Energy Reserves Present Shifting Targets

July 3rd, 2014
in Op Ed, syndication

What does the New British Petroleum Report Tell Us?

Written by

British Petroleum has just released their 2014 Edition of their Statistical Review of World Energy and it can be found here.

Introduction to BP 2014 Statistical Review

What are the major take away messages?

Follow up:

One very important consideration is the ratio of reserves to production which is essentially the years of production remaining at current prices. Of course one would expect the price to increase as this ratio declines thus increasing the reserves but that is a complex analysis with insufficient information in the BP Statistical Review to make that sort of analysis so we are constrained to work with this "Static" set of information.

First let us look at oil. Notice that South and Central America have more than a 120 year supply whereas the U.S. has somewhat more than a thirty-year supply. We are not talking about the absolute level of reserves but the ratio of reserves to current production. There is potential for South and Central America to increase their level of production.

BP 2014 Oil Production to Reserves

Natural gas is very interesting. Even with fracking, North America has a very modest of number of years of supply and yet the U.S. seems to be intent on exporting natural gas. It is a big increase over a two-year period and likely to continue to increase but still one wonders about the wisdom of exporting natural gas.

BP 2014 Natural Gas Production to Reserves

And then there is coal. North America has a 250 year supply but hates this resource. Europe and Eurasia are also well positioned. Despite the environmental issues, it is going to be very difficult for the World to ignore the large coal reserves.

BP 2014 Coal Production to Reserves

What about Asia? They have the lowest ratio of reserves to production for oil and coal and only are slightly better off than North America with regards to natural gas. Given that Asia is likely to experience more rapid growth than many other areas, this represents a significant constraint.

There may be some value in comparing the 2014 Report with the 2012 Report i.e. the view from two years ago.

2014 Report 2012 Report
As of the End of the Prior Year Reserves R/P Reserves R/P
Oil (Billion Barrels)
1688 53 1653 54
Natural Gas (Trillion Cubic Meters)
186 55 208 64
Coal (Million Tonnes)
891,531 113 860,938 112

We can tell from this table that:

  • Oil and coal have been replacing reserves at a rate such that the Reserves to Production ratio which means the remaining years of production at current production rates has remained essentially constant.
  • Natural gas sufficiency has declined it appears to a restatement of Russia's natural gas reserves. Some additional explanation on that revision can be found here. The BP estimates for the reserves of Russia and Turkmenistan have been volatile over the past few years possibly because of lack of cooperation in developing these estimates.

Other organizations that produce similar assessments of the World's Energy situation include oil companies such as ENI and Shell Oil and the U.S. Energy Information Agency (EIA) and the International Energy Agency (IEA). I have not compared the BP data to data from such organizations. I suspect there is a lot of cooperation among the various parties that put together these analyses.

Please note the definition of "reserves" used by BP.

"Proved reserves of oil– Generally taken to be those quantities that geological and engineering information indicates with reasonable certainty can be recovered in the future from known reservoirs under existing economic and operating conditions."

That is the definition BP used for oil reserves and their definition for natural gas and coal were similar. What that means is:

  • Price changes can increase or decrease reserves
  • Improved technologies can increase the reserves
  • New discoveries can increase the reserves. Elsewhere there are studies that predict what is left to be discovered.
  • Political realities can increase but more frequently decrease reserves.

So reserves is an economic concept unlike the size of the total resource which is a geological concept and the technically recoverable portion of the total resource which is an engineering concept. These three concepts and the quantification that corresponds to each concept has a relationship which is not always as clear as it should be and ofttimes controversial especially when things are changing rapidly.

Thus the BP and similar reports are very useful but not necessarily the only information one needs to consider when assessing energy availability, climate change or anything to do with energy.

 









Make a Comment

Econintersect wants your comments, data and opinion on the articles posted.  As the internet is a "war zone" of trolls, hackers and spammers - Econintersect must balance its defences against ease of commenting.  We have joined with Livefyre to manage our comment streams.

To comment, just click the "Sign In" button at the top-left corner of the comment box below. You can create a commenting account using your favorite social network such as Twitter, Facebook, Google+, LinkedIn or Open ID - or open a Livefyre account using your email address.















 navigate econintersect.com

Blogs

Analysis Blog
News Blog
Investing Blog
Opinion Blog
Precious Metals Blog
Markets Blog
Video of the Day
Weather

Newspapers

Asia / Pacific
Europe
Middle East / Africa
Americas
USA Government
     

RSS Feeds / Social Media

Combined Econintersect Feed
Google+
Facebook
Twitter
Digg

Free Newsletter

Marketplace - Books & More

Economic Forecast

Content Contribution

Contact

About

  Top Economics Site

Investing.com Contributor TalkMarkets Contributor Finance Blogs Free PageRank Checker Active Search Results Google+

This Web Page by Steven Hansen ---- Copyright 2010 - 2016 Econintersect LLC - all rights reserved