econintersect.com
  • 토토사이트
    • 카지노사이트
    • 도박사이트
    • 룰렛 사이트
    • 라이브카지노
    • 바카라사이트
    • 안전카지노
  • 경제
  • 파이낸스
  • 정치
  • 투자
No Result
View All Result
  • 토토사이트
    • 카지노사이트
    • 도박사이트
    • 룰렛 사이트
    • 라이브카지노
    • 바카라사이트
    • 안전카지노
  • 경제
  • 파이낸스
  • 정치
  • 투자
No Result
View All Result
econintersect.com
No Result
View All Result

Did The Financial Reforms Of The Early 1990s Fail? A Comparison Of Bank Failures And FDIC Losses In The 1986-92 And 2007-13 Periods

admin by admin
5월 17, 2015
in 미분류
0
0
SHARES
0
VIEWS

from the Richmond Fed

From the mid-1980s to the early 1990s, the United States experienced a severe commercial banking crisis. There were 998 bank failures between 1986 and 1992. Of non-de novo banks in existence at the end of 1985, those holding 5.4% of bank assets and 6.0% of bank deposits failed and went through Federal Deposit Insurance Corporation (FDIC) receivership over this same period.


Two of the more significant banking reforms that came out of this period were the increased regulatory capital requirements of Basel 1 and the prompt corrective action (PCA) provisions in the Federal Deposit Insurance Corporation Improvement Act of 1991 (FDICIA). The latter provisions built on the increased capital requirements of Basel 1 by requiring bank supervisors to take certain actions against a bank if its regulatory capital drops below certain thresholds. The purpose of PCA was to force supervisors to intervene in the operations of a bank and even shut it down, if necessary, before a bank becomes too severely distressed. These provisions were motivated by the heavy use of forbearance by thrift and bank supervisors in the 1980s and the belief that this forbearance increased the losses to the FDIC, and ultimately taxpayers, from failed banks and thrifts.

Despite these reforms, the recent financial crisis severely impacted commercial banks. There were 403 failures over 2007 to 2013. Of non-de novo banks in existence as of the end of 2006, those holding 2.2% of bank assets and 3.1% of deposits went through FDIC receivership between 2007 and 2013.

[click on image below to continue reading]

Source: http://www.richmondfed.org/publications/research/working_papers/2015/pdf/wp15-05.pdf

Previous Post

Early Headlines: F. A. O. Schwarz Closing, bin Laden Raid, Cascade Volcano Threat, Islamic Militants Smuggled into Europe and More

Next Post

Who Believes that the Federal Government Seeks to Take Over Texas?

Related Posts

Bitcoin Is Finally Trading Perfectly Like 'Digital Gold'
Economics

Bitcoin Is Finally Trading Perfectly Like ‘Digital Gold’

by admin
Namibia Will Regulate And Not Ban Crypto With New Law
Finance

Namibia Will Regulate And Not Ban Crypto With New Law

by admin
6,746 ETH Valued At $12M Was Just Burned
Economics

6,746 ETH Valued At $12M Was Just Burned

by admin
Bitcoin Is Steady Above $29,000 Awaiting US NFP Figures
Economics

Bitcoin: What Next After Consolidation Ends?

by admin
US Government Offloads Another 8,200 Bitcoin – On-chain Data
Economics

US Government Offloads Another 8,200 Bitcoin – On-chain Data

by admin
Next Post

Who Believes that the Federal Government Seeks to Take Over Texas?

답글 남기기 응답 취소

이메일 주소는 공개되지 않습니다. 필수 필드는 *로 표시됩니다

Browse by Category

  • Business
  • Econ Intersect News
  • Economics
  • Finance
  • Politics
  • Uncategorized

Browse by Tags

adoption altcoins bank banking banks Binance Bitcoin Bitcoin market blockchain BTC BTC price business China crypto crypto adoption cryptocurrency crypto exchange crypto market crypto regulation decentralized finance DeFi Elon Musk ETH Ethereum Europe Federal Reserve finance FTX inflation investment market analysis Metaverse NFT nonfungible tokens oil market price analysis recession regulation Russia stock market technology Tesla the UK the US Twitter

Categories

  • Business
  • Econ Intersect News
  • Economics
  • Finance
  • Politics
  • Uncategorized

© Copyright 2024 EconIntersect

No Result
View All Result
  • 토토사이트
    • 카지노사이트
    • 도박사이트
    • 룰렛 사이트
    • 라이브카지노
    • 바카라사이트
    • 안전카지노
  • 경제
  • 파이낸스
  • 정치
  • 투자

© Copyright 2024 EconIntersect