econintersect.com
  • 토토사이트
    • 카지노사이트
    • 도박사이트
    • 룰렛 사이트
    • 라이브카지노
    • 바카라사이트
    • 안전카지노
  • 경제
  • 파이낸스
  • 정치
  • 투자
No Result
View All Result
  • 토토사이트
    • 카지노사이트
    • 도박사이트
    • 룰렛 사이트
    • 라이브카지노
    • 바카라사이트
    • 안전카지노
  • 경제
  • 파이낸스
  • 정치
  • 투자
No Result
View All Result
econintersect.com
No Result
View All Result
Home Uncategorized

President Trump’s Major League Score: 0:4

admin by admin
9월 6, 2021
in Uncategorized
0
0
SHARES
0
VIEWS

Written by Frank Li

In a previous post (It’s Over, President Trump!), I predicted that President Trump would be totally “humiliated” over the battle on the government shutdown, and declared that the Trump Presidency is practically over. Since then, my prediction has come true (Trump Bows to Democrats, Temporarily Ends Shutdown Without Wall). So, it’s time to expand on my declaration with more predictions …

Here is President Trump’s major league score so far: 0:4.

Specifically, below is the tally:

  1. Against Nancy Pelosi: 0:1.
  2. Against Russia’s Putin: 0:1.
  3. Against China’s Xi: 0:1.
  4. Against North Korea’s Kim III: 0:1.

Please share this article – Go to very top of page, right hand side, for social media buttons.


Let me elaborate on each …

1. Against Nancy Pelosi: 0:1

For the first time, President Trump has a real opposition at home: House Speaker Nancy Pelosi. Man, how badly he has just lost the first round between them! For more, read: Pelosi brought Trump to his knees.

If you think the outcome of the first round was bad enough for the President, wait for that of the next round just around the corner: February 15, when the 3-week window closes, with the President getting no more than $1 for the wall!

Why is the outcome so predictable?

Three main reasons:

  1. The President is so obsessed with the wall, thanks to “getting re-elected ad nauseam“, that he has backed himself in the corner, with no room left for maneuvering – Any opponent can smell the blood!
  2. The President simply can’t handle the truth that his base is only around 35% of the electorate, while the majority of the country is against the wall, before adding quite a few more percentages who do not think shutting down the government should be a bargaining chip for the wall.
  3. The Speaker is not only older and wiser than him, but also much more stubborn and merciless, which means she will again bring him down to his knees in the next round, while smiling at him, most likely.

2. Against Russia’s Putin: 0:1

This one should be obvious, if you have watched the video below.

Bottom line: President Trump has proven to be incapable of matching President Putin in the major league. For more, read: President Trump vs. President Putin.

3. Against China’s Xi: 0:1

I am referring to the trade war President Trump initiated against China. This score of 0:1 in favor of China may not be obvious to many Americans.

As a matter of fact, many Americans who get news stories from the MSM (main-stream media) may believe that the U.S. is winning the trade war against China.

Wrong!

My prediction: The U.S. may win the first few battles, but China will ultimately win the war!

Four informative readings:

  1. The U.S. vs. China: A Trade War (II)?
  2. Free Trade and China.
  3. Free Trade and The U.S.
  4. What is ‘Free Market’, Anyway?

What, then, is wrong with the MSM (e.g. Fox, MCNBC, and CNN)?

Two big problems:

  1. Brainwashing in America. For more, read: Brainwashing in Communism and in Democracy.
  2. China bashing is a fashion in American politics, as the Chinese can’t vote in America!

Bottom line: President Trump has proven to be incapable of matching President Xi in the major league. For more, read: President Trump vs. President Xi.

4. Against North Korea’s Kim III: 0:1

Some basic reasoning …

What does Kim III want most?

Survival!

What is the #1 threat to his survival?

The U.S. subversion! Two recent examples: Saddam in Iraq and Gaddafi in Libya!

What is the best way to deter the U.S. subversion?

Having nuclear weapons with Intercontinental ballistic missiles!

What is America’s strategy to remove Kim III’s deterrence?

Economic sanctions.

Will the sanctions work without the full support from China?

No!

Will the U.S. have the full support from China?

No!

Why not?

Among many reasons, the trade war with China is first and foremost!

Bottom line: Kim III clearly won the first round against President Trump, and will win the next round, if the President is stupid, not just naive, enough to have a second summit with him! For more, read the bait: North Korean leader Kim Jong-un’s New Year warning to U.S.

5. Discussion

With the major league score being 0:4, It’s Over, President Trump!

The domestic example with Nancy Pelosi should be most obvious to most Americans. Think about the incompetence and recklessness involved in it, you should be able to infer the rest!

Furthermore, is this domestic example the rule or an exception for our country? For more, read: America: A Great Country Without A Working Government?

President Trump, you were given a great opportunity not only to make America great again, but also to make human history matching China’s Deng Xiaoping. But you have blown it, totally!

As a result, you will be remembered in history as nobody, at best!

At worst? Wait until the Mueller investigation concludes!

For America, the Second American Revolution continues – We must continue our search for a great transformational leader matching China’s Deng, hopefully. Or America is doomed to become a fiddle, second to China! Two informative readings:

  1. The Second American Revolution under Way?
  2. America: Towards a Tyranny of the Majority?

For the most accurate diagnosis of America, as well as the best solution, read my last book: American Democracy – Why is it failing & how to fix it?

6. Closing

I am disappointed with President Trump. So are many independents who voted for him in 2016, presumably. But I am not very surprised. After all, I bet on him, but it did not work out, just like so many other bets.

Now, please sit back and enjoy the short video below.

.

Page Code: $divide1 = “277”; echo $divide1; ?>Count: $headline = “”; include “/home4/aleta/public_html/pages/contributors/frank_count.php”; echo $headline; ?>

Previous Post

How Should We Then Invest?

Next Post

The Week Ahead: Testing Time

Related Posts

Scammers Steal $300K Using Fake Blur Airdrop Websites
Uncategorized

FBI Warns Investors Of Crypto-Stealing Play-to-Earn Games

by admin
Maersk Almost Completing Russia Exit After The Sale Of Logistics Sites
Uncategorized

Maersk Almost Completing Russia Exit After The Sale Of Logistics Sites

by admin
Why Is ‘Staking’ At The Center Of Crypto’s Latest Regulation Scuffle
Uncategorized

Why Is ‘Staking’ At The Center Of Crypto’s Latest Regulation Scuffle

by admin
Mexico's Pemex Dismantled Resources Worth $342M From Two Top Fields
Uncategorized

Mexico’s Pemex Dismantled Resources Worth $342M From Two Top Fields

by admin
Oil Giant Schlumberger Rebrands Itself As SLB For Low-Carbon Future
Uncategorized

Oil Giant Schlumberger Rebrands Itself As SLB For Low-Carbon Future

by admin
Next Post

Democratic Governors Are Quicker In Responding To The Coronavirus Than Republicans

답글 남기기 응답 취소

이메일 주소는 공개되지 않습니다. 필수 필드는 *로 표시됩니다

Browse by Category

  • Business
  • Econ Intersect News
  • Economics
  • Finance
  • Politics
  • Uncategorized

Browse by Tags

adoption altcoins bank banking banks Binance Bitcoin Bitcoin market blockchain BTC BTC price business China crypto crypto adoption cryptocurrency crypto exchange crypto market crypto regulation decentralized finance DeFi Elon Musk ETH Ethereum Europe Federal Reserve finance FTX inflation investment market analysis Metaverse NFT nonfungible tokens oil market price analysis recession regulation Russia stock market technology Tesla the UK the US Twitter

Categories

  • Business
  • Econ Intersect News
  • Economics
  • Finance
  • Politics
  • Uncategorized

© Copyright 2024 EconIntersect

No Result
View All Result
  • 토토사이트
    • 카지노사이트
    • 도박사이트
    • 룰렛 사이트
    • 라이브카지노
    • 바카라사이트
    • 안전카지노
  • 경제
  • 파이낸스
  • 정치
  • 투자

© Copyright 2024 EconIntersect