Sea Container Counts Have Good Improvement in June 2012

Written by Steven Hansen

In a nice surprise, the combined container counts for the Ports of Los Angeles and Long Beach showed a relative surge of growth. The economically intuitive imports are up 4.8% year-over-year and up a more meager 0.9% year-to-date. There is a direct linkage between imports and USA economic activity.

Even exports (which are an indicator of competitiveness and global economic growth) are up 5.9% year-over-year – but only up 1.8% year-to-date.

There is reasonable correlation between the container counts and the US Census trade data also being analyzed by Econintersect.

Unadjusted Year-over-Year Change in Container Counts – Ports of Los Angeles and Long Beach Combined – Imports (red line) and Exports (blue bars)

/images/z container1.PNG

Econintersect considers import and exports significant elements in determining economic health (please see caveats below). On a month-over-month basis, exports grew 5.9%, while imports grew 7.3% (more than wiping out last month’s contraction).

Unadjusted Import Container Counts – Ports of Los Angeles and Long Beach Combined

/images/z container2.PNG

Unadjusted Export Container Counts – Ports of Los Angeles and Long Beach Combined

/images/z container3.png

So far other major transport indicators are mixed but the May / June data released so far is showing weak to no to negative growth:

For container counts, only import counts are USA economically intuitive. Using transport as an economic barometer – the real economic growth in the USA is at least 3% with the June data seen to date.

The Ports of LA and Long Beach account for much (approximately 40%) of the container movement into and out of the United States – and these two ports report their data significantly earlier than other USA ports. Most of the manufactured goods move between countries in sea containers (except larger rolling items such as automobiles). This pulse point is an early indicator of the health of the economy.

Containers come in many sizes so a uniform method involves expressing the volume of containers in TEU, the volume of a standard 20 foot long sea container. Thus a standard 40 foot container would be 2 TEU.

There is a good correlation between container counts and trade data (the US Census trade data is shown on the graph below).  Using container counts gives a two month advance window on trade data.

Inflation Adjusted Year-over-Year Change Imports (blue line) and Exports (red line)

The overall transport started of the year strong, and weakened through mid-year.  One month is not a trend, but it appears transport may again be strengthening.

Caveats on the Use of Container Counts

These are extraordinary times with historical data confused by a massive depression and significant monetary and fiscal intervention by government. Further containers are a relatively new technology and had a 14 year continuous growth streak from 1993 to 2006. There is not enough history to make any associations with economic growth – and we must assume a correlation exists.

Further, it is impossible from this data to understand commodity or goods breakdown (e.g. what is the contents in the containers). Any expansion or contraction cannot be analyzed to understand causation.

Imports are a particularly good tool to view the Main Street economy. Imports overreact to economic changes much like a double ETF making movements easy to see.

Contracting imports historically is a recession marker, as consumers and businesses start to hunker down. Main Street and Wall Street are not necessarily in phase and imports can reflect the direction for Main Street when Wall Street may be saying something different. During some recessions, consumers and businesses hunkered down before the Wall Street recession hit – and in the 2007 recession the contraction began 10 months into the recession.

Above graph with current data:

Imports of Goods and Services

Econintersect determines the month-over-month change by subtracting the current month’s year-over-year change from the previous month’s year-over-year change. This is the best of the bad options available to determine month-over-month trends – as the preferred methodology would be to use multi-year data (but the New Normal effects and the Great Recession distort historical data).

Related Articles:

All Transport Posts

All Trade Posts

3 replies on “Sea Container Counts Have Good Improvement in June 2012”

  1. You must be careful with the TEU data for 2 reasons. First, Long Beach has recently brought in new accounts (that were not servicing the port last year) so the data from Long Beach is not apples to apples. Also, both LA and Long Beach were impacted by the Japanese earthquake last year– inbound container growth last year turned notably negative in June ’11 vs. June ’10. I do not think that you can draw any accurate conclusions as a result. I will say this though–you would think container count in June ’12 should be up from June ’10 for the Port of LA, but it was not. That is not a good sign, imo.

  2. Tom,
    really appreciate the feedback. i never rely on a single dataset because of anomalies as you point out. i am also worried this data set will become invalid when the new panama locks are opened in 2014.


Comments are closed.