February 2013 Industrial Production Growth Strong

Written by

The headlines say Industrial Production (IP) improved strongly 0.7% in February 2013 and up 2.5% year-over-year. Econintersect‘s analysis using the unadjusted data is that IP was less good at an improvement of 0.2% month-over-month but the year-over-year was up a better 2.7% year-over-year than the headlines.

  • The year-over-year rate of growth is trending up using a three month rolling average, but is down using any rolling average up to 12 months.
  • The market was expecting a month-over-month increase of 0.4% to 0.6% (vs the headline growth decline of 0.7%).
  • The manufacturing sub-index (which is more representative of economic activity) was up 0.8% month-over-month – and up 2.0% year-over-year – seasonally adjusted.

IP headline index has three parts – manufacturing, mining and utilities – manufacturing was up 0.8% this month (up 2.0% year-over-year), mining down 0.3% (up 3.4% year-over-year), and utilities were up 1.6% (up 5.8% year-over-year). Note that utilities are 10.3% of the industrial production index.

Comparing Seasonally Adjusted Year-over-Year Change of the Industrial Production Index (blue line) with Components Manufacturing (red line), Utilities (green line), and Mining (orange line)

The last eight months, unadjusted Industrial Production year-over-year growth has been between 2% and 4%. It is interesting that the unadjusted data is giving a smoother trend line.

Year-over-Year Change Total Industrial Production – Unadjusted

/images/z ip3.PNG

Economic downturns have been signaled by only watching the manufacturing portion of Industrial Production. Historically manufacturing year-over-year growth has been negative when a recession is imminent. This index is not indicating a recession is imminent but remains in an overall downtrend.

Seasonally Adjusted Manufacturing Index of Industrial Production

Seasonally Adjusted Capacity Utilization – Year-over-Year Change – Seasonally Adjusted – Total Industry (blue line) and Manufacturing Only (red line)

Econintersect uses unadjusted data and graphs the data YoY in monthly groups. The difficulty in IP is that this index has not settled down to the New Normal effects making evaluation and analysis somewhat problematic.

Total Industrial Production – Unadjusted

/images/z ip1.PNG

Industrial production growth is NOT recessionary, and that the industrial portion of the USA economy is doing better than many other elements. Keep it real, here is a comparison between the survey predictions and the hard data. Industrial Production is the long blue bars.

Comparing Surveys to Hard Data

/images/z survey1.png

In the above graphic, hard data is the long bars, and surveys are the short bars. The arrows on the left side are the key to growth or contraction.

Caveats in the Use of Industrial Production Index

Industrial Production is a non-monetary index – and therefore inflation or other monetary adjustments are not necessary.

The monthly index values are normally revised many months after initial release and are subject to annual revision. The following graphic is an example of the variance between the original released value – and the current value of the index. Note that in general the current values are better than the original values – this is normally a sign of an improving economy.

Total Industrial Production – Unadjusted – Original Headline Index Value (blue line) and Current Index Value (red line)

/images/z ip2.PNG

This index is somewhat distorted by including utility production which is noisy, based primarily on weather variations.

There is some variance between the manufacturing component of industrial production which monitors production, and the US Census reported Manufacturing Sales. While it is true that these are slightly different pulse points (inventory not accounted in shipments) – they should not have different trends for long periods of time.

Comparing Year-over-Year Change – Manufacturing Industrial Production (blue line) to Inflation Adjusted Manufacturers Shipments (green line)

Econintersect determines the month-over-month change by subtracting the current month’s year-over-year change from the previous month’s year-over-year change. This is the best of the bad options available to determine month-over-month trends – as the preferred methodology would be to use multi-year data (but New Normal effects and the Great Recession distort historical data).

Related Articles

All Posts on Manufacturing

[iframe src=”http://econintersect.com/authors/author.htm?author=/home/aleta/public_html/authors/s_hansen.htm” width=”600″ height=”500″ frameborder=”0″ scrolling=”no”]

One reply on “February 2013 Industrial Production Growth Strong”

  1. all of this is accounted for by a MASSIVE increase in energy production…and so i am told…”consumption by utilities of natural gas instead of coal to make electricity.”  in short “waste, fraud and abuse.”  shuttering coal mines so that “prices can reset higher and we can stick it to the consumer” is not how one “shows” an improving economic outlook.  we have MASSIVE energy builds going on five years…should those prices start correcting in the opposite direction because “the correction in the upper direction is bankrupting us sooner rather than later” then i think we’ll have a “true” look at how variable these numbers really are.  these traders are taking things to ridiculous extremes (taking nukers off line?  pulling drugs off store shelves?  REALLY?) it really is screaming “market blow up 101” here.  you need new PRODUCT not an “old worn out idea that collapsed in 2008.”  stay long transports until the whole thing collapses in a big implosion….AGAIN.

Comments are closed.