Global Economic Intersection
Advertisement
  • Home
  • Economics
  • Finance
  • Politics
  • Investments
    • Invest in Amazon $250
  • Cryptocurrency
    • Best Bitcoin Accounts
    • Bitcoin Robot
      • Quantum AI
      • Bitcoin Era
      • Bitcoin Aussie System
      • Bitcoin Profit
      • Bitcoin Code
      • eKrona Cryptocurrency
      • Bitcoin Up
      • Bitcoin Prime
      • Yuan Pay Group
      • Immediate Profit
      • BitQH
      • Bitcoin Loophole
      • Crypto Boom
      • Bitcoin Treasure
      • Bitcoin Lucro
      • Bitcoin System
      • Oil Profit
      • The News Spy
      • Bitcoin Buyer
      • Bitcoin Inform
      • Immediate Edge
      • Bitcoin Evolution
      • Cryptohopper
      • Ethereum Trader
      • BitQL
      • Quantum Code
      • Bitcoin Revolution
      • British Trade Platform
      • British Bitcoin Profit
    • Bitcoin Reddit
    • Celebrities
      • Dr. Chris Brown Bitcoin
      • Teeka Tiwari Bitcoin
      • Russell Brand Bitcoin
      • Holly Willoughby Bitcoin
No Result
View All Result
  • Home
  • Economics
  • Finance
  • Politics
  • Investments
    • Invest in Amazon $250
  • Cryptocurrency
    • Best Bitcoin Accounts
    • Bitcoin Robot
      • Quantum AI
      • Bitcoin Era
      • Bitcoin Aussie System
      • Bitcoin Profit
      • Bitcoin Code
      • eKrona Cryptocurrency
      • Bitcoin Up
      • Bitcoin Prime
      • Yuan Pay Group
      • Immediate Profit
      • BitQH
      • Bitcoin Loophole
      • Crypto Boom
      • Bitcoin Treasure
      • Bitcoin Lucro
      • Bitcoin System
      • Oil Profit
      • The News Spy
      • Bitcoin Buyer
      • Bitcoin Inform
      • Immediate Edge
      • Bitcoin Evolution
      • Cryptohopper
      • Ethereum Trader
      • BitQL
      • Quantum Code
      • Bitcoin Revolution
      • British Trade Platform
      • British Bitcoin Profit
    • Bitcoin Reddit
    • Celebrities
      • Dr. Chris Brown Bitcoin
      • Teeka Tiwari Bitcoin
      • Russell Brand Bitcoin
      • Holly Willoughby Bitcoin
No Result
View All Result
Global Economic Intersection
No Result
View All Result

JP Morgan: Eight Challenging Questions

admin by admin
June 24, 2012
in Uncategorized
0
0
SHARES
15
VIEWS
Share on FacebookShare on Twitter

Is Opacity Hiding the Mother of All Ponzi Schemes?

Written by Desputatio Sapiens

pirateSMALLThe scary thing about the recently announced trading losses at JP Morgan is not that a twenty or thirty something “rogue” trader in London can lose a lot of money.  That has happened to many if not most of the Too Big to Fail Banks and the system keeps rocking along.  The really scary thing is that, just as with the mortgage mess of the 2000s, we are left with the feeling that no one, including Mr. Dimon, really understands the accounting used to book derivatives transactions.

1.  What is VAR, Really?

Derivatives risks are not booked by banks based on the gross exposures of the banks.  If so, JP Morgan’s $71 Trillion of derivatives exposure as of December 31, 2011 would totally overwhelm its $2.3 trillion of assets, even more so its $182 billion of net worth.  Banks depend on highly complex models to determine the net risk of their derivatives portfolios.  By netting out trades and utilizing formulas that only a Fine Hall mathematician could understand, the banks measure what they call “value at risk” (VAR) to determine the net bookings of their derivatives portfolios.

Using these formulas JP Morgan determined that, as of December 31, 2011, it had “only” $348 billion of net credit exposure (or 256% of Risk Based Capital) on its derivatives books.  It looks like both of those numbers can come down by a billion or two as a result of the original JPM announcement (or maybe several billion more based on later information and conjecture).  So here’s the scary part.  While Mr. Dimon was quick to take blame for his team’s sloppiness and bad judgment, it also appears that part of the problem came about as a result of a flawed VAR model and that the bank will go back to using an older model which they now believe may be more accurate.

Can we seriously expect that can be a solution?  Bill Black has asserted that the modern derivatives universe provides vehicles that can confound accurate accounting.  Could VAR actually be the acronym for “vacuous accounting ruse?”  Or could it be “voracious accounting rape?”

2.  Who Understands This Mess?

Mr. Dimon has criticized Paul Volcker for speaking out against a trading system he says Volcker doesn’t understand.  What if no one can understand the system?  If the models being used by the banks cannot be trusted, there is no way for anyone, including Mr. Dimon, to know with certainty what his real risks are.  We can say with some certainty that for JP Morgan the risks are likely between their risk estimate of $348 Billion and total notional exposure of $71 Trillion, but that’s a pretty big range.

“Rogue” traders only come to light when someone loses money.  Until then they typically appear to be making a lot of money for their employers and have the status of a Roman God.  The wild trading comes about when one of these guys incurs a loss, hides it and scrambles to make it up.  Things get out of hand and suddenly you’ve got headlines.  It would be really interesting to know what was happening in the JP Morgan trading book in question before the “London Whale” began to do his thing.

3.  Is it possible that there might be losses built into the derivatives books as a whole that would appear once the gross notional exposures quit growing?

According to the most recent OCC Quarterly Report on Bank Trading and Derivatives Activities, Gross Notional Exposure from derivatives trading at U. S. Banks fell $17 Trillion in Q4 2011, leading to the first year-to-year decline on record.  Not surprisingly trading revenues also fell from $8.5 billion to $2.5 billion in the fourth quarter.  We have no way of knowing whether the current JP Morgan loss has any connection with the overall shrinkage of the derivatives books or whether our concerns about the booking of derivatives assets are well founded.  The accounting is just too murky and we don’t have enough facts.  Let’s hope that someone does.

4.  What if the entire derivatives structure is an accidental Ponzi pyramid and the players don’t even know?

A Ponzi scheme has a specific definition (from Wikipedia):

A Ponzi scheme is a fraudulent investment operation that pays returns to its investors from their own money or the money paid by subsequent investors, rather than from profit earned by the individual or organization running the operation. The Ponzi scheme usually entices new investors by offering higher returns than other investments, in the form of short-term returns that are either abnormally high or unusually consistent. Perpetuation of the high returns requires an ever-increasing flow of money from new investors to keep the scheme going.[1]

The system is destined to collapse because the earnings, if any, are less than the payments to investors.

As stated in the discussion of the third question, we have no way of knowing whether or not the contraction of nominal value of total derivatives outstanding had anything but a coincidental relationship to the lack of liquidity that led to the large “hedging” losses at JP Morgan.  Let us simply leave this fourth question open and ask a fifth, more specific question, which has an indirect relationship to the Ponzi question.

5. What if, when money stops coming in, the liquidity supporting the structure dries up?

It has been alleged by many that a compensation regime is perverse if it compensates for transactions as they occur and does not compensate for the later results of the transactions.  By compensation, especially in later time, we mean both positive and negative events.  If the well-compensated current transaction proves to have negative consequences later, a logical compensation plan would include claw backs in proportion to the eventual damage realized.

Thus, if the purpose for the build-up of derivatives is primarily driven by the compensation derived by process, the interest in further transactions of such vehicles should reasonably decline if the money to be made has left the house with the originators.  The trade becomes purely defensive as every player tries to cover his exposures; one side (the risk side) of many trades can wither away.  Too many want to hold the protection and too few want provide it.  Liquidity is finis.

6.  Is the continued growth of the TBTF sucking the air out of the room?

Let’s take a step back from the liquidity problem for derivatives and look at the larger economy.  Why you might ask should ordinary mortals living everyday lives in Des Moines or Duluth or Dahlonega (the Main Street economy) care about the machinations of a few traders in London or New York.  It’s pretty simple.  If you’re a $15 million company in Des Moines growing to $50 million, you’re the heart and soul of the American economy, part of the small business engine of jobs growth that the politicians are fond of championing these days.  And you’re NOT going to get a loan from JP Morgan – they are too tied up in this huge derivatives game.  You depend on community and regional banks or private capital sources for your growth.  The big money is otherwise occupied.

Community bankers around the U. S. all tell the same story.  They have a multitude of great opportunities, but no capital to fund them.  As a country we’ve put the entire banking system at risk to the success of the derivatives traders and as a result it appears that a third of the community banks in the U. S. will be merged or go out of business over the next several years.  If America wants to succeed in the 21st century, it’s time to turn the equation around and put capital in the hands of the guys who know how to produce real jobs, not just jobs for the seven figure traders at the big banks, if it is not too late.

7.   What if a declining global derivatives portfolio starts sucking the air out of the TBTF banks?

If the TBTF banks have been sucking the air out of the real (Main Street) economy, this question considers what happens when the “air” accumulating each quarter in the casino center banks reverses and a declining derivative notional volume collapses the former cash center into an expense center.  The result is not likely to be that the air previously denied to Main Street will come rushing back.  Main Street is not likely to see any benefit from the reversal because the air has been captured outside of the financial system and has been carried away by the high compensation and bonuses paid for cash flow and the winnings of players at the derivatives casino without consideration of the cost of that flow down the road.

Instead, a day of reckoning may draw nigh for the TBTF and their sovereign currency backers.  And the former victims on Main Street would then be victimized further.

8. Will this produce the final resolution for The Great Financial Crisis with the collapse of the TBTF?

Herbert Stein is famous for saying:

“If something cannot go on forever, it will stop.”

The growth of the super-bank oligarchy has continued on an exponential growth path, seeming to ignore the hick-up of The Great Financial Crisis.  As Elliott Morss has pointed out, the big four U.S. banks are much larger at the end of 2011 than they were at the end of 2007 before the Great Financial Crisis of 2008.  The growth for three of the banks (Wells Fargo (NYSE:WFC) is not included because that banks asset growth is distorted by the merger with Wachovia Bank) is 23% over the four years compared to nominal GDP growth of 8%.

The growth of the financial sector has taken earnings from 15% of the S&P 500 20 and 30 years ago to more than 40% recently.

These types of relative growth numbers are unsustainable, and to be blunt, are simply unwarranted.  Perhaps the wisdom of Herbert Stein may yet be brought to focus on the financial sector.

Conclusion

The one thing I know is that derivatives are a zero sum game. In the case of a true hedge, one party is willing to pay the other for insurance, but there is a winner and a loser. In a purely speculative derivatives market, all the parties are playing to win the night at the tables. It is likely that 95% plus of the trading is something other than true hedges, because the size of the derivatives market dwarfs the size of real assets which would be hedged.  So we have to assume there are winners and losers, even though a vast majority came to the casino tables to win.

At a minimum, the croupier is there to take her tips. Where else do eight and nine figure bonuses come from? Maybe the trading profits are just another way the banks take it out of the hides of the poor suckers who are buying CDs at negative spreads and corporate or governmental borrowers who are paying too much for credit, but it just seems easier for me to believe that some of the trader salaries and reported profits are being capitalized in the long term contracts that are written and booked for five to twenty year durations at par.  What a racket:  long-term capitalization of short-term expenses.  It’s just too much of a stretch to believe that this is the one time when everyone is playing it straight and no one has been tempted to take advantage of the money creation black box.

Thus I have asked eight challenging questions.  It would have been interesting if these or related questions had been asked during congressional testimony.  But they would probably have been “academic” because it is almost certain that they would not have been answered.

Related Articles

  • The Great Debate©:  Will Dodd-Frank be Effective? by Elliott Morss, Bradley G. Lewis and William K. Black
  • Analysis and Opinion articles about banking
Previous Post

When Pigs Fly: China Business Turns to USA Markets for Profit Growth

Next Post

The Week Ahead: Surprises?

Related Posts

Production of French Salers Cheese Shut Down Due To Drought
Business

Production of French Salers Cheese Shut Down Due To Drought

by John Wanguba
August 16, 2022
Ethereum ICO Whale Address Moves 145K ETH After 3 Years Of Silence
Economics

Ethereum ICO Whale Address Moves 145K ETH After 3 Years Of Silence

by John Wanguba
August 15, 2022
Australian Court Instructs Google To Pay $43M For Misinforming Users
Econ Intersect News

Australian Court Instructs Google To Pay $43M For Misinforming Users

by John Wanguba
August 15, 2022
Dollar Fell Marginally Last Week As Inflation Seems To Peak
Economics

Dollar Fell Marginally Last Week As Inflation Seems To Peak

by John Wanguba
August 15, 2022
Mark Cuban Sued For Supposedly Promoting Crypto Ponzi Scheme
Business

Mark Cuban Sued For Supposedly Promoting Crypto Ponzi Scheme

by John Wanguba
August 15, 2022
Next Post

The Week Ahead: Surprises?

Leave a Reply Cancel reply

Your email address will not be published. Required fields are marked *

Browse by Category

  • Business
  • Econ Intersect News
  • Economics
  • Finance
  • Politics
  • Uncategorized

Browse by Tags

adoption altcoins banking banks Binance Bitcoin Bitcoin adoption Bitcoin market Bitcoin mining blockchain BTC business China Coinbase crypto crypto adoption cryptocurrency crypto exchange crypto market crypto regulation decentralized finance DeFi Elon Musk ETH Ethereum finance funding inflation investment market analysis markets Metaverse mining NFT NFTs nonfungible tokens nonfungible tokens (NFTs) price analysis regulation Russia social media technology Tesla the US Twitter

Archives

  • August 2022
  • July 2022
  • June 2022
  • May 2022
  • April 2022
  • March 2022
  • February 2022
  • January 2022
  • December 2021
  • November 2021
  • October 2021
  • September 2021
  • August 2021
  • July 2021
  • June 2021
  • May 2021
  • April 2021
  • March 2021
  • February 2021
  • January 2021
  • December 2020
  • November 2020
  • October 2020
  • September 2020
  • August 2020
  • July 2020
  • June 2020
  • May 2020
  • April 2020
  • March 2020
  • February 2020
  • January 2020
  • December 2019
  • November 2019
  • October 2019
  • September 2019
  • August 2019
  • July 2019
  • June 2019
  • May 2019
  • April 2019
  • March 2019
  • February 2019
  • January 2019
  • December 2018
  • November 2018
  • October 2018
  • September 2018
  • August 2018
  • July 2018
  • June 2018
  • May 2018
  • April 2018
  • March 2018
  • February 2018
  • January 2018
  • December 2017
  • November 2017
  • October 2017
  • September 2017
  • August 2017
  • July 2017
  • June 2017
  • May 2017
  • April 2017
  • March 2017
  • February 2017
  • January 2017
  • December 2016
  • November 2016
  • October 2016
  • September 2016
  • August 2016
  • July 2016
  • June 2016
  • May 2016
  • April 2016
  • March 2016
  • February 2016
  • January 2016
  • December 2015
  • November 2015
  • October 2015
  • September 2015
  • August 2015
  • July 2015
  • June 2015
  • May 2015
  • April 2015
  • March 2015
  • February 2015
  • January 2015
  • December 2014
  • November 2014
  • October 2014
  • September 2014
  • August 2014
  • July 2014
  • June 2014
  • May 2014
  • April 2014
  • March 2014
  • February 2014
  • January 2014
  • December 2013
  • November 2013
  • October 2013
  • September 2013
  • August 2013
  • July 2013
  • June 2013
  • May 2013
  • April 2013
  • March 2013
  • February 2013
  • January 2013
  • December 2012
  • November 2012
  • October 2012
  • September 2012
  • August 2012
  • July 2012
  • June 2012
  • May 2012
  • April 2012
  • March 2012
  • February 2012
  • January 2012
  • December 2011
  • November 2011
  • October 2011
  • September 2011
  • August 2011
  • July 2011
  • June 2011
  • May 2011
  • April 2011
  • March 2011
  • February 2011
  • January 2011
  • December 2010
  • August 2010
  • August 2009

Categories

  • Business
  • Econ Intersect News
  • Economics
  • Finance
  • Politics
  • Uncategorized
Global Economic Intersection

After nearly 11 years of 24/7/365 operation, Global Economic Intersection co-founders Steven Hansen and John Lounsbury are retiring. The new owner, a global media company in London, is in the process of completing the set-up of Global Economic Intersection files in their system and publishing platform. The official website ownership transfer took place on 24 August.

Categories

  • Business
  • Econ Intersect News
  • Economics
  • Finance
  • Politics
  • Uncategorized

Recent Posts

  • Production of French Salers Cheese Shut Down Due To Drought
  • Ethereum ICO Whale Address Moves 145K ETH After 3 Years Of Silence
  • Australian Court Instructs Google To Pay $43M For Misinforming Users

© Copyright 2021 EconIntersect - Economic news, analysis and opinion.

No Result
View All Result
  • Home
  • Contact Us
  • Bitcoin Robot
    • Bitcoin Profit
    • Bitcoin Code
    • Quantum AI
    • eKrona Cryptocurrency
    • Bitcoin Up
    • Bitcoin Prime
    • Yuan Pay Group
    • Immediate Profit
    • BitIQ
    • Bitcoin Loophole
    • Crypto Boom
    • Bitcoin Era
    • Bitcoin Treasure
    • Bitcoin Lucro
    • Bitcoin System
    • Oil Profit
    • The News Spy
    • British Bitcoin Profit
    • Bitcoin Trader
  • Bitcoin Reddit

© Copyright 2021 EconIntersect - Economic news, analysis and opinion.

en English
ar Arabicbg Bulgarianda Danishnl Dutchen Englishfi Finnishfr Frenchde Germanel Greekit Italianja Japaneselv Latvianno Norwegianpl Polishpt Portuguesero Romanianes Spanishsv Swedish