.
First we look at two models that I find very helpful. On the GFS graphic , the light gray shading shows the tracks which fit with 90% of the forecasts and the dark gray shading shows a smaller area that fits with 50% of the forecasts The large dot is the current location.

It is sometimes useful to look at the recent history of the MJO.


Here is another way of looking at this information through time with a Hovmoeller graphic.

Then the first of the two indices we typically present.
This shows the recent history. A perfect MJO Cycle!!! But faster than usual.
And then a forecast.
This tool allows one to translate the location of the forecast MJO to the impacts on CONUS. To make it easier for the reader I am displaying the highest probability interpretation for the time period in question namely November/December/January. I select this set of graphics since we are entering December, December is the center month in NDJ. This (70% match) of course might miss some other impacts which have less statistical confirmation but may none-the-less be valid.
Remember we are interested in how the MJO impacts CONUS weather during the first half of December. So that is what I have displayed. Over the net two weeks, Phases 3, 4 and 5 may be experienced.


Analogs to the NOAA 6 – 14 Day Outlook.
Now let us take a detailed look at the “Analogs”.
NOAA normally provides two sets of Analogs.
A. Analogs related to the 5 day period centered on 3 days ago and the 7 day period centered on 4 days ago. “Analog” means that the weather pattern then resembles the recent weather pattern and the recent pattern is used to initialize the models to predict the 6 – 14 day Outlook.
B. There is a second set of analogs associated with the Outlook. It compares the forecast (rather than the prior period) to past weather patterns. I have not been regularly analyzing this second set of information. The first set applies to the 5 and 7 day observed pattern prior to today. The second set, relates to the correlation of the forecasted outlook 6 – 10 days out and 8 – 14 days out with similar patterns that have occurred in the past during a longer period that includes the dates covered by the 6 – 10 Day and 8 – 14 Day Outlook. The second set of analogs also has useful information as it indicates that the forecast is feasible in the sense that something like it has happened before. I am not very impressed with that approach. But in some ways both Approach A and B are somewhat similar. I conclude that if the Ocean Condition now are different then the analogs and if the state of ENSO now is different than the analogs that is a reason to have increased lack of confidence in the forecasts and vice versa.
They put the first set of analogs in the discussion with the second set available by a link so I am assuming that the first set of analogs is the most meaningful and I find it so. But NOAA prefers the first set (A) as it helps them (or at least they think it does) assess the quality of the forecast.
Here are today’s analogs in chronological order although this information is also available with the analog dates listed by the level of correlation. I find the chronological order easier for me to work with. It also helps the reader see the impact of the phases of the PDO and AMO which are shown. The first set (A) which is what I am using today applies to the 5 and 7 day observed pattern prior to today.
| Centered Day | ENSO Phase | PDO* | AMO* | Other Comments |
| Dec 19, 1959 | Neutral | + | + | |
| Dec 20. 1959 | Neutral | + | +- | |
| Dec 11, 1960 | Neutral | + | + | |
| Dec 1, 1979 (2) | El Nino | + | – | Weak Modoki Type II |
| Dec 11, 1997 | El Nino | + | + | MegaNino |
| Dec 12, 1997 | El Nino | + | + | MegaNino |
| Dec 20, 2003 (2) | Neutral | + | + | |
| Nov 22, 2008 | La Nina | – | + | Start of weak La Nina |
* I assign values that are consistent with the trend so I am doing some subjective smoothing with respect to the Phases of the AMO and PDO shown in this table. (t) = a month where the Ocean Cycle Index has just changed from a consistent pattern or does change the following month to a consistent pattern.
The spread among the analogs from November 22 to December 20 is 28 days which is tighter than last week. I have not calculated the centroid of this distribution which would be the better way to look at things but the midpoint, which is a lot easier to calculate, and fairly accurate if the dates are reasonably evenly distributed, is about December 6. These analogs are centered on 3 days and 4 days ago (December 5 or December 6). So the analogs could be considered to be back in sync with respect to weather that we would normally be getting right now.
For more information on Analogs see discussion in the GEI Weather Page Glossary. For sure it is a rough measure as there are so many historical patterns but not enough to be a perfect match with current conditions. I use it mainly to see how our current conditions match against somewhat similar patterns and the ocean phases that prevailed during those prior patterns. If everything lines up I have my own measure of confidence in the NOAA forecast. Similar initial conditions should lead to similar weather. I am a mathematician so that is how I think about models.
Including duplicates, there are four El Nino Analogs, five Neutral analogs and one La Nina Analog. The pre-forecast analogs this week strongly favor McCabe Condition C which is “Northern Tier and Mid-Atlantic drought”. This is consistent with Week – 1 of the forecast but not Week – 2. Both the Pacific and the Atlantic seem to be in control.
include(“/home4/aleta/public_html/pages/weather/modules/McCabe_background_information.htm”); ?>
Historical Anomaly Analysis
When I see the same dates showing up often I find it interesting to consult this list.
A Useful Read
Some might find this analysis which you need to click to read interesting as the organization which prepares it focuses on the Pacific Ocean and looks at things from a very detailed perspective and their analysis provides a lot of information on the history and evolution of ENSO events.
Recent CONUS Weather
This is provided mainly to see the pattern in the weather that has occurred recently.
| And the 30 Days ending December 1, 2018 | And the 30 Days ending December 8, 2018 |
![]() | |
| The drought has eased in the Northwest. The temperature pattern has not changed very much. | Dry area has spread but less intense. Cool area now extends to Northern Rockies |
Remember, these maps are a 30 average so the most distant seven days are removed and the most recent seven days are added. | |
B. Beyond Alaska and CONUS Let’s Look at the World which of course also includes Alaska and CONUS
It is Useful to Understand the Semipermanent Pattern that Control our Weather and Consider how These Change from Winter to Summer. These two graphics (click on each one to enlarge) are from a much larger set available from the Weather Channel. They highlight the position of the Bermuda High which they are calling the Azores High in the January graphic and is often called NASH and it has a very big impact on CONUS Southeast weather and also the Southwest. You also see the north/south migration of the Pacific High which also has many names and which is extremely important for CONUS weather and it also shows the change of location of the ITCZ which I think is key to understanding the Indian Monsoon. A lot of things become much clearer when you understand these semi-permanent features some of which have cycles within the year, longer period cycles and may be impacted by Global Warming. We are now moving into Late-December and we should be returning from the set of positions shown below for July back slowly to the Winter Pattern. For CONUS, the seasonal repositioning of the Bermuda High and the Pacific High are very significant.
![]() | ![]() |
World Forecasts
1. Today (Source: University of Maine)
2. Short-term set for day six but can be adjusted (BOM – Australia)
3. 8 – 14 Day (NOAA/Canada/Mexico Experimental NAEFS))
4 Tropical Activity
1. Forecast for Today (you can click on the maps to enlarge them)

And now precipitation

there appears to be a large North Atlantic Storm.
Additional Maps showing different weather variables can be found here.
2. Forecast for Day 6 (Currently Set for Day 6 but the reader can change that)
World Weather Forecast produced by the Australian Bureau of Meteorology. Unfortunately I do not know how to extract the control panel and embed it into my report so that you could use the tool within my report. But if you visit it Click Here and you will be able to use the tool to view temperature or many other things for THE WORLD. It can forecast out for a week. Pretty cool. Return to this report by using the “Back Arrow” usually found top left corner of your screen to the left of the URL Box. It may require hitting it a few times depending on how deep you are into the BOM tool. Below are the current worldwide precipitation and temperature forecasts for six days out. They will auto-update and be current for Day 6 whenever you view them. If you want the forecast for a different day Click Here
Please remember this graphic updates every six hours so the diurnal pattern can confuse the reader.
Now Precipitation

3. And now we have experimental 8 – 14 Day World forecasts from the NAEFS Model.
First Temperature
Then Precipitation
4. Tropical Hazards.

C. ENSO SUMMARY of Current Status. Our full report was published on November 20, 1018 and can be accessed here.
Current Status of ENSO
This section is organized into three parts.
1. Current Sea Surface Temperatures (SST)
2. Current Nino 3.4 Readings
3. The Surface Air Pressure Pattern that confirms the state of ENSO.
1. Current and Recent Sea Surface Temperatures (SST)
A major driver of weather is Surface Ocean Temperatures. Evaporation only occurs from the Surface of Water. So we are very interested in the temperatures of water especially when these temperatures deviate from seasonal norms thus creating an anomaly. The geographical distribution of the anomalies is very important. To a substantial extent, the temperature anomalies along the Equator have disproportionate impact on weather so we study them intensely and that is what the ENSO (El Nino – Southern Oscillation) cycle is all about. Subsurface water can be thought of as the future surface temperatures. They may have only indirect impacts on current weather but they have major impacts on future weather by changing the temperature of the water surface. Winds and Convection (evaporation forming clouds) is weather and is a result of the Phases of ENSO and also a feedback loop that perpetuates the current Phase of ENSO or changes it. That is why we monitor winds and convection along or near the Equator especially the Equator in the Eastern Pacific.
My focus here is sea surface temperature anomalies as they are one of the two largest factors determining weather around the World. If we want to have a good feel for future weather we need to look at the oceans as our weather mostly comes from oceans and we need to look at surface temperature anomalies (weather develops from the ocean surface
It is the ocean surface that interacts with the atmosphere and causes convection and also the warming and cooling of the atmosphere. So we are interested in the actual ocean surface temperatures and the departure from seasonal normal temperatures which is called “departures” or “anomalies”. Since warm water facilitates evaporation which results in cloud convection, the pattern of SST anomalies suggests how the weather pattern east of the anomalies will be different than normal.
Current Sea Surface Temperature (SST) Departures from Normal for this Time of the Year i.e. Anomalies
Then we look at the change in the anomalies. The SST anomaly is sort of like the first derivative and the change in the anomaly is somewhat like a second derivative. It tells us if the anomaly is becoming more or less intense.

I am only showing the currently issued version of the NINO SST Index Table as the prior values are shown in the small graphics on the right with this graphic. The same data in graphic form but going back a couple of more years can be found here. The full table of values can be found here. NOAA considers Nino 3.4 shown in the graphic as the best indicator of Equatorial Surface Temperature Anomalies associated with different phases of ENSO. There is a duration requirement to be a recorded El Nino or La Nina but to have El Nino Conditions the Nino 3.4 index needs to be +0.5C or warmer and to have La Nina Conditions the Nino 3.4 Index needs to be -0.5C or cooler.

This graphic brings the Nino 3.4 up to date and is easy to read.

Here is a daily version
Starting with Surface Conditions.
TAO/TRITON GRAPHIC (a good way of viewing data related to the part of the Equator and the waters close to the Equator in the Eastern Pacific where we monitor to determining the current phase of ENSO. It is probably not necessary to follow the discussion below, but here is a link to TAO/TRITON terminology.
And here is the current version of the TAO/TRITON Graphic. The top part shows the actual temperatures, the bottom part shows the anomalies i.e. the deviation from normal.

| ———————————————— | A | B | C | D | E | —————– |
3. The Surface Air Pressure that Confirms the Nino 3.4 Index
And of course Queensland Australia is the official keeper of the SOI measurements.

SOI = 10 X [ Pdiff – Pdiffav ]/ SD(Pdiff) where Pdiff = (average Tahiti MSLP for the month) – (average Darwin MSLP for the month), Pdiffav = long term average of Pdiff for the month in question, and SD(Pdiff) = long term standard deviation of Pdiff for the month in question. So really it is comparing the extent to which Tahiti is more cloudy than Darwin, Australia. During El Nino we expect Darwin Australia to have lower air pressure and more convection than Tahiti (Negative SOI especially lower than -7 correlates with El Nino Conditions). During La Nina we expect the Warm Pool to be further east resulting in Positive SOI values greater than +7).
D. Putting it all Together.
At this time, La Nina Conditions along the Equator have come to an end and we are solidly into ENSO Neutral and possibly entering into El Nino Conditions. But the drivers of a transition to El Nino are not solidly in place. In fact this is almost unprecedented in terms of the lateness of the arrival of a potential El Nino.
E. Relevant Recent Articles and Reports
Updated ONI History

F. Useful Reference Information
Understand How the Jet Stream Impacts Weather
include(“/home4/aleta/public_html/pages/weather/modules/Jet_Streak_Four_Quadrant_Analysis.htm”); ?>
include(“/home4/aleta/public_html/pages/weather/modules/MJO_and_ENSO_Interaction_Matrix.htm”); ?>
Standard Pressure Levels
include(“/home4/aleta/public_html/pages/weather/modules/Standard_Pressure_surfaces.htm”); ?> include(“/home4/aleta/public_html/pages/weather/modules/Table_of_Contents_for_Part_II.htm”); ?>








30DayTemperatureandPrecipitationDepartures.png)












