econintersect.com
  • 토토사이트
    • 카지노사이트
    • 도박사이트
    • 룰렛 사이트
    • 라이브카지노
    • 바카라사이트
    • 안전카지노
  • 경제
  • 파이낸스
  • 정치
  • 투자
No Result
View All Result
  • 토토사이트
    • 카지노사이트
    • 도박사이트
    • 룰렛 사이트
    • 라이브카지노
    • 바카라사이트
    • 안전카지노
  • 경제
  • 파이낸스
  • 정치
  • 투자
No Result
View All Result
econintersect.com
No Result
View All Result
Home Uncategorized

January 23, 2021 Seasonal Forecasts: Part II, NOAA Comparison with JAMSTEC

admin by admin
9월 6, 2021
in Uncategorized
0
0
SHARES
0
VIEWS

Written by Sig Silber

We published the NOAA Long-Term Forecast Part I on January 22, 2021. Here we compare the NOAA forecast for Alaska and CONUS with the JAMSTEC forecast. It is easier to see the disagreements by comparing the maps which we show side by side in a table with a summary of the comparison. Obviously, the further out you look, the less confidence you have in the forecasts and thus the differences in the forecasts. Also provided are the JAMSTEC World Forecasts. In Part I, we showed the differences in the assumptions with respect to ENSO, and I have repeated and expanded on them in this article. Again this month, it seems like JAMSTEC shows the Polar Branch of the Jet Stream farther north than NOAA has it but not by as much. There is quite a bit of similarity in the temperature forecasts but less similarity in the precipitation forecasts. 

NOAA v. JAMSTEC


Please share this article – Go to the very top of the page, right-hand side for social media buttons. Please feel free to send this article to anyone who you think might find it interesting and or useful.


C. Comparison of the NOAA and JAMSTEC Forecasts

Below is the comparison of the NOAA and JAMSTEC temperature and precipitation forecast maps for three time-periods and from left to right the NOAA forecast for Alaska and CONUS (the contiguous mid-latitude U.S) and then JAMSTEC for North America (which includes Canada and Mexico). The NOAA forecast maps can be clicked on to enlarge. The JAMSTEC maps in the table are not set up to be clicked on to enlarge (because we have no larger version of them). We have concluded that these smaller images work fine for comparison purposes.  Later in the article, we show the World Forecasts.

JAMSTEC works with three-month seasons: Spring: MAM, Summer JJA, and Fall SON.

Out of each three months, there is one where the months in the two forecasts align perfectly for the first time period. This is not one of those months so for the first period we are comparing  MAM for both JAMSTEC NOAA. It is not perfect but probably ok. February was addressed in great detail in the NOAA Seasonal Outlook Article we published on January 22, 2021. February is part of meteorological Winter and JAMSTEC has moved on to starting with Spring.

In addition to the value of comparing the JAMSTEC and NOAA forecasts, the JAMSTEC forecast by showing North America provides more context for the Alaska and CONUS Forecasts as the temperature and precipitation patterns cover North America, not just Alaska and CONUS.

Map Comparisons and our Comments

Temperature*

 NOAA Alaska Plus CONUSJAMSTEC North America

SPRING

MAM  2021

 

https://www.cpc.ncep.noaa.gov/products/predictions/long_range/lead01/off01_temp.gif

Summer

JJA 2021

Fall

SON 2021

For Spring:  Except for Alaska the forecasts are very similar. JAMSTEC has the center of the heat anomaly a bit farther east than NOAA.
For Summer:  Again except for Alaska the forecasts are very similar. NOAA shows a small North Central EC area that JAMSTEC does not show.
For Fall: Again except for Alaska, the forecasts are very similar. If you look closely you can see differences but they are fairly small.

Precipitation*

 NOAA Alaska Plus CONUSJAMSTEC North America

SPRING

MAM 2021

 

Summer

JJA 2021

Dec-Jan-Feb 2020/21

Fall

SON 2021

https://www.cpc.ncep.noaa.gov/products/predictions/long_range/lead08/off08_prcp.gif
For Spring: Quite similar except JAMSTEC has the dry Southern Tier anomaly farther east.
For Summer: JAMSTEC is much drier than NOAA. This really shows up with respect to the eastern half of CONUS. NOAA shows EC for the North American Monsoon. JAMSTEC shows the NAM but it seems to benefit Arizona a bit but not New Mexico or the Great Plains.
For Fall: Not much similarity here.

* It is important to keep in mind that NOAA reports probabilities of being warmer or cooler than Climatology and JAMSTEC reports the degrees of temperature and millimeters of precipitation variation from Climatolory (Normal). So they are not exactly comparable. Also please keep in mind that we will shortly have a redefinition of Climatology which is the mean of the most recent three decades of weather. NOAA says that redefinition will take place with the May 20, 2021 release of the Seasonal Outlook Update and I suspect that JAMSTEC will do so at about the same time as they work closely with NOAA. Right now, Climatology is measured for the period 1981 – 2010, and when the adjustment is made it will be for the period 1991 – 2020. The impact on precipitation I believe will be relatively minor but for temperature, the ratio of red to white to blue om the NOAA maps will be reduced. So for CONUS, it will not be red almost everywhere. As the decade unfolds if the warming trend continues the predominance of red will return.

JAMSTEC World Forecasts

This month our comments for Spring are taken directly from the JAMSTEC discussion. Normally their comments cover two seasons but not this time so we made our own comments for the Summer period.

Spring which is MAM  2021

Temperature
http://www.jamstec.go.jp/aplinfo/sintexf/2017/forecast/temp2.glob.SON2020.1jul2020.F23DVAR.gif
Precipitation
http://www.jamstec.go.jp/aplinfo/sintexf/2017/forecast/temp2.glob.SON2020.1jul2020.F23DVAR.gif
JAMSTEC says:  “ On a seasonal scale, the SINTEX-F predicts that most part of the globe will experience a warmer-than-normal condition in boreal spring (austral autumn) except for Alaska, western Canada, northern part of the South American Continent, western Australia, Indochina Peninsula, and India.

As regards to the seasonally averaged rainfall in boreal spring (austral autumn), a drier-than-normal condition is predicted for U.S.A., La Plata Basin, southwestern Africa, southern Europe facing the Mediterranean Sea, some part of the Middle East, eastern China, and Indonesia. In contrast, Canada, most part of Brazil, Philippines, Indochina Peninsula, India, Sri Lanka, and western China will experience a wetter-than-normal condition.

The model predicts most part of Japan will experience a warmer-than-normal condition in spring as a seasonal average. As regards to the seasonally averaged rainfall, most part of Japan (except for Kyushu and Okinawa) will experience a slightly wetter-than-normal condition.              

Summer which is JJA 2021

http://www.jamstec.go.jp/aplinfo/sintexf/2017/forecast/temp2.glob.DJF2021.1jul2020.F23DVAR.gif
Precipitation
http://www.jamstec.go.jp/aplinfo/sintexf/2017/forecast/temp2.glob.DJF2021.1jul2020.F23DVAR.gif“
JAMSTEC surprisingly does not comment on the Season which is Summer. The JAMSTEC maps cover both land and water so you can see their forecast for the La Nina. It seems to be dry for the Maritime Continent and South Asia. Australia is EC although JAMSTEC does not use that terminology.

And Fall 2021

Temperature
http://www.jamstec.go.jp/aplinfo/sintexf/2017/forecast/temp2.glob.MAM2021.1jul2020.F23DVAR.gif
Precipitation
http://www.jamstec.go.jp/aplinfo/sintexf/2017/forecast/temp2.glob.MAM2021.1jul2020.F23DVAR.gif
JAMSTEC  does not comment on the third period in their discussion. We assume this represents the lower level of confidence that far out. But you can see what it shows on the maps. Europe looks dry. India looks a bit dry. Australia is a bit dry.

Here is the JAMSTEC Discussion

JAMSTEC Discussion

We provided the full JAMSTEC Discussion in Part I. We repeat it here.

Jan. 15, 2021

Prediction from 1st Jan., 2021

ENSO forecast:

Observation now shows a La Niña Modoki-like state, as predicted earlier. The SINTEX-F continues to predict that this La Niña Modoki-like state will persist in this boreal winter. Then, it will start to decay from boreal spring. We need to be careful of its impact as it may be different from that of a canonical La Niña.

Indian Ocean forecast:

Observation shows that the tropical Indian Ocean is a neutral state. The ensemble mean prediction suggests that the present condition will persist in the first half of this year.

Regional forecast:

On a seasonal scale, the SINTEX-F predicts that most part of the globe will experience a warmer-than-normal condition in boreal spring (austral autumn) except for Alaska, western Canada, northern part of the South American Continent, western Australia, Indochina Peninsula, and India.

As regards to the seasonally averaged rainfall in boreal spring (austral autumn), a drier-than-normal condition is predicted for U.S.A., La Plata Basin, southwestern Africa, southern Europe facing the Mediterranean Sea, some part of the Middle East, eastern China, and Indonesia. In contrast, Canada, most part of Brazil, Philippines, Indochina Peninsula, India, Sri Lanka, and western China will experience a wetter-than-normal condition.

The model predicts most part of Japan will experience a warmer-than-normal condition in spring as a seasonal average. As regards to the seasonally averaged rainfall, most part of Japan (except for Kyushu and Okinawa) will experience a slightly wetter-than-normal condition.

D. Conclusion

As usual, there is some disagreement between NOAA and JAMSTEC. The differences are mostly relative to precipitation. 

It is difficult to relate the differences in the forecast to differences in assumptions on ENSO. But JAMSTEC tends to consider other factors that may not be considered by NOAA. On the other hand, the new versions of the JAMSTEC model are early in their usage and may not have been fully calibrated. I do not think I have gone into it in detail but when it comes to models we need to recognize that there are limitations and NOAA and JAMSTEC use very different approaches which I have summarized in the below table.

 Shorter TermIntermediate-Term
NOAADeterministicStatistical
JAMSTECDeterministicDeterministic (may also use statistical methods)
AssessmentGenerally Considered to be reliable for 14 to 28 daysErrors build up in deterministic models and statistical models generally have insufficient historical data to be reliable

So it is kind of a pick your poison choice. But both agencies have great skill at employing approaches that have inherent limitations.

E. Additional Information

ENSO Phase

We showed some of this information in Part. I am repeating it with some additions here.

First, let us look at the NOAA ENSO Update

More information can be found here.

NOAA depends a lot on the IRI-CPC analysis.

600

It is useful to see how the view has changed if at all which is shown below

This compares the new forecast to the one made last month. The first forecast in each month is based on a survey of meteorologists and the second is based on climate models so they are not totally comparable. But there is not much change through MAM but AMJ is more evenly balanced between La Nina and ENSO Neutral than the forecast in Mid-December and the chances of an El Nino getting started soon have been reduced.

Here is a more recent version. I do not think that NOAA had this when they did their Seasonal Outlook even though it is dated January 19

This suggests a slightly more rapid demise of the La Nina. And unlike the first survey of the month this is based on computer models not a survey of meteorologists.

NOAA has their own proprietary model which they rarely use. It is not exactly clear why they shun their own model.

CFSv2 spread and bias correct ENSO forecast

It extends the La Nina indefinitely, The blue lines are the latest runs of the model.

In most cases, I freeze the models as of the date of publication but for this one, I am going to just let the above model run so if you refer to the article in the future, the values in the above may not relate well to the discussion. But I am doing that so if you refer to this article in say two weeks, you will see if there has been any change in the forecast from this model.

Comparison models would include JAMSTEC

JAMSTEC sees the La Nina become ENSO Neutral at about the same time as does NOAA.  ENSO Neutral includes values of the Nino 3.4 from -5C to +5C. JAMSTEC actually sees a visitation to marginally El Nino Territory.

And the JAMSTEC Modoki Index

Modoki Index

I am not sure what to make of this. But JAMSTEC is even more confident that this La Nina will behave like a La Nina Modok but gradually move to ENSO Neutral.  My best guess is that the weather patterns may be shifted a bit to the west more than predicted by NOAA.

And the Australian BOM

BOM sees the La Nina ending sooner than does NOAA or JAMSTEC. The BOM forecast stops with June 2021.

This is what is called the plume of forecasts. It shows a lot of forecasts of the NINO 3.4 Index

Of most interest is the red, blue, and green lines. They seem to reach Nino 3.4 = 0 and then flatten out. It would be nice if IRI published on a schedule and if NOAA indicated clearly the information they used in their Seasonal Outlook.

And here is one more graphic that I created from a different NOAA source. It is a cross-section of the Pacific Equator from the surface down to 450 meters. What is shown in this graphic is the temperature anomalies not the absolute temperature. ENSO is measured at the surface since only the surface interacts with the atmosphere. But the future of the surface often is impacted by the water below the surface. At some point, NOAA will update the normal values for this area as they do that every five years but they have not done so yet. See the note at the beginning of this article.

Currently

Two Months AgoLast Month

I do not see much change.

That graphic gets updated about every five days. Here is a newer version.

It is not a major change and I doubt that NOAA had this graphic when they did the Seasonal Outlook. It is dated January 18 which I believe means it represents an average of the data from January 15 through January 20.

http://www.bom.gov.au/climate/enso/monitoring/soi30.png

From the BOM Glossary

The Southern Oscillation Index, or SOI, gives an indication of the development and intensity of El Niño or La Niña events in the Pacific Ocean. The SOI is calculated using the pressure differences between Tahiti and Darwin.

Sustained negative values of the SOI below −7 often indicate El Niño episodes. These negative values are usually accompanied by sustained warming of the central and eastern tropical Pacific Ocean, a decrease in the strength of the Pacific Trade Winds, and a reduction in winter and spring rainfall over much of eastern Australia and the Top End. You can read more about historical El Niño events and their effect on Australia in the Detailed analysis of past El Niño events.

Sustained positive values of the SOI above +7 are typical of a La Niña episode. They are associated with stronger Pacific trade winds and warmer sea temperatures to the north of Australia. Waters in the central and eastern tropical Pacific Ocean become cooler during this time. Together these give an increased probability that eastern and northern Australia will be wetter than normal. You can read more about historical La Niña events and their effect on Australia in the Detailed analysis of past La Niña events.

The Southern Oscilation Index or SOI being above 7 confirms that the Atmosphere is in tune with the Sea Surface Temperatures in the Pacific along the Equator. I have not frozen the SOI graphic so we will be able to track the SOI in this article. It is now indicating a fairly strong La Nina right now.

Previous Post

24 January 2021 Coronavirus Charts and News: An Opposing View Of Whether One Should Run Out And Get Vaccinated.

Next Post

‘The US Is Falling Apart’: How Russian Media Is Portraying The US Capitol Siege

Related Posts

Scammers Steal $300K Using Fake Blur Airdrop Websites
Uncategorized

FBI Warns Investors Of Crypto-Stealing Play-to-Earn Games

by admin
Maersk Almost Completing Russia Exit After The Sale Of Logistics Sites
Uncategorized

Maersk Almost Completing Russia Exit After The Sale Of Logistics Sites

by admin
Why Is ‘Staking’ At The Center Of Crypto’s Latest Regulation Scuffle
Uncategorized

Why Is ‘Staking’ At The Center Of Crypto’s Latest Regulation Scuffle

by admin
Mexico's Pemex Dismantled Resources Worth $342M From Two Top Fields
Uncategorized

Mexico’s Pemex Dismantled Resources Worth $342M From Two Top Fields

by admin
Oil Giant Schlumberger Rebrands Itself As SLB For Low-Carbon Future
Uncategorized

Oil Giant Schlumberger Rebrands Itself As SLB For Low-Carbon Future

by admin
Next Post
Final August 2021 Michigan Consumer Sentiment Shows A Stunning Loss Of Confidence

Final August 2021 Michigan Consumer Sentiment Shows A Stunning Loss Of Confidence

답글 남기기 응답 취소

이메일 주소는 공개되지 않습니다. 필수 필드는 *로 표시됩니다

Browse by Category

  • Business
  • Econ Intersect News
  • Economics
  • Finance
  • Politics
  • Uncategorized

Browse by Tags

adoption altcoins bank banking banks Binance Bitcoin Bitcoin market blockchain BTC BTC price business China crypto crypto adoption cryptocurrency crypto exchange crypto market crypto regulation decentralized finance DeFi Elon Musk ETH Ethereum Europe Federal Reserve finance FTX inflation investment market analysis Metaverse NFT nonfungible tokens oil market price analysis recession regulation Russia stock market technology Tesla the UK the US Twitter

Categories

  • Business
  • Econ Intersect News
  • Economics
  • Finance
  • Politics
  • Uncategorized

© Copyright 2024 EconIntersect

No Result
View All Result
  • 토토사이트
    • 카지노사이트
    • 도박사이트
    • 룰렛 사이트
    • 라이브카지노
    • 바카라사이트
    • 안전카지노
  • 경제
  • 파이낸스
  • 정치
  • 투자

© Copyright 2024 EconIntersect