econintersect.com
  • 토토사이트
    • 카지노사이트
    • 도박사이트
    • 룰렛 사이트
    • 라이브카지노
    • 바카라사이트
    • 안전카지노
  • 경제
  • 파이낸스
  • 정치
  • 투자
No Result
View All Result
  • 토토사이트
    • 카지노사이트
    • 도박사이트
    • 룰렛 사이트
    • 라이브카지노
    • 바카라사이트
    • 안전카지노
  • 경제
  • 파이낸스
  • 정치
  • 투자
No Result
View All Result
econintersect.com
No Result
View All Result
Home Uncategorized

Brand-name Specialty Drugs Accounted For About 30 Percent Of Net Spending On Prescription Drugs Under Medicare Part D

admin by admin
9월 6, 2021
in Uncategorized
0
0
SHARES
0
VIEWS

from the Congressional Budget Office

In recent years, the prices charged for certain types of drugs – referred to as specialty drugs – have become a source of concern for many policymakers. Such drugs typically treat chronic, complex, or rare conditions, frequently have high prices, and may require special handling or patient monitoring.

From 2010 through 2015, specialty drugs accounted for a growing share of new drugs introduced to the market, and they were introduced at much higher prices than nonspecialty drugs. Those factors have contributed to increased spending on prescription drugs in Medicare Part D (Medicare’s prescription drug benefit) and Medicaid. Counting spending by all parties:

  • Net spending on specialty drugs in Medicare Part D rose from $8.7 billion in 2010 to $32.8 billion in 2015.
  • Net spending on specialty drugs in Medicaid roughly doubled from 2010 to 2015, rising from $4.8 billion to $9.9 billion.

Prices for and Spending on Specialty Drugs in Medicare Part D and Medicaid from Congressional Budget Office

In 2015, brand-name specialty drugs accounted for about 30 percent of net spending on prescription drugs under Medicare Part D and Medicaid, but they accounted for only about 1 percent of all prescriptions dispensed in each program. Because Medicare Part D and Medicaid are two large purchasers of prescription drugs, increases in spending for those drugs could have important implications for the federal budget.

In this report, the Congressional Budget Office examines the net prices paid for specialty drugs and spending on those drugs in Medicare Part D and Medicaid over the 2010 – 2015 period. (In each program, the net price for many drugs is lower than the amount paid to pharmacies, also referred to as the retail price, because of manufacturers’ rebates and other discounts.) Key findings include the following:

  • The net prices paid for brand-name specialty drugs are much higher in Medicare Part D than in Medicaid. In 2015, the weighted average net price for 50 top-selling brand-name specialty drugs in Medicare Part D was $3,600 per “standardized” prescription – a measure that roughly corresponds to a 30-day supply of medication – whereas the weighted average net price for the same set of drugs in Medicaid was $1,920. That difference was attributable to much larger rebates in Medicaid than in Medicare Part D.
  • Specialty drugs accounted for a growing share of total net drug spending from 2010 to 2015 in both programs, rising from 13 percent to 31 percent of such spending in Medicare Part D and from 25 percent to 35 percent in Medicaid.
  • For beneficiaries in the Medicare Part D program who took brand-name specialty drugs, average annual net spending on such drugs per person (in 2015 dollars) roughly tripled over the 2010 – 2015 period – from $11,330 in 2010 to $33,460 in 2015.

Data and Supplemental Information

  • Data Underlying Figures

Related Publications

  • Prices for and Spending on Specialty Drugs in Medicare Part D and Medicaid: An In-Depth Analysis: Working Paper 2019-02

    March 18, 2019

  • Prices for and Spending on Specialty Drugs in Medicare Part D and Medicaid

    June 7, 2018

  • Competition and the Cost of Medicare’s Prescription Drug Program

    July 30, 2014

  • Spending Patterns for Prescription Drugs Under Medicare Part D

    December 1, 2011

Source

https://www.cbo.gov/publication/54964

Previous Post

Housing Recessions And Recoveries

Next Post

Changes In Labor Force Participation Help Explain Recent Job Gains

Related Posts

Scammers Steal $300K Using Fake Blur Airdrop Websites
Uncategorized

FBI Warns Investors Of Crypto-Stealing Play-to-Earn Games

by admin
Maersk Almost Completing Russia Exit After The Sale Of Logistics Sites
Uncategorized

Maersk Almost Completing Russia Exit After The Sale Of Logistics Sites

by admin
Why Is ‘Staking’ At The Center Of Crypto’s Latest Regulation Scuffle
Uncategorized

Why Is ‘Staking’ At The Center Of Crypto’s Latest Regulation Scuffle

by admin
Mexico's Pemex Dismantled Resources Worth $342M From Two Top Fields
Uncategorized

Mexico’s Pemex Dismantled Resources Worth $342M From Two Top Fields

by admin
Oil Giant Schlumberger Rebrands Itself As SLB For Low-Carbon Future
Uncategorized

Oil Giant Schlumberger Rebrands Itself As SLB For Low-Carbon Future

by admin
Next Post

Democratic Governors Are Quicker In Responding To The Coronavirus Than Republicans

답글 남기기 응답 취소

이메일 주소는 공개되지 않습니다. 필수 필드는 *로 표시됩니다

Browse by Category

  • Business
  • Econ Intersect News
  • Economics
  • Finance
  • Politics
  • Uncategorized

Browse by Tags

adoption altcoins bank banking banks Binance Bitcoin Bitcoin market blockchain BTC BTC price business China crypto crypto adoption cryptocurrency crypto exchange crypto market crypto regulation decentralized finance DeFi Elon Musk ETH Ethereum Europe Federal Reserve finance FTX inflation investment market analysis Metaverse NFT nonfungible tokens oil market price analysis recession regulation Russia stock market technology Tesla the UK the US Twitter

Categories

  • Business
  • Econ Intersect News
  • Economics
  • Finance
  • Politics
  • Uncategorized

© Copyright 2024 EconIntersect

No Result
View All Result
  • 토토사이트
    • 카지노사이트
    • 도박사이트
    • 룰렛 사이트
    • 라이브카지노
    • 바카라사이트
    • 안전카지노
  • 경제
  • 파이낸스
  • 정치
  • 투자

© Copyright 2024 EconIntersect