econintersect.com
  • 토토사이트
    • 카지노사이트
    • 도박사이트
    • 룰렛 사이트
    • 라이브카지노
    • 바카라사이트
    • 안전카지노
  • 경제
  • 파이낸스
  • 정치
  • 투자
No Result
View All Result
  • 토토사이트
    • 카지노사이트
    • 도박사이트
    • 룰렛 사이트
    • 라이브카지노
    • 바카라사이트
    • 안전카지노
  • 경제
  • 파이낸스
  • 정치
  • 투자
No Result
View All Result
econintersect.com
No Result
View All Result
Home Uncategorized

Volatility? Really?

admin by admin
9월 6, 2021
in Uncategorized
0
0
SHARES
0
VIEWS

by Russ Allen, Online Trading Academy Instructor

Online Trading Academy Article of the Week

As I’m writing this, it is the afternoon of January 6, 2016. The stock market has been in full-blown meltdown mode for the last five trading days. The S&P 500 index has dropped by about 4% in that time. The Chinese stock market is down much more after dropping 5% yesterday alone. Crude oil has dropped over 6% in that time. This is high volatility in anybody’s book.

And yet, there was one type of volatility that was curiously muted: implied volatility in the options market.

Implied volatility is the name we give to the fear reflected in options prices. The more fear there is, the more people are willing to pay for the insurance offered by options. This fear factor for the stock market as a whole is measured by the VIX, or Volatility Index. The VIX is derived from option prices. It measures the expected rate of change that is built into the prices that people are paying for the options.

The VIX is charted below along with the S&P 500 Index, the benchmark for US stocks.

Learn what the VIX is and how it can help you in volatile markets.

From these charts we can see that VIX and the S&P generally have an inverse relationship. At the end of the day on January 6, the VIX stood at 20.59%. This was a fairly modest reading compared to the levels of 27% reached in early December on a smaller drop in the stock market and the 28% reading at the end of September on a slightly larger one.

What could this mean? This was the option market saying that it did not believe that the recent rate of change would be sustained. Options market makers were willing to sell insurance against stock price drops at rates that are only fairly modestly elevated. They would not do this if they thought there was a very high probability of a bloodbath.

Are they right? Of course there is no way to know for certain, but they have a pretty good track record.

How should we respond to this?

That depends on your outlook for the stock market. If you believe that the wheels are coming off and that the option market makers are smoking hopium, you would want to sell your stocks, if you hadn’t already. You could then take a small percentage of the cash generated and buy out-of-the-money put options on the SPY, the ETF that tracks the S&P 500, with an expiration of three months or more.

If the market then did break down severely, your puts would rocket in value. Two separate factors would drive this. As the drop in the price of SPY brought it closer to your put strike price, the puts would gain extrinsic value at an accelerating rate. Besides that effect, the drop in stock prices would cause the VIX, and all option prices, to surge. The best strategy would be to sell the puts when they reached the put strike, at which point they would have the maximum possible extrinsic value.

On the other hand, say that you believed that the option market makers were correct and the CNBC talking heads were a bunch of Chicken Littles. In that case, you could do almost the same thing, except that you would not sell your stocks. Buying those out-of-the-money puts in that case would just amount to cost-effective disaster insurance.

Either way, options could give you a way to protect yourself and/or profit from the apparent underpricing of the options.

Previous Post

Mathesis Universalis: Lawson’s Criticisms Fall Short of their Real Target

Next Post

Early Headlines: Asia Stocks Down, China In Bear Market, GE To Boston, Top 10 US Cities For Economic Growth, EU Debates China Trade And More

Related Posts

Scammers Steal $300K Using Fake Blur Airdrop Websites
Uncategorized

FBI Warns Investors Of Crypto-Stealing Play-to-Earn Games

by admin
Maersk Almost Completing Russia Exit After The Sale Of Logistics Sites
Uncategorized

Maersk Almost Completing Russia Exit After The Sale Of Logistics Sites

by admin
Why Is ‘Staking’ At The Center Of Crypto’s Latest Regulation Scuffle
Uncategorized

Why Is ‘Staking’ At The Center Of Crypto’s Latest Regulation Scuffle

by admin
Mexico's Pemex Dismantled Resources Worth $342M From Two Top Fields
Uncategorized

Mexico’s Pemex Dismantled Resources Worth $342M From Two Top Fields

by admin
Oil Giant Schlumberger Rebrands Itself As SLB For Low-Carbon Future
Uncategorized

Oil Giant Schlumberger Rebrands Itself As SLB For Low-Carbon Future

by admin
Next Post

Bye Bye Miss American Pie - Market Slide Should Lower 2016 Economic Forecasts

답글 남기기 응답 취소

이메일 주소는 공개되지 않습니다. 필수 필드는 *로 표시됩니다

Browse by Category

  • Business
  • Econ Intersect News
  • Economics
  • Finance
  • Politics
  • Uncategorized

Browse by Tags

adoption altcoins bank banking banks Binance Bitcoin Bitcoin market blockchain BTC BTC price business China crypto crypto adoption cryptocurrency crypto exchange crypto market crypto regulation decentralized finance DeFi Elon Musk ETH Ethereum Europe Federal Reserve finance FTX inflation investment market analysis Metaverse NFT nonfungible tokens oil market price analysis recession regulation Russia stock market technology Tesla the UK the US Twitter

Categories

  • Business
  • Econ Intersect News
  • Economics
  • Finance
  • Politics
  • Uncategorized

© Copyright 2024 EconIntersect

No Result
View All Result
  • 토토사이트
    • 카지노사이트
    • 도박사이트
    • 룰렛 사이트
    • 라이브카지노
    • 바카라사이트
    • 안전카지노
  • 경제
  • 파이낸스
  • 정치
  • 투자

© Copyright 2024 EconIntersect