January 2013 New Home Sales Were Beautiful

Written by and

New home sales data for January 2013 was definitely better than last month’s data.  We are now seeing one terrible month, and one unbelievably good month.

  • January 2013 was the best January since 2008;
  • Last month’s data was terrible, and this month’s data is outstanding.  Averaging out the data, the 3 month rolling average is at the levels seen in the last 12 months.
  • The headline seasonally adjusted numbers say new home sales are up 15.6%, and Econintersect‘s analysis is even better.

Econintersect Analysis:

  • sales up 22.3% month-over-month
  • year-over-year sales up 34.8%.

US Census Headlines:

  • sales down 7.3% month-over-month
  • year-over-year sales up 28.9%
  • market expected annualized sales of 375K to 383K (actual was 437K – seasonally adjusted)

The quantity of new single family homes for sale is now well below historical levels.

Seasonally Adjusted New Homes for Sale

As the sales data is noisy (large monthly variations). The graph below shows the growth trend line although noisy appears to be flat.

Year-over-Year Change – Unadjusted New Home Sales Volumes (blue line) with zero growth line emphasized (red line)

The headlines of the data release:

Sales of new single-family houses in January 2013 were at a seasonally adjusted annual rate of 437,000, according to estimates released jointly today by the U.S. Census Bureau and the Department of Housing and Urban Development. This is 15.6 percent (±18.9%)* above the revised December rate of 378,000 and is 28.9 percent (±21.7%) above the January 2012 estimate of 339,000.

Unadjusted New Home Sales Monthly Volumes In Thousands

The median sales price of new houses sold in January 2013 was $226,400; the average sales price was $286,300.

Unadjusted Median New Home Sales Price

The seasonally adjusted estimate of new houses for sale at the end of January was 150,000. This represents a supply of 4.1 months at the current sales rate.

Seasonally Adjusted – Number of Months of Supply of New Homes at Current Rate of Sales

The unsold supply of new homes has returned to pre-crisis levels.

Caveats on Use of New Home Sales Data

This data is compiled by sampling, and historically has little revision. This data is based on contracts signed – not actual properties conveyed.

As in most US Census reports, Econintersect does not agree with the seasonal adjustment methodology used and provides an alternate analysis. The issue is that the exceptionally large recession and subsequent economic roller coaster has caused data distortions that become exaggerated when the seasonal adjustment methodology uses several years of data. Further, Econintersect believes there may be a New Normal seasonality and using data prior to the end of the recession for seasonal analysis could provide the wrong conclusion.

Econintersect determines the month-over-month change by subtracting the current month’s year-over-year change from the previous month’s year-over-year change. This is the best of the bad options available to determine month-over-month trends – as the preferred methodology would be to use multi-year data (but the New Normal effects and the Great Recession distort historical data).

With new home sales at 25% of past rates, whatever your interpretation of the new home sales data is not significant enough to matter. Also the data is distorted by the first home buyer’s stimulus which required contract signing before 30 April 2010 – causing a data bubble and subsequent trough. In spite of Econintersect‘s reservations about the efficacy of seasonal adjustment at the present time, it is interesting to look at the deep history of the seasonally adjusted data.

The broad bottoming process for new home sales in 2010 may not be confirmed or denied for another year or more. The critical factor will be whether the one-year positive trend can continue as year-over-year comparisons will no longer be against the very low sales after the collapse of the tax credit stimulus micro-bubble.

The seasonally adjusted new home sales rate is the lowest it has been for 50 years and has been at that level for almost two years. At the beginning of 1963 the U.S. population was around 188 million. With annual new home sales averaging around 550,000 per year in 1963, the extreme depression in the new home market is evident. In 1963 the rate of new home sales was about 290,000 per 100 million of population. In 2011 the number is about 100,000 per 100 million.

It is more informative to look at these changes over the nearly fifty-year history. The following graph shows new home sales normalized to population from from St, Louis Fed:

Seasonally Adjusted New Home Sales Ratio to Population

The same data is plotted below to include the average for the entire period and two moving averages (graph updated through October 2011):

The bottom line is that the new home market is in an extreme depression and the apparent bottoming process has been dragging on for two years, if in fact the bottom has been reached. Recent review of the Fed 2011 stress tests for banks has a new recession scenario that would see home prices decline another 20% from here. It is unlikely that the attempts to complete a bottom here could hold under those conditions. Econintersect analysis of recession indicators is still not seeing the start of new U.S. recession, however. We can only hope that outlook continues.

Related Articles

All real estate posts

[iframe src=”http://econintersect.com/authors/author.htm?author=/home/aleta/public_html/authors/John Lounsbury.htm” width=”600″ height=”650″ frameborder=”0″ scrolling=”no”]

One reply on “January 2013 New Home Sales Were Beautiful”

  1. Good report John but I see It merely s 2009/10 moves, not the general public they are still facing foreclosures after the big boys conned them into unreasonable credit, cost, duration, purposes solely to top-up export GDP losses with undue domestic consumption they can ill afford in their 47% underemployed position Romney the idiot rightly told of.
    What is moving the housing generally is re-employed or re-financed investors buying  bargain basement foreclosures and new to rent to those now homeless forecloses. Why are investors, specially the 1% moving into rental properties? Because they are getting out of the Stock-market while the going is good and have to place the cash somewhere other than buggered hedges and funds, they can’t go into Gold while Treasury & IMF are flogging the prices down from the stupid heights along with profit takers, before that commodity goes much lower as it will.
    Don’t forget there are some rather large (Hundreds of Millions 1%’ers are taking out of markets ~ Just Buffet unloading for easy gains, Bill Gates Microsoft insider sales, Facebook vendor shares, and a few others reported, so there are billions bailing out slowly I suggest from Equity Markets, including futures, Specially Gold, and with silver and others a limited shift potential. It is reasonable these investors should go into the heavily depressed realty opportunities that are way lower than statistical sector averages show up.

Comments are closed.