Global Economic Intersection
Advertisement
  • Home
  • Economics
  • Finance
  • Politics
  • Investments
    • Invest in Amazon $250
  • Cryptocurrency
    • Best Bitcoin Accounts
    • Bitcoin Robot
      • Quantum AI
      • Bitcoin Era
      • Bitcoin Aussie System
      • Bitcoin Profit
      • Bitcoin Code
      • eKrona Cryptocurrency
      • Bitcoin Up
      • Bitcoin Prime
      • Yuan Pay Group
      • Immediate Profit
      • BitQH
      • Bitcoin Loophole
      • Crypto Boom
      • Bitcoin Treasure
      • Bitcoin Lucro
      • Bitcoin System
      • Oil Profit
      • The News Spy
      • Bitcoin Buyer
      • Bitcoin Inform
      • Immediate Edge
      • Bitcoin Evolution
      • Cryptohopper
      • Ethereum Trader
      • BitQL
      • Quantum Code
      • Bitcoin Revolution
      • British Trade Platform
      • British Bitcoin Profit
    • Bitcoin Reddit
    • Celebrities
      • Dr. Chris Brown Bitcoin
      • Teeka Tiwari Bitcoin
      • Russell Brand Bitcoin
      • Holly Willoughby Bitcoin
No Result
View All Result
  • Home
  • Economics
  • Finance
  • Politics
  • Investments
    • Invest in Amazon $250
  • Cryptocurrency
    • Best Bitcoin Accounts
    • Bitcoin Robot
      • Quantum AI
      • Bitcoin Era
      • Bitcoin Aussie System
      • Bitcoin Profit
      • Bitcoin Code
      • eKrona Cryptocurrency
      • Bitcoin Up
      • Bitcoin Prime
      • Yuan Pay Group
      • Immediate Profit
      • BitQH
      • Bitcoin Loophole
      • Crypto Boom
      • Bitcoin Treasure
      • Bitcoin Lucro
      • Bitcoin System
      • Oil Profit
      • The News Spy
      • Bitcoin Buyer
      • Bitcoin Inform
      • Immediate Edge
      • Bitcoin Evolution
      • Cryptohopper
      • Ethereum Trader
      • BitQL
      • Quantum Code
      • Bitcoin Revolution
      • British Trade Platform
      • British Bitcoin Profit
    • Bitcoin Reddit
    • Celebrities
      • Dr. Chris Brown Bitcoin
      • Teeka Tiwari Bitcoin
      • Russell Brand Bitcoin
      • Holly Willoughby Bitcoin
No Result
View All Result
Global Economic Intersection
No Result
View All Result

March Madness Report – Office Pools Cost Millions, But Boost Morale

admin by admin
March 11, 2015
in Uncategorized
0
0
SHARES
2
VIEWS
Share on FacebookShare on Twitter

by Challenger Gray and Christmas

The main action for the 2015 NCAA men’s basketball tournament gets underway Thursday, March 19, but the viral phenomenon known as March Madness officially sets in on Monday, March 16. That is when workers across the country begin clogging the company internet with efforts to craft a winning bracket for their workplace and non-workplace betting pools.


It is estimated that more than 60 million Americans fill out tournament brackets. Many of these individuals, including the President of the United States, take time out of their workday to complete these brackets, as well as conduct the research needed to make informed selections.

Of course, the distractions do not end with filling out the bracket. Even more productivity is lost over the first two full days of tournament play (Thursday and Friday), when a dozen games are played during work hours.

It is an annual tradition that has become woven into the fabric the American workplace and society at large. However, there is a cost in terms of lost wages paid to distracted and unproductive workers, and, this year, the cost could reach as high as $1.9 billion. Said John A. Challenger, chief executive officer of Challenger, Gray & Christmas:

That figure may be on the conservative side, considering this year could garner a lot more interest from even casual basketball fans eager to see if Kentucky can continue its undefeated season through the tournament.

If Kentucky plays their first tournament game during the workday, it wouldn’t be shocking if every single working person in the state called in sick for the day or took an extra-long lunch break.

Challenger’s estimate is based on the number of working Americans who are likely to be caught up in March Madness; the estimated time spent filling out brackets and streaming games; and average hourly earnings, which, in January, stood at $24.78, according to the Bureau of Labor Statistics.

The challenge is estimating the number of people who participate in March Madness pools. A 2009 Microsoft survey, estimated that 50 million Americans participate in March Madness office pools. A 2014 article at Smithsonian.com put the number of Americans “filling out brackets” at 60 million.

Meanwhile, a 2012 MSN survey found that 86 percent of workers will devote at least part of their workday to updating brackets, checking scores and following games during the tournament. If that survey sample was representative of the US workforce, it means that the number the working Americans with “March Madness” could reach 119 million.

Furthermore, the MSN survey indicated that 56 percent of workers planned to spend at least one hour on March Madness activities. Assuming that holds for this year’s tournament, that is roughly 77.7 million workers who will each cost their employers an average of $24.78 in wages for an hour of wasted productivity. That comes to a total of $1.9 billion for the group. (77.7 million X $24.78)

Even with the most conservative estimates, March Madness is still costly. A 2013 survey by CareerBuilder.com found that 19 percent of private sector workers participated in March Madness office pools. Based on the latest private-sector payroll data from the Bureau of Labor Statistics, the 19 percent represents about 22.3 million workers.

Each hour of unproductive work time for these 22.3 million March Madness pool participants costs the nation’s employers $552.6 million. Said Challenger:

Of course, the 22.3 million figure leaves out public-sector workers. However, they too get caught up in March Madness. In fact, the most powerful public-sector worker in the country – President Obama – has filled out a bracket each year he’s been in office,

While some might argue that measuring productivity for salaried workers, including the president, is very difficult. After all, these workers are not confined to a 9-to-5 workday. So, if a little time during the workday is spent filling out a bracket, that work will be made up at another time.

However, it is important to remember that hourly-wage earners number 77.2 million, representing more than 52 percent all workers. And, it is not just low-skilled minimum wage earners who are clock punchers. Many professionals, the most notable being attorneys, charge for their services on an hourly basis.

Additionally, while it may have once been true that only deskbound office workers with internet access were at risk of being distracted by the tournament, now anyone with a mobile phone can get in on the action. Armed with ubiquitous tablets and smart phones, even hourly workers in the field may be consumed by the tournament.

So, employers should ban workplace pools and block access to streaming sites, right?

Absolutely not.

This tournament and the betting and bracket-building that come with it are ingrained in the national fabric. Trying to stop it would be like trying to stop a freight train. When even the president finds time to fill out a bracket, an employer would be hard pressed to come up with a legitimate reason to clamp down on March Madness activities.

Any attempt to do so would most likely result in long-term damage to employee morale, loyalty and engagement that would far outweigh any short-term benefit to productivity.

If anything, employers should embrace March Madness and seek ways to it as a tool to boost employee morale and engagement. For example, creating a company-wide office pool that is free to enter and offers a free lunch or gift card for the winner could help build camaraderie and encourage interaction among co-workers who may not typically cross paths.

# # #

Key March Madness Stats

EMPLOYMENT/WAGE STATS

138,728,000 Total nonfarm payroll employment in January (BLS)

116,976,000 Total private-sector, nonfarm payroll employment in January (BLS)

$24.75 Average hourly earnings of all employees on private nonfarm payrolls in January (BLS)

NUMBER BETTING/FILLING OUT BRACKETS

50,000,000 Estimated number of Americans participating in MM office pools, based on 2009 Microsoft survey

60,000,000 Estimated number of Americans who “fill out a bracket each year,” according to March 2014 article on Smithsonian.com.

22,000,000 Number of private sector workers who participated in MM office pool, based on 1-in-5 (19%) respondents to a November 2013 CareerBuilder.com survey. Applied to the BLS count on private, nonfarm payroll employees of 116.3 million (116.3 mil X .19 = 22 million).

11,000,000 Approximate number of people filling out brackets on ESPN.com during 2014 Tournament.

NUMBER OF VIEWERS

16.3 million Gross total of viewers of Turner Sports’ coverage of semifinal rounds on TBS, TNT, and TruTV in 2014.

21 million Number of viewers for CBS coverage of 2014 NCAA national championship.

102 million Total number of unique viewers for entire 2014 tournament.

9.9 million Number of unique viewers who streamed games on NCAA March Madness Live in 2014

HOURS WATCHED

377 Average number of minutes each of the 102 million unique viewers watched throughout the 2014 tournament

15.1 million Total number of live hours streamed on March Madness Live in 2014

1.5 hours Average number of hours streamed per unique user (15.1 mil/9.9 mil)

86% Percentage of respondents to 2012 MSN survey who said they will devote at least part of their workday to updating brackets, checking scores and following games during the tournament. If that holds this year, more than 119 million workers will be distracted by March Madness. (.86 X 138,728,000, which was total nonfarm employment in January, according to BLS).

56% Percentage of workers who planned to spend at least one hour of their workday on March Madness activities (MSN, 2012). If that repeats this year, approximately 77.7 million workers, based on total nonfarm payrolls as of January 2015

POSSIBLE IMPACT

$1.24 billion Total in “lost wages” for each hour spent on March Madness activities, based on 50 million workplace March Madness bracket-ers (50 mil X $24.75)

$544.5 million Total in “lost wages” for each hour, based on more conservative estimate of 22 million workers in March Madness office pools. (22mil. X $24.75)

$1.9 billion Lost wages resulting if MSN Survey is correct in its estimate that 56% of all workers, or 77.7 million people, will spend at least one hour of their workday on March Madness activities. (77.7 mil X $24.75)

$367.5 million Lost wages resulting from the 9.9 million March Madness Live users, who spend an average of 1.5 hours streaming games (9.9 million X $37.13, which is the amount earned in 1.5 hours of work, based on hourly rate of $24.75)

Previous Post

11Mar2015 Market Close: Markets Closed In The Red, DOW Off 28, Dollar Index At 99.97, WTI Oil Closed At Support

Next Post

The US Ad Market Remains Unchallenged

Related Posts

Bitcoin Flirts With $24K, How High Will It Go?
Economics

Bitcoin Flirts With $24K, How High Will It Go?

by John Wanguba
February 3, 2023
Venezuela's PDVSA Toughens Oil Prepayment Terms
Business

Venezuela’s PDVSA Toughens Oil Prepayment Terms

by John Wanguba
February 2, 2023
German Economy Unexpectedly Contracts In Q4, Renewing Recession Fears
Economics

German Economy Unexpectedly Contracts In Q4, Renewing Recession Fears

by John Wanguba
February 2, 2023
Judge Dismisses Proposed Class-Action Suit Claiming Coinbase Securities Sales
Business

Judge Dismisses Proposed Class-Action Suit Claiming Coinbase Securities Sales

by John Wanguba
February 2, 2023
Aesop Targeted In $2bn Bidding War Between French Groups
Business

Aesop Targeted In $2bn Bidding War Between French Groups

by John Wanguba
February 1, 2023
Next Post

The US Ad Market Remains Unchallenged

Leave a Reply Cancel reply

Your email address will not be published. Required fields are marked *

Browse by Category

  • Business
  • Econ Intersect News
  • Economics
  • Finance
  • Politics
  • Uncategorized

Browse by Tags

adoption altcoins banking banks Binance Bitcoin Bitcoin adoption Bitcoin market Bitcoin mining blockchain BTC business China crypto crypto adoption cryptocurrency crypto exchange crypto market crypto regulation decentralized finance DeFi Elon Musk ETH Ethereum Europe finance FTX inflation investment market analysis markets Metaverse mining NFT nonfungible tokens oil market price analysis recession regulation Russia technology Tesla the UK the US Twitter

Archives

  • February 2023
  • January 2023
  • December 2022
  • November 2022
  • October 2022
  • September 2022
  • August 2022
  • July 2022
  • June 2022
  • May 2022
  • April 2022
  • March 2022
  • February 2022
  • January 2022
  • December 2021
  • November 2021
  • October 2021
  • September 2021
  • August 2021
  • July 2021
  • June 2021
  • May 2021
  • April 2021
  • March 2021
  • February 2021
  • January 2021
  • December 2020
  • November 2020
  • October 2020
  • September 2020
  • August 2020
  • July 2020
  • June 2020
  • May 2020
  • April 2020
  • March 2020
  • February 2020
  • January 2020
  • December 2019
  • November 2019
  • October 2019
  • September 2019
  • August 2019
  • July 2019
  • June 2019
  • May 2019
  • April 2019
  • March 2019
  • February 2019
  • January 2019
  • December 2018
  • November 2018
  • October 2018
  • September 2018
  • August 2018
  • July 2018
  • June 2018
  • May 2018
  • April 2018
  • March 2018
  • February 2018
  • January 2018
  • December 2017
  • November 2017
  • October 2017
  • September 2017
  • August 2017
  • July 2017
  • June 2017
  • May 2017
  • April 2017
  • March 2017
  • February 2017
  • January 2017
  • December 2016
  • November 2016
  • October 2016
  • September 2016
  • August 2016
  • July 2016
  • June 2016
  • May 2016
  • April 2016
  • March 2016
  • February 2016
  • January 2016
  • December 2015
  • November 2015
  • October 2015
  • September 2015
  • August 2015
  • July 2015
  • June 2015
  • May 2015
  • April 2015
  • March 2015
  • February 2015
  • January 2015
  • December 2014
  • November 2014
  • October 2014
  • September 2014
  • August 2014
  • July 2014
  • June 2014
  • May 2014
  • April 2014
  • March 2014
  • February 2014
  • January 2014
  • December 2013
  • November 2013
  • October 2013
  • September 2013
  • August 2013
  • July 2013
  • June 2013
  • May 2013
  • April 2013
  • March 2013
  • February 2013
  • January 2013
  • December 2012
  • November 2012
  • October 2012
  • September 2012
  • August 2012
  • July 2012
  • June 2012
  • May 2012
  • April 2012
  • March 2012
  • February 2012
  • January 2012
  • December 2011
  • November 2011
  • October 2011
  • September 2011
  • August 2011
  • July 2011
  • June 2011
  • May 2011
  • April 2011
  • March 2011
  • February 2011
  • January 2011
  • December 2010
  • August 2010
  • August 2009

Categories

  • Business
  • Econ Intersect News
  • Economics
  • Finance
  • Politics
  • Uncategorized
Global Economic Intersection

After nearly 11 years of 24/7/365 operation, Global Economic Intersection co-founders Steven Hansen and John Lounsbury are retiring. The new owner, a global media company in London, is in the process of completing the set-up of Global Economic Intersection files in their system and publishing platform. The official website ownership transfer took place on 24 August.

Categories

  • Business
  • Econ Intersect News
  • Economics
  • Finance
  • Politics
  • Uncategorized

Recent Posts

  • Bitcoin Flirts With $24K, How High Will It Go?
  • Venezuela’s PDVSA Toughens Oil Prepayment Terms
  • German Economy Unexpectedly Contracts In Q4, Renewing Recession Fears

© Copyright 2021 EconIntersect - Economic news, analysis and opinion.

No Result
View All Result
  • Home
  • Contact Us
  • Bitcoin Robot
    • Bitcoin Profit
    • Bitcoin Code
    • Quantum AI
    • eKrona Cryptocurrency
    • Bitcoin Up
    • Bitcoin Prime
    • Yuan Pay Group
    • Immediate Profit
    • BitIQ
    • Bitcoin Loophole
    • Crypto Boom
    • Bitcoin Era
    • Bitcoin Treasure
    • Bitcoin Lucro
    • Bitcoin System
    • Oil Profit
    • The News Spy
    • British Bitcoin Profit
    • Bitcoin Trader
  • Bitcoin Reddit

© Copyright 2021 EconIntersect - Economic news, analysis and opinion.

en English
ar Arabicbg Bulgarianda Danishnl Dutchen Englishfi Finnishfr Frenchde Germanel Greekit Italianja Japaneselv Latvianno Norwegianpl Polishpt Portuguesero Romanianes Spanishsv Swedish