econintersect.com
  • 토토사이트
    • 카지노사이트
    • 도박사이트
    • 룰렛 사이트
    • 라이브카지노
    • 바카라사이트
    • 안전카지노
  • 경제
  • 파이낸스
  • 정치
  • 투자
No Result
View All Result
  • 토토사이트
    • 카지노사이트
    • 도박사이트
    • 룰렛 사이트
    • 라이브카지노
    • 바카라사이트
    • 안전카지노
  • 경제
  • 파이낸스
  • 정치
  • 투자
No Result
View All Result
econintersect.com
No Result
View All Result

Housing Affordability Slightly Lower in Third Quarter

admin by admin
11월 13, 2014
in 미분류
0
0
SHARES
0
VIEWS

from the National Association of Home Builders (NAHB)

Firming home prices in markets across the country contributed to a slight dip in nationwide housing affordability in the third quarter of 2014, according to the National Association of Home Builders/Wells Fargo Housing Opportunity Index (HOI), released today.


In all, 61.8 percent of new and existing homes sold between the beginning of July and the end of September were affordable to families earning the U.S. median income of $63,900. This is down from the 62.6 percent of homes sold that were affordable to median-income earners in the second quarter.

The national median home price increased from $214,000 in the second quarter to $221,000 in the third quarter. Meanwhile, average mortgage interest rates decreased from 4.44 percent to 4.35 percent in the same period.

“Low mortgage rates, strong job growth and affordable home prices make this a good time to buy a home,” said NAHB Chairman Kevin Kelly, a home builder and developer from Wilmington, Del.

“Even with nationwide home prices reaching their highest level since the end of 2007, affordability still remains fairly high by historical standards,” said NAHB Chief Economist David Crowe. “Rising employment and incomes, interest rates that remain near historically low levels, and pent-up demand should contribute to positive momentum heading into next year.”

Youngstown-Warren-Boardman, Ohio-Pa. claimed the title of the nation’s most affordable major housing market, as 89.1 percent of all new and existing homes sold in this year’s third quarter were affordable to families earning the area’s median income of $52,700.

Meanwhile, Cumberland, Md.-W.Va. and Kokomo, Ind. each tied as the most affordable smaller market, with 94.8 percent of homes sold in the third quarter being affordable to those earning the median income of $54,100 in Cumberland and $56,900 in Kokomo.
Other major U.S. housing markets at the top of the affordability chart in the third quarter included Syracuse, N.Y.; Indianapolis-Carmel, Ind.; Harrisburg-Carlisle, Pa.; and Dayton, Ohio; in descending order.

Meanwhile, smaller markets joining Cumberland and Kokomo at the top of the affordability chart included Davenport-Moline-Rock Island, Iowa-Ill.; Mansfield, Ohio; and Springfield, Ohio; in descending order.

For an eighth consecutive quarter, San Francisco-San Mateo-Redwood City, Calif. was the nation’s least affordable major housing market. There, just 11.4 percent of homes sold in the third quarter were affordable to families earning the area’s median income of $100,400.

Other major metros at the bottom of the affordability chart were Los Angeles-Long Beach-Glendale, Calif.; Santa Ana-Anaheim-Irvine, Calif.; San Jose-Sunnyvale-Santa Clara, Calif.; and New York-White Plains-Wayne, N.Y.-N.J.; in descending order.

All five least affordable small housing markets were in California. At the very bottom was Napa, where 10.2 percent of all new and existing homes sold were affordable to families earning the area’s median income of $70,300. Other small markets included Santa Cruz-Watsonville, Salinas, Santa Rosa-Petaluma, and San Luis Obispo-Paso Robles; in descending order.

HOUSING OPPORTUNITY INDEX, MEDIAN PRICE & INTEREST RATES
National
Interest Rates (3) No. of
Year/HOI MedianWeighted Percent Share Metro
Quarter (%) PriceInterest Fixed ARM Fixed ARM Areas


( $000’s)Rate(1)(2)

Covered
1991







I–$99 9.09 9.50 7.62 78%22%147
II–$105 9.06 9.53 7.28 79%21%173
III–$110 9.33 9.74 8.10 76%24%191
IV–$106 8.78 9.08 7.71 75%25%176
1992







I53.9 $105 8.75 8.73 6.98 82%18%169
II55.5 $105 8.42 8.87 6.95 79%21%173
III57.5 $110 7.93 8.30 6.43 80%20%190
IV60.0 $114 7.76 8.22 6.21 77%23%187
1993







I64.7 $105 7.57 8.02 5.98 78%22%202
II65.1 $109 7.27 7.66 5.89 78%22%186
III65.1 $110 7.04 7.31 5.72 83%17%188
IV66.8 $112 6.80 7.15 5.42 80%20%178
1994







I67.5 $112 6.91 7.32 5.52 77%23%174
II60.5 $114 7.42 8.17 6.14 63%37%186
III61.7 $117 7.72 8.59 6.58 57%43%185
IV62.3 $114 7.82 8.92 6.84 47%53%160
1995







I61.2 $114 8.15 9.13 7.25 48%52%179
II60.5 $117 7.99 8.41 7.20 65%35%187
III61.3 $118 7.73 7.94 7.06 77%23%191
IV63.4$117 7.53 7.74 6.81 78%22%192
1996







I67.5 $118 7.35 7.43 6.91 84%16%185
II63.1 $120 7.84 8.14 7.08 72%28%172
III61.2 $122 7.97 8.36 7.19 67%33%174
IV64.1 $120 7.73 8.06 6.94 71%29%184
1997







I66.5 $120 7.75 8.01 6.97 75%25%190
II64.3 $123 7.91 8.20 7.06 75%25%196
III63.7 $127 7.65 7.96 6.82 80%20%195
IV64.8 $127 7.47 7.63 6.71 83%17%193
1998







I67.6 $129 7.22 7.31 6.62 87%13%191
II64.8 $135 7.21 7.31 6.53 86%14%193
III64.4 $138 7.08 7.18 6.40 88%12%187
IV66.2 $136 6.88 6.95 6.22 90%10%186
1999







I69.6 $134 6.95 7.03 6.29 88%12%181
II67.0 $138 7.10 7.85 6.35 83%17%184
III63.4 $141 7.52 7.25 6.69 72%28%186
IV63.8 $139 7.58 7.98 6.62 70%30%192
2000







I62.8 $140 7.93 8.32 7.09 69%31%184
II58.4 $147 8.20 8.55 7.47 68%32%173
III58.1 $151 8.01 8.29 6.98 79%21%177
IV59.3 $151 7.75 7.95 6.73 84%16%180
2001







I56.9 $153 7.21 7.28 6.61 89%11%181
II63.4 $156 7.15 7.23 6.49 89%11%187
III61.5 $161 7.06 7.17 6.42 85%15%186
IV64.1 $158 6.71 6.80 6.08 88%12%181
2002







I64.8 $160 6.86 7.03 6.01 83%17%191
Annual63.7 $164 6.54 6.73 5.66 83%17%223
2003







IV58.9 $186 5.83 6.09 5.13 73%27%161
Annual63.7 $176 5.75 5.92 5.03 81%19%166
2004







I61.2 $187 5.62 5.90 4.90 73%27%163
II55.6 $204 5.72 6.09 5.06 64%36%162
III50.4 $225 5.83 6.12 5.35 62%38%162
IV52.0 $219 5.77 5.93 5.48 64%36%160
2005







I50.1 $225 5.79 5.95 5.43 68%32%158
II45.9 $241 5.82 6.02 5.42 67%33%158
III43.2 $253 5.84 5.97 5.49 72%28%161
IV41.0 $254 6.21 6.36 5.81 71%29%160
2006







I41.3 $250 6.39 6.51 6.10 72%28%182
II40.6 $250 6.65 6.72 6.45 75%25%199
III40.4 $248 6.77 6.82 6.55 81%19%203
IV41.6 $247 6.52 6.55 6.36 86%14%202
2007







I43.9 $238 6.40 6.41 6.29 89%11%219
II43.1 $240 6.44 6.46 6.27 89%11%215
III42.0 $239 6.73 6.76 6.54 88%12%215
IV46.6 $227 6.42 6.43 6.22 92%8%220
2008







I53.8 $219 6.02 6.05 5.66 92%8%223
II55.0 $215 6.12 6.16 5.69 92%8%222
III56.1 $206 6.39 6.43 5.91 92%8%222
IV62.4 $190 6.02 6.02 6.03 98%2%222
2009







I72.5 $176 5.14 5.14 *100%0%222
II72.3 $177 5.03 5.03 *100%0%226
III70.1 $179 5.33 5.33 *100%0%227
IV70.8 $180 5.11 5.11 *100%0%227
2010







I72.2 $175 5.12 5.12 *100%0%225
II72.3 $179 5.11 5.11 *100%0%225
III72.1 $180 4.79 4.79 *100%0%226
IV73.9 $175 4.59 4.59 *100%0%223
2011







I74.6 $165 4.98 4.98 *100%0%222
II72.6 $172 4.95 4.95 *100%0%223
III72.9 $176 4.71 4.71 *100%0%225
IV75.9 $170 4.43 4.43 *100%0%225
2012







I77.5 $162 4.32 4.32 *100%0%226
II73.8 $185 4.05 4.05 *100%0%226
III74.1 $189 3.80 3.80 *100%0%225
IV74.9 $188 3.57 3.57 *100%0%226
2013







I73.7 $184 3.62 3.62 *100%0%222
II69.3 $202 3.73 3.73 *100%0%225
III64.5 $211 4.45 4.45 *100%0%223
IV64.7 $205 4.54 4.54 *100%0%224
2014







I65.5 $195 4.57 4.57 *100%0%225
II62.6 $214 4.44 4.44 *100%0%225
III61.8 $221 4.35 4.35 *100%0%227









Source: Core Logic, HUD & Federal Housing Finance Agency. Analyzed by NAHB Economics & Housing Policy Group







Note: (1) Effective closing rate for all fixed-rate mortgage loans for all major lenders, as reported by FHFB.







(2) Effective closing rate for all ARM mortgage loans for all major lenders, as reported by FHFB.







(3) Share of all loans closed by all major lenders.







*insufficient data to report meaningful numbers (<1%)







Previous Post

Market Commentary: Markets Open With Large Caps Recording New Highs

Next Post

Market Commentary: Averages Off Morning Highs, Mostly Positive And Trending Sideways

Related Posts

Bitcoin Is Finally Trading Perfectly Like 'Digital Gold'
Economics

Bitcoin Is Finally Trading Perfectly Like ‘Digital Gold’

by admin
Namibia Will Regulate And Not Ban Crypto With New Law
Finance

Namibia Will Regulate And Not Ban Crypto With New Law

by admin
6,746 ETH Valued At $12M Was Just Burned
Economics

6,746 ETH Valued At $12M Was Just Burned

by admin
Bitcoin Is Steady Above $29,000 Awaiting US NFP Figures
Economics

Bitcoin: What Next After Consolidation Ends?

by admin
US Government Offloads Another 8,200 Bitcoin – On-chain Data
Economics

US Government Offloads Another 8,200 Bitcoin – On-chain Data

by admin
Next Post

Market Commentary: Averages Off Morning Highs, Mostly Positive And Trending Sideways

답글 남기기 응답 취소

이메일 주소는 공개되지 않습니다. 필수 필드는 *로 표시됩니다

Browse by Category

  • Business
  • Econ Intersect News
  • Economics
  • Finance
  • Politics
  • Uncategorized

Browse by Tags

adoption altcoins bank banking banks Binance Bitcoin Bitcoin market blockchain BTC BTC price business China crypto crypto adoption cryptocurrency crypto exchange crypto market crypto regulation decentralized finance DeFi Elon Musk ETH Ethereum Europe Federal Reserve finance FTX inflation investment market analysis Metaverse NFT nonfungible tokens oil market price analysis recession regulation Russia stock market technology Tesla the UK the US Twitter

Categories

  • Business
  • Econ Intersect News
  • Economics
  • Finance
  • Politics
  • Uncategorized

© Copyright 2024 EconIntersect

No Result
View All Result
  • 토토사이트
    • 카지노사이트
    • 도박사이트
    • 룰렛 사이트
    • 라이브카지노
    • 바카라사이트
    • 안전카지노
  • 경제
  • 파이낸스
  • 정치
  • 투자

© Copyright 2024 EconIntersect