by Dong Beom Choi, Patrick de Fontnouvelle, Thomas Eisenbach, and Michael Fleming – Liberty Street Economics, Federal Reserve Bank of New York
The Federal Reserve Banks of Boston and New York recently cosponsored a workshop on the risks of wholesale funding. Wholesale funding refers to firm financing via deposits and other liabilities from pension funds, money market mutual funds, and other financial intermediaries. Compared with stable retail funding, the supply of wholesale funding is volatile, especially during financial crises. For instance, when a firm relies on short-term wholesale funds to support long-term illiquid assets, it becomes vulnerable to runs by its wholesale creditors, as seen during the recent financial crisis. The workshop was organized to promote a better understanding of the risks posed by wholesale funding and to explore policy options for minimizing these risks.
The day’s agenda started with welcoming remarks from William Dudley, President of the Federal Reserve Bank of New York. President Dudley set the stage by reviewing the risks associated with short-term wholesale funding and explaining how the significance of those risks became clear as the recent crisis unfolded. Eric Rosengren, President of the Federal Reserve Bank of Boston, then gave the workshop’s keynote remarks, in which he focused on the role of broker-dealers and how their vulnerabilities to wholesale funding have not yet been adequately addressed.
Sessions Explore Behavior of Wholesale Funding Markets
The presidents’ remarks were followed by various presentations from researchers in the Federal Reserve System, other central banks, and academia. Some presentations explored what happened in certain funding markets during the crisis, others sought to explain why the crisis unfolded the way it did, and still others attempted to clarify market participant behavior at a theoretical level. All of the presentations were followed by questions from the audience, which included market participants as well as policymakers and academics.
Last Session Focuses on Specific Policy Proposals
The day’s last session considered concrete policy changes to address fragilities in a particular area of wholesale funding, the market forrepurchase agreements. Both presentations focused on the “safe harbor” that allows lenders to liquidate certain classes of collateral immediately rather than enter the normal bankruptcy process if the borrower defaults. The first presentation was based on a paper recommending that the safe harbor be limited only to securities backed by the full faith and credit of the U.S. government. The second presentation discussed the costs and benefits of the safe harbor, and proposed that it be limited to only the most liquid securities. An active and spirited debate followed, with some participants advocating their own solutions to the risks arising from this short-term funding instrument. In the conference overall, however, there was little debate that further steps were needed to improve the resilience of wholesale funding markets.
The views expressed in this post are those of the authors and do not necessarily reflect the position of the Federal Reserve Bank of New York or the Federal Reserve System. Any errors or omissions are the responsibility of the authors.
About the Authors
Dong Beom Choi is an economist in the Federal Reserve Bank of New York’s Research and Statistics Group.
Patrick de Fontnouvelle is a vice president in the Federal Reserve Bank of Boston’s Supervision and Regulation Department.
Thomas Eisenbach is an economist in the Federal Reserve Bank of New York’s Research and Statistics Group.
Michael Fleming is a vice president in the Federal Reserve Bank of New York’s Research and Statistics Group.