econintersect.com
  • 토토사이트
    • 카지노사이트
    • 도박사이트
    • 룰렛 사이트
    • 라이브카지노
    • 바카라사이트
    • 안전카지노
  • 경제
  • 파이낸스
  • 정치
  • 투자
No Result
View All Result
  • 토토사이트
    • 카지노사이트
    • 도박사이트
    • 룰렛 사이트
    • 라이브카지노
    • 바카라사이트
    • 안전카지노
  • 경제
  • 파이낸스
  • 정치
  • 투자
No Result
View All Result
econintersect.com
No Result
View All Result

What’s Wrong with Small Caps?

admin by admin
8월 10, 2012
in 미분류
0
0
SHARES
0
VIEWS

Written by John Lounsbury

For the first 30 months after the secular bear market low of March 2009, small caps consistently led the way.  In most of the year that followed, from August of 2011, the small-businessSMALLhighs and lows of the three market indices, S&P 500, Nasdaq 100 and Russell 2000 have continued to move up and down pretty much in lock step, but with the S&P 500 assuming the leadership role.  That lock step behavior appears to have changed since the end of June.  Since the high for Russell 2000 on July 3, both the S&P 500 and the Nasdaq 100 large cap indexes have continued to advance but the small cap Russell 2000 index has traded down.

The three did trade down by similar amounts until July 12, but since then the two large cap indexes have been much stronger, trading up between 5% and 6% while the Russell 2000 is up only about 1/4 as much and is still below its July 3 closing high.

The divergence since the high for IWM at the beginning of July (and especially since July 12) for the three major indices, represented by SPDR ETF for the S&P 500 (NYSE:SPY), Powershares ETF for the Nasdaq 100 (NASDAQ:QQQ) and iShares ETF for the Russell 2000 (NYSE:IWM) can be seen in the first graph below.

Click on graphs for larger images.

The closest thing to the current behavior during the past 3 1/3 years occurred for about four weeks late August into September last year when IWM traded down, QQQ traded sideways and SPY traded up.

The behavior this year is different:  In the last four weeks both SPY and QQQ have traded up while IWM has declined.

To gain an appreciation for what is significant about the current behavior, let’s look at a longer-term view of the three ETFs all the way back to 09 March 2009:

Click on graphs for larger images.

The 11 peaks in IWM that preceded declines of approximately 15% or more are marked with “X”. The two periods where a significant divergence occurred for IWM with either or both of the other two ETFs are outlined with red boxes. The most recent event has the IWM peak marked with a question mark because that decline either (1) is not yet completed or (2) will prove to be only 6%. IMW need only rise above 81.53 (less than 1.37 above Thursday 09 August close) to exceed the closing high on July3 and remove the question mark.

But whether the high for IWM on July 3 becomes a top defining the start of a 15% or more decline or not, the more important question is whether the large cap indices continue to pull away from the Russell 2000. The longer this continues the more investors should be reducing exposure to small caps. The other factor is the observation that small caps often lead bull markets until they mature but then underperform as the large caps top out. The longer this underperformance for IWM lasts the more likely that the end of the great bull market from 2009 is near, or, at least that a significant correction (20% or more) is imminent.

The plan for the coming weeks:

1. Keep checking the charts for SPY, QQQ and IWM.

2. As long as SPY and QQQ both perform much better than IWM, keep lightening up on small cap stock exposures.

3. If one of the two large cap ETFs outperforms the other in addition to IWM, reduce exposure in whichever large cap index is failing behind as well as small cap stocks.

4. If all three ETFs decline at the same time, lighten up on stocks in general and start monitoring for bargain stocks that you may be able to pick up at lower prices down the road.

Note: This strategy reflects my own personal investment style which is not one of going all in or all out quickly. How other investors would react to the same information depends on their individual investment styles.

Related Articles

Recent articles on the Investing blog

Previous Post

China Exports: Economy Continues to Soften

Next Post

Mitt Romney vs. Deng Xiaoping

Related Posts

Bitcoin Is Finally Trading Perfectly Like 'Digital Gold'
Economics

Bitcoin Is Finally Trading Perfectly Like ‘Digital Gold’

by admin
Namibia Will Regulate And Not Ban Crypto With New Law
Finance

Namibia Will Regulate And Not Ban Crypto With New Law

by admin
6,746 ETH Valued At $12M Was Just Burned
Economics

6,746 ETH Valued At $12M Was Just Burned

by admin
Bitcoin Is Steady Above $29,000 Awaiting US NFP Figures
Economics

Bitcoin: What Next After Consolidation Ends?

by admin
US Government Offloads Another 8,200 Bitcoin – On-chain Data
Economics

US Government Offloads Another 8,200 Bitcoin – On-chain Data

by admin
Next Post

Mitt Romney vs. Deng Xiaoping

답글 남기기 응답 취소

이메일 주소는 공개되지 않습니다. 필수 필드는 *로 표시됩니다

Browse by Category

  • Business
  • Econ Intersect News
  • Economics
  • Finance
  • Politics
  • Uncategorized

Browse by Tags

adoption altcoins bank banking banks Binance Bitcoin Bitcoin market blockchain BTC BTC price business China crypto crypto adoption cryptocurrency crypto exchange crypto market crypto regulation decentralized finance DeFi Elon Musk ETH Ethereum Europe Federal Reserve finance FTX inflation investment market analysis Metaverse NFT nonfungible tokens oil market price analysis recession regulation Russia stock market technology Tesla the UK the US Twitter

Categories

  • Business
  • Econ Intersect News
  • Economics
  • Finance
  • Politics
  • Uncategorized

© Copyright 2024 EconIntersect

No Result
View All Result
  • 토토사이트
    • 카지노사이트
    • 도박사이트
    • 룰렛 사이트
    • 라이브카지노
    • 바카라사이트
    • 안전카지노
  • 경제
  • 파이낸스
  • 정치
  • 투자

© Copyright 2024 EconIntersect