Econintersect: In the twelve months ended March, 2010 only 357,000 new households were formed (net number). This was a record low for the history of the U.S. Census data base, which goes back to 1968. The number is also nearly a million short of the ten-year average of 1.3 million net new households per year. As a result of The Great Recession, by the end of March, 2010 there was a cummulative deficiency of 2.3 million net new households from the recession. That implies a normal net new household formation rate without effects of The Great Recession would have been over 1.5 million per year.According to Reuters, the net rate of new household formation for 2011 is estimated to be between 750,000 and 1 million. That would be easily double the rate of the record low twelve months, but still only 50% to 67% of the normal rate. From the Reuters article:
New households will help boost housing starts to about 648,000 this year and close to 900,000 in 2012 from 586,800 last year, estimates Brad Hunter, chief economist and national director of consulting in Palm Beach Gardens, Florida, for research company Metrostudy. The increase reflects a shadow demand for new homes among family members who have doubled up because of economic necessity, Hunter said.
Reuters identified some businesses that should benefit from an increase in new household formation. Among these are:
- Masco Corp. (MAS), the biggest maker of faucets and cabinets in the world;
- Trex Company Inc., which makes decking and railing;
- USG Corp. (USG), a building-products company;
- Time Warner Cable Inc. (TWC);
- Comcast Corp. (CMCSA);
- PNM Resources Inc. (PNM) (utility in Albuquerque, New Mexico);
- Teco Energy Inc. (TE) (utilty in Tampa, Florida);
- NV Energy Inc. (NVE) ( utility in Las Vegas)
It was estimated that new housing construction could increase from the 586,000 in 2010 to about 648,000 in 2011 and near 900,000 in 2012. The 2012 estimate would be an increase of 50% over the 2010 construction rate, but only about half of the average for 2000-06 (1.75 million) and less than half the 2006 rate of 1.98 million.
Editor’s note: The news articles referenced did not discuss the nature of the new construction. It may be that multifamily (apartment construction) may be a larger proportion than the recent historical norm. The history is shown in the following graph: