econintersect.com
  • 토토사이트
    • 카지노사이트
    • 도박사이트
    • 룰렛 사이트
    • 라이브카지노
    • 바카라사이트
    • 안전카지노
  • 경제
  • 파이낸스
  • 정치
  • 투자
No Result
View All Result
  • 토토사이트
    • 카지노사이트
    • 도박사이트
    • 룰렛 사이트
    • 라이브카지노
    • 바카라사이트
    • 안전카지노
  • 경제
  • 파이낸스
  • 정치
  • 투자
No Result
View All Result
econintersect.com
No Result
View All Result
Home Uncategorized

Is US Manufacturing Fundamentally Strong?

admin by admin
9월 6, 2021
in Uncategorized
0
0
SHARES
0
VIEWS

from the St Louis Fed

Many people think that the U.S. manufacturing sector is in a downward spiral and that it can no longer compete globally, but a recent Economic Synopsesessay argues that is not the case.

The authors – Kevin Kliesen, a business economist and research officer at the St. Louis Fed, and John Tatom, a fellow at the Institute for Applied Economics, Global Health and the Study of Business Enterprise at The Johns Hopkins University – examined trends in U.S. manufacturingand concluded that its slump is largely due to the performance of the U.S. economy overall.

“We believe that U.S. manufacturing is fundamentally strong and that claims about foreign competition tend to be overstated,” they wrote.

Manufacturing in the U.S. vs. Other Countries

To examine the competitiveness of U.S. manufacturing, the authors first compared its performance with that of seven other developed countries.1 U.S. manufacturing output accounted for a little more than one-third of this group’s total in 1997 and about 36 percent of this group’s total in 2015.

“By this standard, U.S. manufacturing is competing well against the manufacturing sectors of other large, developed countries,” they said.

Kliesen and Tatom also looked at China and found that China’s share of global manufacturing output increased 10.1 percentage points (to 19.7 percent) from 2005 to 2015. In contrast, the U.S. share declined 3.5 percentage points (to 15.3 percent) over that period. However, the authors added that China gained more manufacturing share from other countries.

“So, while China successfully expanded its market share compared with the United States, that success registered even more at the expense of China’s non-U.S. competitors,” they wrote.

Sensitive to the State of the Economy

Kliesen and Tatom noted that U.S. manufacturing continues to grow and to have a large global share, but its performance (especially in terms of productivity and output growth) has declined relative to previous periods.

They explained that U.S. manufacturing output and employment are sensitive to the state of the economy, as shown in the figure below. For example, manufacturing output and manufacturing employment declined 20 percent and 13.7 percent, respectively, during the Great Recession.

“We don’t see this as a signal that U.S. manufacturing is weak, however; instead, we see economy-wide factors at work,” Kliesen and Tatom wrote. For instance, they cited the slow growth of the U.S. population – and of the labor force in particular – as having an impact on long-term economic growth and employment.

“So, along with the aggregate economy, manufacturing output and productivity growth have been unusually slow,” they said.

Securing a Brighter Future for U.S. Manufacturing

The authors pointed out that, historically, manufacturing has seen rapidly rising productivity growth and declining employment, but that U.S. manufacturing output’s share of GDP has been roughly constant over time.

However, in recent years, manufacturing has not seen the strong output growth that might’ve been expected. Kliesen and Tatom attributed this to a slowing labor component and also to weaker manufacturing productivity growth. The latter, they added, has slowed since the end of 2007, both in absolute terms and relative to U.S. productivity growth overall.

They calculated that manufacturing output per worker increased at a 0.6 percent rate from the fourth quarter of 2007 to the third quarter of 2017, while real GDP per worker increased at a 0.9 percent rate. “Thus, weaker manufacturing output growth importantly reflects fundamentals in the aggregate economy,” the authors wrote.

Conclusion

Kliesen and Tatom concluded: “So, if there’s any credence to the view that U.S. manufacturing has diminished, it mostly stems from the nation’s slower economic growth process and very weak economic recovery. If aggregate productivity rebounds, it will be reflected in a re-energized manufacturing sector.”

Notes and References

1 In addition to the U.S., the seven other developed countries studied were France, Germany, Italy, Japan, Mexico, South Korea and the U.K. Kliesen and Tatom noted that these eight countries make up about 82 percent of manufacturing activity among all Organization for Economic Cooperation and Development countries.

Additional Resources

  • Economic Synopses: Here’s Why U.S. Manufacturing Is Fundamentally Strong
  • On the Economy: Advanced Manufacturing Is a Key Cog in U.S. Economy
  • On the Economy: The Manufacturing Sector’s Evolution and Its Role in an Economy

Source

https://www.stlouisfed.org/on-the-economy/2018/may/us-manufacturing-fundamentally-strong

Disclaimer

Views expressed are not necessarily those of the Federal Reserve Bank of St. Louis or of the Federal Reserve System.

Previous Post

Companies Should Champion Vets To Reach Full Employment

Next Post

23May2018 Pre-Market Commentary: Wall Street To Slide At The Opening, U.S.-China Trade Deal ‘Too Hard To Get Done’, Says Trump, Crude Prices Down Fractionally, NOKO Meet May Be Off

Related Posts

Scammers Steal $300K Using Fake Blur Airdrop Websites
Uncategorized

FBI Warns Investors Of Crypto-Stealing Play-to-Earn Games

by admin
Maersk Almost Completing Russia Exit After The Sale Of Logistics Sites
Uncategorized

Maersk Almost Completing Russia Exit After The Sale Of Logistics Sites

by admin
Why Is ‘Staking’ At The Center Of Crypto’s Latest Regulation Scuffle
Uncategorized

Why Is ‘Staking’ At The Center Of Crypto’s Latest Regulation Scuffle

by admin
Mexico's Pemex Dismantled Resources Worth $342M From Two Top Fields
Uncategorized

Mexico’s Pemex Dismantled Resources Worth $342M From Two Top Fields

by admin
Oil Giant Schlumberger Rebrands Itself As SLB For Low-Carbon Future
Uncategorized

Oil Giant Schlumberger Rebrands Itself As SLB For Low-Carbon Future

by admin
Next Post

Democratic Governors Are Quicker In Responding To The Coronavirus Than Republicans

답글 남기기 응답 취소

이메일 주소는 공개되지 않습니다. 필수 필드는 *로 표시됩니다

Browse by Category

  • Business
  • Econ Intersect News
  • Economics
  • Finance
  • Politics
  • Uncategorized

Browse by Tags

adoption altcoins bank banking banks Binance Bitcoin Bitcoin market blockchain BTC BTC price business China crypto crypto adoption cryptocurrency crypto exchange crypto market crypto regulation decentralized finance DeFi Elon Musk ETH Ethereum Europe Federal Reserve finance FTX inflation investment market analysis Metaverse NFT nonfungible tokens oil market price analysis recession regulation Russia stock market technology Tesla the UK the US Twitter

Categories

  • Business
  • Econ Intersect News
  • Economics
  • Finance
  • Politics
  • Uncategorized

© Copyright 2024 EconIntersect

No Result
View All Result
  • 토토사이트
    • 카지노사이트
    • 도박사이트
    • 룰렛 사이트
    • 라이브카지노
    • 바카라사이트
    • 안전카지노
  • 경제
  • 파이낸스
  • 정치
  • 투자

© Copyright 2024 EconIntersect