Global Economic Intersection
Advertisement
  • Home
  • Economics
  • Finance
  • Politics
  • Investments
    • Invest in Amazon $250
  • Cryptocurrency
    • Best Bitcoin Accounts
    • Bitcoin Robot
      • Quantum AI
      • Bitcoin Era
      • Bitcoin Aussie System
      • Bitcoin Profit
      • Bitcoin Code
      • eKrona Cryptocurrency
      • Bitcoin Up
      • Bitcoin Prime
      • Yuan Pay Group
      • Immediate Profit
      • BitQH
      • Bitcoin Loophole
      • Crypto Boom
      • Bitcoin Treasure
      • Bitcoin Lucro
      • Bitcoin System
      • Oil Profit
      • The News Spy
      • Bitcoin Buyer
      • Bitcoin Inform
      • Immediate Edge
      • Bitcoin Evolution
      • Cryptohopper
      • Ethereum Trader
      • BitQL
      • Quantum Code
      • Bitcoin Revolution
      • British Trade Platform
      • British Bitcoin Profit
    • Bitcoin Reddit
    • Celebrities
      • Dr. Chris Brown Bitcoin
      • Teeka Tiwari Bitcoin
      • Russell Brand Bitcoin
      • Holly Willoughby Bitcoin
No Result
View All Result
  • Home
  • Economics
  • Finance
  • Politics
  • Investments
    • Invest in Amazon $250
  • Cryptocurrency
    • Best Bitcoin Accounts
    • Bitcoin Robot
      • Quantum AI
      • Bitcoin Era
      • Bitcoin Aussie System
      • Bitcoin Profit
      • Bitcoin Code
      • eKrona Cryptocurrency
      • Bitcoin Up
      • Bitcoin Prime
      • Yuan Pay Group
      • Immediate Profit
      • BitQH
      • Bitcoin Loophole
      • Crypto Boom
      • Bitcoin Treasure
      • Bitcoin Lucro
      • Bitcoin System
      • Oil Profit
      • The News Spy
      • Bitcoin Buyer
      • Bitcoin Inform
      • Immediate Edge
      • Bitcoin Evolution
      • Cryptohopper
      • Ethereum Trader
      • BitQL
      • Quantum Code
      • Bitcoin Revolution
      • British Trade Platform
      • British Bitcoin Profit
    • Bitcoin Reddit
    • Celebrities
      • Dr. Chris Brown Bitcoin
      • Teeka Tiwari Bitcoin
      • Russell Brand Bitcoin
      • Holly Willoughby Bitcoin
No Result
View All Result
Global Economic Intersection
No Result
View All Result

March Madness

admin by admin
March 13, 2012
in Uncategorized
0
0
SHARES
0
VIEWS
Share on FacebookShare on Twitter

Econintersect:  Challenger, Gray & Christmas, the original outplacement company, reports that during March on days when basketball is being played basketball-in-netSMALLduring first shift working hours, 2.5 million workers will average approximately 90 minutes each watching basketball instead of working.  The general term for using company time for personal activities on the internet is called “cyberloafing” according to Challenger.  In addition to the viewing time lost, hours are also lost to participation in ubiquitous office bracket pools as workers try to win local fame and fortune by picking game winners.  Challenger puts the bill for lost work at $175 million for just the first two tournament days.  The report does mention at the end that there may be some benefit to employee morale from the activity and that employers should do what they can to emphasize that.

Here is the full press release:

For Immediate Release

Challenger March Madness Report

2.5 MILLION WORKERS SPENDING 90 MINUTES A DAY WATCHING BASKETBALL; IT MUST BE MARCH

CHICAGO, March 12, 2012 – With the field of 68 teams now selected for the NCAA Division 1 men’s basketball championship tournament – affectionately known as March Madness – companies around the country are preparing for is likely to be a week with noticeably diminished productivity as workers begin the annual tradition of organizing office pools, filling out brackets and watching streaming broadcasts of the games from their desks.

“Monday could be particularly dreadful on the productivity front, as a new study out today from a Penn State University assistant professor suggests that the loss of sleep stemming from the annual change to daylight savings time results in workers to spend more time than normal surfing the web. The ‘cyberloafing,’ as it has been coined, could be particularly robust today as many workers take to the Net to research teams and study match-ups in an attempt to generate a winging office pool bracket,” said John A. Challenger, chief executive officer of Challenger, Gray & Christmas.

“Certainly, statisticians, economists, academia and college basketball fans will likely scoff at our estimate, and rightfully so. It is to be taken with a grain of salt, as it is meant to be a tongue-in-cheek look at how technology continues to blur the line between our professional and personal lives. Ultimately, March Madness will not even register a blip on the nation’s economic radar and even the smallest company will survive the month without any impact on their bottom line.”

In its annual “study,” that gives legitimate scientific studies a bad name, outplacement firm Challenger, Gray & Christmas, Inc. predicts that while March Madness will not be the downfall of the American economy, it could result in millions of hours in lost productivity, or at least diminished productivity, as workers across the nation take time from their work schedules to watch games online, check scores and manage their office pool brackets.

Based on last year’s data, online March Madness coverage could attract more than 2.5 million unique visitors per day, each spending an average of 90 minutes watching games. With private-sector workers earning an average of $23.29 per hour, Challenger estimates that employers will end up paying distracted workers about $175 million over the first two full days of the tournament.

“Statisticians, economists, academia and college basketball fans will likely scoff at that estimate, and rightfully so. It is to be taken with a grain of salt, as it is meant to be a tongue-in-cheek look at how technology continues to blur the line between our professional and personal lives. Ultimately, March Madness will not even register a blip on the nation’s economic radar and even the smallest company will survive the month without any impact on their bottom line,” said John A. Challenger, chief executive officer of Challenger, Gray & Christmas.

“That is not to say there is absolutely no impact. However, it is felt at the micro level. The company’s internet speeds may be slower, some workers will not respond to emails as promptly, and lunch breaks may extend beyond the usual time limits. It’s mostly a headache-inducing annoyance for information technology departments, human resources and department managers,” said Challenger.

So, why does the company continue to issue its dubious estimates of March Madness productivity loss year after year?

“It’s an opportunity to remind workers that practicing some moderation in their March Madness viewing will go a long way toward keeping managers off their back. Meanwhile, it is equally important for employers to cut workers some slack, particularly in an economy that has left many workplaces understaffed and overworked,” said Challenger.

A survey just released by MSN indicates that employers may simply have to accept the fact that workers will find some way to enjoy the games. In the survey, 86 percent of respondents said they plan to devote at least some time during their work day to follow games, scores and updates, showing a five percent increase from last year (81 percent).

A more detailed breakdown of the MSN survey data revealed that more than half (56 percent) plan to dedicate at least one hour of work during the first two days of the tournament to watching games or following scores, with 11 percent saying they will do the same for at least five hours and six percent saying they take the first two days off!

Luckily for these determined basketball fans, there are more choices than ever when it comes to watching tournament games. Last month, Turner Sports, CBS Sports and the NCAA announced that NCAA® March Madness® Live, formerly March Madness on Demand, will provide college basketball fans with more opportunities to watch games across multiple devices. For the first time, mobile devices sporting the Android operating system will have access to the games, which should help boost viewership from last year’s record-breaking levels.

According to statistics released shortly after last year’s NCAA men’s basketball tournament, March Madness on Demand (as it was still known, at the time) saw a 47 percent increase in total visits during the first three rounds, reaching a whopping 26.7 million visits, during which a total of 10.3 million hours of streaming video was consumed.

Other statistics revealed that there was an average of 2.4 million daily unique visitors on broadband and 702,000 average daily unique users through mobile apps during the second and third round of 2011 tournament. Each of these users spent an average of 92.9 minutes per day streaming live video.

This year, the tournament begins on March 13 and 14, when four play-in games will determine the final entrants to the field of 64 teams that will kick off second-round games on Thursday, March 15 and Friday, March 16. The 32 games played Thursday and Friday could begin as early as noon eastern time, right in the middle of the workday.

“It is not just a matter of watching the games during the workday that threatens productivity. Starting the Monday before the tournament begins, workers are likely to be distracted by filling in their brackets for the ubiquitous March Madness office pools,” noted Challenger.

In the MSN survey, 31 percent of respondents said they planned to enter at least two betting pools. That is down from 58 percent who entered two or more pools last year. That may provide some relief for department managers, but the survey shows that 58 percent still plan to enter at least one pool.

So, what is an employer to do about the potential for increased distraction related to March Madness?

“Rather than try to squash employee interest in March Madness, companies could embrace it as a way to build morale and camaraderie. This could mean putting televisions in the break room, so employees have somewhere to watch the games other than the Internet. Employers might consider organizing a company-wide pool, which should have no entry fee in order to avoid ethical and/or legal questions,” Challenger suggested.

“At the very least, department managers may want to consider simply looking the other way, unless March Madness proves to be an overt and significant problem. Obviously, if an employee fails to meet a deadline or if customer service suffers as a result of March Madness distractions, then there should be consequences. However, if employees are getting all of their work done and customers are happy and the biggest problem is a slow internet connection for a couple of days, it may be best to let it slide,” he said.

 

John Lounsbury

Previous Post

Groundhog Day Part Continuer

Next Post

As Greece Staggers, EU Puts Spain in Crosshairs

Related Posts

Ban CBDC Now! – Florida Governor Ron DeSantis
Economics

Ban CBDC Now! – Florida Governor Ron DeSantis

by John Wanguba
March 21, 2023
Microsoft Offers EU Remedies Seeking Approval On Activision Deal
Business

Microsoft Offers EU Remedies Seeking Approval On Activision Deal

by John Wanguba
March 21, 2023
Banking Crisis: Credit Suisse Held Meetings Last Weekend On Scenarios For Bank - Sources
Business

Banking Crisis: Credit Suisse Held Meetings Last Weekend On Scenarios For Bank – Sources

by John Wanguba
March 21, 2023
USDC Issuer Circle Chooses France For Its European Expansion
Econ Intersect News

USDC Issuer Circle Chooses France For Its European Expansion

by John Wanguba
March 21, 2023
OKX To Stop Operations In Canada By June 22, 2023
Business

OKX To Stop Operations In Canada By June 22, 2023

by John Wanguba
March 20, 2023
Next Post

As Greece Staggers, EU Puts Spain in Crosshairs

Leave a Reply Cancel reply

Your email address will not be published. Required fields are marked *

Browse by Category

  • Business
  • Econ Intersect News
  • Economics
  • Finance
  • Politics
  • Uncategorized

Browse by Tags

adoption altcoins bank banking banks Binance Bitcoin Bitcoin market Bitcoin mining blockchain BTC business China crypto crypto adoption cryptocurrency crypto exchange crypto market crypto regulation decentralized finance DeFi Elon Musk ETH Ethereum Europe finance FTX inflation investment market analysis Metaverse mining NFT nonfungible tokens oil market price analysis recession regulation Russia stock market technology Tesla the UK the US Twitter

Archives

  • March 2023
  • February 2023
  • January 2023
  • December 2022
  • November 2022
  • October 2022
  • September 2022
  • August 2022
  • July 2022
  • June 2022
  • May 2022
  • April 2022
  • March 2022
  • February 2022
  • January 2022
  • December 2021
  • November 2021
  • October 2021
  • September 2021
  • August 2021
  • July 2021
  • June 2021
  • May 2021
  • April 2021
  • March 2021
  • February 2021
  • January 2021
  • December 2020
  • November 2020
  • October 2020
  • September 2020
  • August 2020
  • July 2020
  • June 2020
  • May 2020
  • April 2020
  • March 2020
  • February 2020
  • January 2020
  • December 2019
  • November 2019
  • October 2019
  • September 2019
  • August 2019
  • July 2019
  • June 2019
  • May 2019
  • April 2019
  • March 2019
  • February 2019
  • January 2019
  • December 2018
  • November 2018
  • October 2018
  • September 2018
  • August 2018
  • July 2018
  • June 2018
  • May 2018
  • April 2018
  • March 2018
  • February 2018
  • January 2018
  • December 2017
  • November 2017
  • October 2017
  • September 2017
  • August 2017
  • July 2017
  • June 2017
  • May 2017
  • April 2017
  • March 2017
  • February 2017
  • January 2017
  • December 2016
  • November 2016
  • October 2016
  • September 2016
  • August 2016
  • July 2016
  • June 2016
  • May 2016
  • April 2016
  • March 2016
  • February 2016
  • January 2016
  • December 2015
  • November 2015
  • October 2015
  • September 2015
  • August 2015
  • July 2015
  • June 2015
  • May 2015
  • April 2015
  • March 2015
  • February 2015
  • January 2015
  • December 2014
  • November 2014
  • October 2014
  • September 2014
  • August 2014
  • July 2014
  • June 2014
  • May 2014
  • April 2014
  • March 2014
  • February 2014
  • January 2014
  • December 2013
  • November 2013
  • October 2013
  • September 2013
  • August 2013
  • July 2013
  • June 2013
  • May 2013
  • April 2013
  • March 2013
  • February 2013
  • January 2013
  • December 2012
  • November 2012
  • October 2012
  • September 2012
  • August 2012
  • July 2012
  • June 2012
  • May 2012
  • April 2012
  • March 2012
  • February 2012
  • January 2012
  • December 2011
  • November 2011
  • October 2011
  • September 2011
  • August 2011
  • July 2011
  • June 2011
  • May 2011
  • April 2011
  • March 2011
  • February 2011
  • January 2011
  • December 2010
  • August 2010
  • August 2009

Categories

  • Business
  • Econ Intersect News
  • Economics
  • Finance
  • Politics
  • Uncategorized
Global Economic Intersection

After nearly 11 years of 24/7/365 operation, Global Economic Intersection co-founders Steven Hansen and John Lounsbury are retiring. The new owner, a global media company in London, is in the process of completing the set-up of Global Economic Intersection files in their system and publishing platform. The official website ownership transfer took place on 24 August.

Categories

  • Business
  • Econ Intersect News
  • Economics
  • Finance
  • Politics
  • Uncategorized

Recent Posts

  • Ban CBDC Now! – Florida Governor Ron DeSantis
  • Microsoft Offers EU Remedies Seeking Approval On Activision Deal
  • Banking Crisis: Credit Suisse Held Meetings Last Weekend On Scenarios For Bank – Sources

© Copyright 2021 EconIntersect - Economic news, analysis and opinion.

No Result
View All Result
  • Home
  • Contact Us
  • Bitcoin Robot
    • Bitcoin Profit
    • Bitcoin Code
    • Quantum AI
    • eKrona Cryptocurrency
    • Bitcoin Up
    • Bitcoin Prime
    • Yuan Pay Group
    • Immediate Profit
    • BitIQ
    • Bitcoin Loophole
    • Crypto Boom
    • Bitcoin Era
    • Bitcoin Treasure
    • Bitcoin Lucro
    • Bitcoin System
    • Oil Profit
    • The News Spy
    • British Bitcoin Profit
    • Bitcoin Trader
  • Bitcoin Reddit

© Copyright 2021 EconIntersect - Economic news, analysis and opinion.

en English
ar Arabicbg Bulgarianda Danishnl Dutchen Englishfi Finnishfr Frenchde Germanel Greekit Italianja Japaneselv Latvianno Norwegianpl Polishpt Portuguesero Romanianes Spanishsv Swedish