by Dirk Ehnts, Econblog101
Apparently, this story is still under the radar. The Dutch domestic lending to invest in property has produced a real estate bubble just like in Ireland or Spain. I wrote about this in April and apparently the information coming in these days seems to vindicate my writings. Here is Property EU:
The production of commercial real estate loans almost halved last year from EUR 12 bn to EUR 6.6 bn, according to research from PropertyNL, the Dutch sister publication of PropertyEU. Compared to 2008, this marks a decline of 70%. At the peak of the market in 2007, lending production reached EUR 27 bn.
Nice doublespeak, I must say: “lending production”. Sounds so industrial and solid, whereas in reality you just give money to speculators mostly buying existing properties. This has nothing to do with production, this is pure rent extraction. Even lending service sounds terrible. Well, we get what we pay for, and these news are provided for free. What do you expect?
Gulf News was one of the few, it seems, to pick up the bad news coming from Bloomberg:
Dutch lenders, with almost €80 billion ($103 billion) in commercial real estate loans on their books, haven’t set aside enough money to cover potential losses, according to the country’s central bank.
Banks have set aside less than 2 per cent of the total, an amount “insufficient to absorb large losses,” the Dutch central bank said in a report. In addition, valuations of the properties backing the loans are often outdated, according to the report.
The office vacancy rate in the Netherlands is 14 per cent, the central bank said, which is among the highest in Europe. Dutch commercial real estate prices have been falling for four years, dropping by about 12 per cent from a September 2008 peak, the bank said. Supply will probably continue to outweigh demand as online retailing rises, office space is used in a more flexible way and the workforce grows more slowly.
And with the fiscal cliff looming in the US, unresolved EMU problems, weak growth in Japan and relaitively modest growth in China, this just adds to a bunch of uncertainties for 2013.
Related Articles
About the Author
Dr. Dirk Ehnts is a research assistant at the Carl-von-Ossietzky University of Oldenburg (Germany). His focus is on economic integration and economic geography, covering trade, macro and development. He is working at the chair for international economics since 2006 and has recently co-authored a book on Innovation and International Economic Relations (in German). Ehnts has written at his own blog since 2007: Econblog 101. Curriculum Vitae.