Written by Steven Hansen
The import container counts for the Ports of Los Angeles and Long Beach rate of growth continues in record territory. Exports are still having the worst year since 2006.
Analyst Opinion of Container Movements
Import container counts continue to surge. In the last six months, import container counts have been at all-time highs.
There is chaos in container movements with containers in the wrong place, continuing COVID port shutdowns in China, and shortages of rail cars to move containers, containers stacking up in the midwest, and not being able to get back to Asia – there continues a shortage of containers and unloading berths.
Imports are having their best year ever and exports the worst year since 2009. The slowing of year-over-year growth is caused by comparisons to the improving economy one year ago.
Some pundits think that the new Panama Canal locks have affected the West Coasts’ container counts – our analysis is that there is little impact. Many do not understand that the new locks are more expensive per ton. HOWEVER, a new trend is developing is that ships are going around the Cape because of lower fuel prices.
Import container counts give an indication of the U.S. economy’s state and the data this month is suggesting strong economic growth.
Container data is consistent with other transport data.
This data set is based on the Ports of LA and Long Beach which account for much (approximately 40%) of the container movement into and out of the United States – and these two ports report their data significantly earlier than other USA ports. Most of the manufactured goods move between countries in sea containers (except larger rolling items such as automobiles). This pulse point is an early indicator of the health of the economy.
Consider that import final sales are added to GDP usually several months after import – while the import cost itself is subtracted from GDP in the month of import. Export final sales occur around the date of export. Container counts do not include bulk commodities such as oil or autos which are not shipped in containers. For this month:
Acceleration Month-over-Month | Change from Month One Year Ago | Year to Date vs. Previous Year | Acceleration 3 Month Rolling Average | 3 Month Rolling Average vs. Average One Year Ago | |
Imports | -20.9 % | +2.3 % | +42.6 % | -14.0 % | +25.3 % |
Exports | -17.6 % | -24.2 % | -7.7 % | -9.4 % | -10.0 % |
As the data is very noisy – the best way to look at this data normally is the 3-month rolling averages. There is a direct linkage between imports and USA economic activity – and the change in growth in imports foretells a real change in economic growth. Export growth is an indicator of competitiveness and global economic growth.
There is a reasonable correlation between the container counts and the US Census trade data also being analyzed by Econintersect. But trade data lags several months after the more timely container counts.
Econintersect considers import and export significant elements in determining economic health (please see caveats below). recession levels.
Containers come in many sizes so a uniform method involves expressing the volume of containers in TEU, the volume of a standard 20-foot long sea container. Thus a standard 40-foot container would be 2 TEU.
There is a good correlation between container counts and trade data (the US Census trade data is shown on the graph below). Using container counts gives a two-month advance window on trade data.
Inflation-Adjusted Year-over-Year Change Imports (blue line) and Exports (red line)
Caveats on the Use of Container Counts
These are extraordinary times with historical data confused by a massive depression and significant monetary and fiscal intervention by the government. Further containers are a relatively new technology and had a 14-year continuous growth streak from 1993 to 2006. There is not enough history to make any associations with economic growth – and we must assume a correlation exists.
Further, it is impossible from this data to understand commodity or goods breakdown (e.g. what is the contents in the containers). Any expansion or contraction cannot be analyzed to understand causation.
Imports are a particularly good tool to view the Main Street economy. Imports overreact to economic changes much like a double ETF making movements easy to see.
Contracting imports historically is a recession marker, as consumers and businesses start to hunker down. Main Street and Wall Street are not necessarily in phase and imports can reflect the direction for Main Street when Wall Street may be saying something different. During some recessions, consumers and businesses hunkered down before the Wall Street recession hit – and in the 2007 recession, the contraction began 10 months into the recession. Unfortunately, the data series which produced the graph below has been discontinued.
Econintersect determines the month-over-month change by subtracting the current month’s year-over-year change from the previous month’s year-over-year change. This is the best of the bad options available to determine month-over-month trends – as the preferred methodology would be to use multi-year data (but the New Normal effects and the Great Recession distort historical data).
include(“/home/aleta/public_html/files/ad_openx.htm”); ?>