What We Read Today 29 June 2014

June 29th, 2014
in econ_news, syndication

Econintersect: Every day our editors collect the most interesting things they find from around the internet and present a summary "reading list" which will include very brief summaries of why each item has gotten our attention. Suggestions from readers for "reading list" items are gratefully reviewed, although sometimes space limits the number included.

Follow up:

  • Why elites hate it when you say giant student debts aren’t the problem (Matt Phillips, Quartz) Matt Phillips has written a good piece on factors that are big problems in the student loan debt situation and other factors that are not significant problems. But he does miss the point that an article discussed yesterday (in the public portion of WWRT) by Choire Sicha was a takedown of a Brookings Institute study Econintersect has also attacked. Phillips seems to think Sicha was attacking a New York Times article by David Leonhardt which was only obliquely criticized by Sicha in his discussion of the misleading Brookings Institute publication. Is it any wonder mass confusion can develop on a subject when the discussion gets so fragmented? Phillips' essay would be much better at making his valid points if he avoided bringing the Sicha article (or the Leonhardt article for that matter) into his article in any substantive way. Sicha and Leonhardt are discussing the Brookings Institute report and Phillips is not. But Econintersect will wager that the Phillips article will be used to represent support for the Brookings work when it doesn't go near the issues in dispute there. Perhaps he could update his piece with a note stating that he is not discussing issues with Brookings study which have been a major consideration in the Sicha and Leonhardt blogs he references.
  • If the World Began Again, Would Life as We Know It Exist?If the World Began Again, Would Life as We Know It Exist? (Zach Zorich, Nautilus) Experiments with 60,000 generations of 12 different colonies of E. coli which at generation 1 were identical have shown that dramatically different results can evolve in different colonies all maintained in identical external environments for that many generations. In terms of modern humans 60,000 generations would be of the order of 1 million years, a few hundredths of 1% of the time that life has been evolving on earth. The author's conclusion from the scientists involved in the experiments is that of we could start earth all over again the current outcome would be highly improbable.

Today there are 7 articles discussed 'behind the wall'.

Please support all that we do at Global Economic Intersection with a subscription to our premium content 'behind the wall'.

You get a full year for only $25.

The rest of the post is for our premium content subscribers - Click here to continue reading. If you have forgotten your login or password - send an email to info at econintersect.com.


Make a Comment

Econintersect wants your comments, data and opinion on the articles posted. You can also comment using Facebook directly using he comment block below.

 navigate econintersect .com


Analysis Blog
News Blog
Investing Blog
Opinion Blog
Precious Metals Blog
Markets Blog
Video of the Day


Asia / Pacific
Middle East / Africa
USA Government

RSS Feeds / Social Media

Combined Econintersect Feed

Free Newsletter

Marketplace - Books & More

Economic Forecast

Content Contribution



  Top Economics Site

Investing.com Contributor TalkMarkets Contributor Finance Blogs Free PageRank Checker Active Search Results Google+

This Web Page by Steven Hansen ---- Copyright 2010 - 2018 Econintersect LLC - all rights reserved