Investing Bets: China and/or India?

August 30th, 2012
in contributors

by Elliott Morss, Morss Global Finance


With populations of more than one billion, China and India are by far the largest countries in the world (together, 36% of the world total). And while neither has a chindia-yin-yangSMALLGDP as large as the US, they are two of the most rapidly growing countries: According to the IMF, China’s GDP will grow by 8.2% in 2012 with India not far behind at 6.8%. Just how they progress over the next decade will be extremely important for all of us.

Remember how excited people were about India just a few years back? Between 2000 and 2007, the Mumbai SENSEX rose 400% while the Shanghai Composite only increased 200%. Things have changed. In this article, I review developments in both countries with an eye to investment possibilities.

Follow up:

Physical Characteristics

As Table 1 indicates, China’s land area is three times larger than India’s. That, coupled with China having only a slightly larger population than India means a much higher population density in India. But arable land in China is remarkably low, and that is why agriculture is so labor intensive.


Source: World Bank

Poverty, Education, and Health

In 1970, India had a higher GDP than China. As Table 2 indicates, that has all changed, with much of China’s growth coming in the last two decades.


Source: World Bank

By almost any measure, China is more developed than India. In addition to its GDP per capita being more than three times higher than India’s, a much smaller percent of China’s people live in poverty, and life expectancy is 8 years less in India than China. It would appear that China has made a far greater effort to educate and inform its citizens than India. Its adult literacy rate is much higher, the percentage of children attending secondary school is higher, and the access to electricity and the Internet are all higher in China. And the lower fertility rate in China will have great significance in future years.


Source: World Bank


The transport systems of China and India are quite different. China's highways are being developed rapidly, with an expressway network of 85,000 kilometers and growing at the end of 2011. In contrast, India has only 1,000 kilometers of expressways.

As Table 4 indicates, China’s energy consumption per capita on roads is more than twice India’s. In contrast, railroads are far more heavily used in India than China: the total length of rail lines is about same even though China is three times larger than India. In 2010, India had 903 billion rail passengers (passenger-km) while China had only 791 billion.


Source: World Bank

Looking ahead, the ownership and use of motor vehicles in both China and India are likely to grow rapidly with heightened demand from their growing middle classes. Note that in the US, there are 802 motor vehicles per thousand people. It is interesting to ask what will happen to oil consumption when there are 400 motor vehicles per thousand people in both China and India. That would mean more than an eightfold increase in Chinese vehicles and more than a twenty-two-fold increase in India. Assume they drive the same distances as the current vehicles, are powered by and get the same miles-per-gallon as the current vehicles. This growth would increase global oil demand would increase by 42% over its current production level. This will not happen: oil production cannot be increased by that amount. Major changes in engine power technologies are needed.


A country’s transport system is clearly important in affecting its energy needs. As Table 5 indicates, 81% of India’s energy imports are for oil and 53% for China. In both countries, coal is the primary energy source with very little coming from natural gas and renewables.


Source: International Energy Agency

* Renewables include nuclear, hydro, solar, wind, and geothermal.

China consumes more coal than any country in the world. And there is a problem. China is running out of coal. As Table 6 indicates, China only has 35 years of coal left at current production rates. In contrast, the US has 270 years left and India 77. The Chinese authorities are very aware of their coal predicament and are doing all they can to find new energy sources and cut down on coal consumption. But it will be a slow process.


Source: BP: Statistical Review of World Energy, 2012


As mentioned earlier, both China and India continue to grow rapidly. But there are several major differences. China continues to invest heavily in infrastructure to accommodate its growing middle class while India is only starting. In Table 7, I compare China and India with Greece and Spain, the two Euro countries that have required bailouts. Note that India’s government deficit is higher than either Euro country. That means its debt is growing rapidly, and it is already quite high. And India’s current account deficit is already higher than Spain’s.


Source: IMF

Investment Implications

In 2010, as the world started to recover from the global recession caused by the US banking collapse, I recommended investing in emerging market countries because they were growing more rapidly and had less debt than developed nations. Unfortunately, we had the sovereign debt crisis in Europe. And sadly, as I have written, the sovereign debt crisis has not been resolved and more global financial panic can be expected.

And in this context, the question is whether investments in China or India are warranted. The economic problems in India, illustrated in Table 6 are extremely serious. And they are likely to get worse. Stay away from India.

China is not facing such immediate problems and it has a government that can get things done. However, it is a natural resource poor country and its longer term energy/other raw material needs are problematic. However, it is has a positive economic outlook with a rapidly growing middle class. So two ETFs and one mutual fund are worth considering:

  1. FXI is a general ETF for China. Over the last 12 months, it is down almost 20% and down 1% so far in 2012.
  2. CHIQ is a consumer goods ETF for China. It is down almost 28% over the last 12 months and down almost 4% in 2102.
  3. MCHFX is a China mutual fund. It is down 17% for the last 12 months but up 2% this year.

For China, I prefer well-managed mutual funds to ETFs and I hold MCHFX.

The Euro crisis has to be kept in mind, so I believe in high yield, low risk investments for now.  What do I believe is low risk? The US real estate cycle has bottomed out. Fidelity Real Estate Income (FRIFX) has a dividend yield of 4.6% and it is bound to improve as the US real estate market continues to recover.

There are also low risk emerging bond investments worth considering. TGEIX is an emerging market mutual bond fund yielding 5.6%. ELD is an ETF with a quite conservative set of emerging market bonds yielding 3.6%.

And finally, Brookfield Asset Management (BAM) is a well managed company with real estate and energy holdings. It is not a high dividend stock, but is has gained 27% this year. I expect it will go higher.


Related Articles

Investing articles about China

Investing articles about India


About the Author

elliott-morss-photo1Elliott Morss has a broad background in international finance and economics. He holds a Political Economy from The Johns Hopkins University and has taught at the University of Michigan, Harvard, Boston University, Brandeis and the University of Palermo in Buenos Aires. During his career he worked in the Fiscal Affairs Department at the IMF with assignments in more than 45 countries. In addition, Elliott was a principle in a firm that became the largest contractor to USAID (United States Agency for International Development) and co-founded (and was president) of the Asia-Pacific Group with investments in Cambodia, China and Myanmar. He has co-authored seven books and published more than 50 professional journal articles. Elliott writes at his blog Morss Global Finance

Make a Comment

Econintersect wants your comments, data and opinion on the articles posted.  As the internet is a "war zone" of trolls, hackers and spammers - Econintersect must balance its defences against ease of commenting.  We have joined with Livefyre to manage our comment streams.

To comment, just click the "Sign In" button at the top-left corner of the comment box below. You can create a commenting account using your favorite social network such as Twitter, Facebook, Google+, LinkedIn or Open ID - or open a Livefyre account using your email address.


  1. Frank Li (Member) Email says :

    This is so western talk without real insight!

    Theoretically, India is behind China by ~20 years (when you look at China 20 years ago), but practically, India is behind by ~100 years!

    It's the system, stupid!

    India has the worst of socialism and capitalism. China has the best of both!

    As a result, India will never be comparable to China!!!

  2. Admin (Member) Email says :

    I have reviewed this article again and find it to be a thorough analysis of the available data and logical in its conclusions. The author has working experience in both the IMF and as an investment company CEO making investments in Asia. He is able to offer unique insights into the questions he discussed.

    It is my opinion that the author of the article came to a bottom line conclusion which is similar to that of the commenter.

    John Lounsbury, Managing Editor

  3. Frank Li (Member) Email says :

    The analysis is good, but the subject is not - a bit misleading at least. There have been way too many comparisons between India and China in America, to the point of misleading and wasteful, from individual investors to Ms. Clinton (to surround China, balance China out with India, or whatever).

    For an American to compare Indian with China is like a Chinese comparing the US with Russia:
    (1) Both are vast in geo.
    (2) Both have population of ~300M.

    So what? Of course, no Chinese will do this comparison. Americans should soon learn that no comparison between India and China makes any sense, other than
    (1) They used to be poor.
    (2) They both are populous.

    Just remember this: India is behind China by ~100 years now!

    Here is a story: On a street corner in Paris, a princess saw a starving artist sitting there without work. Full sympathy, she sat down and asked him to do a drawing of her. He finished in 1 hour and handed it over to her.
    Princess: Nice drawing!
    Artist: Thanks!
    Princess: How much? H
    Artist: $1M.
    Princess: It only took you 1 hour for the drawing. I pay you $1K.
    Artist: But it was out of a life-long investment! $1M, no change!

    What's the point? Yes, 20 years ago, India had more GDP than China. But it will take India 100 years to catch up with China now, if ever.

  4. tani says :

    Great work. I am highly obliged that you are sharing current affairs of 2012 of india with us. I really like that you are posting on daily basis and that too with good typical news which i didn't get from anywhere.



Analysis Blog
News Blog
Investing Blog
Opinion Blog
Precious Metals Blog
Markets Blog
Video of the Day


Asia / Pacific
Middle East / Africa
USA Government

RSS Feeds / Social Media

Combined Econintersect Feed

Free Newsletter

Marketplace - Books & More

Economic Forecast

Content Contribution



  Top Economics Site Contributor TalkMarkets Contributor Finance Blogs Free PageRank Checker Active Search Results Google+

This Web Page by Steven Hansen ---- Copyright 2010 - 2016 Econintersect LLC - all rights reserved