econintersect.com
  • 토토사이트
    • 카지노사이트
    • 도박사이트
    • 룰렛 사이트
    • 라이브카지노
    • 바카라사이트
    • 안전카지노
  • 경제
  • 파이낸스
  • 정치
  • 투자
No Result
View All Result
  • 토토사이트
    • 카지노사이트
    • 도박사이트
    • 룰렛 사이트
    • 라이브카지노
    • 바카라사이트
    • 안전카지노
  • 경제
  • 파이낸스
  • 정치
  • 투자
No Result
View All Result
econintersect.com
No Result
View All Result
Home Uncategorized

The Great Bond Warning

admin by admin
9월 6, 2021
in Uncategorized
0
0
SHARES
0
VIEWS

Written by Jim Welsh

Correlation between the 10-year Treasury yield and S&P500

Since the end of July (far left on chart below), the correlation between the 10-year Treasury yield and the S&P has been quite high. As the 10-year Treasury yield dropped during August, the S&P 500 fell.

two.roads.diverged

During August the S&P 500 was contained in a range bounded at 2940 and 2825. The S&P 500 broke out above 2940, only after the 10-year yield had started to rise. The S&P 500 peaked at 3021 one day before the 10-year yield topped at 1.90%.

The S&P 500 made a double top on September 19 after the 10-year yield had fallen to 1.75%. As the 10-year yield kept falling, the S&P 500 fell to 2957 on September 24, and tested that support level 3 times before falling below it on October 1. The 10-year yield was down to 1.63% on October 1 but subsequently dropped to 1.51% just as the S&P 500 bottomed at 2855 on October 3, right after the ISM Non-manufacturing number indicated that the service sector had weakened noticeably in September.

welsh.divergences.2019.oct.04

Since bottoming on October 3, the S&P 500 has rallied and reached 2953 on October 4. However, the 10-year yield closed at 1.515% on October 4, just barely above the intra-day low on October 3. As you can see, this divergence between the rally in the S&P 500 and the 10-year yield has opened a wide spread. Either the high correlation between the 10-year yield and the S&P 500 has completely broken down, or the 10-year yield is calling into question the validity of the rally in the S&P 500.

In addition the total volume on the NYSE on October 4 was the lightest of the week and well below the volume recorded on Wednesday, when the market fell hard. Heavy volume on a selloff and lighter volume on a rebound is normally not a healthy sign for the market’s trend.

The employment report certainly eased concerns that the economy was falling off a cliff, after the weak ISM reports on Tuesday and Thursday. But the employment report wasn’t strong, as hours worked were unchanged, wage growth fell from 3.2% to 2.9%, and the growth in the number of private sector jobs continued to trend lower.

The market was also given a big boost on October 4 by President Trump who told reporters that “We have a good chance for deal with China.” The S&P 500 promptly rallied 17 points and never looked back. On October 3 and just after the S&P 500 had set the low for the day, President Trump told reporters:

“China’s coming in next week. We’re going to have a meeting with them. We’ll see. But we’re doing very well. I have a lot of options on China. But if they don’t do what we want, we have tremendous power.”

I don’t think there will be a trade deal, and, if correct, the S&P 500 is unlikely to trade above 3,000. One thing we can be sure of is more Tweets telling us how badly China wants to make a deal prior to October 10 when the meetings start. Just as the President did on October 4 and October 3, and every other time the S&P 500 has started to wobble. The 10-year Treasury yield wasn’t as relieved by the mediocre employment report or the President’s comment about trade, which is why the 10-year yield finished the week 0.005% off the low for this week.

Previous Post

Countries With The Worst Work-Life Balance

Next Post

Backing Putin: Russia’s Middle Class Is No Longer A Catalyst For Democratic Change

Related Posts

Scammers Steal $300K Using Fake Blur Airdrop Websites
Uncategorized

FBI Warns Investors Of Crypto-Stealing Play-to-Earn Games

by admin
Maersk Almost Completing Russia Exit After The Sale Of Logistics Sites
Uncategorized

Maersk Almost Completing Russia Exit After The Sale Of Logistics Sites

by admin
Why Is ‘Staking’ At The Center Of Crypto’s Latest Regulation Scuffle
Uncategorized

Why Is ‘Staking’ At The Center Of Crypto’s Latest Regulation Scuffle

by admin
Mexico's Pemex Dismantled Resources Worth $342M From Two Top Fields
Uncategorized

Mexico’s Pemex Dismantled Resources Worth $342M From Two Top Fields

by admin
Oil Giant Schlumberger Rebrands Itself As SLB For Low-Carbon Future
Uncategorized

Oil Giant Schlumberger Rebrands Itself As SLB For Low-Carbon Future

by admin
Next Post

Democratic Governors Are Quicker In Responding To The Coronavirus Than Republicans

답글 남기기 응답 취소

이메일 주소는 공개되지 않습니다. 필수 필드는 *로 표시됩니다

Browse by Category

  • Business
  • Econ Intersect News
  • Economics
  • Finance
  • Politics
  • Uncategorized

Browse by Tags

adoption altcoins bank banking banks Binance Bitcoin Bitcoin market blockchain BTC BTC price business China crypto crypto adoption cryptocurrency crypto exchange crypto market crypto regulation decentralized finance DeFi Elon Musk ETH Ethereum Europe Federal Reserve finance FTX inflation investment market analysis Metaverse NFT nonfungible tokens oil market price analysis recession regulation Russia stock market technology Tesla the UK the US Twitter

Categories

  • Business
  • Econ Intersect News
  • Economics
  • Finance
  • Politics
  • Uncategorized

© Copyright 2024 EconIntersect

No Result
View All Result
  • 토토사이트
    • 카지노사이트
    • 도박사이트
    • 룰렛 사이트
    • 라이브카지노
    • 바카라사이트
    • 안전카지노
  • 경제
  • 파이낸스
  • 정치
  • 투자

© Copyright 2024 EconIntersect