econintersect.com
  • 토토사이트
    • 카지노사이트
    • 도박사이트
    • 룰렛 사이트
    • 라이브카지노
    • 바카라사이트
    • 안전카지노
  • 경제
  • 파이낸스
  • 정치
  • 투자
No Result
View All Result
  • 토토사이트
    • 카지노사이트
    • 도박사이트
    • 룰렛 사이트
    • 라이브카지노
    • 바카라사이트
    • 안전카지노
  • 경제
  • 파이낸스
  • 정치
  • 투자
No Result
View All Result
econintersect.com
No Result
View All Result
Home Uncategorized

May 2017 Chicago Purchasing Managers Barometer At Lowest Level Since January

admin by admin
9월 6, 2021
in Uncategorized
0
0
SHARES
0
VIEWS

The Chicago Business Barometerdeclined but remains in expansion. This survey came in below expectations.

Analyst Opinion of Chicago PMI

The results of this survey continue to agree with district Federal Reserve manufacturing surveys – and aligns with the overall trend of the ISM manufacturing survey.

From Bloomberg / Econoday, the market expected the index between 56.0 to 60.0 (consensus 57.5) versus the actual at 55.2. A number below 50 indicates contraction. Shaily Mittal, senior economist at MNI Indicators stated,

May’s fall in the MNI Chicago Business Barometer needs to be viewed in the context of the strength seen in the past three months. With the three-month average, broadly stable, it provides a better guide this month to the underlying activity. Still, business activity over the past three months is running significantly above the levels seen during the same time last year.

From ISM Chicago:

The MNI Chicago Business Barometer decreased to 55.2 in May from 58.3 in April, the lowest level since January.

Optimism among firms about business conditions eased for the first time in four months. Three of the five Barometer components led May’s decline, with Order Backlogs and Supplier Deliveries increasing.

After rising for three consecutive months, demand lost ground in May. New orders fell by a hefty 9.6 points, to hit the lowest level since January. In line with lower orders, Production also receded, although by a softer margin. The indicator was down 3.8 points to 55.7 from 59.5 in April. Order Backlogs remained in contractionary territory for the sixth consecutive month, though did rise by 4.8 points in May. Suppliers took longer to deliver key inputs, with the respective indicator 4.3 points higher at 60.3 in May, the highest level since September 2014. There were reports of longer delivery times due to suppliers running out of products because of maintaining low inventories.

The Employment indicator remained broadly stable after leaping out of contraction territory last month. Although the indicator has expanded only eight times in last 24 months, it is showing tentative signs of a pick-up, sitting above 50 in two of the last three months. Panelists reported a rise in temporary hires and a fall in executive level positions to manage costs.

z chicago pmi.png

The Chicago ISM is important as it is a window into the national ISM reports which will be issued shortly. When you compare the graph below of the ISM Manufacturing Index against the Chicago PMI (graph above) – there is a general correlation in trends, but not necessarily correlation in values.

source and read the full report: Chicago PMI

include(“/home/aleta/public_html/files/ad_openx.htm”); ?>

Permanent link to most recent post on this topic

Previous Post

31May2017 Pre-Market Commentary: Read This Post As A Substitute For Our Missing “Early Bird”

Next Post

April 2017 Pending Home Sales Seasonally Adjusted Index Declines For the Second Month

Related Posts

Scammers Steal $300K Using Fake Blur Airdrop Websites
Uncategorized

FBI Warns Investors Of Crypto-Stealing Play-to-Earn Games

by admin
Maersk Almost Completing Russia Exit After The Sale Of Logistics Sites
Uncategorized

Maersk Almost Completing Russia Exit After The Sale Of Logistics Sites

by admin
Why Is ‘Staking’ At The Center Of Crypto’s Latest Regulation Scuffle
Uncategorized

Why Is ‘Staking’ At The Center Of Crypto’s Latest Regulation Scuffle

by admin
Mexico's Pemex Dismantled Resources Worth $342M From Two Top Fields
Uncategorized

Mexico’s Pemex Dismantled Resources Worth $342M From Two Top Fields

by admin
Oil Giant Schlumberger Rebrands Itself As SLB For Low-Carbon Future
Uncategorized

Oil Giant Schlumberger Rebrands Itself As SLB For Low-Carbon Future

by admin
Next Post

Trump’s Biggest Problem - Not the Russian Investigations

답글 남기기 응답 취소

이메일 주소는 공개되지 않습니다. 필수 필드는 *로 표시됩니다

Browse by Category

  • Business
  • Econ Intersect News
  • Economics
  • Finance
  • Politics
  • Uncategorized

Browse by Tags

adoption altcoins bank banking banks Binance Bitcoin Bitcoin market blockchain BTC BTC price business China crypto crypto adoption cryptocurrency crypto exchange crypto market crypto regulation decentralized finance DeFi Elon Musk ETH Ethereum Europe Federal Reserve finance FTX inflation investment market analysis Metaverse NFT nonfungible tokens oil market price analysis recession regulation Russia stock market technology Tesla the UK the US Twitter

Categories

  • Business
  • Econ Intersect News
  • Economics
  • Finance
  • Politics
  • Uncategorized

© Copyright 2024 EconIntersect

No Result
View All Result
  • 토토사이트
    • 카지노사이트
    • 도박사이트
    • 룰렛 사이트
    • 라이브카지노
    • 바카라사이트
    • 안전카지노
  • 경제
  • 파이낸스
  • 정치
  • 투자

© Copyright 2024 EconIntersect