Global Economic Intersection
Advertisement
  • Home
  • Economics
  • Finance
  • Politics
  • Investments
    • Invest in Amazon $250
  • Cryptocurrency
    • Best Bitcoin Accounts
    • Bitcoin Robot
      • Quantum AI
      • Bitcoin Era
      • Bitcoin Aussie System
      • Bitcoin Profit
      • Bitcoin Code
      • eKrona Cryptocurrency
      • Bitcoin Up
      • Bitcoin Prime
      • Yuan Pay Group
      • Immediate Profit
      • BitIQ
      • BitQH
      • Bitcoin Loophole
      • Crypto Boom
      • Bitcoin Treasure
      • Bitcoin Lucro
      • Bitcoin System
      • Oil Profit
      • The News Spy
      • Bitcoin Buyer
      • Bitcoin Inform
      • Immediate Edge
      • Bitcoin Evolution
      • Cryptohopper
      • Ethereum Trader
      • BitQL
      • Quantum Code
      • Bitcoin Revolution
      • British Trade Platform
      • British Bitcoin Profit
    • Bitcoin Reddit
    • Celebrities
      • Dr. Chris Brown Bitcoin
      • Teeka Tiwari Bitcoin
      • Russell Brand Bitcoin
      • Holly Willoughby Bitcoin
No Result
View All Result
  • Home
  • Economics
  • Finance
  • Politics
  • Investments
    • Invest in Amazon $250
  • Cryptocurrency
    • Best Bitcoin Accounts
    • Bitcoin Robot
      • Quantum AI
      • Bitcoin Era
      • Bitcoin Aussie System
      • Bitcoin Profit
      • Bitcoin Code
      • eKrona Cryptocurrency
      • Bitcoin Up
      • Bitcoin Prime
      • Yuan Pay Group
      • Immediate Profit
      • BitIQ
      • BitQH
      • Bitcoin Loophole
      • Crypto Boom
      • Bitcoin Treasure
      • Bitcoin Lucro
      • Bitcoin System
      • Oil Profit
      • The News Spy
      • Bitcoin Buyer
      • Bitcoin Inform
      • Immediate Edge
      • Bitcoin Evolution
      • Cryptohopper
      • Ethereum Trader
      • BitQL
      • Quantum Code
      • Bitcoin Revolution
      • British Trade Platform
      • British Bitcoin Profit
    • Bitcoin Reddit
    • Celebrities
      • Dr. Chris Brown Bitcoin
      • Teeka Tiwari Bitcoin
      • Russell Brand Bitcoin
      • Holly Willoughby Bitcoin
No Result
View All Result
Global Economic Intersection
No Result
View All Result

The Two Faces of the Inflation Monster

admin by admin
January 2, 2013
in Uncategorized
0
0
SHARES
8
VIEWS
Share on FacebookShare on Twitter

A Treatise on Unsound Money: Part 3

Written by Derryl Hermanutz

The 1970s were the nursery rhyme monster under the bed to sound money, as CPI inflation assaulted the buying power of the helpless hoards of saved money.  Ash writes,

“At the surface level,” Brad DeLong explained long ago, in a 1996 paper, the awful inflation of the 1970s happened because no one who could “placed a high enough priority on stopping inflation.” Worse still, “no one had a mandate to do what was necessary.” Beating unemployment with cheap money was thus the only tool in the box. So by God they would use it, even if it worked about as well as beating an egg with a shovel.”

So what caused 1970s stagflation, which was a mix of high inflation and high unemployment that were supposed by the heretic Keynes to run in opposite directions?  Sound money guys assume with Milton Friedman that “inflation is always and everywhere a monetary phenomenon“, which is true, except when it’s not.

Nixon removed the US$ and the world from the postwar gold-dollar standard in 1971, making the dollar a freely floating fiat currency the quantity of which was not restricted by the quantity of gold owned by the US government.  So the stage was set to allow increased money creation.  We have already noted that banks create our money supply by making loans and by purchasing government securities like Treasury bonds.  Banks create new credit money every time they buy a government bond, which adds to the economy’s money supply when the government spends the new money into the economy; just like new mortgage money or any other bank loan does not ‘relend savings‘ of money that already exists but rather “adds” new money to the economy’s money supply.  (mortgage securitization sold new mortgages as “asset backed securities” to money that already existed; and government debt sold to non-banks is also bought by money that already exists, but ultimately all that saved money originated when somebody spent their new bank loan into the economy, where somebody earned and saved the money that somebody else borrowed and spent)

So who, in 1971, was borrowing and spending lots of new US dollars into the economy? Nixon was, to pay for the Vietnam war.  War spending is far and away the most inflationary use of newly created credit money, as is well known to economic historians. The government hires an army of workers and orders a whole bunch of production and pays for it with the new money.  Then the government ships those goods to a foreign country and blows them up.  All the money the government spent has been earned by the economy contributing to the war effort, but the borrower and spender of the new money has not produced anything that will be “for sale” in the economy, to absorb the money and to use the revenue earned from sales to repay its loans.   So the increased supply of income money is chasing a not-increased supply of consumer goods, and you get CPI inflation.  (essentially, all “consumer” loans have this same effect: borrowed money is spent by people who are not using the money to produce things for sale that will allow them to reabsorb the money and repay their debts, but that’s another story for another long day)

Ok, debt-financed war spending causes inflation, which is a monetary phenomenon as Friedman said.  But what else happened around that time?  OPEC happened, in 1973. Remember the “energy crisis“?  The Arab oil embargo and oil shortages and rationing?  55 mph speed limits to conserve fuel?  Gas station lineups, and even-odd license plate days when you were even “allowed” to line up for gas?  OPEC quadrupled the price of oil virtually overnight, from $3 to $12 per barrel.  Not to mention the Iran-Iraq war of 1979 when oil spiked to $42 per barrel (before collapsing back to $10 in 1982).

Do you think rocketing oil prices caused by supply disruptions had any inflationary effects in the 1970s, or any effects on employment?  Or that a return to $10 oil might have had anything to do with ending the inflation (which is usually attributed to Volcker’s catastrophic 20% interest rates)?

Friedman recognized only one of the two drivers of inflation.  Too much money chasing too few goods is “demand pull” inflation.  Money in the hands of spenders is “demand“.  When too much new money flows into the economy faster than producers can ramp up production to satisfy the increased demand, you get demand pull inflation of CPI prices.  Producers can raise their prices because people have plenty of money and want the stuff, which is a really good thing for producer profits and investment even if savers and people on fixed incomes are not happy about contributing their money to inflated prices and producer profits.  Friedman’s inflation is caused by a too rapid increase in the economy’s supply of spendable money.

But there is another kind of CPI inflation that is driven by a non-monetary phenomenon, “cost push” inflation.  Oil is a primary commodity for which there is no immediate substitute.  Oil is used to make a wide variety of products.  It is also used as heating fuel, and was used to fire electricity generation.  But the main use of oil is for making transportation fuels.  Oil is an input cost into everything that has to be “transported” anywhere, as pretty much all transport is oil-fueled.  Since pretty much everything is transported, pretty much every price has an oil cost component imbedded in it.  So when oil prices quickly quadruple from a long term stable low price, and a few years later spike to 14X, you get cost push inflation of CPI prices.  So OPEC (plus money creation to finance the Vietnam war) was a major contributor to 1970s CPI price inflation when the goods producers’ cost-price of everything went up dramatically.

So why did the economy stagnate and unemployment rise during this double bladed cost-push and demand-pull inflation?  Think about what “triggered” the subprime meltdown in 2007 – 2008.  We know there had been extreme asset inflation in real estate, but as long as lenders kept lending and borrowers kept buying and real estate prices kept rising the gravy train kept rolling.  Then suddenly in 2008 lots of people found they were not able to make their mortgage payments and they began defaulting on their mortgages en masse.  Why did this happen just when it did?  (This is the kind of question economic historians study, by the way, and we should read them because they come up with some really good answers that improve our knowledge of how our economies work.)

Do you remember $147 per barrel oil in the summer of 2008 and gas over $4/gallon? What happens to an already stretched household budget when it costs $400/month instead of $200/month to fill up to drive to work?  In many cases what happened is that this final straw broke the household’s budget.   People ran out of money: their monthly bills rose higher than their after tax incomes.  They had to choose to either gas up the car and go to work, or make their mortgage payment, so they chose not to lose their job by missing work.  Many Americans NEED a car to get from suburbia to work, so it’s not like they had any immediate alternative to their cars.  So they spent their money on gas instead of mortgage payments and the real estate bubble suddenly popped.

All else being equal, adding new money into an economy is inflationary.  There will be more money chasing a not-increased quantity of stuff to buy, and spenders of the new money will bid up prices.  But all else is never actually equal, and other monetary factors actually deflate prices, which reduces profits, investment spending, and employment, which further reduces incomes and spending and profits, in the familiar downward spiral.  Borrowing and spending of newly created bank-credit money adds new spending power into the economy that generates first round inflation of the asset classes that the new money is loaned for, such as real estate (mortgage loans) or college education (student loans) or consumer goods (credit card debt).  That spending becomes incomes to the receivers of the spending.  “Spending” drives the economy. “Saving” has the opposite effect.”  But that is a story for Part 4 of this series.

The Five Parts of the Treatise on Unsound Money

Part 1. Bankers Blow Bubbles

Part 2. Too Much Money and No Money to be Made

Part 3. The Two faces of the Inflation Monster

Part 4. Savings Impede Growth

Part 5. Should the Economy “Serve” Money or Vice Versa?

Previous Post

Markets Stopped Advance At 10 AM and Slide Sideways

Next Post

Sharp Declines for US Dollar Coming

Related Posts

Bitcoin Network Strengthens As Mining Difficulty Reaches ATH Of 31.251T
Econ Intersect News

Bitcoin Network Strengthens As Mining Difficulty Reaches ATH Of 31.251T

by John Wanguba
May 15, 2022
Financial Giants Turn Attention To TikTok
Business

Financial Giants Turn Attention To TikTok

by John Wanguba
May 15, 2022
Santander Sends 80% Of IT Network To The Cloud
Business

Santander Sends 80% Of IT Network To The Cloud

by John Wanguba
May 15, 2022
How Blockchain Technology Boosts Research And Business
Business

How Blockchain Technology Boosts Research And Business

by John Wanguba
May 12, 2022
Nubank To Allocate 1% To Bitcoin And Offer Crypto Investment Services
Business

Nubank To Allocate 1% To Bitcoin And Offer Crypto Investment Services

by John Wanguba
May 11, 2022
Next Post

Sharp Declines for US Dollar Coming

Leave a Reply Cancel reply

Your email address will not be published. Required fields are marked *

Browse by Category

  • Business
  • Econ Intersect News
  • Economics
  • Finance
  • Politics
  • Uncategorized

Browse by Tags

adoption altcoins banking Binance Bitcoin Bitcoin adoption Bitcoin market Bitcoin mining blockchain BTC business CBDC Coinbase crypto crypto adoption cryptocurrency crypto exchange crypto market crypto regulation decentralized finance DeFi digital assets Elon Musk ETH Ethereum finance funding government investment market analysis Metaverse mining NFT NFT marketplace NFTs nonfungible tokens nonfungible tokens (NFTs) price analysis regulation Russia social media technology Tesla the US Twitter

Archives

  • May 2022
  • April 2022
  • March 2022
  • February 2022
  • January 2022
  • December 2021
  • November 2021
  • October 2021
  • September 2021
  • August 2021
  • July 2021
  • June 2021
  • May 2021
  • April 2021
  • March 2021
  • February 2021
  • January 2021
  • December 2020
  • November 2020
  • October 2020
  • September 2020
  • August 2020
  • July 2020
  • June 2020
  • May 2020
  • April 2020
  • March 2020
  • February 2020
  • January 2020
  • December 2019
  • November 2019
  • October 2019
  • September 2019
  • August 2019
  • July 2019
  • June 2019
  • May 2019
  • April 2019
  • March 2019
  • February 2019
  • January 2019
  • December 2018
  • November 2018
  • October 2018
  • September 2018
  • August 2018
  • July 2018
  • June 2018
  • May 2018
  • April 2018
  • March 2018
  • February 2018
  • January 2018
  • December 2017
  • November 2017
  • October 2017
  • September 2017
  • August 2017
  • July 2017
  • June 2017
  • May 2017
  • April 2017
  • March 2017
  • February 2017
  • January 2017
  • December 2016
  • November 2016
  • October 2016
  • September 2016
  • August 2016
  • July 2016
  • June 2016
  • May 2016
  • April 2016
  • March 2016
  • February 2016
  • January 2016
  • December 2015
  • November 2015
  • October 2015
  • September 2015
  • August 2015
  • July 2015
  • June 2015
  • May 2015
  • April 2015
  • March 2015
  • February 2015
  • January 2015
  • December 2014
  • November 2014
  • October 2014
  • September 2014
  • August 2014
  • July 2014
  • June 2014
  • May 2014
  • April 2014
  • March 2014
  • February 2014
  • January 2014
  • December 2013
  • November 2013
  • October 2013
  • September 2013
  • August 2013
  • July 2013
  • June 2013
  • May 2013
  • April 2013
  • March 2013
  • February 2013
  • January 2013
  • December 2012
  • November 2012
  • October 2012
  • September 2012
  • August 2012
  • July 2012
  • June 2012
  • May 2012
  • April 2012
  • March 2012
  • February 2012
  • January 2012
  • December 2011
  • November 2011
  • October 2011
  • September 2011
  • August 2011
  • July 2011
  • June 2011
  • May 2011
  • April 2011
  • March 2011
  • February 2011
  • January 2011
  • December 2010
  • August 2010
  • August 2009

Categories

  • Business
  • Econ Intersect News
  • Economics
  • Finance
  • Politics
  • Uncategorized
Global Economic Intersection

After nearly 11 years of 24/7/365 operation, Global Economic Intersection co-founders Steven Hansen and John Lounsbury are retiring. The new owner, a global media company in London, is in the process of completing the set-up of Global Economic Intersection files in their system and publishing platform. The official website ownership transfer took place on 24 August.

Categories

  • Business
  • Econ Intersect News
  • Economics
  • Finance
  • Politics
  • Uncategorized

Recent Posts

  • Bitcoin Network Strengthens As Mining Difficulty Reaches ATH Of 31.251T
  • Financial Giants Turn Attention To TikTok
  • Santander Sends 80% Of IT Network To The Cloud

© Copyright 2021 EconIntersect - Economic news, analysis and opinion.

No Result
View All Result
  • Home
  • Contact Us
  • Bitcoin Robot
    • Bitcoin Profit
    • Bitcoin Code
    • Quantum AI
    • eKrona Cryptocurrency
    • Bitcoin Up
    • Bitcoin Prime
    • Yuan Pay Group
    • Immediate Profit
    • BitIQ
    • Bitcoin Loophole
    • Crypto Boom
    • Bitcoin Era
    • Bitcoin Treasure
    • Bitcoin Lucro
    • Bitcoin System
    • Oil Profit
    • The News Spy
    • British Bitcoin Profit
    • Bitcoin Trader
  • Bitcoin Reddit

© Copyright 2021 EconIntersect - Economic news, analysis and opinion.

en English
ar Arabicbg Bulgarianda Danishnl Dutchen Englishfi Finnishfr Frenchde Germanel Greekit Italianja Japaneselv Latvianno Norwegianpl Polishpt Portuguesero Romanianes Spanishsv Swedish