Global Economic Intersection
Advertisement
  • Home
  • Economics
  • Finance
  • Politics
  • Investments
    • Invest in Amazon $250
  • Cryptocurrency
    • Best Bitcoin Accounts
    • Bitcoin Robot
      • Quantum AI
      • Bitcoin Era
      • Bitcoin Aussie System
      • Bitcoin Profit
      • Bitcoin Code
      • eKrona Cryptocurrency
      • Bitcoin Up
      • Bitcoin Prime
      • Yuan Pay Group
      • Immediate Profit
      • BitQH
      • Bitcoin Loophole
      • Crypto Boom
      • Bitcoin Treasure
      • Bitcoin Lucro
      • Bitcoin System
      • Oil Profit
      • The News Spy
      • Bitcoin Buyer
      • Bitcoin Inform
      • Immediate Edge
      • Bitcoin Evolution
      • Cryptohopper
      • Ethereum Trader
      • BitQL
      • Quantum Code
      • Bitcoin Revolution
      • British Trade Platform
      • British Bitcoin Profit
    • Bitcoin Reddit
    • Celebrities
      • Dr. Chris Brown Bitcoin
      • Teeka Tiwari Bitcoin
      • Russell Brand Bitcoin
      • Holly Willoughby Bitcoin
No Result
View All Result
  • Home
  • Economics
  • Finance
  • Politics
  • Investments
    • Invest in Amazon $250
  • Cryptocurrency
    • Best Bitcoin Accounts
    • Bitcoin Robot
      • Quantum AI
      • Bitcoin Era
      • Bitcoin Aussie System
      • Bitcoin Profit
      • Bitcoin Code
      • eKrona Cryptocurrency
      • Bitcoin Up
      • Bitcoin Prime
      • Yuan Pay Group
      • Immediate Profit
      • BitQH
      • Bitcoin Loophole
      • Crypto Boom
      • Bitcoin Treasure
      • Bitcoin Lucro
      • Bitcoin System
      • Oil Profit
      • The News Spy
      • Bitcoin Buyer
      • Bitcoin Inform
      • Immediate Edge
      • Bitcoin Evolution
      • Cryptohopper
      • Ethereum Trader
      • BitQL
      • Quantum Code
      • Bitcoin Revolution
      • British Trade Platform
      • British Bitcoin Profit
    • Bitcoin Reddit
    • Celebrities
      • Dr. Chris Brown Bitcoin
      • Teeka Tiwari Bitcoin
      • Russell Brand Bitcoin
      • Holly Willoughby Bitcoin
No Result
View All Result
Global Economic Intersection
No Result
View All Result

It’s Not a Correction Until When?

admin by admin
February 13, 2014
in Uncategorized
0
0
SHARES
5
VIEWS
Share on FacebookShare on Twitter

by Chris Ebert, Zentrader

Is this a correction or isn’t it? A very common response is that it is not a correction unless the market is down 10%.

10% – it’s a nice round number, easy to remember, and may appear to be a reasonable number from a technical standpoint; reasonable, that is, until we are reminded that this is the stock market we’re talking about.

The stock market is a land of a thousand technical indicators. So, isn’t it a bit suspicious that many folks are apparently relying on a nice round number – 10% – to tell them when the market is in a correction? Why not 12%? Why not 9.6%?

The truth is: the 10% figure, while easy to remember, is really not very useful for anything but news headlines. Just because the news media are shouting “correction”, based on their interpretation of a sell-off of more than 10%, does not necessarily mean it is a bad time to buy stocks; and just because the media are hesitant to declare a correction, because their 10% criterion has not been met, does not necessarily imply that buying stocks is a good idea.

It is important, for all traders, to avoid being distracted by talk of a correction, and instead be constantly aware of the condition of the stock market. To a trader who is aware, a correction is not a big deal, but simply one of several common types of market environments. There are rallies, consolidations, crashes, to name a few of the many stock market environments. Focusing on only one environment – correction or the lack thereof – is probably not the healthiest thing a trader or investor can do.

The following analysis is presented here weekly, in order to make it easier for all traders to recognize all types of stock market environments, not just corrections. As of this past week, indications are that the market is not yet in a correction, but simply digesting the massive gains of 2013 and early 2014.

Stocks and Options at a Glance

Click on chart to enlarge

*All strategies involve at-the-money options opened 4 months (112 days) prior to this week’s expiration using an ETF that closely tracks the performance of the S&P 500, such as the SPDR S&P 500 ETF Trust (NYSEARCA:SPY)

You Are Here – Bull Market Stage 2

Recognizing whether the stock market is currently at Stage 2 requires a quick analysis of the three categories (A, B, and C) of option strategies shown in the chart above, using a plus (+) for profitable strategies and a minus (-) for unprofitable ones.

  • Covered Call trading is currently profitable (A+). This week’s profit was 2.9%.

  • Long Call trading is currently profitable (B+). This week’s profit was 0.1%.

  • Long Straddle trading is not currently profitable (C-). This week’s loss was 2.7%.

The combination, A+ B+ C-, occurs whenever the stock market environment is at Stage 2. Often times, Stage 2 is nothing more than a healthy digestion of the market’s recent gains. If so, then the S&P would be expected to soar back towards the highs of several weeks ago once it has spent enough time digesting the gains that resulted from those highs, typically several weeks.

For a complete description of all of the Options Market Stages, click here

What Happens Next?

What happens next depends on how muchfear the stock market has put into traders. Generally the greater the pullback in stock prices, the greater the fear. The greater the fear, the more likely traders will tend to be to sell their currently-losing stocks at break-even if they get the chance. Thus, the greater the amount of fear, the higher the chance will be that all those folks who bought stocks at their highs of early 2014 will be likely to sell them if prices return to those levels in the future.

It’s simple really, when considering ones own reaction to trading:

  • You buy a stock at an all-time high because you believe the price will go up. Instead the price falls a little, but eventually rises back to your purchase price. You might have a little bit of fear, but your greed will likely force you to hold the stock for a profit. If a lot of other traders feel the same way, there will be little or no resistance when the price returns to its all-time high, and the price may indeed continue higher.

  • After you buy the stock at its all-time high, the price falls quite a bit, but eventually returns to your purchase price. Here you may have mixed feelings about holding onto a stock for gains when it has already proven that it can cause you substantial losses. Your fear of repeating the loss may balance your greed of getting a gain on the trade. If a lot of other traders feel the same way, the stock price will probably encounter significant resistance when it rises to the previously-attained all-time high level, and will have difficulty, at least temporarily, rising any higher.

  • After buying the stock at its all-time high, the price falls drastically. If you are like other traders who refuse to sell the stock at a loss, you will count your blessings the moment the price returns to its all-time high, giving you the opportunity to get out of the trade at break-even. Here, your fear of repeating the loss is likely to greatly outweigh your greed; and with many other traders feeling the same way, the stock price will act as if it has hit a brick wall if it eventually rises back to its all-time high price.

The broader stock market, as represented by the S&P 500, acts essentially the same as the above scenarios. To predict whether the S&P will encounter no resistance, significant resistance or brick-wall resistance, if it returns to its all-time high, requires a study of the amount of collective fear among traders. This study can be accomplished with the Options Market Stages.

Options Market Stages 02-08-14

For tips on how the above chart is created, as well as using it as a technical indicator, click here.

  • At the current stage, Stage 2, the market has only pulled back slightly, despite media portrayals of an apocalypse. As long as the S&P falls no lower than the bottom of Stage 2 (above the yellow line on the chart), there is a good argument that the S&P could soar past its recent highs of 1840 – 1850 with little or no resistance.

  • If the market enters Stage 3, the pullback will have become a little more severe. If the S&P declines into Stage 3 (below the yellow line on the chart), it is likely that any eventually rally back to the 1840 – 1850 level will hit a brick wall, at least temporarily.

  • If the market enters Stage 4 (below the orange line), the pullback will have become so severe that there is no doubt it is in a correction. At this level, most traders are not concerned with resistance, as it is likely a long way off, but support. If it is just a Bull-market correction, then support will be found at or above the red line. If it is the beginning of something worse, a Bear market, then no support will hold and the S&P will sink below the red line.

Weekly 3-Step Options Analysis:

On the chart of “Stocks and Options at a Glance”, option strategies are broken down into 3 basic categories: A, B and C. Following is a detailed 3-step analysis of the performance of each of those categories.

STEP 1: Are the Bulls in Control of the Market?

The performance of Covered Calls and Naked Puts (Category A+ trades) reveals whether the Bulls are in control. The Covered Call/Naked Put Index (CCNPI) measures the performance of these trades on the S&P 500 when opened at-the-money over several time frames. Most important is the profitability of these trades opened 112 days prior to expiration.

Covered Call Trading

Covered Call trading did not experience a single loss in 2013, and the streak endures so far in 2014, continuing a streak of nearly lossless trading extending all the way back to late 2011. That means the Bulls have been in control since late 2011 and remain in control today. As long as the S&P remains above 1708 over the upcoming week, Covered Call trading (and Naked Put trading) will remain profitable, indicating that the Bulls retain control of the longer-term trend. The reasoning goes as follows:

  • “If I can sell an at-the-money Covered Call or a Naked Put and make a profit, then prices have either been going up, or have not fallen significantly.” Either way, it’s a Bull market.
  • “If I can’t collect enough of a premium on a Covered Call or Naked Put to earn a profit, it means prices are falling too fast. If implied volatility increases, as measured by indicators such as the VIX, the premiums I collect will increase as well. If the higher premiums are insufficient to offset my losses, the Bulls have lost control.” It’s a Bear market.
  • “If stock prices have been falling long enough to have caused extremely high implied volatility, as measured by indicators such as the VIX, and I can collect enough of a premium on a Covered Call or Naked Put to earn a profit even when stock prices fall drastically, the Bears have lost control.” It’s probably very near the end of a Bear market.

STEP 2: How Strong are the Bulls?

The performance of Long Calls and Married Puts (Category B+ trades) reveals whether bullish traders’ confidence is strong or weak. The Long Call/Married Put Index (LCMPI) measures the performance of these trades on the S&P 500 when opened at-the-money over several time frames. Most important is the profitability of these trades opened 112 days prior to expiration.

Long Call Trading

Long Call trading was profitable for almost all of 2013 except for a brief break from August through early October, and remains profitable today. However, Long Calls are now teetering on the dividing line between profits and losses. A return to losses would mark a significant shift in sentiment among traders, and would be a harbinger of weakening of the current Bull market. If the S&P closes the upcoming week below 1811, Long Calls (and Married Puts) will fail to profit, suggesting the Bulls have lost confidence and strength. The reasoning goes as follows:

  • “If I can pay the premium on an at-the-money Long Call or a Married Put and still manage to earn a profit, then prices have been going up – and going up quickly.” The Bulls are not just in control, they are also showing their strength.
  • “If I pay the premium on a Long Call or a Married Put and fail to earn a profit, then prices have either gone down, or have not risen significantly.” Either way, if the Bulls are in control they are not showing their strength.

STEP 3: Have the Bulls or Bears Overstepped their Authority?

The performance of Long Straddles and Strangles (Category C+ trades) reveals whether traders feel the market is normal, has come too far and needs to correct, or has not moved far enough and needs to break out of its current range. The Long Straddle/Strangle Index (LSSI) measures the performance of these trades on the S&P 500 when opened at-the-money over several time frames. Most important is the profitability of these trades opened 112 days prior to expiration.

Long Straddle Trading

The LSSI currently stands at -2.7%, which is within normal limits. Profits on Long Straddle trades will not occur this week unless the S&P exceeds 1863. That level is likely out of reach this week, although anything is possible. Anything higher than 1863 indicates the presence of euphoria, often accompanied by lottery-fever-type bullishness, so the S&P exceeding that level this upcoming week would indicate a remarkable recovery from the recent slump.

Excessive profits on Long Straddle trades, such as those exceeding 4%, will not occur this coming week unless the S&P rises above 1933. Despite the presence of euphoria, anything higher than 1933 is likely to result in some selling pressure, and historically has been associated with subsequent pullbacks and, occasionally, Bull-market corrections. Given the recent slump in the S&P, 1933 is likely way out of reach and therefore of no concern this upcoming week.

Excessive losses on Long Straddle trades, such as those exceeding 6% will not occur this coming week unless the S&P falls to 1757. At or near that level a subsequent breakout is likely. Since 1757 is easily within reach if there is another sell-off this coming week, that level is important to watch, as anything below it is likely to indicate a major Bull-market correction is underway, and the market is likely to break out into a lower trading range.

The reasoning goes as follows:

  • “If I can pay the premium, not just on an at-the-money Call, but also on an at-the-money Put and still manage to earn a profit, then prices have not just been moving quickly, but at a rate that is surprisingly fast.” Profits warrant concern that a Bull market may be becoming over-bought or a Bear market may be becoming over-sold, but generally profits of less than 4% do not indicate an immediate threat of a correction.
  • “If I can pay both premiums and earn a profit of more than 4%, then the pace of the trend has been ridiculous and unsustainable.” No matter how much strength the Bulls or Bears have, they have pushed the market too far, too fast, and it needs to correct, at least temporarily.
  • “If I pay both premiums and suffer a loss of more than 6%, then the market has become remarkably trendless and range bound.” The stalemate between the Bulls and Bears has gone on far too long, and the market needs to break out of its current price range, either to a higher range or a lower one.

*Option position returns are extrapolated from historical data deemed reliable, but which cannot be guaranteed accurate. Not all strike prices and expiration dates may be available for trading, so actual returns may differ slightly from those calculated above.

The preceding is a post by Christopher Ebert, co-author of the popular option trading book “Show Me Your Options!” He uses his engineering background to mix and match options as a means of preserving portfolio wealth while outpacing inflation. Questions about constructing a specific option trade, or option trading in general, may be entered in the comment section below, or emailed to [email protected]


Previous Post

Mexico: No Help From NAFTA?

Next Post

Finance Refuses to Take Akerlof and Romer Seriously About Looting

Related Posts

Hong Kong Securities Watchdog Hires Crypto Personnel For Sector Supervision
Business

Hong Kong Securities Watchdog Hires Crypto Personnel For Sector Supervision

by John Wanguba
February 6, 2023
Hindenburg Bet Against India's Adani Baffled Rival U.S. Short Sellers
Business

Hindenburg Bet Against India’s Adani Baffled Rival U.S. Short Sellers

by John Wanguba
February 6, 2023
Volvo Prepares EV Blitz In Biggest Product Revamp Under Geely
Business

Volvo Prepares EV Blitz In Biggest Product Revamp Under Geely

by John Wanguba
February 6, 2023
Luxury Rehab Center Comes Up Offering ‘Crypto Addiction’ Therapy
Business

Luxury Rehab Center Comes Up Offering ‘Crypto Addiction’ Therapy

by John Wanguba
February 6, 2023
Alphabet Disappointed On Sales As Ad Revenue Plunged After Pandemic Run-Up
Business

Alphabet Disappointed On Sales As Ad Revenue Plunged After Pandemic Run-Up

by John Wanguba
February 6, 2023
Next Post

Finance Refuses to Take Akerlof and Romer Seriously About Looting

Leave a Reply Cancel reply

Your email address will not be published. Required fields are marked *

Browse by Category

  • Business
  • Econ Intersect News
  • Economics
  • Finance
  • Politics
  • Uncategorized

Browse by Tags

adoption altcoins banking banks Binance Bitcoin Bitcoin adoption Bitcoin market Bitcoin mining blockchain BTC business China crypto crypto adoption cryptocurrency crypto exchange crypto market crypto regulation decentralized finance DeFi Elon Musk ETH Ethereum Europe finance FTX inflation investment market analysis markets Metaverse mining NFT nonfungible tokens oil market price analysis recession regulation Russia technology Tesla the UK the US Twitter

Archives

  • February 2023
  • January 2023
  • December 2022
  • November 2022
  • October 2022
  • September 2022
  • August 2022
  • July 2022
  • June 2022
  • May 2022
  • April 2022
  • March 2022
  • February 2022
  • January 2022
  • December 2021
  • November 2021
  • October 2021
  • September 2021
  • August 2021
  • July 2021
  • June 2021
  • May 2021
  • April 2021
  • March 2021
  • February 2021
  • January 2021
  • December 2020
  • November 2020
  • October 2020
  • September 2020
  • August 2020
  • July 2020
  • June 2020
  • May 2020
  • April 2020
  • March 2020
  • February 2020
  • January 2020
  • December 2019
  • November 2019
  • October 2019
  • September 2019
  • August 2019
  • July 2019
  • June 2019
  • May 2019
  • April 2019
  • March 2019
  • February 2019
  • January 2019
  • December 2018
  • November 2018
  • October 2018
  • September 2018
  • August 2018
  • July 2018
  • June 2018
  • May 2018
  • April 2018
  • March 2018
  • February 2018
  • January 2018
  • December 2017
  • November 2017
  • October 2017
  • September 2017
  • August 2017
  • July 2017
  • June 2017
  • May 2017
  • April 2017
  • March 2017
  • February 2017
  • January 2017
  • December 2016
  • November 2016
  • October 2016
  • September 2016
  • August 2016
  • July 2016
  • June 2016
  • May 2016
  • April 2016
  • March 2016
  • February 2016
  • January 2016
  • December 2015
  • November 2015
  • October 2015
  • September 2015
  • August 2015
  • July 2015
  • June 2015
  • May 2015
  • April 2015
  • March 2015
  • February 2015
  • January 2015
  • December 2014
  • November 2014
  • October 2014
  • September 2014
  • August 2014
  • July 2014
  • June 2014
  • May 2014
  • April 2014
  • March 2014
  • February 2014
  • January 2014
  • December 2013
  • November 2013
  • October 2013
  • September 2013
  • August 2013
  • July 2013
  • June 2013
  • May 2013
  • April 2013
  • March 2013
  • February 2013
  • January 2013
  • December 2012
  • November 2012
  • October 2012
  • September 2012
  • August 2012
  • July 2012
  • June 2012
  • May 2012
  • April 2012
  • March 2012
  • February 2012
  • January 2012
  • December 2011
  • November 2011
  • October 2011
  • September 2011
  • August 2011
  • July 2011
  • June 2011
  • May 2011
  • April 2011
  • March 2011
  • February 2011
  • January 2011
  • December 2010
  • August 2010
  • August 2009

Categories

  • Business
  • Econ Intersect News
  • Economics
  • Finance
  • Politics
  • Uncategorized
Global Economic Intersection

After nearly 11 years of 24/7/365 operation, Global Economic Intersection co-founders Steven Hansen and John Lounsbury are retiring. The new owner, a global media company in London, is in the process of completing the set-up of Global Economic Intersection files in their system and publishing platform. The official website ownership transfer took place on 24 August.

Categories

  • Business
  • Econ Intersect News
  • Economics
  • Finance
  • Politics
  • Uncategorized

Recent Posts

  • Hong Kong Securities Watchdog Hires Crypto Personnel For Sector Supervision
  • Hindenburg Bet Against India’s Adani Baffled Rival U.S. Short Sellers
  • Volvo Prepares EV Blitz In Biggest Product Revamp Under Geely

© Copyright 2021 EconIntersect - Economic news, analysis and opinion.

No Result
View All Result
  • Home
  • Contact Us
  • Bitcoin Robot
    • Bitcoin Profit
    • Bitcoin Code
    • Quantum AI
    • eKrona Cryptocurrency
    • Bitcoin Up
    • Bitcoin Prime
    • Yuan Pay Group
    • Immediate Profit
    • BitIQ
    • Bitcoin Loophole
    • Crypto Boom
    • Bitcoin Era
    • Bitcoin Treasure
    • Bitcoin Lucro
    • Bitcoin System
    • Oil Profit
    • The News Spy
    • British Bitcoin Profit
    • Bitcoin Trader
  • Bitcoin Reddit

© Copyright 2021 EconIntersect - Economic news, analysis and opinion.

en English
ar Arabicbg Bulgarianda Danishnl Dutchen Englishfi Finnishfr Frenchde Germanel Greekit Italianja Japaneselv Latvianno Norwegianpl Polishpt Portuguesero Romanianes Spanishsv Swedish