Global Economic Intersection
Advertisement
  • Home
  • Economics
  • Finance
  • Politics
  • Investments
    • Invest in Amazon $250
  • Cryptocurrency
    • Best Bitcoin Accounts
    • Bitcoin Robot
      • Quantum AI
      • Bitcoin Era
      • Bitcoin Aussie System
      • Bitcoin Profit
      • Bitcoin Code
      • eKrona Cryptocurrency
      • Bitcoin Up
      • Bitcoin Prime
      • Yuan Pay Group
      • Immediate Profit
      • BitQH
      • Bitcoin Loophole
      • Crypto Boom
      • Bitcoin Treasure
      • Bitcoin Lucro
      • Bitcoin System
      • Oil Profit
      • The News Spy
      • Bitcoin Buyer
      • Bitcoin Inform
      • Immediate Edge
      • Bitcoin Evolution
      • Cryptohopper
      • Ethereum Trader
      • BitQL
      • Quantum Code
      • Bitcoin Revolution
      • British Trade Platform
      • British Bitcoin Profit
    • Bitcoin Reddit
    • Celebrities
      • Dr. Chris Brown Bitcoin
      • Teeka Tiwari Bitcoin
      • Russell Brand Bitcoin
      • Holly Willoughby Bitcoin
No Result
View All Result
  • Home
  • Economics
  • Finance
  • Politics
  • Investments
    • Invest in Amazon $250
  • Cryptocurrency
    • Best Bitcoin Accounts
    • Bitcoin Robot
      • Quantum AI
      • Bitcoin Era
      • Bitcoin Aussie System
      • Bitcoin Profit
      • Bitcoin Code
      • eKrona Cryptocurrency
      • Bitcoin Up
      • Bitcoin Prime
      • Yuan Pay Group
      • Immediate Profit
      • BitQH
      • Bitcoin Loophole
      • Crypto Boom
      • Bitcoin Treasure
      • Bitcoin Lucro
      • Bitcoin System
      • Oil Profit
      • The News Spy
      • Bitcoin Buyer
      • Bitcoin Inform
      • Immediate Edge
      • Bitcoin Evolution
      • Cryptohopper
      • Ethereum Trader
      • BitQL
      • Quantum Code
      • Bitcoin Revolution
      • British Trade Platform
      • British Bitcoin Profit
    • Bitcoin Reddit
    • Celebrities
      • Dr. Chris Brown Bitcoin
      • Teeka Tiwari Bitcoin
      • Russell Brand Bitcoin
      • Holly Willoughby Bitcoin
No Result
View All Result
Global Economic Intersection
No Result
View All Result

Michael Pettis Has Me Thinking

admin by admin
November 18, 2013
in Uncategorized
0
0
SHARES
0
VIEWS
Share on FacebookShare on Twitter

Random Thoughts from the High Desert

Written by Sig Silber

Michael Pettis recently wrote this article on Japan which is really good. I would recommend that everyone read it, not just once but three or four times. It is not easy to grasp all the information presented with one reading (at least not for me).

Michael’s article has started me thinking about the question: “What if New Mexico or some portion of the West was a separate country with its own currency (perhaps gold as we have a lot more gold in the ground than the East Coast) and with its own central bank?”

That should be quite amusing to think about but a discussion I will reserve for another occasion.

There is another specific topic that the article raises and I want to discuss that. One of the major reasons I recommend that you read this article by Michael Pettis (and perhaps buy his book “The Great Rebalancing“) is that it addresses some real issues regarding National Debt.

Default of the U.S. is not the issue that many think it is. Nations can not be forced to default and the National Debt is not an obligation foisted on our children . It represents both a debit which is the legal responsibility of living taxpayers and in the future their children and an offsetting credit. The Federal debt obligations are owned mostly by U.S. citizens who will pass these assets on to their children if they are not repaid by the government while they are still alive. And if they are repaid it will largely be with money removed from circulation through taxation . This is a fairly simply concept that politicians in general and Republicans in particular have great difficulty grasping.

And even the National Debt owed to non-U.S. Citizens is not a call on the labor of our children except in the sense of possibly providing them employment. The debt is denominated in U.S. dollars so foreign holders have only two options. When repaid principal or when receiving interest payments in U.S. dollars, they can lend those U.S. dollars back to the U.S. or spend them in the U.S. purchasing products, services or assets. So one has to ask if it is more correct to think in terms of non-U.S. holders of U.S. dollars having lent U.S. dollars to the U.S. or might it be more logical to think of it as the U.S. having allowed non-U.S. holders of U.S. dollars to defer spending them? At close to zero interest with the dollar devaluing, we should be happy that non-U.S. holders of dollars are allowing their purchasing power to decline. It is very much like receiving extended payment terms on our imports combined with a discount . What a deal!

But not to be totally outdone, the Democrats do not understand taxation as evidenced by the rise (or more accurately the return to the former level) of payroll taxes. Could there have been a more idiotic policy move when one is crawling out of what I consider to be a Depression? It is hard to imagine one. Let’s face it. Neither Political Party has a clue as to how money works or any inclination to find out.

Although there is ZERO chance the U.S. will be forced to default on its debt (we may do so voluntarily and recently put ourselves in a position where that could have happened at least temporarily on a technical basis), a high debt to GDP ratio constrains policy options and Michael Pettis discusses that re Japan, the nation with the highest debt to GDP ratio among major nations. So it is very much worth reading.

I have also attempted to sort out the implications of running either a negative or positive balance of trade and this is what I have come up with so far:

Economy Variable Impacted by Current Account Balance

Current Account Deficit

Current Account Surplus

Savings Rate Compared to Investment Rate

Decrease

Increase

Employment

Decrease

Increase

Household Income

Higher

Lower

Inflation

Lower

Higher

Interest Rates

Lower

Higher

GDP Growth

Lower

Higher

Currency Value

Higher

Lower

Now I know the above table is at least a gross simplification and possibly incorrect. There are at least four reasons why it may not be correct:

  1. I have not figured it out correctly yet.
  2. Nations do not exist in a vacuum. So the impact of what U.S. Policy is on the U.S. and other countries depends on what other nations do. If we debase our currency more slowly than our trading partners debase their currency, we end up with the stronger currency and have a larger current account deficit.
  3. The relationships which I attempted to define may very well change over time. The savings rate can not go below zero indefinitely. And GDP growth eventually requires investment to sustain it. Another way of looking at this is: “What is cause and what is effect?”
  4. Some of the natural impacts may not be acceptable for a variety of reasons and this will trigger subsequent actions by fiscal and monetary authorities which modify the initial impacts. That is where high debt comes into play. It is a problem to allow interest rates to go up if you have a lot of debt since when you roll over your debt you will be forced to pay higher interest rates. Michael Pettis has a very interesting way of looking at this. It is worth thinking about the different impacts of real and nominal interest rates (and inflation as well). This is an under-discussed topic.

If you cannot raise interest rates, inflation may get out of control. So a high debt to equity ratio is not desirable but not because we are in danger of default or our children will be burdened with the debt. Debt must be serviced as well as repaid and actually the servicing occurs even if debt is rolled over. And there are other negative impacts as well. They tend to be gradual impacts rather than tipping point impacts because we can invent money out of thin air.

On the other hand, if you cannot lower interest rates, unemployment may get out of control. That is pretty much where we are now in the U.S. I guess it is old fashioned to call it a liquidity trap but to lend you have to have willing and credit worthy borrowers. And if the borrowers are simply recycling the money (carry trade) and serving as middle men without actually putting the money to use in productive ways, it skews income and wealth distribution but does not result in higher production, more jobs, or higher household income.

We have a lot of that recycling without investment going on.

That is why my little table does not represent a dynamic model, and even if correct, is simply a crib sheet, perhaps useful in thinking about the impacts of economic policy.

One thing to keep in mind is that for many things the total balance sheet for the World is zero. Debt among nations (and within nations) must net out to zero since for every debtor there is a creditor. Same with trade balances. If you add up all the positive and negative balances they net out to zero. As an example, Germany exports poverty to France which recently had a credit downgrade. If German cars are exported to France, there must be fewer French workers in the French auto industry. We worry about outsourcing, but importing has essentially the same effect. That is where the phrase ‘beggar they neighbor’ comes into play. It is also one of the ways that both Republicans and Democrats fail to understand a World Economy. Republicans and Democrats tend to look at the U.S. in a vacuum and fail to consider that the U.S. is the sum of the Federal Government sector plus the Private Sector (that includes state and local governments) plus the trade balance with the rest of the World. If you do not integrate all the parts of the equation but only look at each part separately, you come to incorrect conclusions.

In the above table, the right hand column clearly represents Japan and Germany. But does the left column represent the U.S.? That remains an unanswered question as the fit with the U.S. is not perfect. I think I need to be able to answer that question to be able to consider the impact of some part of the U.S. becoming a separate country, but I will think about that over a few days.

It probably would be nice if the Federal Reserve, Congress, and the Executive in the U.S. were thinking about this also. It would be helpful to me and probably would be appreciated by our trading partners.

Previous Post

Infographic of the Day: What Are The Odds of Your Existence?

Next Post

Insider Trading 15 November 2013: Mortgage REIT’s Buying Ahead of QE Tapering Expectations

Related Posts

India’s Largest Retailer Tests Digital Rupee
Economics

India’s Largest Retailer Tests Digital Rupee

by John Wanguba
February 5, 2023
Apple Forecasts Another Plunge In Revenue, Says iPhone Production Issues Over
Business

Apple Forecasts Another Plunge In Revenue, Says iPhone Production Issues Over

by John Wanguba
February 5, 2023
U.S. Weekly Jobless Claims Dropped To 9-Month Low; Productivity Gains Accelerate
Economics

U.S. Weekly Jobless Claims Dropped To 9-Month Low; Productivity Gains Accelerate

by John Wanguba
February 5, 2023
Bitcoin Flirts With $24K, How High Will It Go?
Economics

Bitcoin Flirts With $24K, How High Will It Go?

by John Wanguba
February 3, 2023
Venezuela's PDVSA Toughens Oil Prepayment Terms
Business

Venezuela’s PDVSA Toughens Oil Prepayment Terms

by John Wanguba
February 2, 2023
Next Post

Insider Trading 15 November 2013: Mortgage REIT's Buying Ahead of QE Tapering Expectations

Leave a Reply Cancel reply

Your email address will not be published. Required fields are marked *

Browse by Category

  • Business
  • Econ Intersect News
  • Economics
  • Finance
  • Politics
  • Uncategorized

Browse by Tags

adoption altcoins banking banks Binance Bitcoin Bitcoin adoption Bitcoin market Bitcoin mining blockchain BTC business China crypto crypto adoption cryptocurrency crypto exchange crypto market crypto regulation decentralized finance DeFi Elon Musk ETH Ethereum Europe finance FTX inflation investment market analysis markets Metaverse mining NFT nonfungible tokens oil market price analysis recession regulation Russia technology Tesla the UK the US Twitter

Archives

  • February 2023
  • January 2023
  • December 2022
  • November 2022
  • October 2022
  • September 2022
  • August 2022
  • July 2022
  • June 2022
  • May 2022
  • April 2022
  • March 2022
  • February 2022
  • January 2022
  • December 2021
  • November 2021
  • October 2021
  • September 2021
  • August 2021
  • July 2021
  • June 2021
  • May 2021
  • April 2021
  • March 2021
  • February 2021
  • January 2021
  • December 2020
  • November 2020
  • October 2020
  • September 2020
  • August 2020
  • July 2020
  • June 2020
  • May 2020
  • April 2020
  • March 2020
  • February 2020
  • January 2020
  • December 2019
  • November 2019
  • October 2019
  • September 2019
  • August 2019
  • July 2019
  • June 2019
  • May 2019
  • April 2019
  • March 2019
  • February 2019
  • January 2019
  • December 2018
  • November 2018
  • October 2018
  • September 2018
  • August 2018
  • July 2018
  • June 2018
  • May 2018
  • April 2018
  • March 2018
  • February 2018
  • January 2018
  • December 2017
  • November 2017
  • October 2017
  • September 2017
  • August 2017
  • July 2017
  • June 2017
  • May 2017
  • April 2017
  • March 2017
  • February 2017
  • January 2017
  • December 2016
  • November 2016
  • October 2016
  • September 2016
  • August 2016
  • July 2016
  • June 2016
  • May 2016
  • April 2016
  • March 2016
  • February 2016
  • January 2016
  • December 2015
  • November 2015
  • October 2015
  • September 2015
  • August 2015
  • July 2015
  • June 2015
  • May 2015
  • April 2015
  • March 2015
  • February 2015
  • January 2015
  • December 2014
  • November 2014
  • October 2014
  • September 2014
  • August 2014
  • July 2014
  • June 2014
  • May 2014
  • April 2014
  • March 2014
  • February 2014
  • January 2014
  • December 2013
  • November 2013
  • October 2013
  • September 2013
  • August 2013
  • July 2013
  • June 2013
  • May 2013
  • April 2013
  • March 2013
  • February 2013
  • January 2013
  • December 2012
  • November 2012
  • October 2012
  • September 2012
  • August 2012
  • July 2012
  • June 2012
  • May 2012
  • April 2012
  • March 2012
  • February 2012
  • January 2012
  • December 2011
  • November 2011
  • October 2011
  • September 2011
  • August 2011
  • July 2011
  • June 2011
  • May 2011
  • April 2011
  • March 2011
  • February 2011
  • January 2011
  • December 2010
  • August 2010
  • August 2009

Categories

  • Business
  • Econ Intersect News
  • Economics
  • Finance
  • Politics
  • Uncategorized
Global Economic Intersection

After nearly 11 years of 24/7/365 operation, Global Economic Intersection co-founders Steven Hansen and John Lounsbury are retiring. The new owner, a global media company in London, is in the process of completing the set-up of Global Economic Intersection files in their system and publishing platform. The official website ownership transfer took place on 24 August.

Categories

  • Business
  • Econ Intersect News
  • Economics
  • Finance
  • Politics
  • Uncategorized

Recent Posts

  • India’s Largest Retailer Tests Digital Rupee
  • Apple Forecasts Another Plunge In Revenue, Says iPhone Production Issues Over
  • U.S. Weekly Jobless Claims Dropped To 9-Month Low; Productivity Gains Accelerate

© Copyright 2021 EconIntersect - Economic news, analysis and opinion.

No Result
View All Result
  • Home
  • Contact Us
  • Bitcoin Robot
    • Bitcoin Profit
    • Bitcoin Code
    • Quantum AI
    • eKrona Cryptocurrency
    • Bitcoin Up
    • Bitcoin Prime
    • Yuan Pay Group
    • Immediate Profit
    • BitIQ
    • Bitcoin Loophole
    • Crypto Boom
    • Bitcoin Era
    • Bitcoin Treasure
    • Bitcoin Lucro
    • Bitcoin System
    • Oil Profit
    • The News Spy
    • British Bitcoin Profit
    • Bitcoin Trader
  • Bitcoin Reddit

© Copyright 2021 EconIntersect - Economic news, analysis and opinion.

en English
ar Arabicbg Bulgarianda Danishnl Dutchen Englishfi Finnishfr Frenchde Germanel Greekit Italianja Japaneselv Latvianno Norwegianpl Polishpt Portuguesero Romanianes Spanishsv Swedish