econintersect.com
  • 토토사이트
    • 카지노사이트
    • 도박사이트
    • 룰렛 사이트
    • 라이브카지노
    • 바카라사이트
    • 안전카지노
  • 경제
  • 파이낸스
  • 정치
  • 투자
No Result
View All Result
  • 토토사이트
    • 카지노사이트
    • 도박사이트
    • 룰렛 사이트
    • 라이브카지노
    • 바카라사이트
    • 안전카지노
  • 경제
  • 파이낸스
  • 정치
  • 투자
No Result
View All Result
econintersect.com
No Result
View All Result
Home Uncategorized

Recapitalizing Fannie Mae And Freddie Mac Through Administrative Actions

admin by admin
9월 6, 2021
in Uncategorized
0
0
SHARES
0
VIEWS

from the Congressional Budget Office

Fannie Mae and Freddie Mac are government-sponsored enterprises (GSEs) that play a central role in the U.S. housing finance system. In September 2008, their regulator, the Federal Housing Finance Agency, used its authority to take over management of the GSEs’ assets and business, a concept known as conservatorship.

Since then, Fannie Mae and Freddie Mac have relied on federal support to remain financially solvent. They have also paid most of their earnings to the Treasury, which owns dominant stakes in the two GSEs.

In late 2019, the Treasury allowed the GSEs to retain more of their earnings to rebuild their capital reserves. The Treasury also recommended administrative actions aimed at returning the GSEs to private ownership – including recapitalization and an end to their conservatorships – and called for legislative action to resolve the GSEs’ status.

In this report, the Congressional Budget Office examines options for recapitalizing the GSEs by allowing them to retain all of their profits for an initial period, after which they would sell new common stock to investors to replace the Treasury’s ownership stake. Those actions would be taken administratively. The analysis looks at how the recapitalization options would affect various factors:

  • CBO’s budgetary treatment of the GSEs and its baseline budget projections;
  • Cash flows between the GSEs and the Treasury and other shareholders;
  • The possibility that the GSEs would be released from conservatorship, remain in conservatorship, or be put in receivership; and
  • Mortgage markets and other federal institutions that play a role in the housing finance system.

In some of the scenarios that CBO analyzed, the GSEs would be able to raise enough funds to meet their capital requirements, repurchase all of the outstanding preferred shares issued before their conservatorships, compensate the Treasury for its stake in the GSEs, and become privately owned firms. In other scenarios, the GSEs would not be able to raise enough to meet their capital requirements. In those cases, their regulator and the Treasury would need to explore other plans, such as putting the GSEs in receivership (which would involve liquidating their assets or transferring the assets to other entities).

Data and Supplemental Information

  • Supplemental Table

Related Publications

  • Accounting for Fannie Mae and Freddie Mac in the Federal Budget

    September 18, 2018

  • Transitioning to Alternative Structures for Housing Finance: An Update

    August 23, 2018

  • Transferring Credit Risk on Mortgages Guaranteed by Fannie Mae or Freddie Mac

    December 14, 2017

  • How CBO Determines Whether to Classify an Activity as Governmental When Estimating Its Budgetary Effects

    June 20, 2017

  • The Effects of Increasing Fannie Mae’s and Freddie Mac’s Capital

    October 20, 2016

  • Fannie Mae, Freddie Mac, and the Federal Role in the Secondary Mortgage Market

    December 22, 2010

  • Addressing the Ongoing Crisis in the Housing and Financial Markets

    January 28, 2009

Source

https://www.cbo.gov/publication/56496

Previous Post

Emerging Bond Markets And COVID-19: Evidence From Mexico

Next Post

23 August 2020 Coronavirus Charts and News – Trump Will Reportedly Announce Emergency Authorization For Coronavirus Plasma Treatment Tonight

Related Posts

Scammers Steal $300K Using Fake Blur Airdrop Websites
Uncategorized

FBI Warns Investors Of Crypto-Stealing Play-to-Earn Games

by admin
Maersk Almost Completing Russia Exit After The Sale Of Logistics Sites
Uncategorized

Maersk Almost Completing Russia Exit After The Sale Of Logistics Sites

by admin
Why Is ‘Staking’ At The Center Of Crypto’s Latest Regulation Scuffle
Uncategorized

Why Is ‘Staking’ At The Center Of Crypto’s Latest Regulation Scuffle

by admin
Mexico's Pemex Dismantled Resources Worth $342M From Two Top Fields
Uncategorized

Mexico’s Pemex Dismantled Resources Worth $342M From Two Top Fields

by admin
Oil Giant Schlumberger Rebrands Itself As SLB For Low-Carbon Future
Uncategorized

Oil Giant Schlumberger Rebrands Itself As SLB For Low-Carbon Future

by admin
Next Post
Final August 2021 Michigan Consumer Sentiment Shows A Stunning Loss Of Confidence

Final August 2021 Michigan Consumer Sentiment Shows A Stunning Loss Of Confidence

답글 남기기 응답 취소

이메일 주소는 공개되지 않습니다. 필수 필드는 *로 표시됩니다

Browse by Category

  • Business
  • Econ Intersect News
  • Economics
  • Finance
  • Politics
  • Uncategorized

Browse by Tags

adoption altcoins bank banking banks Binance Bitcoin Bitcoin market blockchain BTC BTC price business China crypto crypto adoption cryptocurrency crypto exchange crypto market crypto regulation decentralized finance DeFi Elon Musk ETH Ethereum Europe Federal Reserve finance FTX inflation investment market analysis Metaverse NFT nonfungible tokens oil market price analysis recession regulation Russia stock market technology Tesla the UK the US Twitter

Categories

  • Business
  • Econ Intersect News
  • Economics
  • Finance
  • Politics
  • Uncategorized

© Copyright 2024 EconIntersect

No Result
View All Result
  • 토토사이트
    • 카지노사이트
    • 도박사이트
    • 룰렛 사이트
    • 라이브카지노
    • 바카라사이트
    • 안전카지노
  • 경제
  • 파이낸스
  • 정치
  • 투자

© Copyright 2024 EconIntersect