econintersect.com
  • 토토사이트
    • 카지노사이트
    • 도박사이트
    • 룰렛 사이트
    • 라이브카지노
    • 바카라사이트
    • 안전카지노
  • 경제
  • 파이낸스
  • 정치
  • 투자
No Result
View All Result
  • 토토사이트
    • 카지노사이트
    • 도박사이트
    • 룰렛 사이트
    • 라이브카지노
    • 바카라사이트
    • 안전카지노
  • 경제
  • 파이낸스
  • 정치
  • 투자
No Result
View All Result
econintersect.com
No Result
View All Result
Home Uncategorized

New Earthquake Risk Model Confirms Possibility Of Statewide Earthquake In California

admin by admin
9월 6, 2021
in Uncategorized
0
0
SHARES
0
VIEWS

from CoreLogic

A large earthquake along the San Andreas fault impacting both Northern and Southern California simultaneously – once considered impossible – could cause up to 126 percent more residential property damage than previously thought, putting more homes at risk and increasing loss estimates in a state already at high risk for earthquake damage.

The CoreLogic analysis is based on revised earthquake risk science from the Uniform California Earthquake Rupture Forecast, Version 3 (UCERF3), which has concluded that a single large earthquake could now rupture simultaneously in both Northern and Southern California, and that earthquakes of magnitude 8.0 and higher will affect a larger land area and greater number of people. In particular, the San Andreas fault has always been viewed as two independent segments with earthquake ruptures on the northern and southern San Andreas faults deemed mutually exclusive of one another.

Based on the revised UCERF3 hazard data, CoreLogic has produced new earthquake risk analysis that illustrates the higher conditional probability of losses for an earthquake impacting both regions simultaneously. Figures 1-4 show four earthquake scenarios in California and the resulting increase in both the number of single-family homes that could be damaged and the accompanying reconstruction cost value (RCV).

The CoreLogic analysis shows that an earthquake of magnitude 8.3 along the San Andreas fault, that previously was thought to only occur along the northern segment of the fault line, could result in a full rupture and increase the number of homes damaged by 126 percent, from 1.6 to 3.5 million homes, and increase RCV by 79 percent, from $161 billion to $289 billion. A similar scenario that expands earthquake risk from just the southern San Andreas fault to a full rupture increases the number of homes damaged by 54 percent, from 2.3 million to 3.5 million, and increases RCV by 111 percent, from $137 billion to $289 billion. For a magnitude 8.2 or 8.0 earthquake scenario, the rupture, while smaller, would still impact both regions of the fault and much of the geography of the state, as well as increase the number of homes damaged and the RCV (Figures 3 and 4). The estimated number of homes damaged includes those that sustain damage of 5 percent or more of the total reconstruction cost value of the property.

Figure 1

Figure 1: Scenario 1: M8.3 Earthquake, Full Rupture vs Northern San Andreas Rupture

Figure 2

Figure 2: Scenario 1: M8.3 Earthquake, Full Rupture vs Southern San Andreas Rupture

Figure 3

Figure 3: Scenario 2: M8.2 San Andreas Fault Earthquake

Figure 4

Figure 4: Scenario 3: M8.0 San Andreas Fault Earthquake

For more information on the CoreLogic revised earthquake risk analysis, visit http://arcg.is/2daBeYs.

Source

http://www.corelogic.com/about-us/news/media-advisory-new-corelogic-analysis-shows-the-number-of-homes-damaged-by-a-large-earthquake-impacting-northern-and-southern-ca.aspx

CORELOGIC and the CoreLogic logo are trademarks of CoreLogic, Inc. and/or its subsidiaries.

Previous Post

Subprime Auto Debt Grows Despite Rising Delinquencies

Next Post

Sustained 3 To 4% GDP Growth Is A Huge Stretch

Related Posts

Scammers Steal $300K Using Fake Blur Airdrop Websites
Uncategorized

FBI Warns Investors Of Crypto-Stealing Play-to-Earn Games

by admin
Maersk Almost Completing Russia Exit After The Sale Of Logistics Sites
Uncategorized

Maersk Almost Completing Russia Exit After The Sale Of Logistics Sites

by admin
Why Is ‘Staking’ At The Center Of Crypto’s Latest Regulation Scuffle
Uncategorized

Why Is ‘Staking’ At The Center Of Crypto’s Latest Regulation Scuffle

by admin
Mexico's Pemex Dismantled Resources Worth $342M From Two Top Fields
Uncategorized

Mexico’s Pemex Dismantled Resources Worth $342M From Two Top Fields

by admin
Oil Giant Schlumberger Rebrands Itself As SLB For Low-Carbon Future
Uncategorized

Oil Giant Schlumberger Rebrands Itself As SLB For Low-Carbon Future

by admin
Next Post

Are You Feeling the Economic Surge?

답글 남기기 응답 취소

이메일 주소는 공개되지 않습니다. 필수 필드는 *로 표시됩니다

Browse by Category

  • Business
  • Econ Intersect News
  • Economics
  • Finance
  • Politics
  • Uncategorized

Browse by Tags

adoption altcoins bank banking banks Binance Bitcoin Bitcoin market blockchain BTC BTC price business China crypto crypto adoption cryptocurrency crypto exchange crypto market crypto regulation decentralized finance DeFi Elon Musk ETH Ethereum Europe Federal Reserve finance FTX inflation investment market analysis Metaverse NFT nonfungible tokens oil market price analysis recession regulation Russia stock market technology Tesla the UK the US Twitter

Categories

  • Business
  • Econ Intersect News
  • Economics
  • Finance
  • Politics
  • Uncategorized

© Copyright 2024 EconIntersect

No Result
View All Result
  • 토토사이트
    • 카지노사이트
    • 도박사이트
    • 룰렛 사이트
    • 라이브카지노
    • 바카라사이트
    • 안전카지노
  • 경제
  • 파이낸스
  • 정치
  • 투자

© Copyright 2024 EconIntersect