econintersect.com
  • 토토사이트
    • 카지노사이트
    • 도박사이트
    • 룰렛 사이트
    • 라이브카지노
    • 바카라사이트
    • 안전카지노
  • 경제
  • 파이낸스
  • 정치
  • 투자
No Result
View All Result
  • 토토사이트
    • 카지노사이트
    • 도박사이트
    • 룰렛 사이트
    • 라이브카지노
    • 바카라사이트
    • 안전카지노
  • 경제
  • 파이낸스
  • 정치
  • 투자
No Result
View All Result
econintersect.com
No Result
View All Result
Home Uncategorized

Technological Change And The U.S.’s Trade Surplus In Services

admin by admin
9월 6, 2021
in Uncategorized
0
0
SHARES
0
VIEWS

from the St Louis Fed

— this post authored by Alexander Monge-Naranjo, Research Officer and Economist, and Qiuhan Sun, Research Associate

Since the early 1980s, the U.S. economy has exhibited deficits in its trade balance (the difference between total export and total imports) and in its current account (the trade balance plus net income and direct payments to American owned factors abroad minus foreign-owned factors in the U.S.). These imbalances have been persistent, have grown over time and have been the subject of significant media coverage, political messaging and extensive works and analyses in academic and policy research.

Interestingly, U.S. imbalances in total trade do not take place only with the emergence of newly industrialized countries. Other examples include:

  • Europe and Japan since World War II
  • South Korea and other southeastern Asian countries since the 1980s
  • China since the 2000s

An important factor behind the global expansion and redirection of trade has been the drastic reductions in the cost of trading goods across countries. The reductions in trading costs have been driven by the widespread use of containers and other transportation and communication technologies and also by the more liberal trade policies around the globe.

All in all, most countries have seen substantially reduced costs for transporting their produced goods around the world. With lower transportation and logistical costs, the deep factors that drive comparative advantage of countries (i.e. the ratio between costs and productivity) have a larger impact in the observed trade of countries.

Along with the global expansion of trade of the last 50 years, the figure below shows that the U.S. has exhibited a large deficit in the balance in the international trade of goods. This deficit has often been linked to an acceleration in the contraction of the U.S. manufacturing sector.

Line graph showing U.S. Net Trade of goods and services from 1970-2018 by goods, services, and total.

Interestingly, the pendulum may be now swinging in the opposite direction. Since the mid-1990s, information and communication technologies have been increasingly impacting international trade in services. The figure clearly shows that U.S. net trade in services has increased substantially over the last five years. In 2018, the surplus in services was $260 billion, which greatly reduced the overall deficit of the U.S., relative to the large negative balance in the trade of goods alone.

The U.S. economy remains the technological leader in many service sectors, most notably finance, insurance, education, IT, health, design, marketing, engineering, and many areas of research and development. Thus, it is only natural to expect that communication and information technology allowing services to be provided across countries more effectively would lead to the comparative advantage of the U.S. creating positive balances in its overall net trade of services.

Additional Resources

  • On the Economy: How Open Are Countries to Trade?
  • On the Economy: Historical U.S. Trade Balance and Industrialization

Source

https://www.stlouisfed.org/on-the-economy/2020/february/us-rise-trading-services

Disclaimer

Views expressed are not necessarily those of the Federal Reserve Bank of St. Louis or of the Federal Reserve System.

Previous Post

Infographic Of The Day: The Ins And Outs Of Remittance Flows

Next Post

The Future Of Oil And Fiscal Sustainability In The GCC Region

Related Posts

Scammers Steal $300K Using Fake Blur Airdrop Websites
Uncategorized

FBI Warns Investors Of Crypto-Stealing Play-to-Earn Games

by admin
Maersk Almost Completing Russia Exit After The Sale Of Logistics Sites
Uncategorized

Maersk Almost Completing Russia Exit After The Sale Of Logistics Sites

by admin
Why Is ‘Staking’ At The Center Of Crypto’s Latest Regulation Scuffle
Uncategorized

Why Is ‘Staking’ At The Center Of Crypto’s Latest Regulation Scuffle

by admin
Mexico's Pemex Dismantled Resources Worth $342M From Two Top Fields
Uncategorized

Mexico’s Pemex Dismantled Resources Worth $342M From Two Top Fields

by admin
Oil Giant Schlumberger Rebrands Itself As SLB For Low-Carbon Future
Uncategorized

Oil Giant Schlumberger Rebrands Itself As SLB For Low-Carbon Future

by admin
Next Post

Democratic Governors Are Quicker In Responding To The Coronavirus Than Republicans

답글 남기기 응답 취소

이메일 주소는 공개되지 않습니다. 필수 필드는 *로 표시됩니다

Browse by Category

  • Business
  • Econ Intersect News
  • Economics
  • Finance
  • Politics
  • Uncategorized

Browse by Tags

adoption altcoins bank banking banks Binance Bitcoin Bitcoin market blockchain BTC BTC price business China crypto crypto adoption cryptocurrency crypto exchange crypto market crypto regulation decentralized finance DeFi Elon Musk ETH Ethereum Europe Federal Reserve finance FTX inflation investment market analysis Metaverse NFT nonfungible tokens oil market price analysis recession regulation Russia stock market technology Tesla the UK the US Twitter

Categories

  • Business
  • Econ Intersect News
  • Economics
  • Finance
  • Politics
  • Uncategorized

© Copyright 2024 EconIntersect

No Result
View All Result
  • 토토사이트
    • 카지노사이트
    • 도박사이트
    • 룰렛 사이트
    • 라이브카지노
    • 바카라사이트
    • 안전카지노
  • 경제
  • 파이낸스
  • 정치
  • 투자

© Copyright 2024 EconIntersect