econintersect.com
  • 토토사이트
    • 카지노사이트
    • 도박사이트
    • 룰렛 사이트
    • 라이브카지노
    • 바카라사이트
    • 안전카지노
  • 경제
  • 파이낸스
  • 정치
  • 투자
No Result
View All Result
  • 토토사이트
    • 카지노사이트
    • 도박사이트
    • 룰렛 사이트
    • 라이브카지노
    • 바카라사이트
    • 안전카지노
  • 경제
  • 파이낸스
  • 정치
  • 투자
No Result
View All Result
econintersect.com
No Result
View All Result
Home Uncategorized

China’s Tariff Retaliation: How Many US Jobs May Be Affected?

admin by admin
9월 6, 2021
in Uncategorized
0
0
SHARES
0
VIEWS

from the St Louis Fed

— this post authored by YiLi Chien, Senior Economist, and Paul Morris, Senior Research Associate

On April 3, the U.S. government proposed imposing 25 percent tariffs on a list of products imported from China in an escalation of their ongoing trade conflict.[ 1] The next day, the Chinese government retaliated with a list of products from the U.S. that would potentially be subject to 25 percent tariffs.

The Peterson Institute for International Economics reported that the total value of U.S. exports subject to China’s retaliation reached $49.8 billion in 2017.[ 2]

Potential Labor Impact of China’s Tariff Retaliation

This blog post looks at the potential impacts of China’s retaliation on the U.S. labor market. We used the 2016 employment requirement matrix provided by the Bureau of Labor Statistics, which details employment generated directly and indirectly by a million dollars of production in a given industry.3 By using this matrix, we can calculate the number of jobs associated with production of the exports subject to retaliation.

The figure below gives an idea of the impact of China’s retaliation on employment in major industries.

China trade retaliation

In total, there were 312,800 jobs supported by the exported goods on China’s list, accounting for slightly over 0.2 percent of total private employment in 2016, mainly in three sectors:

  • The agriculture sector employed 126,200 workers contributing to the production of these exported goods.
  • The manufacturing sector employed 91,200 such workers.
  • The service sector employed 86,700 affected employees.

Given the relatively small number of employees in the agriculture sector as a whole, affected employees accounted for 5.4 percent of employment in agriculture. The corresponding shares in the manufacturing and service sectors were much lower at just 0.5 percent and 0.1 percent, respectively.

Not All Jobs Would Be Affected

It is important to note that these numbers are likely biased upward, as they represent the number of jobs supported by the total value of exports on China’s proposed list.

First, a 25 percent tariff would likely reduce exports to China, but it is unlikely to eliminate the entirety of these exports. In addition, producers in the U.S. would very likely shift some of these exports to other countries or sell them domestically.

Finally, there may be some ways to avoid tariffs imposed on exports to China from the U.S. Producers could export these goods to a third country before selling them to China, a process known as transshipping.

Notes and References

1 The Office of the United States Trade Representative published the full list (PDF).

2 Bown, Chad P. “More than Soybeans: Trump’s Section 301 Tariffs and China’s Response.” Peterson Institute for International Economics, April 4, 2018.

3 The matrix and the associated documentation are available at Employment Requirements Matrix.

Additional Resources

  • On the Economy: The Weakening of the US Dollar
  • On the Economy: The Evolution of US Agricultural Exports
  • On the Economy: The Manufacturing Sector’s Evolution and Its Role in an Economy

Source

https://www.stlouisfed.org/on-the-economy/2018/may/china-tariff-retaliation-how-us-jobs-affected

Disclaimer

Views expressed are not necessarily those of the Federal Reserve Bank of St. Louis or of the Federal Reserve System.

Previous Post

How Futures Trading Changed Bitcoin Prices

Next Post

Industrial Espionage: Keeping An Eye On The Quiet Guy

Related Posts

Scammers Steal $300K Using Fake Blur Airdrop Websites
Uncategorized

FBI Warns Investors Of Crypto-Stealing Play-to-Earn Games

by admin
Maersk Almost Completing Russia Exit After The Sale Of Logistics Sites
Uncategorized

Maersk Almost Completing Russia Exit After The Sale Of Logistics Sites

by admin
Why Is ‘Staking’ At The Center Of Crypto’s Latest Regulation Scuffle
Uncategorized

Why Is ‘Staking’ At The Center Of Crypto’s Latest Regulation Scuffle

by admin
Mexico's Pemex Dismantled Resources Worth $342M From Two Top Fields
Uncategorized

Mexico’s Pemex Dismantled Resources Worth $342M From Two Top Fields

by admin
Oil Giant Schlumberger Rebrands Itself As SLB For Low-Carbon Future
Uncategorized

Oil Giant Schlumberger Rebrands Itself As SLB For Low-Carbon Future

by admin
Next Post

Democratic Governors Are Quicker In Responding To The Coronavirus Than Republicans

답글 남기기 응답 취소

이메일 주소는 공개되지 않습니다. 필수 필드는 *로 표시됩니다

Browse by Category

  • Business
  • Econ Intersect News
  • Economics
  • Finance
  • Politics
  • Uncategorized

Browse by Tags

adoption altcoins bank banking banks Binance Bitcoin Bitcoin market blockchain BTC BTC price business China crypto crypto adoption cryptocurrency crypto exchange crypto market crypto regulation decentralized finance DeFi Elon Musk ETH Ethereum Europe Federal Reserve finance FTX inflation investment market analysis Metaverse NFT nonfungible tokens oil market price analysis recession regulation Russia stock market technology Tesla the UK the US Twitter

Categories

  • Business
  • Econ Intersect News
  • Economics
  • Finance
  • Politics
  • Uncategorized

© Copyright 2024 EconIntersect

No Result
View All Result
  • 토토사이트
    • 카지노사이트
    • 도박사이트
    • 룰렛 사이트
    • 라이브카지노
    • 바카라사이트
    • 안전카지노
  • 경제
  • 파이낸스
  • 정치
  • 투자

© Copyright 2024 EconIntersect