Global Economic Intersection
Advertisement
  • Home
  • Economics
  • Finance
  • Politics
  • Investments
    • Invest in Amazon $250
  • Cryptocurrency
    • Best Bitcoin Accounts
    • Bitcoin Robot
      • Quantum AI
      • Bitcoin Era
      • Bitcoin Aussie System
      • Bitcoin Profit
      • Bitcoin Code
      • eKrona Cryptocurrency
      • Bitcoin Up
      • Bitcoin Prime
      • Yuan Pay Group
      • Immediate Profit
      • BitIQ
      • BitQH
      • Bitcoin Loophole
      • Crypto Boom
      • Bitcoin Treasure
      • Bitcoin Lucro
      • Bitcoin System
      • Oil Profit
      • The News Spy
      • Bitcoin Buyer
      • Bitcoin Inform
      • Immediate Edge
      • Bitcoin Evolution
      • Cryptohopper
      • Ethereum Trader
      • BitQL
      • Quantum Code
      • Bitcoin Revolution
      • British Trade Platform
      • British Bitcoin Profit
    • Bitcoin Reddit
    • Celebrities
      • Dr. Chris Brown Bitcoin
      • Teeka Tiwari Bitcoin
      • Russell Brand Bitcoin
      • Holly Willoughby Bitcoin
No Result
View All Result
  • Home
  • Economics
  • Finance
  • Politics
  • Investments
    • Invest in Amazon $250
  • Cryptocurrency
    • Best Bitcoin Accounts
    • Bitcoin Robot
      • Quantum AI
      • Bitcoin Era
      • Bitcoin Aussie System
      • Bitcoin Profit
      • Bitcoin Code
      • eKrona Cryptocurrency
      • Bitcoin Up
      • Bitcoin Prime
      • Yuan Pay Group
      • Immediate Profit
      • BitIQ
      • BitQH
      • Bitcoin Loophole
      • Crypto Boom
      • Bitcoin Treasure
      • Bitcoin Lucro
      • Bitcoin System
      • Oil Profit
      • The News Spy
      • Bitcoin Buyer
      • Bitcoin Inform
      • Immediate Edge
      • Bitcoin Evolution
      • Cryptohopper
      • Ethereum Trader
      • BitQL
      • Quantum Code
      • Bitcoin Revolution
      • British Trade Platform
      • British Bitcoin Profit
    • Bitcoin Reddit
    • Celebrities
      • Dr. Chris Brown Bitcoin
      • Teeka Tiwari Bitcoin
      • Russell Brand Bitcoin
      • Holly Willoughby Bitcoin
No Result
View All Result
Global Economic Intersection
No Result
View All Result

From Markets to Market-Amoebas, and Back

admin by admin
December 23, 2011
in Uncategorized
0
0
SHARES
34
VIEWS
Share on FacebookShare on Twitter

By Guest Author Roger Erickson

While exploring how and why we have market meltdowns, it’s natural to ask  whether any economic ideology comes close to mapping to the vast literature about known, biological model market systems, i.e. species and ecosystems.  Looking for consistent parallels is of paramount utility to investors able to swing between hyper-local and systemic views in the endless pursuit of adequately managing both known, immediate risks and long-term uncertainties.  My conclusion, up front, is that investors need to invest as much or more time & resources in upgrading operations at the SEC, US Treasury, Federal Reserve and US Congress as they do in choosing winning stocks.  Market platforms, like all other systems, must be created and maintained, and the highest cost in all systems is eventually the cost of maintenance, alternately known as the cost of coordination.To broaden perspectives, let’s start comparing examples, by looking at a particular biology model, the social amoeba Dictyostelium discoideum. It’s an easy choice, since “dicty” carries so very many parallels to human market systems.  From there we’ll proceed to the only economic paradigm that I’ve found to be anything remotely resembling biology – the operational, non-theoretical observations erroneously called MMT (modern monetary theory).  Comparing diverse market models provides quick, powerful methods for seeking logical consistency and spotting inconstancies.  There are far too many useful parallels to mention in one column, but dicty will be introduced as a fantastically useful model which fiscal policy staff should consistently review.

Let’s build the argument for analogous contexts, starting with one, useful comparison useful for reducing confusion over the nature of currency, and of currency creation.  The USA is a social collection of over 300 million agents now.  In comparison, every amoeba is a collection of well over 300 million molecules.  Usefully, each sovereign market, a human nation and a single-cell amoeba, utilizes a sovereign currency system to denominate transactions and translate value between unpredictably distributed transaction chains.  Notably, dicty goes even further, and scales up it’s cells at will into multi-cellular aggregates, remarkably analogous – if not in scale – to the many steps in evolution between amoebas and humans, and their respective markets.  It’s like Libertarians periodically choosing to practice Congregationism!  We’ll leave most of those analogies for later review.

What PRIMARY internal currency system do amoebas, and all known cells use?  A molecule called adenosine.  Adenosine can be loaded with energy value by attaching one, two or three phosphate bonds, making adenosine mono-, di- or tri-phosphate, respectively AMP, ADP or ATP.

The question most orthodox economists would ask is, “how much adenosine does every cell make?”  The answer is, “as much as it needs.”  What’s the mystery?

Does any cell “borrow” adenosine?  What a silly question.  No system borrows its internal bookkeeping methodology.

What entity in cells manages adenosine production?  There are multiple synthesis & degradation paths all capable of recycling adenosine, and they are all kept in dynamic equilibrium by universal feedback.  The self-reporting system becomes it’s own Federal Reserve.

Can a cell ever “run out of” it’s adenosine bookkeeping currency?  Don’t be ridiculous.  As a bookkeeping “issuer”, cells are tasked with managing real-goods budgets.  Short of absolute death or damage, cells can always synthesize as much adenosine bookkeeping currency as is needed in order to translate bookkeeping requirements between transactions waiting to happen.  Bookkeeping in any organized system is infinitely self-generating.  It is an incidental byproduct of the system itself.

Another odd question that orthodox economists ask is “how do cells manage the thorny issue of ‘price stability’?”  What?  The question has no logical base in either context.  The cell or nation must survive, by maintaining all needed components.  No secondary framework for determining price stability has any relevance.  The actual value of any given transaction has no consistent frame of reference other than survival of both needed components PLUS the aggregate.  Local measures of value relevant to that framework are ephemeral, change every picosecond or faster, and are constantly re-established so randomly that there is no aggregate purpose in tracking them other than in assuring “adequate” co-maintenance of components & aggregate.  Endless details not worth tracking get buried in that term, “adequate.”

Now you can see why a biologist first addressing economics would ask, “in human economics, what is the equivalent of the adenosine molecule”?  That’s looking for consistency across contexts, where one  context obviously grew from & must be consistent with, the other.

The human social equivalent of the adenosine molecule? Surprisingly, there is no consensus on that definition, and the history of human market bookkeeping systems is comically convoluted, understood by few, yet vociferously argued over by many.  That’s to be expected in still-emerging systems.  What’s especially comical is the certainty of so many people in claiming permanent definitions for an obviously still-forming operational system. Personally, I’m leaning towards person<->person and person<->group bonds termed affinity, trust & credit to be the more universal human equivalent to adenosine, while our formal “currency” bookkeeping system is  selectively used for only some transactions which actually require calculable precision.

As a graphical reminder, compare two lists yourself, Ben Franklin style.  On one side, make a list of things you can put a $US price on.  On the other side, make a list we’re not [normally] comfortable putting a price on.  Starting at the beginning, does a human egg cell put an exact price on union with a human sperm? [Okay, let’s chalk that one up to statistical variance.]  Does a mother expect cash payment from the embryo growing in her uterus?  Do mom’s keep an accounting record accurately charging for breast milk?  Do fathers or moms charge by the hour for diaper changes, counseling, consoling, bandaids, encouragement & training?  Do [sane] partners put a price on affinity bonds & vows?  Carry on through neighbor potlucks, churches, and any other examples, on up to willingly giving one life to preserve others, and refusing [except by banksters] to put a price on the lives of your co-patriots.  It would be interesting to see an attempted tally of the statistical proportions, nationwide, of the American value system that can & can’t be financially quantified.

Without consistent axioms defining all components, it is very difficult to make a self-consistent system capable of smoothly scaling up markets to any size. A lowly “market-amoeba” such as dictyostelium can routinely scale up from small to large size.  It can aggregate and dis-aggregate “international” markets, and emigrate and colonize – all without EVER having a “depression” caused by currency mismanagement.

In contrast, what are we struggling with?  It’s clear that emerging human aggregates, our nations, constantly confuse affinity, credit, currency, patriotism and other measures, to our detriment.  Loss of operational coherence is always the most costly result of maintenance mistakes.  Upon review, many of our self-imposed difficulties stem directly from confusion due to scale.  We’re generating such large numbers of people, and so many transactions, at such accelerating rates, that we inevitably end up trying to attach exact currency bookkeeping to practices, interactions and products that others are not sure we should try to attach a formal price to!  And we have less time to think through every decision we make.  That is exactly why Walter Shewhart coined his famous phrase.  “In any complex system, the highest cost, by far, is the cost of coordination.”  While Walter was thinking mostly of industrial systems, he did, in retirement, realize the implications of his insight.  Today, a corollary should be obvious to all.   The return-on-coordination is always the highest return.  Furthermore, loss of operational coherence is the greatest danger for a complex aggregate.  Ironically, return on market coherence, across mixtures involving non-precise & precise transaction bookkeeping, is something we can’t put an accurate price on!  Nevertheless, a simple answer is clear, across molecular, cellular and human markets.  As long as we scale aggregate coherence, our aggregate options will continue to scale infinitely.  So why do we sweat those local gains & losses that are negligible in comparison?  Lack of coherent perspective, obviously.

To simplify things, let’s carry on anyway, and begin to parse just the formal currency operations in human markets – recognizing that that approach alone is inadequate for managing national operations. Let’s start by digging through the history of currency, to arrive at MMT, which is not a theory at all, but rather just a description of how a SUBSET of human bookkeeping – which we call monetary operations – is actually managed in current market systems.  It is the only economic data base I’ve come across that, like molecules & adenosine in cells, deals only with operational facts, and can scale up smoothly to handle any contingency, on demand.  In short, it is geared to the scalable operations of aggregates, not encumbered by the non-scalable,  uniquely local perspectives of diverse components, nor the limiting ideology of any market or sub-aggregate.  To a biologist, that sounds promising, and it sounds like a tool that an aggregate can successfully work with, and on.

There are useful reviews of early decisions on currency matters mentioned in the Constitutional Proceedings of 1776, see Public initiative and the beginning of US currency – How a confused electorate can end up pretending to borrow it’s own currency, instead of creating it, and “Understanding Modern Money.  Such links make it clear that currencies, as a “tally method” are initially created, on demand, by aggregate entities, whether nation states or market-amoebas – but ONLY for specific types of transactions, where precision is thought to be required.  So far, so good.

However, what happened next?  Why so much historical confusion over currency creation and management of currency supply?   A biologist would simply conclude that we have an incompletely formed aggregate, not coordinated to the degree required to ensure coherent actions and guarantee national survival.  In short, we simply aren’t thinking this through clearly enough.  It’s not rocket science, and actually doesn’t need to be precise.

When an emerging aggregate is incompletely organized, some mass confusion remains and the bulk of relevant feedback is not yet adequately parsed.  The result is that key aggregate options go unexplored.  That certainly seems to be the case when reviewing current monetary policy.  See Robert Eisner, The Misunderstood Economy, p.90;

Almost everybody talks about budget deficits. Almost everybody seems in principle to be against them. And almost no one, literally, knows what [they are] talking about.

Given this degree of ideological confusion, it is not surprising that so many residents, even financial professionals, know so little about our fiscal history, and possess even less systemic perspective from outside their narrow profession.  Here are just a few essays on the many fiscal and financial misbeliefs blatantly muddying our current financial outlooks:

    Teaching the Fallacy of Composition: The Federal Budget Deficit.

    Taxes for revenue are obsolete.

    Fiscal sustainability 101.

One of my favorite exchanges on fiscal policy occurred in 1941, after we’d had to jettison the cumbersome gold-std in order to gain the focused speed, flexibility & aggregate coherence needed to successfully wage WWII, an example of a nation acting like a market-amoeba.

ECCLES: We [the Federal Reserve] created it.

PATMAN: Out of what?

ECCLES: Out of the right to issue credit money.

PATMAN: And there is nothing behind it, is there, except our government’s credit?

ECCLES: That is what our money system is.

– Federal Reserve Board Governor Marriner Eccles in testimony before the House Committee on Banking and Currency in 1941, during questioning by Congressman Wright Patman about how the Fed got the money to purchase two billion dollars of government bonds in 1933.

 

For more on Marriner Eccles, see:

Marriner S. Eccles and the Federal Reserve Policy, 1934-1951

Marriner Eccles – HEARINGS BEFORE THE 1933 Senate COMMITTEE ON FINANCE

 

This exchange drives home points that make consistent sense to a biologist.  First, any sovereign currency system is, by definition, always tied to a “public initiative” standard, and nothing else. Second, there is a distinct, operational difference between the real-budget metrics used by the bookkeeping issuer and the proxy-budget metrics employed by the users of that bookkeeping currency.  Government credit = a population crediting the group with the right to create as much bookkeeping as needed, no more and no less. Third, momentary tactics are not written in stone. Only our enduring national goals and policies are steadfast principles.  If we can direct our Central Bank to arbitrarily create the currency to “buy” bonds, in order to quickly force innovation through outdated methodology, then it’s also immediately obvious that we don’t even need to “buy” the bonds, and may bypass them as well.   If Treasury-bonds were irrelevant & obsolete in 1941, then there is no reason for US citizens to be limiting their ability to think creatively in 2011!

Warren Mosler, seemingly the reincarnation of Marriner Eccles, has a simplified essay driving home many of the diverse inconsistencies in how most people – even banking and economic policy exerts – view monetary operations: The 7 Deadly, Innocent Frauds of Economic Policy.

In summary, will our national market system eventually have to act more like a self-consistent market-amoeba?  If we are to survive, that seems to be an inevitable conclusion.  How will we continue to evolve successful operations?  Answer, by exploring, on demand, whatever  group options appear.  We certainly won’t thrive by refusing to go where context is forcing us to go.  Our last great depression was both the result and cause of a confluence of factors, yet we traversed it by aggressively exploring options.  The rate of bold activities explored during the 1930s rivals in scope those explored during the 1860s and 1770s-1780s.  See a calendar of some of the notable events and dates during the 1930s.

How should an investor leverage these sweeping insights to shepherd short and long term returns?  As a component in one, particular market-amoeba, the obvious lesson is to continuously invest in your market platform, not just your isolated trades.  The surest way to lose market value is to degrade the market platform which allows value creation.

Rather than endorsing MMT as an ideology, I’ve specifically only provided links revealing operational facts.  The biological approach is that any and all methodologies are incessant works in progress, and that survival comes ONLY with continuous, full re-integration of all emerging approaches, followed by relaxation to the leanest subset fitting a fleeting context.  Our only hope, as both Ben Franklin & FDR cautioned, is for ideologues of all stripes to fully engage, openly share, and honestly compromise views in light of rapidly unfolding operational reality. There is always less time than we believe.

But while they prate of economic laws, men and women are starving. We must lay hold of the fact that economic laws are not made by nature. They are made by human beings.

– Franklin D. Roosevelt

For those further interested in MMT, here is an early attempt to enclose most of the operational insights that have come to be loosely described as Modern Monetary Theory.  It’s an unfortunate name.  A more descriptive term like “A Listing of Current Monetary Operations” would be more accurate, but as usual, mobs and markets and acronyms come to be ruled by logic only after the fact, if ever.  Another useful review of current participants has also appeared, although there are even more.  See: “Modern Monetary Operations“

It’s clear that the logic & concepts reviewed by current MMT authors is quite old, not new.  Rather, inter-twined questions about the inseparable concepts of credit-currency-criminology-policy have simply taken time to be discussed more widely.  The topics are still not adequately re-integrated at the scale demanded by our growing operations.  We need to accelerate propagation of useful ideas widely, not just refine them in small circles.  Here are a few more historical references that I’ve found to be particularly useful for enlarging group perspective on these topics.

“Constitutional” Conservatives v. “Constitutional” Liberals

History of the Legal Tender Paper Money Issued During the Great Rebellion, Being a Loan Without Interest and a National Currency : 1869

Henry Charles Carey, (argued for building on the precedent of non-debt-based fiat money and making the greenback system permanent).

Greenback Dollar.

Money and the Price System – CH Douglas

The Monopoly of Credit – CH Douglas

The Conquest of Poverty – Gerald Gratten McGeer

The Federal Reserve We Need

Fifteen Fatal Fallacies of Financial Fundamentalism – William Vickrey, Nobel Prize winner, 1996

Wynne Godley (popularized the “sectoral balances” concept)

Functional Finance and the Federal Debt – Abba Lerner

Tom Eliot (drafted the social security bill)

Modern Central Bank Operations – The General Principles

A Simple Business Card Economy

Some Neighbors Arrive (a model of MMT)

Related Articles

Articles by Roger Erickson

Opinion and Analysis blog articles on Modern Monetary Theory


About the Author

roger-erickson Roger Erickson is a systems entrepreneur based in Maryland. He worked for years in neurophysiology system research, at the Humboldt Stiftung, MIT, Yale, and NIMH before becoming more interested in community, business and market systems. Roger’s newest interests are being pursued through several startups, as well as pilot agriculture commercialization projects with the USDA.

Previous Post

Dump Some Rockets of 2011 and Shop for Steady Gainers

Next Post

Truck Tonnage Up 0.3% in November 2011: Economy Growing, Not Sliding Into Recession

Related Posts

eBay Unveils Sports-Themed NFT Collection
Business

eBay Unveils Sports-Themed NFT Collection

by John Wanguba
May 25, 2022
SpaceX To Get $1.7B In New Funding To Send Valuation to $127B
Business

SpaceX To Get $1.7B In New Funding To Send Valuation to $127B

by John Wanguba
May 25, 2022
Hyundai Signs Deal to Establish Full EV and Battery Factories in Georgia, US
Business

Hyundai Signs Deal to Establish Full EV and Battery Factories in Georgia, US

by John Wanguba
May 25, 2022
US Tech Giants Meta, Google, and Amazon Could Profit from Ukraine War – Media Guru
Business

US Tech Giants Meta, Google, and Amazon Could Profit from Ukraine War – Media Guru

by John Wanguba
May 25, 2022
Google Looks For New Talent To Lead Global Web3 Efforts
Business

Google Looks For New Talent To Lead Global Web3 Efforts

by John Wanguba
May 25, 2022
Next Post

Truck Tonnage Up 0.3% in November 2011: Economy Growing, Not Sliding Into Recession

Leave a Reply Cancel reply

Your email address will not be published. Required fields are marked *

Browse by Category

  • Business
  • Econ Intersect News
  • Economics
  • Finance
  • Politics
  • Uncategorized

Browse by Tags

adoption altcoins banking Binance Bitcoin Bitcoin adoption Bitcoin market Bitcoin mining blockchain BTC business Coinbase crypto crypto adoption cryptocurrency crypto exchange crypto market crypto regulation decentralized finance DeFi digital assets Elon Musk ETH Ethereum Ethereum blockchain finance funding government investment market analysis Metaverse mining NFT NFT marketplace NFTs nonfungible tokens nonfungible tokens (NFTs) price analysis regulation Russia social media technology Tesla the US Twitter

Archives

  • May 2022
  • April 2022
  • March 2022
  • February 2022
  • January 2022
  • December 2021
  • November 2021
  • October 2021
  • September 2021
  • August 2021
  • July 2021
  • June 2021
  • May 2021
  • April 2021
  • March 2021
  • February 2021
  • January 2021
  • December 2020
  • November 2020
  • October 2020
  • September 2020
  • August 2020
  • July 2020
  • June 2020
  • May 2020
  • April 2020
  • March 2020
  • February 2020
  • January 2020
  • December 2019
  • November 2019
  • October 2019
  • September 2019
  • August 2019
  • July 2019
  • June 2019
  • May 2019
  • April 2019
  • March 2019
  • February 2019
  • January 2019
  • December 2018
  • November 2018
  • October 2018
  • September 2018
  • August 2018
  • July 2018
  • June 2018
  • May 2018
  • April 2018
  • March 2018
  • February 2018
  • January 2018
  • December 2017
  • November 2017
  • October 2017
  • September 2017
  • August 2017
  • July 2017
  • June 2017
  • May 2017
  • April 2017
  • March 2017
  • February 2017
  • January 2017
  • December 2016
  • November 2016
  • October 2016
  • September 2016
  • August 2016
  • July 2016
  • June 2016
  • May 2016
  • April 2016
  • March 2016
  • February 2016
  • January 2016
  • December 2015
  • November 2015
  • October 2015
  • September 2015
  • August 2015
  • July 2015
  • June 2015
  • May 2015
  • April 2015
  • March 2015
  • February 2015
  • January 2015
  • December 2014
  • November 2014
  • October 2014
  • September 2014
  • August 2014
  • July 2014
  • June 2014
  • May 2014
  • April 2014
  • March 2014
  • February 2014
  • January 2014
  • December 2013
  • November 2013
  • October 2013
  • September 2013
  • August 2013
  • July 2013
  • June 2013
  • May 2013
  • April 2013
  • March 2013
  • February 2013
  • January 2013
  • December 2012
  • November 2012
  • October 2012
  • September 2012
  • August 2012
  • July 2012
  • June 2012
  • May 2012
  • April 2012
  • March 2012
  • February 2012
  • January 2012
  • December 2011
  • November 2011
  • October 2011
  • September 2011
  • August 2011
  • July 2011
  • June 2011
  • May 2011
  • April 2011
  • March 2011
  • February 2011
  • January 2011
  • December 2010
  • August 2010
  • August 2009

Categories

  • Business
  • Econ Intersect News
  • Economics
  • Finance
  • Politics
  • Uncategorized
Global Economic Intersection

After nearly 11 years of 24/7/365 operation, Global Economic Intersection co-founders Steven Hansen and John Lounsbury are retiring. The new owner, a global media company in London, is in the process of completing the set-up of Global Economic Intersection files in their system and publishing platform. The official website ownership transfer took place on 24 August.

Categories

  • Business
  • Econ Intersect News
  • Economics
  • Finance
  • Politics
  • Uncategorized

Recent Posts

  • eBay Unveils Sports-Themed NFT Collection
  • SpaceX To Get $1.7B In New Funding To Send Valuation to $127B
  • Hyundai Signs Deal to Establish Full EV and Battery Factories in Georgia, US

© Copyright 2021 EconIntersect - Economic news, analysis and opinion.

No Result
View All Result
  • Home
  • Contact Us
  • Bitcoin Robot
    • Bitcoin Profit
    • Bitcoin Code
    • Quantum AI
    • eKrona Cryptocurrency
    • Bitcoin Up
    • Bitcoin Prime
    • Yuan Pay Group
    • Immediate Profit
    • BitIQ
    • Bitcoin Loophole
    • Crypto Boom
    • Bitcoin Era
    • Bitcoin Treasure
    • Bitcoin Lucro
    • Bitcoin System
    • Oil Profit
    • The News Spy
    • British Bitcoin Profit
    • Bitcoin Trader
  • Bitcoin Reddit

© Copyright 2021 EconIntersect - Economic news, analysis and opinion.

en English
ar Arabicbg Bulgarianda Danishnl Dutchen Englishfi Finnishfr Frenchde Germanel Greekit Italianja Japaneselv Latvianno Norwegianpl Polishpt Portuguesero Romanianes Spanishsv Swedish