econintersect.com
  • 토토사이트
    • 카지노사이트
    • 도박사이트
    • 룰렛 사이트
    • 라이브카지노
    • 바카라사이트
    • 안전카지노
  • 경제
  • 파이낸스
  • 정치
  • 투자
No Result
View All Result
  • 토토사이트
    • 카지노사이트
    • 도박사이트
    • 룰렛 사이트
    • 라이브카지노
    • 바카라사이트
    • 안전카지노
  • 경제
  • 파이낸스
  • 정치
  • 투자
No Result
View All Result
econintersect.com
No Result
View All Result
Home Uncategorized

Debatable numbers in “Why the U.S. is Letting China Accumulate Gold”

admin by admin
9월 6, 2021
in Uncategorized
0
0
SHARES
0
VIEWS

Written by Yichao Wang, GEI Associate

James Rickards recently mentions in Why the U.S. is Letting China Accumulate Gold that, as the second largest economy in the world, China should accumulate the right amount of gold corresponding to its fast-growing economy. Nevertheless, three numbers that he uses are debatable.

First, what is China’s real gold holding? As Rickards admits, the number of 0.7 percent of GDP is official and misleading. The actual gold holding of China is much higher. According to Alasdair Macleod, one of the best analysts of the gold market, in China’s gold strategy:

“The Chinese government could have easily accumulated in excess of 20,000 tons by the end of 2002.”

Bill Holter also supports Macleod’s assessment and further explains how and why this might have been achieved. This number is estimated to be about 30,000 tons now. As a result, China does not need more gold to reduce its economic vulnerability.

Second, we should also consider the reliability of China’s GDP growth rate. As it is indicated in The Reliability of China’s Economic Data: An Analysis of National Output, written by Iacob N. Koch-Weser,

“National aggregate GDP should be equal to the sum of GDP of each province in China. However, there is a serious discrepancy between nominal GDP at the provincial and national level.”

Because local governors get promoted based on local economic growth rates, they may exaggerate the GDP Growth Rate. By combining other indicators such as the amount of cargo freight and bank loans, it could be determined that China would have a lower GDP. Consequently, the percentage of gold reserve to GDP would be much higher than the official number.

The third number that we should question is the gold reserves of the U.S. It is widely believed that the U.S. does not have 8,000 tons of gold it claims. According to Chris Martenson, the US exported about 5,500 tons of gold from 1991-2012. However, it only had about 1,000 tons of surplus gold available for export. It must be the Fed or the Treasury that leased them out because no other private source is big enough to account for that amount. The actual shortfall could be even higher than 4,500 tons if we count private investment.

Sources:

  • Why the U.S. is Letting China Accumulate Gold (James Rickards. Daily Reckoning, March 26th, 2015)
  • China’s gold strategy (Alasdair Macleod. GoldMoney)
  • China’s Massive Holdings of Gold Bullion. Is the West Financially Bankrupt? (Bill Holter. Global Research, November 03, 2014)
  • The Reliability of China’s Economic Data: An Analysis of National Output (Iacob N. Koch-Weser. U.S.-China Economic and Security Review Commission, January 28, 2013)
  • Why There May Be a Lot Less Gold than We Realize (Chris Martenson. Casey Research)

Previous Post

Earnings and Economic Reports: Week Starting 06 April 2015

Next Post

It’s Duke vs. Wisconsin!

Related Posts

Scammers Steal $300K Using Fake Blur Airdrop Websites
Uncategorized

FBI Warns Investors Of Crypto-Stealing Play-to-Earn Games

by admin
Maersk Almost Completing Russia Exit After The Sale Of Logistics Sites
Uncategorized

Maersk Almost Completing Russia Exit After The Sale Of Logistics Sites

by admin
Why Is ‘Staking’ At The Center Of Crypto’s Latest Regulation Scuffle
Uncategorized

Why Is ‘Staking’ At The Center Of Crypto’s Latest Regulation Scuffle

by admin
Mexico's Pemex Dismantled Resources Worth $342M From Two Top Fields
Uncategorized

Mexico’s Pemex Dismantled Resources Worth $342M From Two Top Fields

by admin
Oil Giant Schlumberger Rebrands Itself As SLB For Low-Carbon Future
Uncategorized

Oil Giant Schlumberger Rebrands Itself As SLB For Low-Carbon Future

by admin
Next Post

It's Duke vs. Wisconsin!

답글 남기기 응답 취소

이메일 주소는 공개되지 않습니다. 필수 필드는 *로 표시됩니다

Browse by Category

  • Business
  • Econ Intersect News
  • Economics
  • Finance
  • Politics
  • Uncategorized

Browse by Tags

adoption altcoins bank banking banks Binance Bitcoin Bitcoin market blockchain BTC BTC price business China crypto crypto adoption cryptocurrency crypto exchange crypto market crypto regulation decentralized finance DeFi Elon Musk ETH Ethereum Europe Federal Reserve finance FTX inflation investment market analysis Metaverse NFT nonfungible tokens oil market price analysis recession regulation Russia stock market technology Tesla the UK the US Twitter

Categories

  • Business
  • Econ Intersect News
  • Economics
  • Finance
  • Politics
  • Uncategorized

© Copyright 2024 EconIntersect

No Result
View All Result
  • 토토사이트
    • 카지노사이트
    • 도박사이트
    • 룰렛 사이트
    • 라이브카지노
    • 바카라사이트
    • 안전카지노
  • 경제
  • 파이낸스
  • 정치
  • 투자

© Copyright 2024 EconIntersect