econintersect.com
  • 토토사이트
    • 카지노사이트
    • 도박사이트
    • 룰렛 사이트
    • 라이브카지노
    • 바카라사이트
    • 안전카지노
  • 경제
  • 파이낸스
  • 정치
  • 투자
No Result
View All Result
  • 토토사이트
    • 카지노사이트
    • 도박사이트
    • 룰렛 사이트
    • 라이브카지노
    • 바카라사이트
    • 안전카지노
  • 경제
  • 파이낸스
  • 정치
  • 투자
No Result
View All Result
econintersect.com
No Result
View All Result
Home Uncategorized

Regulation And Regulatory Burden

admin by admin
9월 6, 2021
in Uncategorized
0
0
SHARES
0
VIEWS

from the St Louis Fed

— this post authored by Julie Stackhouse

Nearly 10 years ago, the U.S. financial system experienced the most significant financial crisis since the Great Depression. Congress responded to the crisis with new financial regulation – the Dodd-Frank Act – intended to strengthen the resiliency of the financial system and, to the extent possible, end “too big to fail.”

The Dodd-Frank Act

Under the Dodd-Frank Act, the nation’s largest financial firms are now subject to substantially more regulation than they were prior to the financial crisis. One of the results has been materially improved levels of capital and liquidity, both of which are regularly stress tested under adverse economic scenarios.

However, these regulations are not applied on a one-size-fits-all basis. As regulators have gained experience, regulatory capital and liquidity requirements have been tailored relative to the systemic importance of the institutions, with greater flexibility for the “smaller” large firms.

Not all regulations can be tailored since only Congress can change the wording of the law. The limited ability to tailor some regulations can pose special challenges to small, community banks, which have the least scale to absorb the cost of compliance.

Reducing Regulatory Burden

Recognizing the impact of regulatory burden on small banks, federal banking agencies have taken several steps over the past few years to reduce burden where consistent with the law.

Raising Asset Thresholds

In 2015, the Federal Reserve adjusted the size threshold for exempting small bank-holding companies from consolidated capital requirements, raising the threshold from $500 million to $1 billion in total assets.

Also, in 2016, the Fed implemented a provision in the FAST (Fixing America’s Surface Transportation) Act that raised the asset threshold for insured depository institutions that are eligible for an 18-month examination cycle from $500 million to $1 billion.

Reducing Report Size

The Fed has worked with other regulatory agencies to reduce the number of line items on the regulatory Call Report – the balance sheet and income statements commercial banks are required to submit every quarter. Small, traditional banks are now able to file call reports with 40 percent fewer reportable items.

Conducting More Examination Work Off-Site

Finally, the Fed has continued to “risk focus” its examination work, conducting more activities off-site to reduce the burden on small banking organizations.

Ongoing Efforts to Reduce Regulatory Burden

Regulatory burden reduction efforts are continuing. In 2015, the Fed led a review under the Economic Growth and Regulatory Paperwork Reduction Act, a law that requires all federal banking agencies to examine their regulations for appropriateness at least once every 10 years.

The agencies issued a joint report to Congress on their findings in March 2017, outlining actions they can take without legislative action. The agencies plan to:

  • Simplify capital rules
  • Raise the appraisal threshold for commercial real estate loans
  • Address appraiser shortages in rural areas
  • Jointly review all aspects of the examination process, including the exam report format and preparation process

These proposals hold promise. However, banks are looking for more burden-reducing measures, including legislative changes that permit a simplified capital alternative for small institutions.

On one hand, regulation can be expensive and challenging for bankers and regulators alike. On the other hand, the safety and soundness of our financial system and balanced protection of consumers are important to financial stability. A balanced outcome can be achieved by calibrating regulation through thoughtful change.

Follow the Series

  • Why Are Banks Regulated?
  • Did the Dodd-Frank Act Make the Financial System Safer?
  • Bank Supervision and the Central Bank: An Integrated Mission
  • Why Are There So Many Bank Regulators?
  • Why Didn’t Bank Regulators Prevent the Financial Crisis?
  • Who Funds the Cost of Bank Supervision?
  • Why Does the Fed Supervise Small Banks?

Additional Resources

  • Federal Financial Institutions Examination Council: Joint Report to Congress: Economic Growth and Regulatory Paperwork Reduction Act
  • On the Economy: Keeping a Watchful Eye

Source

https://www.stlouisfed.org/on-the-economy/2017/august/tailoring-banking-regulation-address-regulatory-burden

Disclaimer

Views expressed are not necessarily those of the Federal Reserve Bank of St. Louis or of the Federal Reserve System.

Note:

This post is part of a series titled “Supervising Our Nation’s Financial Institutions.” The series, written by Julie Stackhouse, executive vice president and officer-in-charge of supervision at the St. Louis Federal Reserve, is expected to appear at least once each month throughout 2017.

Previous Post

Individuals Born In The Latter Years Of The Baby Boom Held 11.9 Jobs From Ages 18 To 50

Next Post

How Much Has Job Matching Efficiency Declined?

Related Posts

Scammers Steal $300K Using Fake Blur Airdrop Websites
Uncategorized

FBI Warns Investors Of Crypto-Stealing Play-to-Earn Games

by admin
Maersk Almost Completing Russia Exit After The Sale Of Logistics Sites
Uncategorized

Maersk Almost Completing Russia Exit After The Sale Of Logistics Sites

by admin
Why Is ‘Staking’ At The Center Of Crypto’s Latest Regulation Scuffle
Uncategorized

Why Is ‘Staking’ At The Center Of Crypto’s Latest Regulation Scuffle

by admin
Mexico's Pemex Dismantled Resources Worth $342M From Two Top Fields
Uncategorized

Mexico’s Pemex Dismantled Resources Worth $342M From Two Top Fields

by admin
Oil Giant Schlumberger Rebrands Itself As SLB For Low-Carbon Future
Uncategorized

Oil Giant Schlumberger Rebrands Itself As SLB For Low-Carbon Future

by admin
Next Post

Growing Gambling Facilities in the Northeast US: Is There a Market for Them All?

답글 남기기 응답 취소

이메일 주소는 공개되지 않습니다. 필수 필드는 *로 표시됩니다

Browse by Category

  • Business
  • Econ Intersect News
  • Economics
  • Finance
  • Politics
  • Uncategorized

Browse by Tags

adoption altcoins bank banking banks Binance Bitcoin Bitcoin market blockchain BTC BTC price business China crypto crypto adoption cryptocurrency crypto exchange crypto market crypto regulation decentralized finance DeFi Elon Musk ETH Ethereum Europe Federal Reserve finance FTX inflation investment market analysis Metaverse NFT nonfungible tokens oil market price analysis recession regulation Russia stock market technology Tesla the UK the US Twitter

Categories

  • Business
  • Econ Intersect News
  • Economics
  • Finance
  • Politics
  • Uncategorized

© Copyright 2024 EconIntersect

No Result
View All Result
  • 토토사이트
    • 카지노사이트
    • 도박사이트
    • 룰렛 사이트
    • 라이브카지노
    • 바카라사이트
    • 안전카지노
  • 경제
  • 파이낸스
  • 정치
  • 투자

© Copyright 2024 EconIntersect