econintersect.com
  • 토토사이트
    • 카지노사이트
    • 도박사이트
    • 룰렛 사이트
    • 라이브카지노
    • 바카라사이트
    • 안전카지노
  • 경제
  • 파이낸스
  • 정치
  • 투자
No Result
View All Result
  • 토토사이트
    • 카지노사이트
    • 도박사이트
    • 룰렛 사이트
    • 라이브카지노
    • 바카라사이트
    • 안전카지노
  • 경제
  • 파이낸스
  • 정치
  • 투자
No Result
View All Result
econintersect.com
No Result
View All Result
Home Uncategorized

How We Managed What Einstein Thought Was Impossible – And Used His Theory To Weigh A Star

admin by admin
9월 6, 2021
in Uncategorized
0
0
SHARES
0
VIEWS

from The Conversation

— this post authored by Martin Dominik, University of St Andrews

If you are looking at a glass lens you will not see the lens itself, but rather notice objects behind it being displaced and distorted. Gravitation has a similar effect. Any massive body warps the space and time around it, according to Albert Einstein’s theory of general relativity. As a result, light rays should take an apparent turn around the object rather than travelling in a straight line.


Please share this article – Go to very top of page, right hand side for social media buttons.


In 1919, during a solar eclipse, Arthur Eddington was able to show that this is true. He measured the apparent displacement of stars caused by the bending of their light around the sun, which acted as a “gravitational lens”. It was this result that made Einstein rise to instant fame. Now, a century later, we have for the first time measured this effect on a star other than our sun – something Einstein himself thought was impossible. Our results have been published in Science.

Using the Hubble Space Telescope repeatedly over the course of two years (from October 2013 to October 2015), we monitored the changing position of a background star at the moment it moved to be closely aligned with the nearby white dwarf star Stein 2051 B. White dwarfs are of peculiar interest because, along with neutron stars and black holes, they are faint or invisible remnants of stars at the end of their lives.

Curved space-time. Mopic

Perfect scale

The “gravitational lens” works like a weighing scale, with the light deflection of the background star being analogous to the movement of the needle on the scale. That’s because gravitational strength depends on mass – the bigger the mass, the bigger the effect of gravitational lensing. Consequently, after spending a further year and a half on careful analysis of the acquired data, we were able to directly obtain the mass of Stein 2051 B from the measured deflection of the background star. Stein 2051 B turned out to be 68% the mass of the sun.

While Eddington measured an already incredibly small angle of 1.7 arcseconds – roughly corresponding to the diameter of a human hair seen from 10 metres distance – the measured shift of the background star aligned with Stein 2051 B was 1,000 times smaller, up to 0.002 arcseconds. This reflects the fact that the space curvature is quite small.

In fact, the bending of light in curved space is quite similar to a ball rolling along the surface of Earth. While the Earth’s surface looks flat to us at first sight as we stand on it, the rolling ball follows its small curvature rather than moving strictly in a straight line. After rolling just about 6cm, its direction will have changed by 0.002 arcseconds.

Despite the huge success of Eddington’s observations of light bending by the sun, Einstein was sceptical about the prospects for observing this for other stars. In 1936, he concluded: “Of course, there is no hope of observing this phenomenon directly.” What he could not have predicted were the technological advances of the decades to come, such as the advent of fast computing engines and digital cameras.

The gravity of a luminous red galaxy has gravitationally distorted the light from a much more distant blue galaxy. NASA/ESA

The bending of light by stars is known as “gravitational microlensing”. Unlike the arc-like shapes of galaxies resulting from gravitational lensing (see image above), this weak phenomenon does not lead to observable image distortions. Crucially, it depends on a close alignment between background and foreground stars, which is quite rare. In principle, a foreground star creates two images of the background star, differing in luminosity. Their combined light can then lead to an apparent brightening of the background star as the intervening foreground star passes near the line of sight.

This effect, known as “photometric microlensing”, has been observed lots of times before. However, the measured positional shift of the star passing by Stein 2051 B marks the first ever observation of “astrometric microlensing”.

This latter effect holds the potential to shed new light on how stars evolve by surveying stellar remnants (white dwarfs, neutron stars and black holes) in our neighbourhood – along with brown dwarfs (“failed” stars not massive enough to sustain the nuclear fusion of hydrogen). These otherwise escape detection due to being faint or invisible, but gravitational lensing relies solely on their mass rather than their light.

The ConversationBy the end of its mission in 2019, ESA’s Gaia satellite will have found astrometric microlensing signatures that will provide reliable mass measurements for more than a thousand bodies, turning astrometric microlensing from a most curious effect into a useful astrophysical tool.

Martin Dominik, Reader in Physics & Astronomy, University of St Andrews

This article was originally published on The Conversation. Read the original article.

Previous Post

China And U.S. Are Qatar’s Most Important Trading Partner For Imports

Next Post

America’s Infrastructure Investment Problem

Related Posts

Scammers Steal $300K Using Fake Blur Airdrop Websites
Uncategorized

FBI Warns Investors Of Crypto-Stealing Play-to-Earn Games

by admin
Maersk Almost Completing Russia Exit After The Sale Of Logistics Sites
Uncategorized

Maersk Almost Completing Russia Exit After The Sale Of Logistics Sites

by admin
Why Is ‘Staking’ At The Center Of Crypto’s Latest Regulation Scuffle
Uncategorized

Why Is ‘Staking’ At The Center Of Crypto’s Latest Regulation Scuffle

by admin
Mexico's Pemex Dismantled Resources Worth $342M From Two Top Fields
Uncategorized

Mexico’s Pemex Dismantled Resources Worth $342M From Two Top Fields

by admin
Oil Giant Schlumberger Rebrands Itself As SLB For Low-Carbon Future
Uncategorized

Oil Giant Schlumberger Rebrands Itself As SLB For Low-Carbon Future

by admin
Next Post

Can You Afford to Reach 100?

답글 남기기 응답 취소

이메일 주소는 공개되지 않습니다. 필수 필드는 *로 표시됩니다

Browse by Category

  • Business
  • Econ Intersect News
  • Economics
  • Finance
  • Politics
  • Uncategorized

Browse by Tags

adoption altcoins bank banking banks Binance Bitcoin Bitcoin market blockchain BTC BTC price business China crypto crypto adoption cryptocurrency crypto exchange crypto market crypto regulation decentralized finance DeFi Elon Musk ETH Ethereum Europe Federal Reserve finance FTX inflation investment market analysis Metaverse NFT nonfungible tokens oil market price analysis recession regulation Russia stock market technology Tesla the UK the US Twitter

Categories

  • Business
  • Econ Intersect News
  • Economics
  • Finance
  • Politics
  • Uncategorized

© Copyright 2024 EconIntersect

No Result
View All Result
  • 토토사이트
    • 카지노사이트
    • 도박사이트
    • 룰렛 사이트
    • 라이브카지노
    • 바카라사이트
    • 안전카지노
  • 경제
  • 파이낸스
  • 정치
  • 투자

© Copyright 2024 EconIntersect