econintersect.com
  • 토토사이트
    • 카지노사이트
    • 도박사이트
    • 룰렛 사이트
    • 라이브카지노
    • 바카라사이트
    • 안전카지노
  • 경제
  • 파이낸스
  • 정치
  • 투자
No Result
View All Result
  • 토토사이트
    • 카지노사이트
    • 도박사이트
    • 룰렛 사이트
    • 라이브카지노
    • 바카라사이트
    • 안전카지노
  • 경제
  • 파이낸스
  • 정치
  • 투자
No Result
View All Result
econintersect.com
No Result
View All Result
Home Uncategorized

Monetary Policy Shocks And Aggregate Supply

admin by admin
9월 6, 2021
in Uncategorized
0
0
SHARES
0
VIEWS

by Kansas Fed

— this post authored by Willem Van Zandweghe

During the past six years of slow economic growth, economists and policymakers have expressed repeated concern that the financial crisis and recession of 2007-09 may have harmed the U.S. economy’s productive capacity. Workers’ participation in the labor force declined in the recovery, and growth in labor productivity slowed from its historical trend. The disappointing performance of these and other supply-side indicators has led economists to revise down their estimates of the economy’s potential output (CBO; Ball; Hall).

A sustained period of weak demand may have caused supply-side damage, eroding the economy’s productive capacity through various channels. Many workers may have lost skills due to long spells of unemployment or labor force nonparticipation, and the business sector may have held back on capital formation, business formation, and innovation.

Traditionally, monetary policy is assumed to stabilize economic activity and inflation without affecting the economy’s productive capacity – that is, its potential output. However, if weak demand erodes capacity, then monetary policy may be able to expand capacity by stimulating economic activity. Accommodative monetary policy raises demand for goods and services, thus promoting investment and labor market activity and improving the climate for innovation and new business startups. Indeed, recent remarks by policymakers recognize that supply-side damage could be reversible (Yellen; Powell).

[click on image below to continue reading]

Previous Post

What Are The Economic Costs And Benefits Of Nations Breaking Apart?

Next Post

Greek Crisis: The Temptation To Close The Door On The IMF

Related Posts

Scammers Steal $300K Using Fake Blur Airdrop Websites
Uncategorized

FBI Warns Investors Of Crypto-Stealing Play-to-Earn Games

by admin
Maersk Almost Completing Russia Exit After The Sale Of Logistics Sites
Uncategorized

Maersk Almost Completing Russia Exit After The Sale Of Logistics Sites

by admin
Why Is ‘Staking’ At The Center Of Crypto’s Latest Regulation Scuffle
Uncategorized

Why Is ‘Staking’ At The Center Of Crypto’s Latest Regulation Scuffle

by admin
Mexico's Pemex Dismantled Resources Worth $342M From Two Top Fields
Uncategorized

Mexico’s Pemex Dismantled Resources Worth $342M From Two Top Fields

by admin
Oil Giant Schlumberger Rebrands Itself As SLB For Low-Carbon Future
Uncategorized

Oil Giant Schlumberger Rebrands Itself As SLB For Low-Carbon Future

by admin
Next Post

Insider Trading 14 August 2015: Sears, MBIA Buying

답글 남기기 응답 취소

이메일 주소는 공개되지 않습니다. 필수 필드는 *로 표시됩니다

Browse by Category

  • Business
  • Econ Intersect News
  • Economics
  • Finance
  • Politics
  • Uncategorized

Browse by Tags

adoption altcoins bank banking banks Binance Bitcoin Bitcoin market blockchain BTC BTC price business China crypto crypto adoption cryptocurrency crypto exchange crypto market crypto regulation decentralized finance DeFi Elon Musk ETH Ethereum Europe Federal Reserve finance FTX inflation investment market analysis Metaverse NFT nonfungible tokens oil market price analysis recession regulation Russia stock market technology Tesla the UK the US Twitter

Categories

  • Business
  • Econ Intersect News
  • Economics
  • Finance
  • Politics
  • Uncategorized

© Copyright 2024 EconIntersect

No Result
View All Result
  • 토토사이트
    • 카지노사이트
    • 도박사이트
    • 룰렛 사이트
    • 라이브카지노
    • 바카라사이트
    • 안전카지노
  • 경제
  • 파이낸스
  • 정치
  • 투자

© Copyright 2024 EconIntersect