econintersect.com
  • 토토사이트
    • 카지노사이트
    • 도박사이트
    • 룰렛 사이트
    • 라이브카지노
    • 바카라사이트
    • 안전카지노
  • 경제
  • 파이낸스
  • 정치
  • 투자
No Result
View All Result
  • 토토사이트
    • 카지노사이트
    • 도박사이트
    • 룰렛 사이트
    • 라이브카지노
    • 바카라사이트
    • 안전카지노
  • 경제
  • 파이낸스
  • 정치
  • 투자
No Result
View All Result
econintersect.com
No Result
View All Result

How to Pull the Plug on Irresponsible Capitalism

admin by admin
9월 29, 2014
in 미분류
0
0
SHARES
0
VIEWS

by Martin Parker, The Conversation

The Organization for Economic Cooperation and Development has proposed a plan to stop companies from avoiding billions of dollars in taxes. As we know from the scandals surrounding Amazon, Starbucks, Vodafone and others, big companies often hide their profits by pretending to have head offices somewhere with a low tax regime. Putting it mildly, this stinks.

The OECD has pitched its report as if it were a question of responding to the new challenges of a digital economy, but this is to misunderstand the nature of the problem. Corporations are the problem. They are machines built to make money and ensure that someone else picks up the bills, so that is what they do. Some like to think that they are gigantic profit-making monsters that trample on anyone to make a buck, sociopaths that pollute and lie with no conscience.

But the corporate form is also one that has brought wealth, employment and encouraged a huge amount of innovation. It is difficult to imagine our lives without Apple, McDonald’s, Marks & Spencer and many, many others. So what are we to do with them?

Organised chaos

The first corporations were organisations, like monasteries and universities, given a special status at the whim of the monarch to ensure that they could continue into the future, independent of any one person. The past 150 years of law has changed all this, and given corporations all sorts of rights whilst allowing them to evade all sorts of responsibilities. In British law, this means “limited liability” for owners, but also appears to mean unlimited profits for shareholders.

So when it comes to scandals about tax evasion, huge levels of executive pay, the off-shoring of jobs, “right-sizing” cuts which raise share prices, environmental damage and so on, we shouldn’t really be that surprised. Corporations are now very powerful indeed, many with revenues that dwarf those of small states – and they have organised the world to their advantage. This means that the OECD has to be careful about what it says and it already looks as if the US is not going to be supporting its proposals.

In a new book, Fighting Corporate Abuse: Beyond Predatory Capitalism, a group of academics from Belfast, Bristol, Cardiff, Essex, London and myself, from Leicester, put forward policy proposals to deal with this state of affairs. We document the abuses, but have also offered a manifesto which suggests what should be done in the UK and elsewhere.

Route map

For a start, we need to ensure that there is national action to reform UK company law, particularly in terms of the duty to maximise long-term value to all stakeholders – and not just shareholders. We also propose two-tier supervisory boards, with mandated employee representation, along with legal and enforceable caps on executive bonuses. Just as importantly, we want it to become easier to establish other types of commercial business to compete with the corporates – co-operatives, not-for-profits, partnerships and so on.

Addressing the national financial markets is vital here too, so we want to see a Robin Hood Tax introduced to slow down speculative trading and a ban on recently acquired shares being given voting rights when it comes to takeovers. We must also rigorously enforce new legislation which separates ordinary lending and borrowing from the risky financial instruments that have allowed hedge funds and private equity to destroy so many jobs in order to make profits.

Finally, and as the OECD report suggests, we want to see international action which ends tax avoidance by shutting the gaping holes in the global tax system. Corporations benefit from the roads, hospitals and educated workers that taxpayers fund, so they should contribute to them too. This also means that accounting rules must be simplified in order that corporations are forced to be transparent about who they employ, where, and how much profit they make. Such clarification would also result in owners becoming legally responsible for subsidiaries, and unable to claim that labour or environmental abuse was nothing to do with them.

The modern corporation is made by people, so it should be responsible to them. The frightening truth is that we have made monsters and have given them powers which now far exceed that of ordinary human beings. The OECD report was discussed at the G20 meeting of Finance Ministers over the weekend, but we can guess that implementation will be slow and piecemeal because of the opposition from corporations and some governments. It is a long time since a corporate charter was revoked, but perhaps it is time to get back into the habit.

Martin Parker does not work for, consult to, own shares in or receive funding from any company or organisation that would benefit from this article, and has no relevant affiliations.

This article was originally published on The Conversation. Read the original article.

Previous Post

The “Good” Amongst the “Bad” and the “Ugly”

Next Post

Sraffa vs. Hayek and the Natural Rate of Interest

Related Posts

Bitcoin Is Finally Trading Perfectly Like 'Digital Gold'
Economics

Bitcoin Is Finally Trading Perfectly Like ‘Digital Gold’

by admin
Namibia Will Regulate And Not Ban Crypto With New Law
Finance

Namibia Will Regulate And Not Ban Crypto With New Law

by admin
6,746 ETH Valued At $12M Was Just Burned
Economics

6,746 ETH Valued At $12M Was Just Burned

by admin
Bitcoin Is Steady Above $29,000 Awaiting US NFP Figures
Economics

Bitcoin: What Next After Consolidation Ends?

by admin
US Government Offloads Another 8,200 Bitcoin – On-chain Data
Economics

US Government Offloads Another 8,200 Bitcoin – On-chain Data

by admin
Next Post

Sraffa vs. Hayek and the Natural Rate of Interest

답글 남기기 응답 취소

이메일 주소는 공개되지 않습니다. 필수 필드는 *로 표시됩니다

Browse by Category

  • Business
  • Econ Intersect News
  • Economics
  • Finance
  • Politics
  • Uncategorized

Browse by Tags

adoption altcoins bank banking banks Binance Bitcoin Bitcoin market blockchain BTC BTC price business China crypto crypto adoption cryptocurrency crypto exchange crypto market crypto regulation decentralized finance DeFi Elon Musk ETH Ethereum Europe Federal Reserve finance FTX inflation investment market analysis Metaverse NFT nonfungible tokens oil market price analysis recession regulation Russia stock market technology Tesla the UK the US Twitter

Categories

  • Business
  • Econ Intersect News
  • Economics
  • Finance
  • Politics
  • Uncategorized

© Copyright 2024 EconIntersect

No Result
View All Result
  • 토토사이트
    • 카지노사이트
    • 도박사이트
    • 룰렛 사이트
    • 라이브카지노
    • 바카라사이트
    • 안전카지노
  • 경제
  • 파이낸스
  • 정치
  • 투자

© Copyright 2024 EconIntersect