econintersect.com
  • 토토사이트
    • 카지노사이트
    • 도박사이트
    • 룰렛 사이트
    • 라이브카지노
    • 바카라사이트
    • 안전카지노
  • 경제
  • 파이낸스
  • 정치
  • 투자
No Result
View All Result
  • 토토사이트
    • 카지노사이트
    • 도박사이트
    • 룰렛 사이트
    • 라이브카지노
    • 바카라사이트
    • 안전카지노
  • 경제
  • 파이낸스
  • 정치
  • 투자
No Result
View All Result
econintersect.com
No Result
View All Result
Home Uncategorized

July 2017 Chicago Purchasing Managers Barometer Declines

admin by admin
9월 6, 2021
in Uncategorized
0
0
SHARES
0
VIEWS

The Chicago Business Barometer declined – now 58.9 in July from 65.7 in June. This survey came in below expectations.

Analyst Opinion of Chicago PMI

The results of this survey continue to agree with district Federal Reserve manufacturing surveys – and aligns with the overall trend of the ISM manufacturing survey.

From Bloomberg / Econoday, the market expected the index between 58.0 to 65.3 (consensus 62.0) versus the actual at 58.9. A number below 50 indicates contraction. Jamie Satchi, economist at MNI Indicators stated,

MNI’s July Chicago Business Barometer should be viewed in the context of the underlying, upward trend in business sentiment witnessed since early 2016. Key indicators, despite reversing their June reading, remain above their respective averages set over the last twelve months, and point towards robust confidence among U.S firms.

From ISM Chicago:

While marking the seventeenth above-50 reading, July’s fall snapped a run of five straight monthly increases in business optimism. Each of the five Barometer components receded from last month but remained above their respective 12-month averages. This, therefore, points towards a return to trend after June’s stellar showing. The Barometer had risen 6.3 points in June, to the highest level since May 2014. July’s result means sentiment must average 62.2 in August and September for Q3 to come in flat on Q2.

The fall in sentiment was broad-based in July, though particularly concentrated across both demand and output. New orders fell by 11.6 points to 60.3, the lowest level since February, while Production fell 6.9 points to 60.8, the lowest since April. Firms also saw the level of backlogs slip in July. The Order Backlogs indicator fell 4.9 points from June’s 23-year high to 57.9 in July. Suppliers took slightly less time to deliver key inputs, with the respective indicator down to 61.5 from 62.8 in June, falling for the first time in five months.

Companies saw stock levels accumulate as the growth in demand cooled slightly. The Inventories indicator rose by 3.0 points to 54.9 in July, the highest in two months. The Employment indicator slipped for the second straight month in July, following up June’s 0.5 point drop with a further 4.0 point drop this month. This left the indicator at 52.6, the lowest since March but marginally above its 12-month average of 52.1. The indicator has performed materially better since the turn of the year having spent eight months of last year below the neutral-50 mark.

z chicago pmi.png

The Chicago ISM is important as it is a window into the national ISM reports which will be issued shortly. When you compare the graph below of the ISM Manufacturing Index against the Chicago PMI (graph above) – there is a general correlation in trends, but not necessarily correlation in values.

source and read the full report: Chicago PMI

include(“/home/aleta/public_html/files/ad_openx.htm”); ?>

Permanent link to most recent post on this topic

Previous Post

31Jul2017 Pre-Market Commentary: Wall Street To Open Higher, Analysts Not Sure If Opening Gains Will Remain Intact, WTI Crude Slipping Off Fifty Dollar High Mark, US Dollar Stages Modest Rebound Off 13-month Lows

Next Post

June 2017 Pending Home Sales Seasonally Adjusted Index Improves

Related Posts

Scammers Steal $300K Using Fake Blur Airdrop Websites
Uncategorized

FBI Warns Investors Of Crypto-Stealing Play-to-Earn Games

by admin
Maersk Almost Completing Russia Exit After The Sale Of Logistics Sites
Uncategorized

Maersk Almost Completing Russia Exit After The Sale Of Logistics Sites

by admin
Why Is ‘Staking’ At The Center Of Crypto’s Latest Regulation Scuffle
Uncategorized

Why Is ‘Staking’ At The Center Of Crypto’s Latest Regulation Scuffle

by admin
Mexico's Pemex Dismantled Resources Worth $342M From Two Top Fields
Uncategorized

Mexico’s Pemex Dismantled Resources Worth $342M From Two Top Fields

by admin
Oil Giant Schlumberger Rebrands Itself As SLB For Low-Carbon Future
Uncategorized

Oil Giant Schlumberger Rebrands Itself As SLB For Low-Carbon Future

by admin
Next Post

Happiness Is a Normal Yield Curve

답글 남기기 응답 취소

이메일 주소는 공개되지 않습니다. 필수 필드는 *로 표시됩니다

Browse by Category

  • Business
  • Econ Intersect News
  • Economics
  • Finance
  • Politics
  • Uncategorized

Browse by Tags

adoption altcoins bank banking banks Binance Bitcoin Bitcoin market blockchain BTC BTC price business China crypto crypto adoption cryptocurrency crypto exchange crypto market crypto regulation decentralized finance DeFi Elon Musk ETH Ethereum Europe Federal Reserve finance FTX inflation investment market analysis Metaverse NFT nonfungible tokens oil market price analysis recession regulation Russia stock market technology Tesla the UK the US Twitter

Categories

  • Business
  • Econ Intersect News
  • Economics
  • Finance
  • Politics
  • Uncategorized

© Copyright 2024 EconIntersect

No Result
View All Result
  • 토토사이트
    • 카지노사이트
    • 도박사이트
    • 룰렛 사이트
    • 라이브카지노
    • 바카라사이트
    • 안전카지노
  • 경제
  • 파이낸스
  • 정치
  • 투자

© Copyright 2024 EconIntersect