econintersect.com
  • 토토사이트
    • 카지노사이트
    • 도박사이트
    • 룰렛 사이트
    • 라이브카지노
    • 바카라사이트
    • 안전카지노
  • 경제
  • 파이낸스
  • 정치
  • 투자
No Result
View All Result
  • 토토사이트
    • 카지노사이트
    • 도박사이트
    • 룰렛 사이트
    • 라이브카지노
    • 바카라사이트
    • 안전카지노
  • 경제
  • 파이낸스
  • 정치
  • 투자
No Result
View All Result
econintersect.com
No Result
View All Result
Home Uncategorized

An Analysis Of Hospital Prices For Commercial And Medicare Advantage Plans

admin by admin
9월 6, 2021
in Uncategorized
0
0
SHARES
0
VIEWS

from the Congressional Budget Office

Prices for hospital admissions have received considerable attention in recent years, both because they are an important component of health care spending and because they can vary widely.

In this presentation, we use 2013 claims data from three large insurers to examine the hospital payment rates of those insurers in their commercial plans and their Medicare Advantage plans and compare them with Medicare’s fee-for-service (FFS) rates; we also examine the variation of those rates across and within markets. We found that the average commercial payment rate for a hospital admission was about $21,400, but the prices for common types of admissions usually varied widely. By contrast, we found that the average payment rate in Medicare’s FFS program for the same mix of admissions and hospitals was about $11,400 (including Medicare’s additional payments for admissions to teaching hospitals and certain other supplemental payments). On average, therefore, commercial rates for inpatient services were 89 percent higher than Medicare’s FFS rates – or Medicare’s FFS rates were 47 percent lower than commercial rates, on average. The ratio of commercial rates to Medicare’s FFS rates varied greatly across metropolitan areas and across hospitals within metropolitan areas.

By contrast, we found that Medicare Advantage rates for hospital inpatient services were roughly equal to Medicare’s FFS rates, on average. In our preferred comparison, we excluded Medicare’s additional payments for admissions to teaching hospitals from the FFS rates, because the Medicare program makes such payments directly to hospitals for Medicare Advantage enrollees. Those additional payments were thus excluded from our estimated payment rates for both FFS and Medicare Advantage. But including those additional payments in the FFS rates affected the comparison only modestly. We also found that the ratio of Medicare Advantage rates to Medicare’s FFS rates varied much less across hospital stays, across metropolitan areas, and across hospitals within metropolitan areas than the corresponding ratio for commercial rates. Finally, we found that hospital payment rates in Medicare Advantage plans do not increase or decrease noticeably as the share of enrollees in those plans grows – a finding that has informed the Congressional Budget Office’s analysis of proposals to change the terms of competition between Medicare Advantage plans and Medicare’s FFS program.

Note

Presentation by Jared Maeda, an analyst for CBO’s Health, Retirement, and Long-Term Analysis Division, at AcademyHealth’s Annual Research Meeting.

An Analysis of Hospital Prices for Commercial and Medicare Advantage Plans from Congressional Budget Office

Source

https://www.cbo.gov/publication/52819

Previous Post

Who Funds The Cost Of Bank Supervision?

Next Post

Intra-Industry Trade With Mexico May Aid U.S. Global Competitiveness

Related Posts

Scammers Steal $300K Using Fake Blur Airdrop Websites
Uncategorized

FBI Warns Investors Of Crypto-Stealing Play-to-Earn Games

by admin
Maersk Almost Completing Russia Exit After The Sale Of Logistics Sites
Uncategorized

Maersk Almost Completing Russia Exit After The Sale Of Logistics Sites

by admin
Why Is ‘Staking’ At The Center Of Crypto’s Latest Regulation Scuffle
Uncategorized

Why Is ‘Staking’ At The Center Of Crypto’s Latest Regulation Scuffle

by admin
Mexico's Pemex Dismantled Resources Worth $342M From Two Top Fields
Uncategorized

Mexico’s Pemex Dismantled Resources Worth $342M From Two Top Fields

by admin
Oil Giant Schlumberger Rebrands Itself As SLB For Low-Carbon Future
Uncategorized

Oil Giant Schlumberger Rebrands Itself As SLB For Low-Carbon Future

by admin
Next Post

Mad Hawk Disease Strikes Federal Reserve

답글 남기기 응답 취소

이메일 주소는 공개되지 않습니다. 필수 필드는 *로 표시됩니다

Browse by Category

  • Business
  • Econ Intersect News
  • Economics
  • Finance
  • Politics
  • Uncategorized

Browse by Tags

adoption altcoins bank banking banks Binance Bitcoin Bitcoin market blockchain BTC BTC price business China crypto crypto adoption cryptocurrency crypto exchange crypto market crypto regulation decentralized finance DeFi Elon Musk ETH Ethereum Europe Federal Reserve finance FTX inflation investment market analysis Metaverse NFT nonfungible tokens oil market price analysis recession regulation Russia stock market technology Tesla the UK the US Twitter

Categories

  • Business
  • Econ Intersect News
  • Economics
  • Finance
  • Politics
  • Uncategorized

© Copyright 2024 EconIntersect

No Result
View All Result
  • 토토사이트
    • 카지노사이트
    • 도박사이트
    • 룰렛 사이트
    • 라이브카지노
    • 바카라사이트
    • 안전카지노
  • 경제
  • 파이낸스
  • 정치
  • 투자

© Copyright 2024 EconIntersect